Hello, I'm
Οἶδα. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Katie Halper, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Οἶδα (
talk)
18:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Herostratus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:Mariah Carey that didn't seem very
civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Herostratus (
talk)
12:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Farrah Abraham, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk
22:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Farrah Abraham, you may be
blocked from editing.
General Ization
Talk
22:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Dad Stop Embarrassing Me!, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
YoungForever
(talk)
22:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read
MOS:NUMERAL before making similar edits. Thanks! –
The Grid (
talk)
00:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fuck wit Dre Day (And Everybody's Celebratin'), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Mia Khalifa. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
21:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Riley Reid. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
13:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
What part was added or deleted from the prior versions. Can I get a list of updates from original wiki page? 174.212.162.183 ( talk) 21:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
John Ritter. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
01:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
04:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Red Hot Chili Peppers discography, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ss
112
22:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Christine Blasey Ford, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HaeB (
talk)
06:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
You're sure making a lot of unnecessary work for editors who try a keep this project up to date, clean and basically cosistent and it pretty evident you're not helping at all, maybe you should find something else to do while you're online. Cheers, - FlightTime ( open channel) 00:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Black Sabbath (album). -
FlightTime (
open channel)
00:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
The Police (album). Please stop changing numbers represented as words to numbers represented as figures.
MOS:NUMBER allows for both so it's not broken - don't fix it.
Muhandes (
talk)
11:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
You've been warned several times that the MOS allows for textual numbers, per MOS:NUMERAL, but you continue to disrupt to alter these to be numerals.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia.
Canterbury Tail
talk
19:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Canterbury Tail talk 12:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Despite already having had a block you continue to ignore MOS:NUMERAL and proceed with what can only now be described as deliberate disruptive editing. If you continue to change simple worded numbers into numerals, against MOS:NUMERAL, you will be blocked. I don't know how I can make this clearer. Canterbury Tail talk 13:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial ( talk) 01:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Jason David Frank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. Rockchalk
7
17
19:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove
maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at
You Know My Name (Look Up the Number).
Sundayclose (
talk)
03:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
So
Why
14:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love and Kisses.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi. There is an ongoing thread related to a bold edit which you performed in Penélope Cruz on 30 August 2023. See Talk:Penélope Cruz. Are you acquainted with intrincacies of the pronunciation of Peninsular Spanish varieties (in this case the Madrid one)? Cited source is an English-language video report/interview on CBS, mentioning the "actual" (presumably meaning the native one) pronunciation of her name at 5 min 00 min.--Asqueladd ( talk) 16:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CurryTime7-24. An edit that you recently made to
Shemp Howard seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
CurryTime7-24 (
talk)
22:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Twelve-bar blues. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned about MOS:NUMERAL before. Please stop making disruptive edits. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 13:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
You've been blocked twice for disruptive editing and violating the Manual of Style (specifically the one on MOS:NUMERALS) yet you continue with your pattern of disruptive editing. Your page is just jam packed with warnings and you don't seem to want to use talk pages. Since this disruption has been going on for a very long period of time without you changing your editing patterns, it comes across that it is a deliberate choice and not just mistakes or lack of knowledge. You've been pointed to all out policies, guidelines and MOS on multiple occasions and your time here is more than sufficient for you to have become aware of what is expected of editors on the project. So at this point it's one of a couple of options. 1) You're deliberately making these edits. 2) You're unable to understand the editing expectations. I'm not sure which is it, but I'm giving you one final warning of your disruptive edits. The next time you make a disruptive edit on Wikipedia you will be blocked indefinitely. So here is your chance to prove that you can edit in a collaborate manner according to our MOS, guidelines and policies. Canterbury Tail talk 14:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
As you have decided, of your own free will, to continue disruptive editing, and as you were very clearly warned of the consequences of continuing disruptive editing above, you have been blocked from editing. You have clearly demonstrated that you do not care about any of our policies, guidelines or even any respect for fellow editors and it's obvious through your choices that you have no intention to change and as a result you're not a fit for the project. Canterbury Tail talk 14:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Hello, I'm
Οἶδα. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Katie Halper, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Οἶδα (
talk)
18:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Herostratus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:Mariah Carey that didn't seem very
civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Herostratus (
talk)
12:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Farrah Abraham, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk
22:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Farrah Abraham, you may be
blocked from editing.
