This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Ah, the mysterious 72.228.3.244. Thank you for registering and hashing this out with me. I want to make Wikipedia a better place, not an ugly mess. I am sure that you can understand that anon users just can't be taken at face value since they are mostly likely just trying to cause trouble. Spike 17:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Either way, the same thing. :-) Alpha characters look better than numeric IP's, I guess..
You have broken WP:3RR (counting previous anon edits) at St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine. Please don't do this again or you will be blocked William M. Connolley 18:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
We have to wait out the 24 hours and watch ourselves for the future. There isn't much that can be done. We also can't log out and do an anon edit since the IP is linked in logs to our registered users, and it's also a violation of the Sock Puppet Rule, which will get you banned but good. Spike 18:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
There are many more people than just you and I involved in this. Spike 00:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC
You had better watch your edits, you have violated the 3RR rule again. Spike 20:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it's really not vandalism. It's more of an edit war and that does fall under 3RR. Regardless, cases that are not clear cut vandalism should be reported and handled by a mod. or admin. for wikipedia, not an average user. Spike 21:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, since their is obviously a dispute over the factual accuracy of the article, I would welcome an admin to lock the article with the current dispute banner in place. Leuko 21:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Leuko.. who the hell are you and who made you an authority on what should and shouldn't be included in the SCIMD page? From what i can see you are only adding things to the page that can be used negatively against their students and hurt them. If you would do some research on the pages and the people you are helping (ie azskeptic) you will see that he is already the target of several lawsuits pending and future, for doing such things as what you are doing. I'm simply leaving out negative things being put onto their wikipedia article that was the result of actions of "azskeptic". I'm trying to show the positive things about the school and help them with the future while you seem to be on a mission to try to ruin the lives of these people?
if you are so confident in what you are posting then please post your real name and contact info as i'm sure the students of the school would be much more than will to at least attempt to sue you for slander and defamation at the very least. Gubica 04:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a sad attempt at influencing the truth by threatening lawsuit. -- Azskeptic 22:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Leuko, please refrain from changing the SCIMD article without a consensus on what is to be done... I think this needs to be a group decision. Please do not change the article again as I have given you very obvious privacy reasons and some technical reasons on the discussion page.... Sir, you doing this takes time out of my day for reverting the post back to normal. I would strongly appreciate for the third time to discuss it on the talk page until a decision is made, before finally reverting it. Thanks and now I have to go check on that Rectal bleed on North 8.-- Vtak 21:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Well as i have said before man, it can be checked but we are not gonna do it without the graduates' permission... all other minor colleges are doing that here, however, how come we are the only singled out ones? The reference to a graduate without his/her permission in the article is a violation of Wikipedia's Five Pillars as well... its not proctology service, called HSO and its his case now, med cannot bovie.-- Vtak 00:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Please try to be diplomatic in your edit summaries (like St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine). Removing information from an article isn't vandalism per Wikipedia:Vandalism, and remember it's always preferable to discuss disputes instead of reverting edits and starting an edit war. Diplomacy can go a long way sometimes. Fagstein 02:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Blanking: Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit
A user has already be blocked for the continued blanking vandalism of significant information from the article, and now it looks like he is continuing with anon ip's. I am sorry, but I believe I have been very diplomatic, and have not resorted to personal attacks. Leuko 02:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Leuko, I bring up verifiable information about Mr Hughson and you call that a personal attack. Since when is something verifiable, your words and rules, an attack. Again, I have presented in the discussion forum information you choose to ignore. This is blatantly siding with Mr. Hughson who is verifiably, under investigation for his role with Oregon ODA in collusion. He has no credentials anyone can verify and is nothing more really, than an unenlightened consumer claiming all kinds of expertise he should not lay claim to!! If you like, I can arrange a conference call with the students attorney firm in NJ and we can discuss the issues so that you can understand far more than you currently do depending only on web citations and the like. The real story is far more in depth than you currently know and Mr. Hughson is way behind the curve. -- Doctorcane08 18:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't think this qualifies for speedy deletion, the group's members have an apparent notability, over 2 million google hits between them. User:Pedant 07:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Just FYI, I originally agreed with you that the article should be speedy-deleted, but I double-checked WP:CSD and "This is advertising/spam" is specifically listed there as something that isn't a valid speedy-delete reason. Kickaha Ota 19:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
