![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
Apostrophe, it is recommended that you use the
preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Thank you. —
Coroboy (
talk)
02:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NNU-10-HanRongrong/Classification of touristic sites (China), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk)
23:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NNU-10-HanRongrong/Classification of touristic sites (China), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk)
06:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In United Nations laissez-passer, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Laissez-passer ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion? [1] Ron 1987 ( talk) 22:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Template:Same-sex unions shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you join to discussion? Ron 1987 ( talk) 20:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
L.tak come join the discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Same-sex_marriage_in_Alagoas . The ruling document has been posted there, and now it seems the other people are getting over the language problem. Thanks for the help. Denisxavier ( talk) 22:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, it looks like they're all done (ages ago). If you're still up for it, could you please fly through the articles and fill in the ticks? Many thanks. (If you can't for some reason, please let me know, and I will look after it.) Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 08:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:First stamp of Curaçao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please consider adding your name at: Wikipedia:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012
Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 06:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
If you've got the time, can you produce an updated SVG version of this image with Inkscape? — C M B J 13:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi folks. The students are going to become active soon. We could use some input in these areas:
Many thanks. (For those up to speed, pls consider this post just a CC) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 16:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012#Topic list - duplicate checking's talk page. 13:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
If you are going to add some ticks, now's the time, so the others will know what needs doing. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 03:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I must admit I am awed by your courtesy, honesty and moral judgement in regarding the machinations of men.What more can one said, for all the time in the world? Life is short, but the years are long! ( talk) 22:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Next time you send DMCA notices to Google try not to misrepresent yourself as an official member of the Wikimedia Foundation, please. There are better ways to bring someone into license compliance. Such as trying to work with them first. In the future, please post any suspected copyright or licensing issues to WP:CP before attempting any resolutions yourself. 173.78.231.69 ( talk) 05:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I recently reverted your revert of my edit of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement from January. The positions and procedures of adoptions is indeed a valid point of negotiations. Int21h ( talk) 20:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012#Main points from April 6 IRC meeting's talk page. 04:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing back Tourist Attraction Rating Categories of China. It was a shame when that article got deleted last semester, because it's useful information for many a foreign tourist. Njnu-ban-xueshenghao ( talk) 13:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
16:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njnu-ban-xueshenghao ( talk • contribs)
Hello! Thanks for your edit. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wang_Zigan&diff=487142041&oldid=487140001 But I think my writting is correct. Both Feburary and February are correct. And can you tell me where did you find the information about the book? I'm just trying to make sure if 方阳 is one of the authors. Thanks! :) -- NNUR06LizaZhang21081235 ( talk) 16:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
oh... you are right, feburary sounds strange.... What language do you speak then? (or where are you from?) I thought your are all Chinese... How did you become the HELPER? ;) -- NNUR06LizaZhang21081235 ( talk) 17:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Could you please join the discussion on the article talk page? Please note that maintenance templates should not be removed until the dispute has been settled, hence {{ uw-tdel1}}, {{ uw-tdel2}}, {{ uw-tdel3}}, {{ uw-tdel4}}. -- Ronz ( talk) 04:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I see you started it. Just wondering if it's xlation class or not. It has a zh articles. Anyhow, it exists in the main list at article management. Keep up the good work. You are awesome. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Frodesiak ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your instructions and patience! We've noticed that our article was approved to go to DYK, which is really inspiring. Our team members are all quite exited about this, even though we may have done not that well in Josh's midterm... and my German... Anyhow, thank you very much! ≧▽≦
--
NNUTransAliceFan03090230 (
talk)
14:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 17 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tomb of the King of Boni, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that China had such appeal during the Ming Dynasty that even a king from Borneo insisted to have his tomb there? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tomb of the King of Boni. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Bushranger One ping only 08:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for giving us feedback and suggestions about the Yang Huanyi article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/NNU_Class_Project/Winter_2012/Drafts/Yang_Huanyi
Here is my confusion and don't know.
1.I don't know how to format the references.
2."proficient" can be adjective.
3."millet" is a kind of crop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NNUCSL10VeraLiu24110114 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for all the suggestions.
