![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Hi! I am glad that you came back
--
FrankBoy
(Buzz)
07:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Vidya Balan has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Vensatry
(ping)
14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Kahaani will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 9 March 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. You should notify the FAC co-nominators. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the peer review for the film. Please do suggest any changes that I should make before I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 06:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Just a reminder of the Enthiran PR.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me
07:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Please give me your opinion on the section 'Question from Bollyjeff' in the SRK peer review. BollyJeff | talk
![]() | Featured Article
![]() |
![]() |
Thank you, but the credit for this goes entirely to Dwaipayanc, Karthikndr, Jionpedia and Msrag. My contribution here is very limited. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 10:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Was this a wait for this to happen? :) — Vensatry (ping) 13:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Have you or a talk page stalker ever heard this in a Bollywood film?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could proofread 63rd Academy Awards for featured list consideration? I've reviewed Kana and lent support for it. I would appreciate the help.
Hi! Like you, I have used galleries to describe my work on my user page. I hope you don't mind. Also, if you could look at my nom. -- FrankBoy (Buzz) 17:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
why are Redirecting the article Dangal (film) to Nitesh Tiwari ? Db135 ( talk) 09:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 15:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alia Bhatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sangharsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 7 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Dharma Productions films, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Shah Rukh Khan has starred in six films produced by Dharma Productions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Dharma Productions films. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on getting this one through! — Vensatry (ping) 20:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the FAC for
Enthiran. Feel free to leave comments.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me
04:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Krimuk. I'm just posting to let you know that List of films released by Yash Raj Films – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 3. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Will you help me? Can you review this article or nominate for GA; I want this article in a GA class, So please.... Hetika ( talk) 17:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I have a question regarding the use of videos as sources. In the performers section of 84th Academy Awards list, some users (including ' Atomic Meltdown) want to put the songs (or actually singing about the Best Picture nominees in tune with popular songs) that host Billy Crystal performed in his opening monologue. Atomic Meltdown uses this article from The Hollywood Reporter as a source. The article contains a video of Billy Crystal performing the songs, but the article itself does not say or indicate word for word in the text what he is actually singing (i.e. singing about Midnight in Paris to the tune of "The Last Time I Saw Paris"). I know what Crystal sang is true, but for the sake of Wikipedia standards, is this acceptable?
BTW, could you review the 63rd Academy Awards?
Hi. Hope you're well. I'm sure I wasn't the first to come across this on the FA. I think Biyer Phool maybe a 1996 film not 1992 as stated in the now dead NDTV link. Here's a BFI directory entry: [ [1]], and on the Bengali film directory book it's listed on pg. 258 as a 1996 release [ [2]] (unfortunately only snippet view maybe you could find a hard copy at your location). Cowlibob ( talk) 18:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Krimuk! I need your help. After expanding the article of Rashi Khanna, i searched for a free image and found it at Bollywood Hungama here. But i don't know how to upload a free image from Bollywood Hungama and especially the usage of OTRS. Can you please explain me about OTRS in brief? Or, if you feel it as a waste of time, can you upload it? Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 06:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Seems like there is a stiff competition between Ranaut and Chopra for the "Best Actress" title this time. — Vensatry (ping) 14:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
If this report is true, Shahid Kapoor will certainly win this time. — Vensatry (ping) 17:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
You need not feel disappointed for Shahid. Watch this trailer man, I'm sure you'll like it. This guy deserves more than anyone! — Vensatry (ping) 16:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to intrude, but It's nice that Chopra left those roles for the so-called Bimbos that's why Ranaut got what she has got. She must thank her, No? Jokes apart, yes I do feel the film was weak but not laughable. It's main problem was it's cliched writing by a new writer, who had only written TV show or whatever. A director's work is to work according to the script. I think If they would have removed the filmi drama It would have been much better. But, It was destined to happen so that Ranaut can get awards, which was only possible when Mary Kom felt like a weak fil. No matter how much Chopra worked hard. Still, Chopra's best performance is her most underrated one that is Barfi!.— Prashant 19:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Also, Rani's reasons were different for not doing Mary Kom. As she did not wanted to burn her hands witha first time Director. Remember Aiyya, which was the dumber film ever made starring her. Mardaani too was also like Mary Kom. If you go by the experience then, mardaani was abig dissapointment as it was from director of Parineeta awhile Mary Kom was director's debut.— Prashant 20:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Featured Article
|
![]() |
Congrats Krimuk! Great to see her!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Please restore your old signature, it was much better!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Krimuk. This is my first time meeting you, and I have heard a lot about you. I respect your choices of favorite actors, but what about other Bollywood actors like Ajay Devgan, Salman Khan, Akshay Kumar, Shahid Kapoor etc.
