Hi all!!! This is Legolas and welcome to my talk page.

Archives

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Hi Legolas. I'm glad you enjoyed the last review so much. About "Like a Prayer", sure, I'd love to look at it and give you feedback. Are you taking it to FAC right away? Did you want me to look at it during FAC as a reviewer, or give you some feedback before you take it to FAC? For an article of that length (wow, it's 100,000 bytes!) I'm sure it would take me several days at least to give it a thorough review—which would fine with me, depending on how much of a hurry you're in. But just skimming it now, it looks pretty interesting, so, yeah, I'd definitely be interested in being involved in one way or another. Just let me know! Talk again soon, Moisejp ( talk) 17:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply

In the meantime, I'm going to review "Dear Jessie" for GA. I'll let you know when I'm done the review. Moisejp ( talk) 17:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC) reply

OK, I'll have a look at it soon. Looking forward to it. So what kind of timeline are you thinking for when you want to bring it to FAC? Or are you just going to play it by ear? Moisejp ( talk) 04:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Legolas. How are things? OK, I'll start looking at "Like a Prayer" very soon. I do want to review four more GAs this month so that I can get one of those nifty spinning Tireless Contributor Barnstars. How did you get so many barnstars, by the way? I'm jealous. :-) Oh well, you've got about ten times as many GAs under your belt as I do, so I guess I can't complain. Anyway, I'll fit "Like a Prayer" in around my GA reviews.

Speaking of GA Reviews, "Dear Jessie" is done, and it is On Hold. Just let me know when you're done fixing that up! Talk again soon, Moisejp ( talk) 05:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Legolas. Yes, of course I remember "Like a Prayer"—very good song! I even vaguely remember about the controversy surrounding it, but I look forward to refreshing my memory about the details as I read through the article. Good job on "Dear Jessie"—it is now a GA. OK, I'll be talking to you again very soon either here or on the "Like a Prayer" Talk page. Take care, Moisejp ( talk) 18:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Avi. Do you think this lead is too long? The article is over 80 Kb long. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 12:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC) reply

On 12 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dear Jessie, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that singer Madonna appeared only as an animated fairy in the music video for her song " Dear Jessie"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dear Jessie.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DEV HAS HIMSELF LAUNCHED HIS FACEBOOK & HOMEPAGE! I can give proofs! Even Dev was amazed to see him exclusive photos which his fan page http://www.facebook.com/devthesuperstar has but no other page ha! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Listen dude, I have no time for this tomfoolery. I don't care what Dev has said or wants, but these are fan sites and spam links and are NOT considered reliable as per WP:RS. I have said above also what constitutes reliable sources and you have time and again failed to pay attention to it and have chosen to add such fancrufty sources and unsourced content. I have reported you at WP:AIV. Please stop doing such additions lest you face a block. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

SEE THE PROOF here http://calcuttatube.com/tollywood-star-dev-launches-devthesuperstar-com-blog-at-priya-cinema/116340/ ORIGINAL CERTIFIED BY DEV! THAT MEANS ALL THE INFORMATION IN IT MUST ME TRUE! I AM EDITING IT FOR THE FINAL TIME plz don't report but contact me at www.facebook.com/som.rocks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hurray! Got it! Finally got those cherishing reliable sources see yourself & then speak -

1. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100905/jsp/calcutta/story_12898207.jsp 2. http://calcuttatube.com/tollywood-star-dev-launches-devthesuperstar-com-blog-at-priya-cinema/116340/ 3. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100821/jsp/entertainment/story_12834380.html 4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZYf-WvxsHg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Calcuttatube and Youtube are both copyright violating websites and The Telegraph does not support any of your claim. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 02:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

