You have failed to explain why Russia handing over passports to a majority of south ossetians is the same as South Ossetia receiving a majority of its budget from Russia. Please restore the Reuters content you deleted. -- Xeeron ( talk) 16:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion of the article Gazprom? I've been trying to do major improvements on it for a while, but each time I ask for outside opinion on the talk page or at WP:RUSSIA, no one replies. I think the main problem is that the history chapter is messy. Obsolete / irrelevant stuff should be removed. Perhaps materials on gas price disputes with Ukraine and Belarus should be moved to a separate chapter called "Pricing" (which I will create shortly; it will discuss material such as the diffence between domestic and intra-CIS gas prices and world market prices, as well as price reform efforts by the Russian government.) Basically, I'd like the article to focus more on the present and less on the history and chronology of events. For example, the info about being given export monopoly should be moved from the history chapter to a separate chapter "exports" and stated as a fact instead of as a chronology item. Does this make sense to you? Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the article? Offliner ( talk) 05:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm also probably going to edit other articles related to Russian energy sector soon as well. I'm thinking of creating Gas industry of Russia, but perhaps this would overlap too much with Gazprom? Also, about the Russia-Ukraine gas price dispute: everyone seems to assume that Russia used gas as a political weapon (whatever that means), but I recently came across a comprehensive article by big-name researchers of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, which comes to the clear conclusion that this was not the case. I will probably add some info to Russia-Ukraine gas dispute of 2009 soon. What do you think? Offliner ( talk) 05:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
What do you think of this: European dependence on Russian energy? It was created by a POV pusher [4]. Offliner ( talk) 21:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you think this wording is neutral? Why don't we use similar wording in Nord Stream? "Another way to prevent the project from completion is to make claims about environmental impact..." I'm sure that would be reverted on neutrality grounds. Offliner ( talk) 22:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this edit? It introduces misleading wording: the source does not say that 17% is "little"; the word "only" just refers to the difference between the two figures. I also do not like the first sentence in "job discrimination". It says "A number Russian activists continue to allege..." But now we have very clear statistics of this, so we shouldn't use such wording (it's not just activists who say there is discrimination, and it's not "an allegation".) I've never heard survey results being characterized as "allegations." Offliner ( talk) 10:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there LokiiT, you have email. -- Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 00:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Please point out where I bit a newbie. The first Npov warning in opn the top of the page, I then gave a lvl 2 warning, discussed not only on the talkpage but also on the user talk page. After his fourth revert I warned him for 3rr. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 04:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Further note: I speedy-deleted Terrorism by Caucasus Extremists. I have no problem with an article on the general topic, but this title is itself POV, and there was not really any content worth saving (the last version I deleted was only one sentence). Better to start over with an NPOV title. NawlinWiki ( talk) 04:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Insufficient ( talk) 18:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
in some places with a ref tag, i remove the ref tag because it had just a name, and i understand(now) that it's not a mistake, but the same ref tag may reffer to a couple of places in the article. sorry for that Insufficient ( talk) 19:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC).
Hi there, Biophys has posted an amount of evidence at Arbcom, most of which has absolutely nothing to do with the scope of the case, but I believe that as you are mentioned there, you should probably address accusations which have been made against you. The evidence can be seen at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Biophys. -- Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 12:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I would like to know your opinion concerning a proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.-- The Devil's Advocate ( talk) 03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Also, Pravda isn't a reliable source. LokiiT (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, LokiiT. I think you update this table.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coalition_military_casualties_in_afghanistan_by_month.PNG
Now its last edit as June 3.While today is July 7.
So please update that page.
