This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spoonerism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. You changed a direct (& cited) quote. Please be more careful. Also please use the edit summaries to explain your edits. It helps everybody. Hertz1888 ( talk) 19:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Neuro-Immuno Deficiency Syndrome, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuro-Immuno Deficiency Syndrome. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. KurtRaschke ( talk) 00:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I have responded to your question in Wikipedia:Help desk#colors. Chzz ► 08:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
i wonder if you still airnser to your wikipedai user page if you do say hi back P.S its me noname-- 68.228.234.21 ( talk) 05:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sonic News Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NP
ervez
15:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
helpme|How would I be able to align a table to the right?}}
{{
helpme}}
template again.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
(←) I replied to your question on my talk page :-) Sorry it took so long to reply. Killiondude ( talk) 03:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mercedes Rose, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mariowiki.com/Mercedes_Rose. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 19:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Mercedes Rose.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly ( Parrot) 19:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
helpme|How do I change font colors?}}
Although it was probably an accident, Drew R. Smith has been contributing since he requested that if he was inactive for two months to put a retired template on his page. (also, this confuses me, it has only been 17 days since he put the semiretired template on his page!) Accidents Happen! Good Luck! Programmer13 Talk What I do 17:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Nicholas Stewart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PamD (
talk)
07:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
While I have no particular preference for what happens to that redirect, you were completely out of order using R3 as grounds for speedy deletion - that is specifically for recently created redirects, and there is no way that a redirect that is over 5 years old qualifies. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Raul seems to have gone on leave, but a lot of the article doesn't have references attached so a lot of people would oppose it YellowMonkey ( cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 01:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ok there was no closing / in the tag. Are you familiar with the albums wikiproject? they have a standard way of laying out track listings, and the useful template {{ Infobox album}}. Rich Farmbrough, 16:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC).
I have no idea whether the album is notable or not, and that is what the notability tag is for. The article does not establish the notability of the album. If it is notable, there should be some reviews in trade publications or chart history or other indication of importance in reliable sources. Thanks. -- Wolfer68 ( talk) 20:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Here Come the Girls (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Here Come the Girls (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Come the Girls (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan ( talk) 14:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely-used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Dale 20:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Per WP:SIG#Must not be used, images must not be used in signatures. Please amend ASAP. Thanks. Rd232 talk 17:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Launchballer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GrooveDog ( oh hai.) 19:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
You are still using a template-signature after being asked not to more than a month ago. Please change it immediately; see WP:SIG if you need help doing this.
Also, please stop using your signature as the title of sections on pages and noticeboards (use something descriptive instead). Thanks. ╟─ Treasury Tag► belonger─╢ 17:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Lau nch bal ler 16:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Please read this carefully, because it is the last warning you will receive. Do not use a non-substituted template as your signature. Change it immediately – this is not a friendly choice you're being given, it's a direct instruction. Do not continue using your signature as a section-heading (if you don't understand what this means, then ask someone), as it makes pages difficult to follow and is disruptive. ╟─ Treasury Tag► prorogation─╢ 06:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Talkbubble has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. Rd232 talk 17:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
OK. You have one last chance, and then you are going to be reported to the administrators' noticeboard.
Please act on this at once. ╟─ Treasury Tag► duumvirate─╢ 17:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#836-character_sig. ╟─ Treasury Tag► constabulary─╢ 19:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
User:Launchballer/Signature, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Launchballer/Signature and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Launchballer/Signature during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 23:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I sign with {{subst:User:Launchballer/signature}}.-- Laun chba ller 06:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
<span style="background:#0FF;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#F00">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#F00">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#F00">ller</font>]]</span>
You moved it to a title that doesn't match the title listed on the article, and did so without discussing it on the talk page first. Moving an article that has been at one place for over four years is pretty controversial, and moving it to a title that doesn't match the cover is pretty controversial, so it shouldn't be done without discussion.— Kww( talk) 21:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The single cover includes the "..." and BMI shows the legal title as "Baby One More Time". The article discusses the reasons the title was changed before release.— Kww( talk) 12:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The article James Bentley (actor) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
03:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Burger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. - Mobius Clock 15:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Rollback.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Signature (Launchballer).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The article The Girls (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
13:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Launchballer/archive ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's been several years since I was last here (almost 40 months) and I feel that I am a much better editor for it. I know what I did then was completely out of order and I have no intention to do so again, and I have been working constructively on many other Wikia projects without issue (under the name Launchballer, hence why I'm requesting unblock here and not at the puppetmaster account). It's time for a fresh start.
