![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Can you take a look at my Michael Wieck effort? Sca 23:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting my user subpage.
-- Meno25 09:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Kusma. Thank you for the kind support and the flattering adminship offer. The only reason why I'm slightly hesitant about adminship is that I feel I'm already spending way too much time editing Wikipedia as it is. But that's not a serious ojection now is it? :-) So if you're interested in nominating me at RFA, please go ahead. There's no rush of course. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 16:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. As you probably noticed, my RfA was unsuccessful. I was sort of bitter at first when I got oppose votes that I felt unfairly represented my work (and came from a clear clique of editors) but I've gotten over it. I'm confident that I've been doing very decent work around here without the admin tools and I don't see why I can't continue. In any case, thanks so much for your support. I hope to have other chances down the road of cooperating with you on this crazy project. Best, Pascal.Tesson 02:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, we were trying to add a page about our band and you deleted it numerous times. Please explain to me, how can brazilian band, Trinnity, which is much smaller than us, and not as well known as the project of Kaiaphas from Ancient who had worldwide releases since 1992 until present time and several videos on MTV, be accepted to wikipedia and we can't? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Todesfee ( talk • contribs) 23:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC).
Thank you for the reply. I will change the article and show it to you when i am done with it. Todesfee 01:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Now that User:Fmnb has been blocked indefinitely, is there any way to restore the Andersen Corporation article which has been speedy deleted by him? That article is linked to the This Old House article as the TV show This Old House is partially underwrited by Andersen. Steelbeard1 15:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I disagree that it's a duplicate, as ISO is different from iso. But whatever, good enough. At least people won't search for the two most common uses of the term (film speed and CD format) and not be able to figure out what's going on. 75.203.163.23 13:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I just remembered and was heading back... ;) -- BozMo talk 16:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
you deleted this page. What does it need in order to be kept.-- SteelersFan UK06 17:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Only Bureaucrats can close the Rfa to prevent outcome prejudice. Please stop vandalising Wikipedia:Requests for adminship & Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Foundby. -- Foundby 17:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Gandoman has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:smile}}, {{
subst:smile2}} or {{
subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for your welcome! I cleaned up the above page which was on the list of articles needing cleanup: if you have a moment, please review it and let me know if the result's acceptable. I corrected syntax and misspellings, and added some info on the ADN's role as the manager of state censorship which I happened to know about. (I studied in East Berlin and had a long conversation with a reported for an Ost-CDU newspaper who had experienced this first-hand.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Langohio ( talk • contribs) 21:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
that you entered this suggestion under 10 January *...that German poet and playwright Klabund was charged with treason for writing an open letter calling for the abdication of William II? - article translated from dewiki by Jieagles, nom by Kusma (討論) 08:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Risk Godstorm (additional rules) has been proposed for deletion and no one has worked on it since. It is ready for deletion. b_cubed 18:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the swift reversion of vandalism to my talk page, and the blocking of the offending user. Pedro1999a | Talk 14:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Could you please advise on when this article can be renominated for deletion. In my opinion, whoever placed it on the main page made a gross error of judgement in the first place, as the article is a news article, not an encyclopedia article. Perhaps the relevant bolded link could go directly to the article on David Beckham? Robotforaday 14:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The result was "merge" not "speedy keep", or am I missing something?-- CuentaDisponible 18:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Is there some sort of procedure for perhaps a Delayed Deletion or Delayed Merge, like voting on it now and then taking the consensus action once the page is off the main page? -- Targetter (Lock On) 03:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I have placed a comment on this administrator's talk page called "My userpage" at the bottom and was wondering if maybe you could help me answer it. Right now, I don't see any reason why I shouldn't do this... ( Me | The Article) 03:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not take it upon yourself to speedily delete articles, as you did to Matt Groth. Consult the Wikipedia community on a discussion page before deleting future articles. Thank you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamminman ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
There should be no redirecting as that was merely a typo of mine. It is a name, it is not a word with different spellings. Zigzig20s 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Rory096 20:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I just re-did Portal:China, applying the skeleton of Main Page on it. How do you think it looks? AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 23:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again Kusma, for your help at DYK and your support on my Arbcom election. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
How do you open them in background tabs? And I still don't understand the Contributions idea. Sorry for being dense. -- Dweller 15:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
