Hello, LemonJuice78, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! -
wolf
19:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Welcome LemonJuice78, thank you for contributing but please don't keep adding the same material that has been removed. The reason for removal is in the edit summary, whereas you have given no reasons for adding it. Making the same edit repeatedly without explanation is edit warring and can get you blocked from editing. There is a lot of help available, have a look at Help:Getting started for guidance. Cheers! Captainllama ( talk) 00:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Curtis LeMay, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
17:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David C. Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airborne Warning and Control System. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
On 9 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brent Scowcroft, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Bagumba ( talk) 01:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to
Independence Day (1996 film) have been removed because you cited the information you added to another Wikipedia article or an external
wiki. As discussed at
WP:CIRCULAR and
WP:SPS, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered
reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reference, perhaps from the article you originally linked to. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
16:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Strategic Air Command. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.
BilCat (
talk)
18:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
px
(e.g. |thumb|300px
), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting." (Bolding in original)
BilCat (
talk)
18:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Hello. Twice now you have re-added the gallery section to Richard Myers, without comment or discussion, and in doing so have manually reverted my edits. This is not only rude, but violates WP:GALLERY and constitutes edit warring. As I have pointed out in my edit summaries, WP:GALLERY clearly states: "Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved ... or moved to Wikimedia Commons." The gallery in Richard Myers falls into this category. As the article already features a large number of images and a linked Wikimedia category, the gallery section does not enhance nor add anything to the article beyond an indiscriminate collection of images of the subject. It does not belong in the article. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 00:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, this is SuperWIKI. I have added your Richard Myers image to the Richard Myers article. I plan on adding a new section tomorrow to List of active duty United States four-star officers to cover command elevations to four-star rank. As such, I am still planning an image scheme that covers all service branches (i.e. equal images across time periods for all services for the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force), as well as a reformatting to fit MOS:IMAGESIZE. While I appreciate your help in finding older images (i.e. the George S. Brown image), I humbly request that you take care when adding images. The addition of the Richard Myers image and moving my Marines image down the section where you added it is cutting into the next section (if on web, notice the format line that is now cut off at the end rather than going all the way through), as well as the addition of mostly Air Force image. I intend to reorder the images a final time to ensure that, where possible, an equal amount is devoted to either pinning ceremonies, change of commands, retirement ceremonies, Senate hearings and public briefings, as well as being equally distributed among the services to ensure equilbrium. Thank you for your consideration. SuperWIKI ( talk) 16:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Mark Milley. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Acroterion
(talk)
16:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mark Milley. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Matrix Resurrections, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edit does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Sariel Xilo (
talk)
16:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
I asked you politely to stop adding unsourced word salad to the page. You didn't respond and, instead, you added the material a third time, here and here, and for good measure you added a nonsensical caption to one of the images. At least this time you added an actual source to your first edit, but it doesn't support your edit that "Milley's nomination was controversy" [sic]. Even if it did, who cares whether "there's never been any Air Force General who serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff since 2005", at any rate anybody reading Milley's page? You also seem to reinsert material that editors have objected to without discussing them on the talk page and without giving an edit summary, like here and here. Please, stop this behavior. @ Acroterion:, @ SuperWIKI:, @ Wtmitchell:, @ Truthsofwolf:, @ Snooganssnoogans: pinging other editors who have reverted your edits on the page. Space4Time3Continuum2x ( talk) 16:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
01:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
22:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)⚠️ Why? You've received multiple warnings and just came off a block earlier in the day, but you still go and add this image to USS Bon Homme Richard (CV-31) and again to George Stephen Morrison, and despite the information provided on the image file page, you added deliberately false information to the image caption, then added the image to two pages it didn't belong to.
