This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Looks like you might have missed this, but how about it? Would you like to give RfA a shot? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
-— Isarra ༆ 03:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my edit on Motor (disambiguation). In fact, I was just about to undo my own edit. Cre81ve master ( talk) 03:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Legoktm, I am running a bot and some web scripts on Toolserver. One of my python web script requires of support of wide unicode character (compile with --enable-unicode=ucs4), which python in web server doesn't.
So what should I do to make my tools works. Thank you :) -- Nullzero ( talk) 11:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
A few months back you created a list of active/inactive AWB users for MBisanz. I'm going thru Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage and removing inactive editors. I've already removed inactive bots. Whenever toolserver decides rejoins the world and not play possum, could I get two reports? One of all users on that list who have not made an edit since January 1, 2012 and another of all those who have made an edit since January 1, 2012. I'm going to be removing more people than MBisanz did. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
BO | Talk 12:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
About that, could you also review this AfC? While declining the album appears correct (given the lack of secondary sources), the used argument not (a music album is not "an event" and should not be judged through WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:ONEEVENT, otherwise almost every music album should be rejected). New editors that use AfC (and that have obvious gaps about our policies and guidelines) could be confused by the use of such "strange" arguments. -- Cavarrone ( talk) 05:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Legoktm. At Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 53#Page purging Null edit bot you said your bot could perform a purge or null edit on request. Is it possible for the bot to automatically purge or null edit all pages that have say some specific template on them? If that were the case, then I could for example modify {{ File page NFCC concerns tag}} so that it also transcludes that template when being placed on a page. Would that be possible? The rationale for this is that for files tagged with {{ File page NFCC concerns tag}} to appear in Category:Non-free files lacking a non-free use rationale for more than 7 days a null edit to the file page containing the template is necessary (I don't know whether a purge would be enough). -- Toshio Yamaguchi 08:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey. I was surprised to see that you weren't an admin, given how much I've seen you around with all your bot work and the like. If you're considering adminship I'd have no problems nominating you, so long as there aren't any hidden demons I'm unaware of :) Wizardman 16:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at User talk:Legobot, please? You seem to have missed a couple of posts (including one from me) about Legobot tasks that have stalled. Thank you! Maralia ( talk) 12:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello again! Now an admin has approved my request for shell access. You could add me to bot and tools project. Thanks a lot :) -- Nullzero ( talk) 19:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
A few months back you created a list of active/inactive AWB users for MBisanz. I'm going thru Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage and removing inactive editors. I've already removed inactive bots. Whenever toolserver decides rejoins the world and not play possum, could I get two reports? One of all users on that list who have not made an edit since January 1, 2012 and another of all those who have made an edit since January 1, 2012. I'm going to be removing more people than MBisanz did. Bgwhite ( talk) 17:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
~/queries/mbisanz2.py
).
Legoktm (
talk)
03:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for this edit. However, I notice that since the SPI investigation wasn't initiated in the standard way, it is not listed at WP:SPI. Can something be done about this? Thank you. Toccata quarta ( talk) 17:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
There are times when I'm lousy with words, so I'll just keep it short/simple. Thanks! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed you have requested a change to {{ Commons category}} and would suggest the equivalent change should be made to the inline version {{ Commons category-inline}}. Keith D ( talk) 11:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
If you'd given me another 30 seconds you'd have seen me self revert with the comment "misclick". Dpmuk ( talk) 04:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Howdy! I'm just curious on how you fixed the template and what did I do wrong? Coffeepusher ( talk) 15:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
"At a [[User talk:Coffeepusher/Archive 1#Nestle again|conversation on my talk page], BTfromLA...")
... plus, having piped information inside a template that's looking for pipes at specific places can sometimes be problematic (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎)
15:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)|evidence=
. Specifically, the link [[http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3ANestleNW911&diff=535747509&oldid=535528075 they start editing other articles]
should have opened witha single square bracket, not double; and the link [[User talk:Coffeepusher/Archive 1#Nestle again|conversation on my talk page]
should have closed with a double square bracket, not single. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
15:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Legoktm. Could you add an explanation as to what this tracking category is for and how it is resolveable? Apparently I'm not the only one wondering! Thanks. SFB 19:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
{{
commonscat}}
is going to be placed in one of those five, so which one are we aiming to get them into? --
Redrose64 (
talk)
20:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Looks like you might have missed this, but how about it? Would you like to give RfA a shot? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
-— Isarra ༆ 03:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my edit on Motor (disambiguation). In fact, I was just about to undo my own edit. Cre81ve master ( talk) 03:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Legoktm, I am running a bot and some web scripts on Toolserver. One of my python web script requires of support of wide unicode character (compile with --enable-unicode=ucs4), which python in web server doesn't.