You prodded the article Ralph Winter (judge). I made some changes to it (removing some of the attacks and adding some references), and removed the prod. Regards, TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 15:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Mediation is a waste of time. If we could work through this without admin input we would have done it by now, obviously we can't. Arbitration is what will allow a final ruling about the validity of .gov sources that use unverified and undocumented research and sources as well as all the other issues regarding this article and allow for a final entry to be constructed for SCIMD. Spike 01:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
True, mediation requires that editors be willing to go through the process and work towards an amicable solution. I'll put in the arbitration request. Leuko 17:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
I added the {{ unaccredited}} template and removed from the UK medical school templates, "Spike" is (of course) edit warring over it. Feel free to pitch in, and feel free to add to the WP:RFAR. Just zis Guy you know? 21:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- Tony Sidaway 13:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Several days ago, you prodded the article Joel Hedgpeth. Please take a look at the latest version of the Joel Hedgpeth article, and make any changes that seem appropriate. TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 15:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
i see on your little boxes on the right side of your page that you are against personal attacks. then i ask what will be done about them. i was personally attacked mrphyzyx or something like that, on a talk page for a proposed deletion. my username is The03Era15Strong, and a comment he left for the proposed deletion of the article "43228" was that people should look at my user page. he did this because of old comments of mine left there, and he was trying to make me look bad. i have a problem with hypocrits, which is why i think you should look at this problem im having, because there is nothing i can do about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The03era15strong ( talk • contribs)
why do you feel it's necessary to get this article removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tparker393 ( talk • contribs)
alright- there are some references for the Larson Plan article now- are you happy? by the way, looks like you found out my name anyway- but here's the sig as you requested, why are you wiki freaks so uptight anyway, do you think people are going to care about this in a few years, when the world is reduced to ash and rubble? Tparker393 03:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
You remove my link http://card-magic.blogspot.com because you think it's a blog. Do I talk about current events? Do I talk about my life? It's not a blog FYI. It just have a blogspot domain so you think it's a blog. The site is a collection of card tricks that users submitted.
Following your recent reversion of my edits to the Howard Barnett article, I contacted the article's creator User:Rougher07, and suggested that he cite a source which is compliant with Wikipedia policies governing NPOV and reliable sources. -- TommyBoy 21:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Help me please. I notice you have donde excellent work with SC. Can you help me with UHSA (university health sciences antigua) I am trying to post factual information that is provided on some official state websites and other potential valueable sources of information. Thank you. Robo doc 21:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Robo doc has nothing meaningful to contribute and he isn't even qualified to post about a foreign medical school. He is copying and pasting links and copyrighted material into my article from other websites. I’m surprised to see he is asking for your help. Notice, he recently registered his ID for the sole purpose of posting his nasty remarks in the UHSA article. DrGladwin
Why did you propose my first article get deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VeeRob ( talk • contribs) .
Hi...saw your deletion listing for the article I just added HS Produkt. Please see my response on the Talk:HS Produkt page. Urban011 05:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
What are you talking about; I didn't remove the notices from the article, so maybe you should look into things before making false accusations. Not to mention the fact that this article is a completely new article, unlike the one that was deleted. Maybe if you spent a minute checking into it, you would have figured that out, but I guess you were too busy trying to get good guy badges. You really shouldn't let this power go to your head, after all; it's just the internet. Maybe if you spent less time worrying about people trying to make articles about people who do good deeds in their home town, and more time about real life, you would have a girlfriend. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Waldorf Goodhue ( talk • contribs) .
Why don't you go mind your own business. Do you really have nothing better to do then sit here and watch what I do? That's kinda sad. Waldorf Goodhue 18:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Explain to me how the "Rim Jim" article is inapproriate. I didn't write it with the intention of being a vandal. Tall Boy
You have nominated it (i understand why) for deletion.. but i am in the middle of researching this topic..copro records had mentions on the official desecration bands website as being the record label for most of their studio albums
sorry..if ive..done something wrong or whatever Fethroesforia 17:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I am new to wikipedia and the short "robert greenstein" article is one of my first efforts. I would like to know more about why you tagged my contribution as unsourced. The information in the article comes from sites for which links are provided. Please note, he was already listed (red link) on the MacArthur Fellows Program page.
