Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks:
How to edit a page,
How to write a great article,
Naming conventions,
Manual of Style. You should read our
policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 03:33, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lady Tenar,
I'm glad you are interested in the spices and herbs stuff... I made some fixes to the List of herbs and spices. I hope I didn't screw it up too much. I also made some replies to the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Herbs_and_Spices discuss page. dave 06:44, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hallo,Lady Tenar. I am from Croatia and don't speek english well (sorry). My contributions will by small, but hoping helpfull. I wrote number of articles for croatian wiki. Here are letters you dont have: ĐđŠšĆćČ莞. Thanks for welkoming! User:Boris Živ
As I haven't said it yet, welcome to Wikipedia. :) Based on your comment at the Village pump, I thought I might point out to you the Wikipedia:Translation page. Only two of us there are available for German, and both of us are not fluent. If you have any interest in the translation project (described on that page), well, we'd certainly need your help. :) Otherwise, enjoy the site. :) Jwrosenzweig 01:12, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Here is a flower for your work on Night-blooming cereus:
such a nice picture |
---|
![]() |
Thanks for your modifications to Wikipedia:WikiProject Herbs and Spices/Template. dave 17:12, Feb 18, 2004 (UTC)
Ah yes, that is indeed very confusing. I'll take off the vfd notice. What happened is that a poorer, confusing version of that page was posted at Adam Kraft. It obviously didn't belong there. I nominated Adam Kraft for deletion, someone figured out the problem and moved the page to Hans Sachs, and then the vfd posting for Adam Kraft got moved to Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Good luck following all that... moink 21:38, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You may like to know that we have a short-cut message for directing people to the sandbox. The tag {{subst:test}} yields the text:
Rmhermen 13:45, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
Took me a few months to realize it, but I appreciated the welcome and useful information on my user page. Thanks again! :)
I have to agree with the said above: Thanks for the nice welcome! - Olaf Fritz 06:39, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
That you from me, also. I added the attribution (the fact that I took the picture) to my photograph of the Mendenhall Glacier. It's nice to be greeted and then corrected in so nice a fashion. I sent you an email before I realized that this was probably the preferred method. Anyway, please let me know if you notice me doing anything stupid.
Henryhartley 13:45, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
In the future, if you end up in a situation like lolium/ryegrass, it is much preferred to use the Move tab, rather than do a cut and paste move, as it appears you did, as the Move keeps the history with the related text. Plus it's easier, and automatically creates the redirect from the old location for you :). Niteowlneils 15:41, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hi,
Hey thanks a million for your nice note when I signed up for this site. I'm having a bit of trouble with one of my entries. Its been nominated for deletion (it was a work in progress) and I have corrected the flaws, but one administrator is gunning for it and I don't understand what I can do to save it.
Hi,
I have updated this page discussion to show where I got this information. I don't see it being a problem. I am incorrect?
-- YUL89YYZ 21:25, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
I'm sure you're right. I hadn't thought about the consequences -- to be honest, I don't take a lot of interest in the copyvio procedure. I should have left the original article at the old title and created it afresh under the current title. Deb 12:41, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man ( comment| talk)
Lady Tenar-
You've helped me out in the past, I'm hoping you can now as well. In January I got involved in an ugly edit war with a over the Ohio Wesleyan University article. The user had corrupted the page with his personal POV and refused to deal with facts. The article was placed under a questionable NPOV heading and various community members helped by turning the article back to an NPOV state. I now find out the user I was in the edit war with has, using one of his sock puppet ID's started a request for comment page on my user name. My question is, what rights do I have? Can I address the charges? I should also add that the user with whom I have had some heated exchanges stalks me on Wikipedia, so there is a 50/50 chance that he will track this posting and insert his opinion. user: stude62 user talk:stude62 15:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I see you put a copyvio notice on Secondary sex characteristic without citing a source and then User:Sasquatch specified a source which is in fact a fork of Wikipedia. I have therefore removed the copyvio notice pending some actual evidence of copyright violation. May I ask what prompted you to put it there in the first place, aside from the article's suspicious well-writtenness and lack of wikification?-- Pharos 06:01, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the link. Those articles need a lot of corrections. They seem to be automatically translated! Jyril 22:31, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
I see you already warned 68.79.59.42 today. He's doing quite some damage. Many edits, and some of his vandalism is hard to spot unless you happen to know it's wrong. I put him up on Vandalism in progress. Let's keep an eye on this guy. Rl 22:09, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Dear Lady Tenar,
I noticed you created the Category:Lace, and contributed to
Crocheted lace and various other lace pages. I thought you might be interested in participating in the
Wikiproject Lace I have just created. --
Julie E. 01:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Unless I'm mistaken, you are a native German speaker (apologies if I have that wrong). Could you possibly weigh in at Talk:Jew#Jew_and_German? Or suggest whom I might better ask? Thanks in advance. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hobbits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hobbits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Duo Datz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of significance. Unsourced. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 11:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duo Datz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
scope_creep Talk 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks:
How to edit a page,
How to write a great article,