TELEGRAPH shows that the official website for Dev has been launched like that of other actors & YouTube shows that Dev is celebrating the launch of his website with images! It means that what www.devthesuperstar.com is providing is correct! So the information is all true! His twitter account also shows that! & what do u think newspaper would provide all the information about him??? His official pages would know better about him! You just can't stop or hide the correct information! WHAT'S RIGHT WILL ALWAYS BE RIGHT! TRUTH ALWAYS PREVAILS! I am providing reference to the edits too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Just to prove how idiotic your comments are, this link says: "Sayantan Roy, a 21-year-old amateur web designer and a fan of Tollywood’s newest heartthrob Dev, has built www.devthesuperstar. com. 'I had created an Orkut community last January, which proved a rage with 8,180 members. So I created this website and approached Devda to launch it. I get calls from fans daily, even from Bangladesh.” The site is the base for a fan club with a paid membership." It clearly says that www.devthesuperstar.com is a fansite and not Dev's official site. Get it? Hence it cannot be added. And stop writing in capitals here and sign your posts. Else don't post here. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

If Dev has launched it, that means all information about it is 1000000000% right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I GUESS YOU ARE ONE OF THOSE ANTI-DEV PEOPLE WHO DOESN'T WANT RIGHT INFORMATION ABOUT HIM TO BE THERE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohompramanick ( talk • contribs) 18:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I really don't care what this Dev person thinks. The website is a fansite. You add it one more time, you will be indefinitely blocked from editing. You have crossed all limit now. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

• Legolas, as inept and incorrect those edits are, I don't think they're libelous, for instance, and you seem to be guilty of edit-warring. Please consider this a friendly warning, but a warning nonetheless. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 18:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Replied in your talk page explaining this. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

As did I! Drmies ( talk) 18:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Ah, I just caught it! Thanks again Drmies. Sohom if you are reading this, please listen to reason. You are moving towards getting blocked. I have explained time and again to you that fansites are NOT acceptable in Wikipedia. Please go through policy WP:RS again. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

On your case again...

...sorry, but I am. Through something completely unrelated I saw this edit of yours. It's not helpful, and I think you should remove it. If you check the history of that talk page you'll see that I've had a run-in with that editor as well, and he is on a short leash (with Qxyrxian and me). Your message can be seen as baiting, and that's not something we need with a disruptive and problematic editor: it either provokes or, later, it exculpates (if they're ever blocked, they can say they were insulted etc. and that might boomerang back on you). I hope you understand where I'm coming from. That editor has the capacity to irk people into anger, and the best thing to do is to not enter into a mudslinging contest. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 20:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Removed it Drmies, thanks for explaining. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I have a few choice words for that editor as well and I'm biting my tongue. Thanks Legolas, Drmies ( talk) 05:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Sorry for joining being uninvited. But yes, you should also talk to him. It is good to know that we also have a life outside Wikipedia and that it does not feel great to be harassed by such editors every time we log in. Sorry for my honesty. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 05:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I appreciate the offer. Don't know if I can keep up with you though, haha. Right now I have DDLJ up for GA. Is there a formal definition of collaboration, or what exactly did you have in mind? BollyJeff || talk 19:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I would like to collaborate :) — Commander _{(Ping me)} 19:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

BollyJeff, I will be starting with principal draft soon and then I will notify you guys. You can also search for info, though I think we need to have a discussion regarding reliable sources and access to books, journals, magazines etc. I need to research and gather all these information and then only I will advance. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Avi. Is this article here saying that "Single Ladies" uses whistles in the background? I found it here and since then i have been searching for a reliable source. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 07:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Let it be. I have got my reliable source. :() Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 07:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Avi, in the final chorus of "Single Ladies", there are several vocals layered,

to that final chorus, with the best phrase, the keyboards underneath and the multiple vocals

there's that intermittent but ominous grinding at the low end of the song, which only make it more obvious that Beyonce's vocals, layered though they might be, are the only thing holding the song together. She barrels through it.