I understand and agree that there should be an especially high standard for biographical material about living people and (hoping that you have time to explain!) would like to know how I could modify the article to remove your qualification.
Thanks!! Jobrill 20:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Greenstein's role at the FDA is mentioned in the Spanish version of the history of the food stamp program on the FDA's site. The English version doesn't mention names. Here's the source -- http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsp/rules/Legislation/sp-history.htm. Here's a New York Times article attesting to his role -- http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F20911F9385F0C718EDDAB0894DC494D81. Here's a NYT article naming Greenstein as a member of that commission -- http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9807E6DF1738F936A25751C1A962958260
Advice welcome on how to mention this in the article. Jobrill 10:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed you 'undid' some vandalism from SGU, despite the fact that the 'vandalism' in question was actual correcting some POV additions made by the previous edit. Just thought you would like a heads-up on the situation. Cheers, PaddyM 00:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. ParalelUni's community ban is endorsed. Any of the single-purpose accounts mentioned identified in the case, or any other accounts or IPs an administrator deems to be an account used solely for the editing of St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages, may be banned from that article or related pages for disruptive edits. For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 17:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Leuko! I removed your PROD notice from that article, and nominated it for deletion via afd instead. It had been deleted via PROD once, and the re-creation by the author qualifies as a contested deletion. Feel free to add your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keeping on Gaming. Joyous! | Talk 01:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
what —The preceding unsigned comment was added by O2ZY ( talk • contribs) .
Leuko,
This is in regards to a proposed deletion of Denison & Porter (a recently formed hedge fund and real estate investment trust). I take offensive to the proposal to delete the listing of a legitimite corporation which is registered in the District of Columbia as well as a GmBh in Muenster, Germany. The description that was placed on Wikipedia was modeled after those of nearly every other non-public corporation listed.
Feel free to visit our up-and-coming website or to google us at Denison & Porter.
Thank you, Christopher Andrade chrisotpher.andrade@denisonporter.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonpor ( talk • contribs) .
Hello Leuko or Bula in my Language
topic written on Mere Tuisalalo I do not understand why you think it needs to be deleted?? individuals and intermarriages played a big part in Fiji's documneted and oral history. this item has relivance as to the connection the family has with the Turaga Na Rasau Title. at the time the marriage to Ratu keni signified the joining of two tribes, her details and family background are relievant to the article and to the people of Lomaloma and their history. Thank you Maikeli
Hi Leuko and thanks for your note.
To start with, I re-posted this article [J&P] as I had the impression that the site was never saved (I was working on it in “preview mode” and thought I had not saved it prior to logging off last night). In fact I was kicking myself as I had to do all the typing again.
Which brings me on to the more important point; which is the basis of your deletion. I can’t see the justification for this (sorry never been come across a situation like this so far) so I summarise my argument below:
J&P is a household name in the Middle East having build most of the infrastructure in several countries, information which I started outlining in my article. It has a turnover of more than £1 billion. If companies such as George Wimpey, McCarthy & Stone and Barratt Developments some of which which are miniscule in comparison are listed in Wikipedia I don’t see why larger companies that have had a more significant global impact (albeit in other regions of the world than yours) should not be featured. Please note this was not an attempt to advertise J&P as I have no affiliations to this company whatsoever. The information I included was very similar to what's posted on the companies I site above.
Regards, StephP 21:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I was unaware of that, so thank you for the note! | Mr. Darcy talk 01:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Care to explain why you slapped the article with a speedy deletion label?? I wrote an article describing TEN, which is an adult TV network, don't see how any part of the article is an advertisement. It merely describes the Network and what type of programming it offers. Need explanation or the template will be taken off. HeMan5 03:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
What about say, Paul_Otellini ? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gkklein ( talk • contribs) .