General Ization
Talk
22:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Dad Stop Embarrassing Me!, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
YoungForever
(talk)
22:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read
MOS:NUMERAL before making similar edits. Thanks! –
The Grid (
talk)
00:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fuck wit Dre Day (And Everybody's Celebratin'), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Mia Khalifa. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
21:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Riley Reid. Thank you.
Sangdeboeuf (
talk)
13:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
What part was added or deleted from the prior versions. Can I get a list of updates from original wiki page? 174.212.162.183 ( talk) 21:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
John Ritter. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
01:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
04:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Red Hot Chili Peppers discography, you may be
blocked from editing.
Ss
112
22:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Christine Blasey Ford, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HaeB (
talk)
06:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
You're sure making a lot of unnecessary work for editors who try a keep this project up to date, clean and basically cosistent and it pretty evident you're not helping at all, maybe you should find something else to do while you're online. Cheers, - FlightTime ( open channel) 00:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Black Sabbath (album). -
FlightTime (
open channel)
00:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
The Police (album). Please stop changing numbers represented as words to numbers represented as figures.
MOS:NUMBER allows for both so it's not broken - don't fix it.
Muhandes (
talk)
11:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
You've been warned several times that the MOS allows for textual numbers, per MOS:NUMERAL, but you continue to disrupt to alter these to be numerals.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia.
Canterbury Tail
talk
19:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Canterbury Tail talk 12:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Despite already having had a block you continue to ignore MOS:NUMERAL and proceed with what can only now be described as deliberate disruptive editing. If you continue to change simple worded numbers into numerals, against MOS:NUMERAL, you will be blocked. I don't know how I can make this clearer. Canterbury Tail talk 13:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial ( talk) 01:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Jason David Frank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. Rockchalk
7
17
19:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove
maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at
You Know My Name (Look Up the Number).
Sundayclose (
talk)
03:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
So
Why
14:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love and Kisses.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi. There is an ongoing thread related to a bold edit which you performed in Penélope Cruz on 30 August 2023. See Talk:Penélope Cruz. Are you acquainted with intrincacies of the pronunciation of Peninsular Spanish varieties (in this case the Madrid one)? Cited source is an English-language video report/interview on CBS, mentioning the "actual" (presumably meaning the native one) pronunciation of her name at 5 min 00 min.--Asqueladd ( talk) 16:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CurryTime7-24. An edit that you recently made to
Shemp Howard seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
CurryTime7-24 (
talk)
22:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Twelve-bar blues. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned about MOS:NUMERAL before. Please stop making disruptive edits. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 13:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
You've been blocked twice for disruptive editing and violating the Manual of Style (specifically the one on MOS:NUMERALS) yet you continue with your pattern of disruptive editing. Your page is just jam packed with warnings and you don't seem to want to use talk pages. Since this disruption has been going on for a very long period of time without you changing your editing patterns, it comes across that it is a deliberate choice and not just mistakes or lack of knowledge. You've been pointed to all out policies, guidelines and MOS on multiple occasions and your time here is more than sufficient for you to have become aware of what is expected of editors on the project. So at this point it's one of a couple of options. 1) You're deliberately making these edits. 2) You're unable to understand the editing expectations. I'm not sure which is it, but I'm giving you one final warning of your disruptive edits. The next time you make a disruptive edit on Wikipedia you will be blocked indefinitely. So here is your chance to prove that you can edit in a collaborate manner according to our MOS, guidelines and policies. Canterbury Tail talk 14:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
As you have decided, of your own free will, to continue disruptive editing, and as you were very clearly warned of the consequences of continuing disruptive editing above, you have been blocked from editing. You have clearly demonstrated that you do not care about any of our policies, guidelines or even any respect for fellow editors and it's obvious through your choices that you have no intention to change and as a result you're not a fit for the project. Canterbury Tail talk 14:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.