Please construct a sentence for me to say it effectively. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 09:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Jivesh, since I'm in office most of these links won't open for me. I will construct a proper sentence for you after I go back home. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 11:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please do not forget. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 17:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Still in office. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Jivesh, here's how you can construct the sentence: "[Reviewer name] felt that although Knowles' vocals were always omnipresent within layers of music, it was the only intermittent link between the ever-changing composition of the song". — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Can it fit in a composition section? Legolas, didn't the reviewer want to say that several vocals are layered on one another in the final chorus? Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 15:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please Avi, don't think that I was being ungrateful. It's just that what you have written kind of puzzles me. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 17:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi,

Thank you for the barnstar :) I love Lady Gaga since 2008 but I've never edited her articles here. I'm also interested in sales and chart positions so I will try to fix/update few things as I did today. Max24 ( Talk) 15:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I know that your queen is a "FA" however this states otherwise maybe you can fix that :-) Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 15:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Ajona, that is because WikiProject Religion is not one of the projects under which the article falls currently. Madonna is not considered a core subject for the project, which deals with hardcore religion related topics. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Oh I know, maybe she once was part of it (just wanted to let you know). Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 15:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

		The Monster Award — You are the ultimate Monster of editing
		Well done, and congratulations for your exceptional contributions. Your edits to the Lady Gaga Wikiproject have been truly inspirational to others. Paws up!

Hello Legolas, it's Theologiae. I just wanted to pass by, and give you my new Lady Gaga Award, which, if you can see on User:Theologiae/Sandbox 3, I'm working on based on the Madonna ones you created. Do you want to have a look? By the way, I modified the Bedtime Story page, if you want to see?

Yours,

-- &レア ( talk) 23:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Wow Theologiae, a big big thanks. And yes of course I have seen your work on "Bedtime Story". It's wonderful. Please keep up the good work. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you! By the way, if you want to check out the Wikipedia:WikiProject Lady Gaga/Barnstars page, I just created it. Thank you immensely for the templates, which were inspired by yours on Wikipedia:WikiProject Madonna/Barnstar Workshop. -- &レア ( talk) 10:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I already checked. Marvellous job! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

No, theyre not, The united kingdom date should be November 30...it currently says December 5...change it to November 30. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.189.22.165 ( talk) 14:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure if you seen this but I'm having troubles understanding what you had wanted in your review. Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 18:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Ajona, sorry if my explanation was not clear. I want the references to be formatted properly. Now, there are two ways of doing that. I can do dummy edits and show you what needs to be done or I can point them here. I prefer the first one and would do that. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I thought I have fixed all the formatting for the references, it took me several hours but I did it a couple days ago. Is there anything that sticks out? Best, Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 15:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

U forgot me :-( lolz Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 15:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please forgive me. I could not do the dummy edits as I urgently had to go out of town for some work in the weekend. I will do it by today EOD. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Ok :-) Jona yo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

W.E got 2 GG noms =) Crystal Clear x3 04:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Yeahhhh, I heard it too. And "Masterpiece" is just brilliant on every level. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I just got around to watching the trailer, and it doesn't seem as bad as critics are saying. In some of the ones I got off of Rotten Tomatoes, the reviewers seem to be making their negative reviews more about the director then the actual quality of the film. I can't help but curiously want to see the reviews had this movie been directed by some little known person.... =/ Crystal Clear x3 12:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Exactly, the film is so-so much better I heard. Its intense, a feast for the eyes and emotional quotient is high too. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I seriously cannot believe it has been 5 years since Hard Candy was released. When the press releases and shit said so I was very confused and then I realized it actually has been. I'm so very anxious for the song, for numerous reasons. 1) It is really her first release in the post-Gaga's fame era. 2) It might be really bad.

The song seems way too safe to me, but at the same time - if she did anything too ballsy - "MADONNA COPIES LADY GAGA" headlines. (Pathetic... yeah, but probably would still happen).