Unfortunately, I can't find anything to cite the fact of the site's size beyond MPOGD itself, which probably wouldn't do as it's hardly impartial. Wouldn't the fact that I referred to it as 'one of the largest' as opposed to 'the largest' offer me a bit of leeway? It does have close to 2700 games listed currently and it literally gets larger every week or so. That's pretty big. HalfShadow 02:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I guess I'm going by the fact that there are dozens and dozens of articles in existence. Anyway, I don't feel it falls under speedy deletion. Until consensus is reached, it's best to leave it there. -- Merope Talk 19:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
The reason I believe it to be spam is because the user had done nothing but post links to about.com on multiple pages. You'll probably want to revert the rest of them too. Pizzapotamus 21:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC) = Pizzapotamus
p.s. It is not o.k. you deleted my page without warning at first. Then I must typed it twice. Pressume my good intentions first and come to my page to talk before you delete anything. Greetings from Belgrade. -- Mladifilozof 02:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
I was unaware that testmasters was even up as an article or had even been deleted. Is there any place that would tell me this? I am wondering also why Testmasters cannot have an article on Wikipedia, but The Princeton Review, and Kaplan, Inc both have articles on Wikipedia. This doesn't make sense to me. 64.131.205.160 06:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the addition of ...Netherlands and ...Spain to the original UK squats AfD was not, imo, carried out in accordance with AfD procedure and I was unable to delete them as part of the same process. The titles of any and all articles in an AfD listing should be in bold at the top of the debate, and in the case of non-near-as-dammit identical articles they should really be listed simultaneously to ensure they all receive the same consideration. Please relist them again if you wish. Thanks, Deizio talk 15:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I just started the School for Robots article, and had just added a summary.. I paused to upload related images, and in the meantime it was marked for speedy deletion by you. I did not have time to add more information. I am curious when you say I should cite external information to make it know that my entry is valid. However I did have a band website link to a full page. How else can I validate that the band actually exists? I am new to this site, and have read the FAQs, and it still remains unclear to me how I prove that this entry is relevant. Thank you for your information, Blake
You may also want to note other article creations by the user Erzherzogin. All are covered under articles with English names. Charles 01:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. :-) Leuko 02:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Rather than tagging something for deletion for lack of context, would you please next time try to give me a few more minutes to add some? Incidentally, this article has enough context, as it is! - CrazyRussian talk/ email 04:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Ah, the mysterious 72.228.3.244. Thank you for registering and hashing this out with me. I want to make Wikipedia a better place, not an ugly mess. I am sure that you can understand that anon users just can't be taken at face value since they are mostly likely just trying to cause trouble. Spike 17:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Either way, the same thing. :-) Alpha characters look better than numeric IP's, I guess..
You have broken WP:3RR (counting previous anon edits) at St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine. Please don't do this again or you will be blocked William M. Connolley 18:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
We have to wait out the 24 hours and watch ourselves for the future. There isn't much that can be done. We also can't log out and do an anon edit since the IP is linked in logs to our registered users, and it's also a violation of the Sock Puppet Rule, which will get you banned but good. Spike 18:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
There are many more people than just you and I involved in this. Spike 00:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC
You had better watch your edits, you have violated the 3RR rule again. Spike 20:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually, it's really not vandalism. It's more of an edit war and that does fall under 3RR. Regardless, cases that are not clear cut vandalism should be reported and handled by a mod. or admin. for wikipedia, not an average user. Spike 21:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, since their is obviously a dispute over the factual accuracy of the article, I would welcome an admin to lock the article with the current dispute banner in place. Leuko 21:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Leuko.. who the hell are you and who made you an authority on what should and shouldn't be included in the SCIMD page? From what i can see you are only adding things to the page that can be used negatively against their students and hurt them. If you would do some research on the pages and the people you are helping (ie azskeptic) you will see that he is already the target of several lawsuits pending and future, for doing such things as what you are doing. I'm simply leaving out negative things being put onto their wikipedia article that was the result of actions of "azskeptic". I'm trying to show the positive things about the school and help them with the future while you seem to be on a mission to try to ruin the lives of these people?