Accept reason:
Per consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Ah. I had meant Wikia. Surely, though, both Wikimedia projects and Wikia are sister projects of Wikipedia and therefore it would have made no difference whatsoever?-- Laun chba ller 23:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at WP:AN#Launchballer unblock request. Max Semenik ( talk) 15:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spoonerism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. You changed a direct (& cited) quote. Please be more careful. Also please use the edit summaries to explain your edits. It helps everybody. Hertz1888 ( talk) 19:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Neuro-Immuno Deficiency Syndrome, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuro-Immuno Deficiency Syndrome. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. KurtRaschke ( talk) 00:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I have responded to your question in Wikipedia:Help desk#colors. Chzz ► 08:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
i wonder if you still airnser to your wikipedai user page if you do say hi back P.S its me noname-- 68.228.234.21 ( talk) 05:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sonic News Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NP
ervez
15:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
helpme|How would I be able to align a table to the right?}}
{{
helpme}}
template again.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
(←) I replied to your question on my talk page :-) Sorry it took so long to reply. Killiondude ( talk) 03:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mercedes Rose, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mariowiki.com/Mercedes_Rose. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 19:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Mercedes Rose.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly ( Parrot) 19:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
helpme|How do I change font colors?}}
Although it was probably an accident, Drew R. Smith has been contributing since he requested that if he was inactive for two months to put a retired template on his page. (also, this confuses me, it has only been 17 days since he put the semiretired template on his page!) Accidents Happen! Good Luck! Programmer13 Talk What I do 17:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Nicholas Stewart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PamD (
talk)
07:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
While I have no particular preference for what happens to that redirect, you were completely out of order using R3 as grounds for speedy deletion - that is specifically for recently created redirects, and there is no way that a redirect that is over 5 years old qualifies. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Raul seems to have gone on leave, but a lot of the article doesn't have references attached so a lot of people would oppose it YellowMonkey ( cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 01:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ok there was no closing / in the tag. Are you familiar with the albums wikiproject? they have a standard way of laying out track listings, and the useful template {{ Infobox album}}. Rich Farmbrough, 16:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC).
I have no idea whether the album is notable or not, and that is what the notability tag is for. The article does not establish the notability of the album. If it is notable, there should be some reviews in trade publications or chart history or other indication of importance in reliable sources. Thanks. -- Wolfer68 ( talk) 20:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
The article Here Come the Girls (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RadioFan (
talk)
12:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Here Come the Girls (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Come the Girls (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan ( talk) 14:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely-used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Dale 20:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Per WP:SIG#Must not be used, images must not be used in signatures. Please amend ASAP. Thanks. Rd232 talk 17:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Launchballer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GrooveDog ( oh hai.) 19:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
You are still using a template-signature after being asked not to more than a month ago. Please change it immediately; see WP:SIG if you need help doing this.
Also, please stop using your signature as the title of sections on pages and noticeboards (use something descriptive instead). Thanks. ╟─ Treasury Tag► belonger─╢ 17:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Lau nch bal ler 16:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Please read this carefully, because it is the last warning you will receive. Do not use a non-substituted template as your signature. Change it immediately – this is not a friendly choice you're being given, it's a direct instruction. Do not continue using your signature as a section-heading (if you don't understand what this means, then ask someone), as it makes pages difficult to follow and is disruptive. ╟─ Treasury Tag► prorogation─╢ 06:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Talkbubble has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for deletion page. Thank you. Rd232 talk 17:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
OK. You have one last chance, and then you are going to be reported to the administrators' noticeboard.
Please act on this at once. ╟─ Treasury Tag► duumvirate─╢ 17:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#836-character_sig. ╟─ Treasury Tag► constabulary─╢ 19:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
User:Launchballer/Signature, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Launchballer/Signature and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Launchballer/Signature during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 23:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I sign with {{subst:User:Launchballer/signature}}.-- Laun chba ller 06:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
<span style="background:#0FF;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#F00">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#F00">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#F00">ller</font>]]</span>
You moved it to a title that doesn't match the title listed on the article, and did so without discussing it on the talk page first. Moving an article that has been at one place for over four years is pretty controversial, and moving it to a title that doesn't match the cover is pretty controversial, so it shouldn't be done without discussion.— Kww( talk) 21:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The single cover includes the "..." and BMI shows the legal title as "Baby One More Time". The article discusses the reasons the title was changed before release.— Kww( talk) 12:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The article James Bentley (actor) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
03:49, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Template:Burger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. - Mobius Clock 15:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Rollback.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Signature (Launchballer).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The article The Girls (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
13:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Launchballer/archive ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's been several years since I was last here (almost 40 months) and I feel that I am a much better editor for it. I know what I did then was completely out of order and I have no intention to do so again, and I have been working constructively on many other Wikia projects without issue (under the name Launchballer, hence why I'm requesting unblock here and not at the puppetmaster account). It's time for a fresh start.
Accept reason:
Per consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Ah. I had meant Wikia. Surely, though, both Wikimedia projects and Wikia are sister projects of Wikipedia and therefore it would have made no difference whatsoever?-- Laun chba ller 23:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at WP:AN#Launchballer unblock request. Max Semenik ( talk) 15:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)