All these conflicting rumors are NOT helping. First, the song is completely different from the demo. Now, reports are saying that it isn't, and it is just extended and has a bit alt lyrics and chanting in the background. And a song called "Girls Gone Wild" Madge? I really need another "Ray of Light" here, or at least "Music". I have a feeling this album will be like Goodbye Lullaby; amazing songs mixed with so-so mainstream songs to make people buy the album.

Seriously though: Madge's main audience is really her elder audience. Unless she releases two lead singles, someone's about to get alienated.

And really at the title? The other one was WAY better. I under the "Luvin" part, because of the L-U-V, but it just looks gross and immature to me.

SIGH.

I don't think I could handle an album full of "Masterpiece"'s and then "Gimme All Your Luvin" randomly in there. I guess we can just be glad it's not "Gimme All Ur Luvin"...

But seriously, what fan that doesn't follow her day to day is gonna know this album is "Ray of Light 2" with "Gimme All Your Luvin"? She doesn't need hit singles anymore. She's proven herself. Just release another "Frozen" and call it a day. Her tour will sell millions, and her album will too.

/End rant

— Status { ^talk _contribs 11:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Yes, that is true. Music is like this as well. (Which, I still can't get over the amazing style for the artwork that era) Yeah, I don't know the whole story, but it seems like something happened that made Madge not want to do anything for Warner. :L That came off with the new songs on Celebration, tbh (the quality I mean). Yeah, it was in my head for a while. I felt like I was driving down the road in my car listening to it. :L The fact that she is also working with nobodies (director of the video, photographer of the artwork, etc) gives me home. And yes, the Interscope deal. <3 I wish Live Nation's label happened though. I was excited for it. I hope Shakira gets her ass away from Epic like Madge did Warner when her time comes. Also, the album title: Mirror, M and MADONNA have been reportedly tossed around. Personally, I would think it amazing for a second self-titled album. Starting afresh, but I'd still prefer Masterpiece as the title. Did you see her new store? New logo perhaps?

And yeah, I'm super glad she is really promoting. Bitch just won't stop. It's not like she was sitting around drinking tea for 5 years. She did a two year tour, released a greatest hits album/DVD and a live album, opened a fitness gym, did clothing line stuff with her daughter, and most of all - filmed a movie. When will she ever tire? D: Oh, and she, of course, looks amazing.

— Status { ^talk _contribs 11:56, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Her blackberry <3 She's still so young at heart. — Status { ^talk _contribs 11:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Madge would do 80s inspirations right. I mean, she did start her career in the 80s. I don't remember who did it, but the same person who designed Confessions and Hard Candy are doing the booklet design. Let us pray that she doesn't disappoint like Hard Candy. "Masterpiece" is a step in the right direction. — Status { ^talk _contribs 16:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Currently jamming to Music. "Runaway Lover" is stunning! — Status { ^talk _contribs 05:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't know why, but these Live Nation deals amaze me. — Status { ^talk _contribs 17:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

IKR? Huge amount of money is onvolved this time though. Just wait till next year when the headlines make Madonna again the highest-earning woman in business. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Should this article really not be located at Madonna? I find it quite ridiculous that it isn't. What's so harmful about a disambiguation page? I find it hard to believe the reason if because of this. Hell, one of the most common names in the world Britney redirects to Britney Spears, but Madonna can't have Madonna? It's not even like it's only a stage name; it's her legal name. — Status { ^talk _contribs 17:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Frankly Zach, I dont give a damn about dabs. They can be anything as long as I don't have to keep on changing them everytime. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

you can turn the article in GA? Flores,Alberto ( talk) 18:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Yes. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

... bless me with your precious assistance on the FAC of "Single Ladies". Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 17:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Lol, you made me drop my chicken.. He he, wat kinda? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Avi, reviewers are repeatedly bringing the same thing, especially Efe. I cannot take this anymore. Is it so difficult to read the whole FAC before posting. And everyone is saying in my taste, in my opinion, in my... Am i expected to write the same article in 13 different ways to conform to their individual preferences? Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 17:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