if you are so confident in what you are posting then please post your real name and contact info as i'm sure the students of the school would be much more than will to at least attempt to sue you for slander and defamation at the very least. Gubica 04:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a sad attempt at influencing the truth by threatening lawsuit. -- Azskeptic 22:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Leuko, please refrain from changing the SCIMD article without a consensus on what is to be done... I think this needs to be a group decision. Please do not change the article again as I have given you very obvious privacy reasons and some technical reasons on the discussion page.... Sir, you doing this takes time out of my day for reverting the post back to normal. I would strongly appreciate for the third time to discuss it on the talk page until a decision is made, before finally reverting it. Thanks and now I have to go check on that Rectal bleed on North 8.-- Vtak 21:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Well as i have said before man, it can be checked but we are not gonna do it without the graduates' permission... all other minor colleges are doing that here, however, how come we are the only singled out ones? The reference to a graduate without his/her permission in the article is a violation of Wikipedia's Five Pillars as well... its not proctology service, called HSO and its his case now, med cannot bovie.-- Vtak 00:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Please try to be diplomatic in your edit summaries (like St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine). Removing information from an article isn't vandalism per Wikipedia:Vandalism, and remember it's always preferable to discuss disputes instead of reverting edits and starting an edit war. Diplomacy can go a long way sometimes. Fagstein 02:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Blanking: Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit
A user has already be blocked for the continued blanking vandalism of significant information from the article, and now it looks like he is continuing with anon ip's. I am sorry, but I believe I have been very diplomatic, and have not resorted to personal attacks. Leuko 02:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Leuko, I bring up verifiable information about Mr Hughson and you call that a personal attack. Since when is something verifiable, your words and rules, an attack. Again, I have presented in the discussion forum information you choose to ignore. This is blatantly siding with Mr. Hughson who is verifiably, under investigation for his role with Oregon ODA in collusion. He has no credentials anyone can verify and is nothing more really, than an unenlightened consumer claiming all kinds of expertise he should not lay claim to!! If you like, I can arrange a conference call with the students attorney firm in NJ and we can discuss the issues so that you can understand far more than you currently do depending only on web citations and the like. The real story is far more in depth than you currently know and Mr. Hughson is way behind the curve. -- Doctorcane08 18:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't think this qualifies for speedy deletion, the group's members have an apparent notability, over 2 million google hits between them. User:Pedant 07:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Just FYI, I originally agreed with you that the article should be speedy-deleted, but I double-checked WP:CSD and "This is advertising/spam" is specifically listed there as something that isn't a valid speedy-delete reason. Kickaha Ota 19:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
You prodded the article Ralph Winter (judge). I made some changes to it (removing some of the attacks and adding some references), and removed the prod. Regards, TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 15:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Mediation is a waste of time. If we could work through this without admin input we would have done it by now, obviously we can't. Arbitration is what will allow a final ruling about the validity of .gov sources that use unverified and undocumented research and sources as well as all the other issues regarding this article and allow for a final entry to be constructed for SCIMD. Spike 01:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
True, mediation requires that editors be willing to go through the process and work towards an amicable solution. I'll put in the arbitration request. Leuko 17:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
I added the {{ unaccredited}} template and removed from the UK medical school templates, "Spike" is (of course) edit warring over it. Feel free to pitch in, and feel free to add to the WP:RFAR. Just zis Guy you know? 21:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- Tony Sidaway 13:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Several days ago, you prodded the article Joel Hedgpeth. Please take a look at the latest version of the Joel Hedgpeth article, and make any changes that seem appropriate. TruthbringerToronto ( Talk | contribs) 15:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
i see on your little boxes on the right side of your page that you are against personal attacks. then i ask what will be done about them. i was personally attacked mrphyzyx or something like that, on a talk page for a proposed deletion. my username is The03Era15Strong, and a comment he left for the proposed deletion of the article "43228" was that people should look at my user page. he did this because of old comments of mine left there, and he was trying to make me look bad. i have a problem with hypocrits, which is why i think you should look at this problem im having, because there is nothing i can do about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The03era15strong ( talk • contribs)
why do you feel it's necessary to get this article removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tparker393 ( talk • contribs)
alright- there are some references for the Larson Plan article now- are you happy? by the way, looks like you found out my name anyway- but here's the sig as you requested, why are you wiki freaks so uptight anyway, do you think people are going to care about this in a few years, when the world is reduced to ash and rubble? Tparker393 03:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
You remove my link http://card-magic.blogspot.com because you think it's a blog. Do I talk about current events? Do I talk about my life? It's not a blog FYI. It just have a blogspot domain so you think it's a blog. The site is a collection of card tricks that users submitted.