So what should I do to make my tools works. Thank you :) -- Nullzero ( talk) 11:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
A few months back you created a list of active/inactive AWB users for MBisanz. I'm going thru Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage and removing inactive editors. I've already removed inactive bots. Whenever toolserver decides rejoins the world and not play possum, could I get two reports? One of all users on that list who have not made an edit since January 1, 2012 and another of all those who have made an edit since January 1, 2012. I'm going to be removing more people than MBisanz did. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
BO | Talk 12:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
About that, could you also review this AfC? While declining the album appears correct (given the lack of secondary sources), the used argument not (a music album is not "an event" and should not be judged through WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:ONEEVENT, otherwise almost every music album should be rejected). New editors that use AfC (and that have obvious gaps about our policies and guidelines) could be confused by the use of such "strange" arguments. -- Cavarrone ( talk) 05:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Legoktm. At Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 53#Page purging Null edit bot you said your bot could perform a purge or null edit on request. Is it possible for the bot to automatically purge or null edit all pages that have say some specific template on them? If that were the case, then I could for example modify {{ File page NFCC concerns tag}} so that it also transcludes that template when being placed on a page. Would that be possible? The rationale for this is that for files tagged with {{ File page NFCC concerns tag}} to appear in Category:Non-free files lacking a non-free use rationale for more than 7 days a null edit to the file page containing the template is necessary (I don't know whether a purge would be enough). -- Toshio Yamaguchi 08:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey. I was surprised to see that you weren't an admin, given how much I've seen you around with all your bot work and the like. If you're considering adminship I'd have no problems nominating you, so long as there aren't any hidden demons I'm unaware of :) Wizardman 16:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at User talk:Legobot, please? You seem to have missed a couple of posts (including one from me) about Legobot tasks that have stalled. Thank you! Maralia ( talk) 12:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello again! Now an admin has approved my request for shell access. You could add me to bot and tools project. Thanks a lot :) -- Nullzero ( talk) 19:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
A few months back you created a list of active/inactive AWB users for MBisanz. I'm going thru Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage and removing inactive editors. I've already removed inactive bots. Whenever toolserver decides rejoins the world and not play possum, could I get two reports? One of all users on that list who have not made an edit since January 1, 2012 and another of all those who have made an edit since January 1, 2012. I'm going to be removing more people than MBisanz did. Bgwhite ( talk) 17:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
~/queries/mbisanz2.py
).
Legoktm (
talk)
03:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for this edit. However, I notice that since the SPI investigation wasn't initiated in the standard way, it is not listed at WP:SPI. Can something be done about this? Thank you. Toccata quarta ( talk) 17:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
There are times when I'm lousy with words, so I'll just keep it short/simple. Thanks! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed you have requested a change to {{ Commons category}} and would suggest the equivalent change should be made to the inline version {{ Commons category-inline}}. Keith D ( talk) 11:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
If you'd given me another 30 seconds you'd have seen me self revert with the comment "misclick". Dpmuk ( talk) 04:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Howdy! I'm just curious on how you fixed the template and what did I do wrong? Coffeepusher ( talk) 15:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
"At a [[User talk:Coffeepusher/Archive 1#Nestle again|conversation on my talk page], BTfromLA...")
... plus, having piped information inside a template that's looking for pipes at specific places can sometimes be problematic (
✉→
BWilkins
←✎)
15:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)|evidence=
. Specifically, the link [[http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3ANestleNW911&diff=535747509&oldid=535528075 they start editing other articles]
should have opened witha single square bracket, not double; and the link [[User talk:Coffeepusher/Archive 1#Nestle again|conversation on my talk page]
should have closed with a double square bracket, not single. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
15:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Legoktm. Could you add an explanation as to what this tracking category is for and how it is resolveable? Apparently I'm not the only one wondering! Thanks. SFB 19:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
{{
commonscat}}
is going to be placed in one of those five, so which one are we aiming to get them into? --
Redrose64 (
talk)
20:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)