What exactly is Mark saying? What doesn't he find appropriate? And NO, you are NOT to modify the article just to suit someone's preference. If you do not find something to be agreeable, just write below it: "I do not find this comment actionable because .. [reason]". Just look at the FAC for Madonna. I had done everything to keep my patience, including breaking my coffee mug. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Lol. Avi, you just cheered me up. Read Efe comments. I have already explained everything to him. But you know how he is. He does not want live performances to be described. He is saying that I have written the background section from my personal understanding (That's what we are supposed to do, right but heaven knows what he wants). He even wants the parodies to be summarized in the lead. What was he thinking while typing that? He wants me to elaborate on Knowles as herself simply because "Single Ladies" is about Sasha. etc etc etc. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 18:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please Avi. Please read his comments and see how you can reply him. I have already done that but he won't break like your coffee mug. Lol. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 18:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I read them. A little far-fetched and yes, the OWN like statements are showing. Your replies are fine and to the point. I also just realized it that Moisejp has commented and supported. This FAC WILL pass. Mark it. :) — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Oh thanks. And Sandy suggested a copy-editor to me. He is called Malleus. After talking to him for weeks, he supported. Nikki told me that his vote weighs a lot in an FAC. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 18:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

It really does. After TOny1 left FAC, Malleus and Moni3 do carry a lot of weight. I do wish Andy and KAren would be back full-time though. Sandy and Ucucha are doing wonderful though. Jivesh what will you treat me with after you get your first FA? :) — Legolas ^(talk2me) 18:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I have no idea. What do you want? Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 18:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Do you know how to reduce the quality of a music file? Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 06:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Nopes, I always depend on others for it. :D — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Same here Avi. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 06:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Please explain this to me: Well—a few things. Beyonce referring to herself as "it"? Equating herself to bling? Handing herself over to a man who will determine her self-worth through a demeaning, years-long game which can only end with Beyonce emerging triumphant as his symbolic property, or crawling away as a meaningless ex? Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 13:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The writer actually feels that the lyrics of the song, where Knowles sings about finding a better man, and just being triumphant and vile, actually portrays women in a derogatory manner. The writer contrasts the general feedback of the song as an empowerment theme, to that of a derogatory pun. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I will let you see how I will treat him now. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 13:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Are you talking about the red and dirty wig woman's articles that's not even supposed to be C-class and will never pass FAC? I gotcha yo mind! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Lol. I was talking about the one who wrote that article about Beyonce. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 14:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I know how to turn a situation to my advantage. :D :P — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

You really do because you are the ... BEST. Jivesh1205 ( Talk) 14:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

How about run Madonna for TFA the day the new album comes out? — WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 18:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

How do I do that? I have absolutely no clue about TFA. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

WP:TFAR. You post your nomination for TFA and consensus is developed. Then Raul or Dabomb will schedule it for the main page. — WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 11:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I would appreciate it if you were to look over the article one last time before I close the peer review. Thank you, — Status { ^talk _contribs 01:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC) (This message is being sent to everybody involved in the PR.) reply

Legolas, thank you for your note. I was just thinking yesterday, "I've got to get back to Legolas soon—he's probably wondering what's happening." I did read through it once several days ago and you probably noticed I made some small edits. I also noticed a few little things I was going to bring up. I'm going to read through it once more and try to see what else I can catch. Let's see, when can I promise to do that by... How about by Christmas? I'll be in touch again very, very soon! Moisejp ( talk) 15:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

OMG, I didn't realize that PR was open and that it has been waiting on my comments. I think you mentioned something about a PR a while back, but to be honest I don't know if I've ever participated in one, so I didn't realize exactly how they worked. OK, I will get some comments on there by around Christmas. Talk soon, Moisejp ( talk) 16:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Would you mind weighing in your opinion here — Commander _{(Ping me)} 16:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

you are imature and a real time KNOB