Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Lil' Chris. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kurt Shaped Box (
talk)
10:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Earlier this month you changed the description of the John Roan school to city academy. Can you provide a source for this - I can't find one. Rjm at sleepers ( talk) 18:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Next United Kingdom general election, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Next United Kingdom general election was changed by Lukespencer91 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-07-07T20:56:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 20:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
Next United Kingdom general election. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —
Jeff
G. ツ
21:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Next United Kingdom general election. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Road Wizard (
talk)
21:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Next United Kingdom general election. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
21:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as
this edit you made to
User:IronGargoyle. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Favonian (
talk)
21:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. – B.hotep •
talk•
21:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Next United Kingdom general election has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ~
Super
Hamster
Talk
Contribs
16:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
16:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Lil' Chris. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kurt Shaped Box (
talk)
10:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Earlier this month you changed the description of the John Roan school to city academy. Can you provide a source for this - I can't find one. Rjm at sleepers ( talk) 18:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Next United Kingdom general election, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Next United Kingdom general election was changed by Lukespencer91 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-07-07T20:56:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 20:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
Next United Kingdom general election. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —
Jeff
G. ツ
21:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Next United Kingdom general election. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Road Wizard (
talk)
21:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Next United Kingdom general election. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
21:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as
this edit you made to
User:IronGargoyle. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Favonian (
talk)
21:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. – B.hotep •
talk•
21:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Next United Kingdom general election has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ~
Super
Hamster
Talk
Contribs
16:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
16:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)