In June 102 NATO soldiers killed making worst month for NATO in this 9 years war. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.82.197 ( talk) 14:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
neutral notification Collect ( talk) 12:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
First off, this link is just another blog from some Russian propagandist who is trying to libel Goble (reading the comments it seems other readers find this guy a joke). Second, KyivPost cited Goble and reported the events (they are a reliable source) and EurasiaReview is another reliable source. Also, what bias of mine?-- Львівське ( talk) 19:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
See WP:AN3#User:Lvivske reported by User:LokiiT (Result: ). I have suggested the possibility that both parties should be blocked. You are welcome to add your own comment. EdJohnston ( talk) 21:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please update the File:Russian economy since fall of Soviet Union.PNG? That would be really nice. GreyHood Talk 23:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your with the charts, LokiiT. I think eventually we are going to need a separate GDP growth graph for different industries. Also, a chart about total production of "passenger motor cars" [5] could be nice to include in User:Nanobear/Automotive industry of Russia. Btw, which program are you using to create the charts? Nanobear ( talk) 20:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Here is an iteresting general collection of graphics about Russian economy and demographics in the last 20 years. It's in Russian language and with some "political" comments, but the information is based mostly on the Rosstat data. I believe many such graphics could be used for the articles related to Russian economy. GreyHood Talk 20:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi LokiiT,
I noticed that you are adding charts to wikipedia in a PNG format, so I wanted to suggest using SVG instead (see commons:Commons:Transition_to_SVG). I created a demo chart File:Albania demography.svg which recreates the formatting you usually employ, just as an example. I used Gnuplot for this, but there are a lot of tools for SVG creation or export. Other examples include File:Population of Taiwan since 1978.svg, File:Saudipop.svg. My choice of Gnuplot is based on the fact that the source can be easily added to the description page, so that the chart may later be updated with minimum effort. Please consider this and let me know if you have any comments. Demmo ( talk) 21:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Since you're skilled with Excel, could you please make a nice-looking popularity chart for Medvedev from the data at [6]? (It's already in an Excel file). That would be very useful for a new chapter "popularity" at Dmitry Medvedev. Nanobear ( talk) 12:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I just thought I'd ask you if you could update this graph with new data the from 2011 Census? GreyHood Talk 23:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I've downgraded this article you've significantly contributed to B-class due to citation needed tags. There are only few, so if you could add the references, we could restore the B-class on the article. Thanks! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I am so sorry, I never meant to report you, I was trying to report an IP but i might have clicked your name by accident, sorry for the accusations and everything, I am awarding you a barnstar! PBASH607 ( talk) 00:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I am sorry for accusing you, as you are truly the wrong person to accuse, you have done a lot for wikipedia, Thank you, and I hope you accept my apology PBASH607 ( talk) 00:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC) |
Two sources from Poland stating that what happened in Ukraine was a non-democratic coup by Maidanists. [7]
[8] Both come from reliable mainstream newspaper and Kuzniar is at top of politics [9]
Now, both sources try to justify the coup in various ways, but still are ready to admit that the events were non-constitutional and a coup. Second one is pretty "interesting" as the author claims democracy has to be suspended when "order" needs it... I thought you might be interested as these sources are from the other side, and non-Russian, yet they confirm that not all is black and white in this crisis. Also contrary to what media may show, there are a lot of people unhappy in Poland about what was done in Ukraine, especially in view of parties like Svoboda or Right Sector gaining power. Many comments in mainstream websites of Polish papers are highly critical of antagonizing Russia by this and supporting nationalists in Ukraine. Anyway that's just my 0.2 cents, and I won't be probably editing much in view how emotional these things get on Wikipedia.-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 12:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
So, where do we discuss it? Can we discuss it here? 24.201.209.74 ( talk) 23:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you see the talk page? There is a court document and a conviction included in the references you deleted. Please self revert. Thanks! No, not all politicians are criminals, even in Ukraine. ;) USchick ( talk) 02:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I have added some information and source which you might consider interesting [10] -- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 22:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate if you could revert mathew's removal of antisemetic violence. I reverted it once and doing so too many times would violate 3 revert rule. I really do not understand his logic. Vapour ( talk) 15:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refer to the UN Security Council vote. 13 members vote 'aye', China abstains because of its own interests in Tibet and Xinjiang, Russian veto. Counties voting 'aye' include among others Rwanda, Chad, Nigeria, Chile, Argentina, Korea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubrat2000 ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I thought that perhaps you'd like to give your opinion about the deletion of Simferopol Incident article. Have a nice day. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simferopol_incident Cmoibenlepro ( talk) 17:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, LokiiT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Silvio1973 ( talk) 13:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hello, LokiiT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You have failed to explain why Russia handing over passports to a majority of south ossetians is the same as South Ossetia receiving a majority of its budget from Russia. Please restore the Reuters content you deleted. -- Xeeron ( talk) 16:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion of the article Gazprom? I've been trying to do major improvements on it for a while, but each time I ask for outside opinion on the talk page or at WP:RUSSIA, no one replies. I think the main problem is that the history chapter is messy. Obsolete / irrelevant stuff should be removed. Perhaps materials on gas price disputes with Ukraine and Belarus should be moved to a separate chapter called "Pricing" (which I will create shortly; it will discuss material such as the diffence between domestic and intra-CIS gas prices and world market prices, as well as price reform efforts by the Russian government.) Basically, I'd like the article to focus more on the present and less on the history and chronology of events. For example, the info about being given export monopoly should be moved from the history chapter to a separate chapter "exports" and stated as a fact instead of as a chronology item. Does this make sense to you? Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the article? Offliner ( talk) 05:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm also probably going to edit other articles related to Russian energy sector soon as well. I'm thinking of creating Gas industry of Russia, but perhaps this would overlap too much with Gazprom? Also, about the Russia-Ukraine gas price dispute: everyone seems to assume that Russia used gas as a political weapon (whatever that means), but I recently came across a comprehensive article by big-name researchers of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, which comes to the clear conclusion that this was not the case. I will probably add some info to Russia-Ukraine gas dispute of 2009 soon. What do you think? Offliner ( talk) 05:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
What do you think of this: European dependence on Russian energy? It was created by a POV pusher [4]. Offliner ( talk) 21:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Do you think this wording is neutral? Why don't we use similar wording in Nord Stream? "Another way to prevent the project from completion is to make claims about environmental impact..." I'm sure that would be reverted on neutrality grounds. Offliner ( talk) 22:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this edit? It introduces misleading wording: the source does not say that 17% is "little"; the word "only" just refers to the difference between the two figures. I also do not like the first sentence in "job discrimination". It says "A number Russian activists continue to allege..." But now we have very clear statistics of this, so we shouldn't use such wording (it's not just activists who say there is discrimination, and it's not "an allegation".) I've never heard survey results being characterized as "allegations." Offliner ( talk) 10:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi there LokiiT, you have email. -- Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 00:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Please point out where I bit a newbie. The first Npov warning in opn the top of the page, I then gave a lvl 2 warning, discussed not only on the talkpage but also on the user talk page. After his fourth revert I warned him for 3rr. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 04:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Further note: I speedy-deleted Terrorism by Caucasus Extremists. I have no problem with an article on the general topic, but this title is itself POV, and there was not really any content worth saving (the last version I deleted was only one sentence). Better to start over with an NPOV title. NawlinWiki ( talk) 04:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Insufficient ( talk) 18:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
in some places with a ref tag, i remove the ref tag because it had just a name, and i understand(now) that it's not a mistake, but the same ref tag may reffer to a couple of places in the article. sorry for that Insufficient ( talk) 19:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC).
Hi there, Biophys has posted an amount of evidence at Arbcom, most of which has absolutely nothing to do with the scope of the case, but I believe that as you are mentioned there, you should probably address accusations which have been made against you. The evidence can be seen at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Russavia-Biophys/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Biophys. -- Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 12:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I would like to know your opinion concerning a proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.-- The Devil's Advocate ( talk) 03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Non-notable, non-encyclopedic. Also, Pravda isn't a reliable source. LokiiT (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, LokiiT. I think you update this table.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coalition_military_casualties_in_afghanistan_by_month.PNG
Now its last edit as June 3.While today is July 7.
So please update that page.