Naming conventions,
Manual of Style. You should read our
policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 03:33, 7 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lady Tenar,
I'm glad you are interested in the spices and herbs stuff... I made some fixes to the List of herbs and spices. I hope I didn't screw it up too much. I also made some replies to the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Herbs_and_Spices discuss page. dave 06:44, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hallo,Lady Tenar. I am from Croatia and don't speek english well (sorry). My contributions will by small, but hoping helpfull. I wrote number of articles for croatian wiki. Here are letters you dont have: ĐđŠšĆćČ莞. Thanks for welkoming! User:Boris Živ
As I haven't said it yet, welcome to Wikipedia. :) Based on your comment at the Village pump, I thought I might point out to you the Wikipedia:Translation page. Only two of us there are available for German, and both of us are not fluent. If you have any interest in the translation project (described on that page), well, we'd certainly need your help. :) Otherwise, enjoy the site. :) Jwrosenzweig 01:12, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Here is a flower for your work on Night-blooming cereus:
such a nice picture |
---|
![]() |
Thanks for your modifications to Wikipedia:WikiProject Herbs and Spices/Template. dave 17:12, Feb 18, 2004 (UTC)
Ah yes, that is indeed very confusing. I'll take off the vfd notice. What happened is that a poorer, confusing version of that page was posted at Adam Kraft. It obviously didn't belong there. I nominated Adam Kraft for deletion, someone figured out the problem and moved the page to Hans Sachs, and then the vfd posting for Adam Kraft got moved to Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Good luck following all that... moink 21:38, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
You may like to know that we have a short-cut message for directing people to the sandbox. The tag {{subst:test}} yields the text:
Rmhermen 13:45, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
Took me a few months to realize it, but I appreciated the welcome and useful information on my user page. Thanks again! :)
I have to agree with the said above: Thanks for the nice welcome! - Olaf Fritz 06:39, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
That you from me, also. I added the attribution (the fact that I took the picture) to my photograph of the Mendenhall Glacier. It's nice to be greeted and then corrected in so nice a fashion. I sent you an email before I realized that this was probably the preferred method. Anyway, please let me know if you notice me doing anything stupid.
Henryhartley 13:45, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
In the future, if you end up in a situation like lolium/ryegrass, it is much preferred to use the Move tab, rather than do a cut and paste move, as it appears you did, as the Move keeps the history with the related text. Plus it's easier, and automatically creates the redirect from the old location for you :). Niteowlneils 15:41, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hi,
Hey thanks a million for your nice note when I signed up for this site. I'm having a bit of trouble with one of my entries. Its been nominated for deletion (it was a work in progress) and I have corrected the flaws, but one administrator is gunning for it and I don't understand what I can do to save it.
Hi,
I have updated this page discussion to show where I got this information. I don't see it being a problem. I am incorrect?
-- YUL89YYZ 21:25, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
I'm sure you're right. I hadn't thought about the consequences -- to be honest, I don't take a lot of interest in the copyvio procedure. I should have left the original article at the old title and created it afresh under the current title. Deb 12:41, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
OR
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man ( comment| talk)
Lady Tenar-
You've helped me out in the past, I'm hoping you can now as well. In January I got involved in an ugly edit war with a over the Ohio Wesleyan University article. The user had corrupted the page with his personal POV and refused to deal with facts. The article was placed under a questionable NPOV heading and various community members helped by turning the article back to an NPOV state. I now find out the user I was in the edit war with has, using one of his sock puppet ID's started a request for comment page on my user name. My question is, what rights do I have? Can I address the charges? I should also add that the user with whom I have had some heated exchanges stalks me on Wikipedia, so there is a 50/50 chance that he will track this posting and insert his opinion. user: stude62 user talk:stude62 15:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I see you put a copyvio notice on Secondary sex characteristic without citing a source and then User:Sasquatch specified a source which is in fact a fork of Wikipedia. I have therefore removed the copyvio notice pending some actual evidence of copyright violation. May I ask what prompted you to put it there in the first place, aside from the article's suspicious well-writtenness and lack of wikification?-- Pharos 06:01, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the link. Those articles need a lot of corrections. They seem to be automatically translated! Jyril 22:31, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
I see you already warned 68.79.59.42 today. He's doing quite some damage. Many edits, and some of his vandalism is hard to spot unless you happen to know it's wrong. I put him up on Vandalism in progress. Let's keep an eye on this guy. Rl 22:09, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Dear Lady Tenar,
I noticed you created the Category:Lace, and contributed to
Crocheted lace and various other lace pages. I thought you might be interested in participating in the
Wikiproject Lace I have just created. --
Julie E. 01:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Unless I'm mistaken, you are a native German speaker (apologies if I have that wrong). Could you possibly weigh in at Talk:Jew#Jew_and_German? Or suggest whom I might better ask? Thanks in advance. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hobbits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hobbits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 20:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Duo Datz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of significance. Unsourced. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
scope_creep
Talk 11:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duo Datz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
scope_creep Talk 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)