1. I have removed unnecessary links for Nüshu, and actually I think it unnecessary to link every Nüshu too.
2."Enter 20 centuries 90 time, Yang was the only descendent of Nüshu." This sentence means when it came to the 1990s, after other proficient users of Nüshu passed away, Yang was the only descendent of Nüshu. Maybe there is something wrong with the way I represent it.
3."in the references, please provide a translation for the chinese titles..." You mean the translation of the thtles of the passage? I provide the translation at the reference colomn? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NNUCSL10VeraLiu24110114 ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Good luck! L.tak ( talk) 09:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Where'd the content go to? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 10:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
For your dedication to helping students in the NNU project, I award you this Guidance Barnstar. Thank you for expending so much time and effort and doing such a stellar job. wctaiwan ( talk) 06:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the time to fix the problems identified in Zanzibar women's national football team. These were not intentionally and normally, I am better at having source matching. (Though fluidity of my prose is a problem.) Hopefully, these fixes will help it get past WP:GAN at some point as I really like seeing women's topics in places like Africa improved. -- LauraHale ( talk) 23:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
understanding |
Thank you for handling difficult topics factually and with discretion, for listening in discussion and acting on questions, and for making foreign words understood with a feeling for nuances, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks!; hopefully the next discussion will be regarding a lighter topic ;-)... L.tak ( talk) 18:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the message. I have read up about the policies surrounding edit warring, 3RR, etc. My conclusion is that your actions are inappropriate. While I did edit war in the past, lately I have not violated any 3RR policies or even 1RR. On the other hand, your revert without any discussion on the talk page is not only hypocritical based on what you told me, but also edit warring yourself. I have at least engaged in discussion on the talk page. You have not. You simply reverted without any justification. Undoing edit warring is not proper justification for reverting. It takes 2 parties to edit war, and by reverting you are joining the 2nd party and assuming that their edit is correct. You have the right to that opinion, but not the right to revert without providing any justification. Palestine is by no means a sovereign nation. It does not control its land or have internationally recognized borders. Their symbolic declaration of independence in 1988 did not have any effect on the world map. Palestine does not appear on world maps today for that reason. What does often appear on world maps are the West Bank and Gaza, which is why I have made sure these territories appear in the article in the appropriate dates. As you mentioned in your message, consensus should be built on the talk page among multiple editors. I made an attempt to discuss and compromise on the talk page, and the other editors did not join so consensus is impossible. I have my justification, pointed out the reasons why Palestine is not sovereign and did not represent a world map change, and noted that I welcome other editors to provide a source if they want to include the disputed content. No other editors have done any of this. As such, the content is incorrect and unsourced, and you have reinserted it into the article. I invite you to self-revert or provide the needed references to back up your apparent position that Palestine is a sovereign nation that constitutes a world map change. 99.237.236.218 ( talk) 18:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Could you give your opinion to edit by Eraserhead1? See [2] Ron 1987 ( talk) 01:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Jetstreamer Talk 21:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There are still some articles at Wikipedia:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012/Student list that need moving to the mainspace. Some have rubbish references and could be AfDd, so best not move those. But many just need a bit of cleanup and a move. If you have time to do a few, we would be much obliged. Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 12:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for sharing your opinion on talk page of Schengen Area. Please do not involve in vandalism on the Schengen Area map and try to find a consensus to implement new changes. Clearly we don't see any reason why we should implement Ro and Bg to the main map. Be careful not to edit articles without consensus. Thank you.-- Camoka4 ( talk) 21:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The PRC Barnstar | |
For your very helpful participation in the Winter 2012 Nanjing Normal University Class Project, I hereby present to you this lovely Barnstar. Your centralized help page assistance was great, and so were your other edits. On behalf of all of the students and Josh the instructor, thank you very, very much. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 07:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to L.tak by Anna Frodesiak ( talk) on 07:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks! it was a pleasure to participate! L.tak ( talk) 08:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all the good work on the EU patent article. I have just posted a question on the talk page. -- Edcolins ( talk) 10:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edit to Glossary of patent legal concepts. I have a minor concern, see the edit summary of this edit... -- Edcolins ( talk) 20:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
Apostrophe, it is recommended that you use the
preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Thank you. —
Coroboy (
talk)
02:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NNU-10-HanRongrong/Classification of touristic sites (China), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk)
23:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on NNU-10-HanRongrong/Classification of touristic sites (China), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk)
06:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In United Nations laissez-passer, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Laissez-passer ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion? [1] Ron 1987 ( talk) 22:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Template:Same-sex unions shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you join to discussion? Ron 1987 ( talk) 20:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
L.tak come join the discussion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Same-sex_marriage_in_Alagoas . The ruling document has been posted there, and now it seems the other people are getting over the language problem. Thanks for the help. Denisxavier ( talk) 22:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, it looks like they're all done (ages ago). If you're still up for it, could you please fly through the articles and fill in the ticks? Many thanks. (If you can't for some reason, please let me know, and I will look after it.) Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 08:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:First stamp of Curaçao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please consider adding your name at: Wikipedia:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012
Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 06:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
If you've got the time, can you produce an updated SVG version of this image with Inkscape? — C M B J 13:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi folks. The students are going to become active soon. We could use some input in these areas:
Many thanks. (For those up to speed, pls consider this post just a CC) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 16:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012#Topic list - duplicate checking's talk page. 13:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
If you are going to add some ticks, now's the time, so the others will know what needs doing. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 03:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I must admit I am awed by your courtesy, honesty and moral judgement in regarding the machinations of men.What more can one said, for all the time in the world? Life is short, but the years are long! ( talk) 22:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Next time you send DMCA notices to Google try not to misrepresent yourself as an official member of the Wikimedia Foundation, please. There are better ways to bring someone into license compliance. Such as trying to work with them first. In the future, please post any suspected copyright or licensing issues to WP:CP before attempting any resolutions yourself. 173.78.231.69 ( talk) 05:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I recently reverted your revert of my edit of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement from January. The positions and procedures of adoptions is indeed a valid point of negotiations. Int21h ( talk) 20:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012#Main points from April 6 IRC meeting's talk page. 04:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing back Tourist Attraction Rating Categories of China. It was a shame when that article got deleted last semester, because it's useful information for many a foreign tourist. Njnu-ban-xueshenghao ( talk) 13:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
16:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njnu-ban-xueshenghao ( talk • contribs)
Hello! Thanks for your edit. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wang_Zigan&diff=487142041&oldid=487140001 But I think my writting is correct. Both Feburary and February are correct. And can you tell me where did you find the information about the book? I'm just trying to make sure if 方阳 is one of the authors. Thanks! :) -- NNUR06LizaZhang21081235 ( talk) 16:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
oh... you are right, feburary sounds strange.... What language do you speak then? (or where are you from?) I thought your are all Chinese... How did you become the HELPER? ;) -- NNUR06LizaZhang21081235 ( talk) 17:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Could you please join the discussion on the article talk page? Please note that maintenance templates should not be removed until the dispute has been settled, hence {{ uw-tdel1}}, {{ uw-tdel2}}, {{ uw-tdel3}}, {{ uw-tdel4}}. -- Ronz ( talk) 04:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I see you started it. Just wondering if it's xlation class or not. It has a zh articles. Anyhow, it exists in the main list at article management. Keep up the good work. You are awesome. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Frodesiak ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your instructions and patience! We've noticed that our article was approved to go to DYK, which is really inspiring. Our team members are all quite exited about this, even though we may have done not that well in Josh's midterm... and my German... Anyhow, thank you very much! ≧▽≦
--
NNUTransAliceFan03090230 (
talk)
14:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 17 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tomb of the King of Boni, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that China had such appeal during the Ming Dynasty that even a king from Borneo insisted to have his tomb there? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tomb of the King of Boni. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Bushranger One ping only 08:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for giving us feedback and suggestions about the Yang Huanyi article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/NNU_Class_Project/Winter_2012/Drafts/Yang_Huanyi
Here is my confusion and don't know.
1.I don't know how to format the references.
2."proficient" can be adjective.
3."millet" is a kind of crop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NNUCSL10VeraLiu24110114 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for all the suggestions.