In June 102 NATO soldiers killed making worst month for NATO in this 9 years war. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.82.197 ( talk) 14:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
neutral notification Collect ( talk) 12:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
First off, this link is just another blog from some Russian propagandist who is trying to libel Goble (reading the comments it seems other readers find this guy a joke). Second, KyivPost cited Goble and reported the events (they are a reliable source) and EurasiaReview is another reliable source. Also, what bias of mine?-- Львівське ( talk) 19:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
See WP:AN3#User:Lvivske reported by User:LokiiT (Result: ). I have suggested the possibility that both parties should be blocked. You are welcome to add your own comment. EdJohnston ( talk) 21:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please update the File:Russian economy since fall of Soviet Union.PNG? That would be really nice. GreyHood Talk 23:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your with the charts, LokiiT. I think eventually we are going to need a separate GDP growth graph for different industries. Also, a chart about total production of "passenger motor cars" [5] could be nice to include in User:Nanobear/Automotive industry of Russia. Btw, which program are you using to create the charts? Nanobear ( talk) 20:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Here is an iteresting general collection of graphics about Russian economy and demographics in the last 20 years. It's in Russian language and with some "political" comments, but the information is based mostly on the Rosstat data. I believe many such graphics could be used for the articles related to Russian economy. GreyHood Talk 20:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi LokiiT,
I noticed that you are adding charts to wikipedia in a PNG format, so I wanted to suggest using SVG instead (see commons:Commons:Transition_to_SVG). I created a demo chart File:Albania demography.svg which recreates the formatting you usually employ, just as an example. I used Gnuplot for this, but there are a lot of tools for SVG creation or export. Other examples include File:Population of Taiwan since 1978.svg, File:Saudipop.svg. My choice of Gnuplot is based on the fact that the source can be easily added to the description page, so that the chart may later be updated with minimum effort. Please consider this and let me know if you have any comments. Demmo ( talk) 21:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Since you're skilled with Excel, could you please make a nice-looking popularity chart for Medvedev from the data at [6]? (It's already in an Excel file). That would be very useful for a new chapter "popularity" at Dmitry Medvedev. Nanobear ( talk) 12:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I just thought I'd ask you if you could update this graph with new data the from 2011 Census? GreyHood Talk 23:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I've downgraded this article you've significantly contributed to B-class due to citation needed tags. There are only few, so if you could add the references, we could restore the B-class on the article. Thanks! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I am so sorry, I never meant to report you, I was trying to report an IP but i might have clicked your name by accident, sorry for the accusations and everything, I am awarding you a barnstar! PBASH607 ( talk) 00:13, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I am sorry for accusing you, as you are truly the wrong person to accuse, you have done a lot for wikipedia, Thank you, and I hope you accept my apology PBASH607 ( talk) 00:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC) |
Two sources from Poland stating that what happened in Ukraine was a non-democratic coup by Maidanists. [7]
[8] Both come from reliable mainstream newspaper and Kuzniar is at top of politics [9]
Now, both sources try to justify the coup in various ways, but still are ready to admit that the events were non-constitutional and a coup. Second one is pretty "interesting" as the author claims democracy has to be suspended when "order" needs it... I thought you might be interested as these sources are from the other side, and non-Russian, yet they confirm that not all is black and white in this crisis. Also contrary to what media may show, there are a lot of people unhappy in Poland about what was done in Ukraine, especially in view of parties like Svoboda or Right Sector gaining power. Many comments in mainstream websites of Polish papers are highly critical of antagonizing Russia by this and supporting nationalists in Ukraine. Anyway that's just my 0.2 cents, and I won't be probably editing much in view how emotional these things get on Wikipedia.-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 12:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
So, where do we discuss it? Can we discuss it here? 24.201.209.74 ( talk) 23:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you see the talk page? There is a court document and a conviction included in the references you deleted. Please self revert. Thanks! No, not all politicians are criminals, even in Ukraine. ;) USchick ( talk) 02:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I have added some information and source which you might consider interesting [10] -- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 22:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate if you could revert mathew's removal of antisemetic violence. I reverted it once and doing so too many times would violate 3 revert rule. I really do not understand his logic. Vapour ( talk) 15:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refer to the UN Security Council vote. 13 members vote 'aye', China abstains because of its own interests in Tibet and Xinjiang, Russian veto. Counties voting 'aye' include among others Rwanda, Chad, Nigeria, Chile, Argentina, Korea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubrat2000 ( talk • contribs) 15:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I thought that perhaps you'd like to give your opinion about the deletion of Simferopol Incident article. Have a nice day. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simferopol_incident Cmoibenlepro ( talk) 17:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, LokiiT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Silvio1973 ( talk) 13:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hello, LokiiT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)