Dear Bro,
How are you doing today, well I just request for File Mover right would you be kind enough to have a look on it and grant me the permission, that would be helpful for me in some of my created pages and serve our beloved wiki more better. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 10:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Arctic Kangaroo 04:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
G'day Kudpung. TParis has you listed as an editor from whom he will accept a nudge that he might not be acting as an admin in the right way. I have been involved with him in a conflict for the past couple of weeks that he is prosecuting way too personally. The latest incident is particularly disappointing as it was essentially an attempt by him to restart the conflict after it had fallen into a lull ( diff), and an attempt by two other editors on either side of the divide to approach a resolution (see Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Epeefleche#Discussion_redirect until TParis' attempt to close down the discussion, which was shortly followed by the diff above).
At the moment, I'd like to ask that you talk with TParis about the above diff, which was a clear attempt to restart the drama machine and probably WP:BAITING, and ask for him to back off. If he does not, then I'll leave it to your consideration as to whether this is now grounds for recall, but, personally, I have a high expectations of behaviour for admins, and, on top of everything else, WP:BAITING is a clear breach of that.
In terms of TParis' criteria:
As I said, I'm leaving any decisions about whether TParis' behaviour is not what is expected of an admin in your hands. However, I would ask that you suggest that he consider stopping.
I am also posting this message to the other admins on TParis' recall list. Also, I am scaling back my involvement with wikipedia, so I might not see replies very quickly. If you have something you want me to respond to, I'd like to ask that you e-mail me at "daniel.judd@gmail.com". Cheers. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 14:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
See [1]. You need template:tl to include tempaltes on talk pages. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm wondering if you've been keeping an eye on this editor. He appears to be doing a bunch of stuff that fall outside of the informal "ban" you placed on him, including tagging articles for deletion, hunting for sockpuppets, and making edit with his IP address of a nature that at least one editor called them "vandalism". I think that this is just a kid, but it's taking continual advice from numerous editors just to try to keep him on the straight and narrow. If you haven't been keeping up with him, it might be worth a look. (I'm not looking for a block, just another nudge.) Beyond My Ken ( talk) 21:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I have written a proposed remedy to the Richard Arthur Norton affair, to be taken to AN/I in the event that ArbCom defers the case. Since the original thread is hatted, the proposal has been made on his talk page ( User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_)). As you were a participant in the original thread, I would very much appreciate your comments as to whether the proposed remedy satisfies your concerns. Thanks, —Tim /// Carrite ( talk) 23:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, I just saw the block at User talk:74.131.177.233. Starship, however, is still editing, presumably because (bear with me--I'm a luddite) you didn't check the "Prevent logged-n users..." box. Did you do that on purpose so that no IP "accidents" could happen? I'm beginning to think that Starship should just be blocked indefinitely... Drmies ( talk) 17:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
I dont want to be blocked indefinitely so should I do adopt me instead? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 22:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Per the AfD, it was decided to "merge" the information into Berea City School District. I'm not very experienced with these procedures, but it doesn't appear that the orphaned content in the former article was ever merged, and the new redirect points to Berea, Ohio instead of the school district. I can do the work and fix this, but I wanted to check with you first to see if this was intentional. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Should I do adopt me that way I can understand better? I do not want to be blocked and I am sorry. Please don't block me! Should I do adopt me that way I should understand better? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 22:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The empty article, 2013 Women's Qualification Tournament, should be nominated for speedy deletion. Thanks! -- Starship9000 ( talk) 00:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, if the draft article about the Tornado roller coaster is ready, then should I move it to the mainspace? The draft article is ready for the mainspace so should I move it? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is 2 more article needing to be proposed for deletion. First one is Cih Ji Palace and the concern you should write down is:
And the last article Roller Skater (roller coaster) should be proposed for deletion as well and the concern about it is:
Do you think you can propose these 2 articles for deletion with the concerns (as above) because I do not think they are notable enough? Thank you! -- Starship9000 ( talk) 19:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Starship, do you want to be adopted or not? Go Phightins ! 21:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Collapsing comment moved to
User talk:Starship9000
|
---|
I am willing to take on User:Starship9000 on as an adoptee under the following terms:
|
Question: Do vandalism reverts and deletion tags count towards my total? Cobalion. Setting Justice everywhere.active 19:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Cheers, — Theopolisme ( talk) 21:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello there Kudpung,
About a month ago, I created a gastropod article titled Apicalia, once I had published this article a bot under that name of MadmanBot, marked my article with a template stating that the article was directly copied from the World Register of Marine Species, this however, was a mistake and you simply took care of the problem in a flash. I have just now, created an article titled Eulimostraca indomatta and the same bot has once again, marked the article with a tag regarding it being directly duplicated from WoRMS. This is once again false, I was just wondering, is there any possible way I can prevent this from happening again in the future? The way I publish my gastropod articles in is pretty much the same for each and every documentation. Thank you and by the way, enjoy Valentines Day while it lasts this year! Happy editing! The whimsical enigmatic Solo Toady! 09:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
TBrandley ( what's up) 03:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 04:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Please review Cornwall Shinty Club. I don't know what to do with it. It had been deleted once before it was re-created. Should it be CSDed/Proded? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors February 2013 events newsletter
We are preparing to start our February requests blitz and March backlog elimination drive. The February 2013 newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the
February blitz and
March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk)
22:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
|
I saw your prod for Lung float test, which you thought was based on a student's paper. The corresponding author for the then-linked paper is the head of medicolegal affairs for emergency services at the University of Cologne, which is not a student position. So since you're a clueful person, and since I'm trying to help someone at Meta with systems for identifying desirable sources, can you give me an idea of what you were thinking (assuming it wasn't just a mistake/a reason intended for a different page)?
Alternatively, if you've got any ideas about common mistakes, I'd be happy to hear them. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 16:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2013 wrap-up
Participation: Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, BDD and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk)
21:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I have removed your redirect that caused Shuqun Primary School to redirect to Jurong. Although Shuqun Primary School might be located in Jurong, the article 'Jurong' does not mention this school. I have realised why you wanted to put the redirect because the article did not fit in Wikipedia. That was when my edits were to unorganized. Here a version a lot better that before. I hope it is not too bad for deletion. Do leave a feedback. Thanks! Hz.tiang ( talk) 13:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Dear Bro,
How are you doing today, well I just request for File Mover right would you be kind enough to have a look on it and grant me the permission, that would be helpful for me in some of my created pages and serve our beloved wiki more better. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 10:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Arctic Kangaroo 04:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
G'day Kudpung. TParis has you listed as an editor from whom he will accept a nudge that he might not be acting as an admin in the right way. I have been involved with him in a conflict for the past couple of weeks that he is prosecuting way too personally. The latest incident is particularly disappointing as it was essentially an attempt by him to restart the conflict after it had fallen into a lull ( diff), and an attempt by two other editors on either side of the divide to approach a resolution (see Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Epeefleche#Discussion_redirect until TParis' attempt to close down the discussion, which was shortly followed by the diff above).
At the moment, I'd like to ask that you talk with TParis about the above diff, which was a clear attempt to restart the drama machine and probably WP:BAITING, and ask for him to back off. If he does not, then I'll leave it to your consideration as to whether this is now grounds for recall, but, personally, I have a high expectations of behaviour for admins, and, on top of everything else, WP:BAITING is a clear breach of that.
In terms of TParis' criteria:
As I said, I'm leaving any decisions about whether TParis' behaviour is not what is expected of an admin in your hands. However, I would ask that you suggest that he consider stopping.