You deleted my article on Kidblount. While I can see that some people would find an article on a webpage boring, seeing as their are articles on YTMND.com, goatse, askaninja, the N64kid and the limitless others, I don't quite how kidblount was not asserting notability, while all these others were. Moreover, how does one assert notability about a webpage that was deleted some time ago? Bilz0r 22:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you know the current consunses of them? I know that at some point they were considered useless, I'd just like to know if that's changed recently and don't want to read through every related discussion in case you'd know right away. The reason is that there's a user whose only contributions consist of hundreds of machine-translated articles (some with questionable copyright status), and I'd hate to delete them if someone thinks they could be useful (mostly because it's a lot of work). - Bobet 16:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I will leave detailed assessment comments on the articles you've mentioned at the respective article's comment page later tonight. -- doco (☏) 11:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kusma. How do I request a for a category to be created? WP:RFC is definitely not what I'm lookin' for here. The one I want to have is Category:Wikipedians who like the Dr. Slump series - Dr. Slump was a famous manga (which later became an anime series also) Where can I post such a request? Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
This is to thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 17:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, this "/Comments" page has nothing to do with the WP:1.0 assessment system. The page was created by a new user and was not going to be seen by anyone. I've moved the content to the talk pages and was just hoping someone might clean up. -- Steve (Slf67) talk 09:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I've posted on a couple of places about this as i'm not sure who exactly to contact. Or whether this is a bot thing, or a person thing.
Basically the discussion page for the article shows a brief justification for inclusion. Additional claims to notoriety include a number of reviews and interviews in the following websites and publications -BBC Radio Ulster Across the Line (3 live reviews) -Culture Northern Ireland (CD review and interview)
The band were also featured in a documentary on the Franco-German TV station "Arté" in 2004. Link [4] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.76.203.84 ( talk) 11:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC).
Hi ironically, I deliberately omitted this info from the article to attempt to keep it factual, rather than appear as a promotional tool. I will edit and update the article for the meantime I will revert to the previous version. Thanks for your consideration. Anthony
The article is essentially a synopsis of the documentary which was broadcast. The band's mentioned were all included in the documentary. As a further example this link [5] shows the band reaching the final of a Nationwide Irish Language band competition in Ireland. Do you think the inclusion of all this additional information would protect the article from further tagging?
OK cheers! I'll compile a list of supporting material and get it together onto the article as soon as I can. :-)
>Radiant< 14:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
From my talk page. I was wondering if I there is a shortcut to revert to the previous version without have to copy and paste the contents. Cpbaherwani 14:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
If you're wondering about my anonymous edits, see my userpage for details. As for the tagging of sockpuppets, well, I felt that if an account was a sockpuppet, I should tag it. WP:DENY seems to have been a rejected proposal anyway.
I hope I can do better for my next RFA.... this one's probably going to fail anyway! -- SunStar Net talk 19:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 22:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For going out of the way to help in a particularly pesky unblocking request with perfect manners and kindness. TheGreenFaerae 08:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
I DON'T LIKE HOW YOU DELETED MY PAGE. I'M AM ANGRY AND FRUSTRATED. THIS IS NOT OVER.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ultra2207 ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Your support vote for Bishzilla's RFA was the best! Bishonen | talk 05:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
I too have never had the mumps. I haven't had measles either. Viridae Talk 10:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Please read the my entry into the talk page of the article. I'm totally disgusted by the analogy made between the Bundespräsident and the Reichspräsident! Greetings-- Gabriel-Royce 16:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, man zwei deutsche Muttersprachler fangen eine Dikussion in Englisch an! Weil ich es gerade ein bischen eilig hab, mal kurz in Deutsch: Es ist einfach nicht das gleiche Bundespräsident und Reichspräsident, schau doch dazu mal die zwei Artikel im deutschen Wiki an. Schon das Wahlverfahren ist unterschiedlich.-- Gabriel-Royce 16:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Ja, gute Sache! Bin beim lesen, des Artikels, förmlich explodiert nach wahrnehmung der Aussage: Bundespräsident, früher (formerly) Reichspräsident. Ich finde diese Gleichsetzung abstossend, nach dem das Amt des Reichspräsidenten so pervertiert wurde. Also habe ich mal versucht, mit einem Umbau des Textes, diesen so zu formulieren, daß klar wird das es sich um unterschiedliche Ämter handelt. Schau es dir mal an und Teil mir deine Meinung mit. Außerdem scheint die Struktur des Artikels wirklich nicht gut zu sein. Nach dem 12.02. schau ich mir das noch mal genauer an, aber bis dahin sollte ich wohl besser für meine Fachprüfungen lernen.(Seufz) Sollte sich da was tun, schreibt mir das einfach auf meine Diskussionseite, da gucke ich regelmäßig rein. Bis dahin werd ich mal besser nichts großes beginnen. Gruß-- Gabriel-Royce 23:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
The 1.0 project generally leaves the exact interpetation of the scale to the individual WikiProjects doing the assessment, so creating more specific criteria (within reason) isn't a problem; I don't see any issues with WP:GER adopting (in whole or in part) the criteria we've come up with.