1. I have removed unnecessary links for Nüshu, and actually I think it unnecessary to link every Nüshu too.
2."Enter 20 centuries 90 time, Yang was the only descendent of Nüshu." This sentence means when it came to the 1990s, after other proficient users of Nüshu passed away, Yang was the only descendent of Nüshu. Maybe there is something wrong with the way I represent it.
3."in the references, please provide a translation for the chinese titles..." You mean the translation of the thtles of the passage? I provide the translation at the reference colomn? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NNUCSL10VeraLiu24110114 ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Good luck! L.tak ( talk) 09:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Where'd the content go to? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 10:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Guidance Barnstar | |
For your dedication to helping students in the NNU project, I award you this Guidance Barnstar. Thank you for expending so much time and effort and doing such a stellar job. wctaiwan ( talk) 06:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the time to fix the problems identified in Zanzibar women's national football team. These were not intentionally and normally, I am better at having source matching. (Though fluidity of my prose is a problem.) Hopefully, these fixes will help it get past WP:GAN at some point as I really like seeing women's topics in places like Africa improved. -- LauraHale ( talk) 23:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
understanding |
Thank you for handling difficult topics factually and with discretion, for listening in discussion and acting on questions, and for making foreign words understood with a feeling for nuances, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks!; hopefully the next discussion will be regarding a lighter topic ;-)... L.tak ( talk) 18:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the message. I have read up about the policies surrounding edit warring, 3RR, etc. My conclusion is that your actions are inappropriate. While I did edit war in the past, lately I have not violated any 3RR policies or even 1RR. On the other hand, your revert without any discussion on the talk page is not only hypocritical based on what you told me, but also edit warring yourself. I have at least engaged in discussion on the talk page. You have not. You simply reverted without any justification. Undoing edit warring is not proper justification for reverting. It takes 2 parties to edit war, and by reverting you are joining the 2nd party and assuming that their edit is correct. You have the right to that opinion, but not the right to revert without providing any justification. Palestine is by no means a sovereign nation. It does not control its land or have internationally recognized borders. Their symbolic declaration of independence in 1988 did not have any effect on the world map. Palestine does not appear on world maps today for that reason. What does often appear on world maps are the West Bank and Gaza, which is why I have made sure these territories appear in the article in the appropriate dates. As you mentioned in your message, consensus should be built on the talk page among multiple editors. I made an attempt to discuss and compromise on the talk page, and the other editors did not join so consensus is impossible. I have my justification, pointed out the reasons why Palestine is not sovereign and did not represent a world map change, and noted that I welcome other editors to provide a source if they want to include the disputed content. No other editors have done any of this. As such, the content is incorrect and unsourced, and you have reinserted it into the article. I invite you to self-revert or provide the needed references to back up your apparent position that Palestine is a sovereign nation that constitutes a world map change. 99.237.236.218 ( talk) 18:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Could you give your opinion to edit by Eraserhead1? See [2] Ron 1987 ( talk) 01:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Jetstreamer Talk 21:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There are still some articles at Wikipedia:School and university projects/NNU Class Project/Winter 2012/Student list that need moving to the mainspace. Some have rubbish references and could be AfDd, so best not move those. But many just need a bit of cleanup and a move. If you have time to do a few, we would be much obliged. Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 12:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for sharing your opinion on talk page of Schengen Area. Please do not involve in vandalism on the Schengen Area map and try to find a consensus to implement new changes. Clearly we don't see any reason why we should implement Ro and Bg to the main map. Be careful not to edit articles without consensus. Thank you.-- Camoka4 ( talk) 21:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The PRC Barnstar | |
For your very helpful participation in the Winter 2012 Nanjing Normal University Class Project, I hereby present to you this lovely Barnstar. Your centralized help page assistance was great, and so were your other edits. On behalf of all of the students and Josh the instructor, thank you very, very much. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 07:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to L.tak by Anna Frodesiak ( talk) on 07:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks! it was a pleasure to participate! L.tak ( talk) 08:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all the good work on the EU patent article. I have just posted a question on the talk page. -- Edcolins ( talk) 10:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edit to Glossary of patent legal concepts. I have a minor concern, see the edit summary of this edit... -- Edcolins ( talk) 20:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)