Now we'll have to go through your recent edits (many have been reverted, but the ones that haven't will need to be checked) to see if they are legit. This is a purely disruptive timesink by a WP:NOTHERE user. I am pinging Acroterion to make him aware of this, and will advise him of any further issues that are found. If you do resume editing when your current block expires, you need to give serious thought to why you're here and how you can really contribute to building this project. - wolf 06:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 04:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
LemonJuice78 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
request for unblock and apologize for all of the disruptive editing since I've followed much of my ego and ambition and totally apologize for not been talking at user talk since I just learn how to use it by now and also still learning to use wikipedia further. Please accept my apology and will not repeat again in the future. LemonJuice78 17:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the concern that you were deliberately adding false information. Yamla ( talk) 17:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, LemonJuice78, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! -
wolf
19:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Welcome LemonJuice78, thank you for contributing but please don't keep adding the same material that has been removed. The reason for removal is in the edit summary, whereas you have given no reasons for adding it. Making the same edit repeatedly without explanation is edit warring and can get you blocked from editing. There is a lot of help available, have a look at Help:Getting started for guidance. Cheers! Captainllama ( talk) 00:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Curtis LeMay, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
17:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David C. Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airborne Warning and Control System. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
On 9 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brent Scowcroft, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Bagumba ( talk) 01:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to
Independence Day (1996 film) have been removed because you cited the information you added to another Wikipedia article or an external
wiki. As discussed at
WP:CIRCULAR and
WP:SPS, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered
reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reference, perhaps from the article you originally linked to. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
16:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Strategic Air Command. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.
BilCat (
talk)
18:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
px
(e.g. |thumb|300px
), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting." (Bolding in original)
BilCat (
talk)
18:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Hello. Twice now you have re-added the gallery section to Richard Myers, without comment or discussion, and in doing so have manually reverted my edits. This is not only rude, but violates WP:GALLERY and constitutes edit warring. As I have pointed out in my edit summaries, WP:GALLERY clearly states: "Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved ... or moved to Wikimedia Commons." The gallery in Richard Myers falls into this category. As the article already features a large number of images and a linked Wikimedia category, the gallery section does not enhance nor add anything to the article beyond an indiscriminate collection of images of the subject. It does not belong in the article. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 00:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, this is SuperWIKI. I have added your Richard Myers image to the Richard Myers article. I plan on adding a new section tomorrow to List of active duty United States four-star officers to cover command elevations to four-star rank. As such, I am still planning an image scheme that covers all service branches (i.e. equal images across time periods for all services for the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force), as well as a reformatting to fit MOS:IMAGESIZE. While I appreciate your help in finding older images (i.e. the George S. Brown image), I humbly request that you take care when adding images. The addition of the Richard Myers image and moving my Marines image down the section where you added it is cutting into the next section (if on web, notice the format line that is now cut off at the end rather than going all the way through), as well as the addition of mostly Air Force image. I intend to reorder the images a final time to ensure that, where possible, an equal amount is devoted to either pinning ceremonies, change of commands, retirement ceremonies, Senate hearings and public briefings, as well as being equally distributed among the services to ensure equilbrium. Thank you for your consideration. SuperWIKI ( talk) 16:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Mark Milley. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Acroterion
(talk)
16:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mark Milley. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Matrix Resurrections, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your edit does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Sariel Xilo (
talk)
16:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
I asked you politely to stop adding unsourced word salad to the page. You didn't respond and, instead, you added the material a third time, here and here, and for good measure you added a nonsensical caption to one of the images. At least this time you added an actual source to your first edit, but it doesn't support your edit that "Milley's nomination was controversy" [sic]. Even if it did, who cares whether "there's never been any Air Force General who serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff since 2005", at any rate anybody reading Milley's page? You also seem to reinsert material that editors have objected to without discussing them on the talk page and without giving an edit summary, like here and here. Please, stop this behavior. @ Acroterion:, @ SuperWIKI:, @ Wtmitchell:, @ Truthsofwolf:, @ Snooganssnoogans: pinging other editors who have reverted your edits on the page. Space4Time3Continuum2x ( talk) 16:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
01:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
22:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)⚠️ Why? You've received multiple warnings and just came off a block earlier in the day, but you still go and add this image to USS Bon Homme Richard (CV-31) and again to George Stephen Morrison, and despite the information provided on the image file page, you added deliberately false information to the image caption, then added the image to two pages it didn't belong to.
Now we'll have to go through your recent edits (many have been reverted, but the ones that haven't will need to be checked) to see if they are legit. This is a purely disruptive timesink by a WP:NOTHERE user. I am pinging Acroterion to make him aware of this, and will advise him of any further issues that are found. If you do resume editing when your current block expires, you need to give serious thought to why you're here and how you can really contribute to building this project. - wolf 06:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 04:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
LemonJuice78 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
request for unblock and apologize for all of the disruptive editing since I've followed much of my ego and ambition and totally apologize for not been talking at user talk since I just learn how to use it by now and also still learning to use wikipedia further. Please accept my apology and will not repeat again in the future. LemonJuice78 17:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the concern that you were deliberately adding false information. Yamla ( talk) 17:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.