Following your recent reversion of my edits to the Howard Barnett article, I contacted the article's creator User:Rougher07, and suggested that he cite a source which is compliant with Wikipedia policies governing NPOV and reliable sources. -- TommyBoy 21:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Help me please. I notice you have donde excellent work with SC. Can you help me with UHSA (university health sciences antigua) I am trying to post factual information that is provided on some official state websites and other potential valueable sources of information. Thank you. Robo doc 21:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Robo doc has nothing meaningful to contribute and he isn't even qualified to post about a foreign medical school. He is copying and pasting links and copyrighted material into my article from other websites. I’m surprised to see he is asking for your help. Notice, he recently registered his ID for the sole purpose of posting his nasty remarks in the UHSA article. DrGladwin
Why did you propose my first article get deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VeeRob ( talk • contribs) .
Hi...saw your deletion listing for the article I just added HS Produkt. Please see my response on the Talk:HS Produkt page. Urban011 05:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
What are you talking about; I didn't remove the notices from the article, so maybe you should look into things before making false accusations. Not to mention the fact that this article is a completely new article, unlike the one that was deleted. Maybe if you spent a minute checking into it, you would have figured that out, but I guess you were too busy trying to get good guy badges. You really shouldn't let this power go to your head, after all; it's just the internet. Maybe if you spent less time worrying about people trying to make articles about people who do good deeds in their home town, and more time about real life, you would have a girlfriend. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Waldorf Goodhue ( talk • contribs) .
Why don't you go mind your own business. Do you really have nothing better to do then sit here and watch what I do? That's kinda sad. Waldorf Goodhue 18:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Explain to me how the "Rim Jim" article is inapproriate. I didn't write it with the intention of being a vandal. Tall Boy
You have nominated it (i understand why) for deletion.. but i am in the middle of researching this topic..copro records had mentions on the official desecration bands website as being the record label for most of their studio albums
sorry..if ive..done something wrong or whatever Fethroesforia 17:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I am new to wikipedia and the short "robert greenstein" article is one of my first efforts. I would like to know more about why you tagged my contribution as unsourced. The information in the article comes from sites for which links are provided. Please note, he was already listed (red link) on the MacArthur Fellows Program page.
I understand and agree that there should be an especially high standard for biographical material about living people and (hoping that you have time to explain!) would like to know how I could modify the article to remove your qualification.
Thanks!! Jobrill 20:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Greenstein's role at the FDA is mentioned in the Spanish version of the history of the food stamp program on the FDA's site. The English version doesn't mention names. Here's the source -- http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsp/rules/Legislation/sp-history.htm. Here's a New York Times article attesting to his role -- http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F20911F9385F0C718EDDAB0894DC494D81. Here's a NYT article naming Greenstein as a member of that commission -- http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9807E6DF1738F936A25751C1A962958260
Advice welcome on how to mention this in the article. Jobrill 10:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed you 'undid' some vandalism from SGU, despite the fact that the 'vandalism' in question was actual correcting some POV additions made by the previous edit. Just thought you would like a heads-up on the situation. Cheers, PaddyM 00:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. ParalelUni's community ban is endorsed. Any of the single-purpose accounts mentioned identified in the case, or any other accounts or IPs an administrator deems to be an account used solely for the editing of St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages, may be banned from that article or related pages for disruptive edits. For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 17:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Leuko! I removed your PROD notice from that article, and nominated it for deletion via afd instead. It had been deleted via PROD once, and the re-creation by the author qualifies as a contested deletion. Feel free to add your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keeping on Gaming. Joyous! | Talk 01:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
what —The preceding unsigned comment was added by O2ZY ( talk • contribs) .
Leuko,
This is in regards to a proposed deletion of Denison & Porter (a recently formed hedge fund and real estate investment trust). I take offensive to the proposal to delete the listing of a legitimite corporation which is registered in the District of Columbia as well as a GmBh in Muenster, Germany. The description that was placed on Wikipedia was modeled after those of nearly every other non-public corporation listed.
Feel free to visit our up-and-coming website or to google us at Denison & Porter.