(If you do decide to use the numbered criteria system, there's some possibly useful code in {{ WPMILHIST}} that produces a checklist of them on the talk page; you might want to take a look at that to see if there's anything you want to copy over to your banner as well.) Kirill Lokshin 16:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
On second thought, I'm not sure if I should do 1000+ edits like that with my own account, so I filed at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Sdebot, and will wait to hear before I do any more. When I add more, I'll copy the class from that template. - Steve Sanbeg 17:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, its Power Level. These's something I always wanted to know... How do I download or utilise those three things to stop vandals? What do each of those three things do exactly anyway? Can you teach me how to get access to that stuff? I really want them cause I think they're cool and they stop vandals. Please answer back to me when ya can. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 03:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kusma,
If you think I'd pass an RfA, I would definately like you nominating me. I haven't, however, been involved in writing an FA or GA and my large edit count is the result of my stub sorting and AWB editing. But if you think I'd make it anyway, please do nominate me. Thanks-- Carabinieri 13:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Can you take a look at my Michael Wieck effort? Sca 23:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting my user subpage.
-- Meno25 09:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Kusma. Thank you for the kind support and the flattering adminship offer. The only reason why I'm slightly hesitant about adminship is that I feel I'm already spending way too much time editing Wikipedia as it is. But that's not a serious ojection now is it? :-) So if you're interested in nominating me at RFA, please go ahead. There's no rush of course. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 16:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. As you probably noticed, my RfA was unsuccessful. I was sort of bitter at first when I got oppose votes that I felt unfairly represented my work (and came from a clear clique of editors) but I've gotten over it. I'm confident that I've been doing very decent work around here without the admin tools and I don't see why I can't continue. In any case, thanks so much for your support. I hope to have other chances down the road of cooperating with you on this crazy project. Best, Pascal.Tesson 02:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, we were trying to add a page about our band and you deleted it numerous times. Please explain to me, how can brazilian band, Trinnity, which is much smaller than us, and not as well known as the project of Kaiaphas from Ancient who had worldwide releases since 1992 until present time and several videos on MTV, be accepted to wikipedia and we can't? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Todesfee ( talk • contribs) 23:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC).