I am also posting this message to the other admins on TParis' recall list. Also, I am scaling back my involvement with wikipedia, so I might not see replies very quickly. If you have something you want me to respond to, I'd like to ask that you e-mail me at "daniel.judd@gmail.com". Cheers. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 14:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
See [1]. You need template:tl to include tempaltes on talk pages. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm wondering if you've been keeping an eye on this editor. He appears to be doing a bunch of stuff that fall outside of the informal "ban" you placed on him, including tagging articles for deletion, hunting for sockpuppets, and making edit with his IP address of a nature that at least one editor called them "vandalism". I think that this is just a kid, but it's taking continual advice from numerous editors just to try to keep him on the straight and narrow. If you haven't been keeping up with him, it might be worth a look. (I'm not looking for a block, just another nudge.) Beyond My Ken ( talk) 21:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I have written a proposed remedy to the Richard Arthur Norton affair, to be taken to AN/I in the event that ArbCom defers the case. Since the original thread is hatted, the proposal has been made on his talk page ( User_talk:Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_)). As you were a participant in the original thread, I would very much appreciate your comments as to whether the proposed remedy satisfies your concerns. Thanks, —Tim /// Carrite ( talk) 23:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Kudpung, I just saw the block at User talk:74.131.177.233. Starship, however, is still editing, presumably because (bear with me--I'm a luddite) you didn't check the "Prevent logged-n users..." box. Did you do that on purpose so that no IP "accidents" could happen? I'm beginning to think that Starship should just be blocked indefinitely... Drmies ( talk) 17:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
I dont want to be blocked indefinitely so should I do adopt me instead? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 22:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Per the AfD, it was decided to "merge" the information into Berea City School District. I'm not very experienced with these procedures, but it doesn't appear that the orphaned content in the former article was ever merged, and the new redirect points to Berea, Ohio instead of the school district. I can do the work and fix this, but I wanted to check with you first to see if this was intentional. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Should I do adopt me that way I can understand better? I do not want to be blocked and I am sorry. Please don't block me! Should I do adopt me that way I should understand better? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 22:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The empty article, 2013 Women's Qualification Tournament, should be nominated for speedy deletion. Thanks! -- Starship9000 ( talk) 00:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, if the draft article about the Tornado roller coaster is ready, then should I move it to the mainspace? The draft article is ready for the mainspace so should I move it? -- Starship9000 ( talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is 2 more article needing to be proposed for deletion. First one is Cih Ji Palace and the concern you should write down is:
And the last article Roller Skater (roller coaster) should be proposed for deletion as well and the concern about it is:
Do you think you can propose these 2 articles for deletion with the concerns (as above) because I do not think they are notable enough? Thank you! -- Starship9000 ( talk) 19:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Starship, do you want to be adopted or not? Go Phightins ! 21:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Collapsing comment moved to
User talk:Starship9000
|
---|
I am willing to take on User:Starship9000 on as an adoptee under the following terms:
|
Question: Do vandalism reverts and deletion tags count towards my total? Cobalion. Setting Justice everywhere.active 19:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Cheers, — Theopolisme ( talk) 21:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello there Kudpung,
About a month ago, I created a gastropod article titled Apicalia, once I had published this article a bot under that name of MadmanBot, marked my article with a template stating that the article was directly copied from the World Register of Marine Species, this however, was a mistake and you simply took care of the problem in a flash. I have just now, created an article titled Eulimostraca indomatta and the same bot has once again, marked the article with a tag regarding it being directly duplicated from WoRMS. This is once again false, I was just wondering, is there any possible way I can prevent this from happening again in the future? The way I publish my gastropod articles in is pretty much the same for each and every documentation. Thank you and by the way, enjoy Valentines Day while it lasts this year! Happy editing! The whimsical enigmatic Solo Toady! 09:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
TBrandley ( what's up) 03:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 04:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Please review Cornwall Shinty Club. I don't know what to do with it. It had been deleted once before it was re-created. Should it be CSDed/Proded? Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 13:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors February 2013 events newsletter
We are preparing to start our February requests blitz and March backlog elimination drive. The February 2013 newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the
February blitz and
March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk)
22:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
|
I saw your prod for Lung float test, which you thought was based on a student's paper. The corresponding author for the then-linked paper is the head of medicolegal affairs for emergency services at the University of Cologne, which is not a student position. So since you're a clueful person, and since I'm trying to help someone at Meta with systems for identifying desirable sources, can you give me an idea of what you were thinking (assuming it wasn't just a mistake/a reason intended for a different page)?
Alternatively, if you've got any ideas about common mistakes, I'd be happy to hear them. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 16:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2013 wrap-up
Participation: Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, BDD and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk)
21:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I have removed your redirect that caused Shuqun Primary School to redirect to Jurong. Although Shuqun Primary School might be located in Jurong, the article 'Jurong' does not mention this school. I have realised why you wanted to put the redirect because the article did not fit in Wikipedia. That was when my edits were to unorganized. Here a version a lot better that before. I hope it is not too bad for deletion. Do leave a feedback. Thanks! Hz.tiang ( talk) 13:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)