Thank you, Christopher Andrade chrisotpher.andrade@denisonporter.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonpor ( talk • contribs) .
Hello Leuko or Bula in my Language
topic written on Mere Tuisalalo I do not understand why you think it needs to be deleted?? individuals and intermarriages played a big part in Fiji's documneted and oral history. this item has relivance as to the connection the family has with the Turaga Na Rasau Title. at the time the marriage to Ratu keni signified the joining of two tribes, her details and family background are relievant to the article and to the people of Lomaloma and their history. Thank you Maikeli
Hi Leuko and thanks for your note.
To start with, I re-posted this article [J&P] as I had the impression that the site was never saved (I was working on it in “preview mode” and thought I had not saved it prior to logging off last night). In fact I was kicking myself as I had to do all the typing again.
Which brings me on to the more important point; which is the basis of your deletion. I can’t see the justification for this (sorry never been come across a situation like this so far) so I summarise my argument below:
J&P is a household name in the Middle East having build most of the infrastructure in several countries, information which I started outlining in my article. It has a turnover of more than £1 billion. If companies such as George Wimpey, McCarthy & Stone and Barratt Developments some of which which are miniscule in comparison are listed in Wikipedia I don’t see why larger companies that have had a more significant global impact (albeit in other regions of the world than yours) should not be featured. Please note this was not an attempt to advertise J&P as I have no affiliations to this company whatsoever. The information I included was very similar to what's posted on the companies I site above.
Regards, StephP 21:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I was unaware of that, so thank you for the note! | Mr. Darcy talk 01:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Care to explain why you slapped the article with a speedy deletion label?? I wrote an article describing TEN, which is an adult TV network, don't see how any part of the article is an advertisement. It merely describes the Network and what type of programming it offers. Need explanation or the template will be taken off. HeMan5 03:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
What about say, Paul_Otellini ? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gkklein ( talk • contribs) .
Unfortunately, I can't find anything to cite the fact of the site's size beyond MPOGD itself, which probably wouldn't do as it's hardly impartial. Wouldn't the fact that I referred to it as 'one of the largest' as opposed to 'the largest' offer me a bit of leeway? It does have close to 2700 games listed currently and it literally gets larger every week or so. That's pretty big. HalfShadow 02:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I guess I'm going by the fact that there are dozens and dozens of articles in existence. Anyway, I don't feel it falls under speedy deletion. Until consensus is reached, it's best to leave it there. -- Merope Talk 19:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
The reason I believe it to be spam is because the user had done nothing but post links to about.com on multiple pages. You'll probably want to revert the rest of them too. Pizzapotamus 21:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC) = Pizzapotamus
p.s. It is not o.k. you deleted my page without warning at first. Then I must typed it twice. Pressume my good intentions first and come to my page to talk before you delete anything. Greetings from Belgrade. -- Mladifilozof 02:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
I was unaware that testmasters was even up as an article or had even been deleted. Is there any place that would tell me this? I am wondering also why Testmasters cannot have an article on Wikipedia, but The Princeton Review, and Kaplan, Inc both have articles on Wikipedia. This doesn't make sense to me. 64.131.205.160 06:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the addition of ...Netherlands and ...Spain to the original UK squats AfD was not, imo, carried out in accordance with AfD procedure and I was unable to delete them as part of the same process. The titles of any and all articles in an AfD listing should be in bold at the top of the debate, and in the case of non-near-as-dammit identical articles they should really be listed simultaneously to ensure they all receive the same consideration. Please relist them again if you wish. Thanks, Deizio talk 15:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
I just started the School for Robots article, and had just added a summary.. I paused to upload related images, and in the meantime it was marked for speedy deletion by you. I did not have time to add more information. I am curious when you say I should cite external information to make it know that my entry is valid. However I did have a band website link to a full page. How else can I validate that the band actually exists? I am new to this site, and have read the FAQs, and it still remains unclear to me how I prove that this entry is relevant. Thank you for your information, Blake
You may also want to note other article creations by the user Erzherzogin. All are covered under articles with English names. Charles 01:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. :-) Leuko 02:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Rather than tagging something for deletion for lack of context, would you please next time try to give me a few more minutes to add some? Incidentally, this article has enough context, as it is! - CrazyRussian talk/ email 04:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)