Thank you for the reply. I will change the article and show it to you when i am done with it. Todesfee 01:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Now that User:Fmnb has been blocked indefinitely, is there any way to restore the Andersen Corporation article which has been speedy deleted by him? That article is linked to the This Old House article as the TV show This Old House is partially underwrited by Andersen. Steelbeard1 15:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I disagree that it's a duplicate, as ISO is different from iso. But whatever, good enough. At least people won't search for the two most common uses of the term (film speed and CD format) and not be able to figure out what's going on. 75.203.163.23 13:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I just remembered and was heading back... ;) -- BozMo talk 16:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 2 | 8 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
you deleted this page. What does it need in order to be kept.-- SteelersFan UK06 17:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Only Bureaucrats can close the Rfa to prevent outcome prejudice. Please stop vandalising Wikipedia:Requests for adminship & Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Foundby. -- Foundby 17:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Gandoman has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:smile}}, {{
subst:smile2}} or {{
subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for your welcome! I cleaned up the above page which was on the list of articles needing cleanup: if you have a moment, please review it and let me know if the result's acceptable. I corrected syntax and misspellings, and added some info on the ADN's role as the manager of state censorship which I happened to know about. (I studied in East Berlin and had a long conversation with a reported for an Ost-CDU newspaper who had experienced this first-hand.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Langohio ( talk • contribs) 21:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
that you entered this suggestion under 10 January *...that German poet and playwright Klabund was charged with treason for writing an open letter calling for the abdication of William II? - article translated from dewiki by Jieagles, nom by Kusma (討論) 08:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Risk Godstorm (additional rules) has been proposed for deletion and no one has worked on it since. It is ready for deletion. b_cubed 18:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the swift reversion of vandalism to my talk page, and the blocking of the offending user. Pedro1999a | Talk 14:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Could you please advise on when this article can be renominated for deletion. In my opinion, whoever placed it on the main page made a gross error of judgement in the first place, as the article is a news article, not an encyclopedia article. Perhaps the relevant bolded link could go directly to the article on David Beckham? Robotforaday 14:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The result was "merge" not "speedy keep", or am I missing something?-- CuentaDisponible 18:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Is there some sort of procedure for perhaps a Delayed Deletion or Delayed Merge, like voting on it now and then taking the consensus action once the page is off the main page? -- Targetter (Lock On) 03:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I have placed a comment on this administrator's talk page called "My userpage" at the bottom and was wondering if maybe you could help me answer it. Right now, I don't see any reason why I shouldn't do this... ( Me | The Article) 03:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not take it upon yourself to speedily delete articles, as you did to Matt Groth. Consult the Wikipedia community on a discussion page before deleting future articles. Thank you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamminman ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
There should be no redirecting as that was merely a typo of mine. It is a name, it is not a word with different spellings. Zigzig20s 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of David Beckham move to Los Angeles Galaxy. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Rory096 20:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I just re-did Portal:China, applying the skeleton of Main Page on it. How do you think it looks? AQu01rius ( User • Talk) 23:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again Kusma, for your help at DYK and your support on my Arbcom election. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 01:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
How do you open them in background tabs? And I still don't understand the Contributions idea. Sorry for being dense. -- Dweller 15:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
You deleted my article on Kidblount. While I can see that some people would find an article on a webpage boring, seeing as their are articles on YTMND.com, goatse, askaninja, the N64kid and the limitless others, I don't quite how kidblount was not asserting notability, while all these others were. Moreover, how does one assert notability about a webpage that was deleted some time ago? Bilz0r 22:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you know the current consunses of them? I know that at some point they were considered useless, I'd just like to know if that's changed recently and don't want to read through every related discussion in case you'd know right away. The reason is that there's a user whose only contributions consist of hundreds of machine-translated articles (some with questionable copyright status), and I'd hate to delete them if someone thinks they could be useful (mostly because it's a lot of work). - Bobet 16:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I will leave detailed assessment comments on the articles you've mentioned at the respective article's comment page later tonight. -- doco (☏) 11:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kusma. How do I request a for a category to be created? WP:RFC is definitely not what I'm lookin' for here. The one I want to have is Category:Wikipedians who like the Dr. Slump series - Dr. Slump was a famous manga (which later became an anime series also) Where can I post such a request? Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
This is to thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 17:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, this "/Comments" page has nothing to do with the WP:1.0 assessment system. The page was created by a new user and was not going to be seen by anyone. I've moved the content to the talk pages and was just hoping someone might clean up. -- Steve (Slf67) talk 09:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I've posted on a couple of places about this as i'm not sure who exactly to contact. Or whether this is a bot thing, or a person thing.
Basically the discussion page for the article shows a brief justification for inclusion. Additional claims to notoriety include a number of reviews and interviews in the following websites and publications -BBC Radio Ulster Across the Line (3 live reviews) -Culture Northern Ireland (CD review and interview)
The band were also featured in a documentary on the Franco-German TV station "Arté" in 2004. Link [4] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.76.203.84 ( talk) 11:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC).
Hi ironically, I deliberately omitted this info from the article to attempt to keep it factual, rather than appear as a promotional tool. I will edit and update the article for the meantime I will revert to the previous version. Thanks for your consideration. Anthony
The article is essentially a synopsis of the documentary which was broadcast. The band's mentioned were all included in the documentary. As a further example this link [5] shows the band reaching the final of a Nationwide Irish Language band competition in Ireland. Do you think the inclusion of all this additional information would protect the article from further tagging?
OK cheers! I'll compile a list of supporting material and get it together onto the article as soon as I can. :-)
>Radiant< 14:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
From my talk page. I was wondering if I there is a shortcut to revert to the previous version without have to copy and paste the contents. Cpbaherwani 14:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
If you're wondering about my anonymous edits, see my userpage for details. As for the tagging of sockpuppets, well, I felt that if an account was a sockpuppet, I should tag it. WP:DENY seems to have been a rejected proposal anyway.
I hope I can do better for my next RFA.... this one's probably going to fail anyway! -- SunStar Net talk 19:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 22:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For going out of the way to help in a particularly pesky unblocking request with perfect manners and kindness. TheGreenFaerae 08:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
I DON'T LIKE HOW YOU DELETED MY PAGE. I'M AM ANGRY AND FRUSTRATED. THIS IS NOT OVER.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ultra2207 ( talk • contribs) 09:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Your support vote for Bishzilla's RFA was the best! Bishonen | talk 05:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
I too have never had the mumps. I haven't had measles either. Viridae Talk 10:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Please read the my entry into the talk page of the article. I'm totally disgusted by the analogy made between the Bundespräsident and the Reichspräsident! Greetings-- Gabriel-Royce 16:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, man zwei deutsche Muttersprachler fangen eine Dikussion in Englisch an! Weil ich es gerade ein bischen eilig hab, mal kurz in Deutsch: Es ist einfach nicht das gleiche Bundespräsident und Reichspräsident, schau doch dazu mal die zwei Artikel im deutschen Wiki an. Schon das Wahlverfahren ist unterschiedlich.-- Gabriel-Royce 16:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Ja, gute Sache! Bin beim lesen, des Artikels, förmlich explodiert nach wahrnehmung der Aussage: Bundespräsident, früher (formerly) Reichspräsident. Ich finde diese Gleichsetzung abstossend, nach dem das Amt des Reichspräsidenten so pervertiert wurde. Also habe ich mal versucht, mit einem Umbau des Textes, diesen so zu formulieren, daß klar wird das es sich um unterschiedliche Ämter handelt. Schau es dir mal an und Teil mir deine Meinung mit. Außerdem scheint die Struktur des Artikels wirklich nicht gut zu sein. Nach dem 12.02. schau ich mir das noch mal genauer an, aber bis dahin sollte ich wohl besser für meine Fachprüfungen lernen.(Seufz) Sollte sich da was tun, schreibt mir das einfach auf meine Diskussionseite, da gucke ich regelmäßig rein. Bis dahin werd ich mal besser nichts großes beginnen. Gruß-- Gabriel-Royce 23:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
The 1.0 project generally leaves the exact interpetation of the scale to the individual WikiProjects doing the assessment, so creating more specific criteria (within reason) isn't a problem; I don't see any issues with WP:GER adopting (in whole or in part) the criteria we've come up with.
(If you do decide to use the numbered criteria system, there's some possibly useful code in {{ WPMILHIST}} that produces a checklist of them on the talk page; you might want to take a look at that to see if there's anything you want to copy over to your banner as well.) Kirill Lokshin 16:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
On second thought, I'm not sure if I should do 1000+ edits like that with my own account, so I filed at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Sdebot, and will wait to hear before I do any more. When I add more, I'll copy the class from that template. - Steve Sanbeg 17:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, its Power Level. These's something I always wanted to know... How do I download or utilise those three things to stop vandals? What do each of those three things do exactly anyway? Can you teach me how to get access to that stuff? I really want them cause I think they're cool and they stop vandals. Please answer back to me when ya can. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 03:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Kusma,
If you think I'd pass an RfA, I would definately like you nominating me. I haven't, however, been involved in writing an FA or GA and my large edit count is the result of my stub sorting and AWB editing. But if you think I'd make it anyway, please do nominate me. Thanks-- Carabinieri 13:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)