Thank you, Maheshreddy2 ( talk) 10:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Could you proofread 83rd Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I would appreciate the help.
Hi Krimuk90,
I was putting together my 3rd sockpuppet investigation for Richa101091, when I came across a likely sock User:Shwayze, who you accused of being a sock of User:Shez 15. I thought you may be interested in checking out this investigation and further linking these accounts. This seems to be a HUGE meat/sock farm for Indian-related film topics. Don't forget to check the archived cases against Richa101091 as well. This is obviously someone (or more likely someone's) creating hundreds of sock accounts to avoid detection. - War wizard90 ( talk) 04:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I thought you may like to know that I blocked the IPs from sending emails :)
Hi. Thanks for the welcome back. I had one query, for the above list why is "BH Surfer's Choice awards" included when they are basically a result of an internet poll? Cowlibob ( talk) 16:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I require your help in this issue for which i explain the things in detail :
It began with an IP user adding content from a non reliable source to this article which was reverted twice by me. When that IP added it for the third time, i restrained from reverting it adhering to WP:3RR and explained that user patiently about that non reliable source in its talk page. I approached Materialscientist who reverted that edit and added the article to his watchlist. Now another IP adds the same info, same source with same errors. Now, my question is, can i revert its edit? Becasue i dont know whether 3RR is violated because of reverting a user's edit or any user's edit.
I want to bring the article to GA status which i nominated on 15 December 2014 for the same, and i dont want it to fail in its GAR on the grounds of lack of stability i.e. due to edit warring. Please suggest / help me in this issue. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 16:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello friend, first I'd like to express my immense appreciation to your on-going, wonderful work should I say, on the various articles you've been involved with. What I meant by this comment is definitely not to belittle your work - much before we all were lucky to see you join WP, this article had been years in the making, and the opposition was really tough to deal with. I realised that the quality required is really high and the research was really a challenging task, which included books, going through old magazines, looking everywhere and fighting many folks for what seemed to be an impossible mission. We all know that Zinta is known not for her work in films only; the variety of her activities is diverse and her image is extremely complex to put into paper. Other than that, it all happened at a time when many foreign WP editors were not really ready to accept an article on an Indian actress they were not that familiar with; it seemed too hard to digest for many. I must note that in my comment I didn't make any statements on anyone's work, and didn't refer to any specific article. Actually the article I'm most proud of (for whatever reason) is Dimple Kapadia, which was an enjoyable and highly satisfying project for me. Right now, there are really great, great articles, and your efforts are truly appreciated. Anyhow, for whatever wrong I might have said, I sincerely apologise, and I really am in complete awe of your efforts. Keep up the good work. Shahid • Talk2me 00:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the 2nd FAC for the article. Please do let me know if you would like to make any comments. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 02:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Hi! I am glad that you came back
--
FrankBoy
(Buzz)
07:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Vidya Balan has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Vensatry
(ping)
14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Kahaani will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 9 March 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. You should notify the FAC co-nominators. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the peer review for the film. Please do suggest any changes that I should make before I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 06:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Just a reminder of the Enthiran PR.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me
07:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Please give me your opinion on the section 'Question from Bollyjeff' in the SRK peer review. BollyJeff | talk
![]() | Featured Article
![]() |
![]() |
Thank you, but the credit for this goes entirely to Dwaipayanc, Karthikndr, Jionpedia and Msrag. My contribution here is very limited. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 10:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Was this a wait for this to happen? :) — Vensatry (ping) 13:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Have you or a talk page stalker ever heard this in a Bollywood film?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could proofread 63rd Academy Awards for featured list consideration? I've reviewed Kana and lent support for it. I would appreciate the help.
Hi! Like you, I have used galleries to describe my work on my user page. I hope you don't mind. Also, if you could look at my nom. -- FrankBoy (Buzz) 17:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
why are Redirecting the article Dangal (film) to Nitesh Tiwari ? Db135 ( talk) 09:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 15:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alia Bhatt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sangharsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 7 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Dharma Productions films, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Shah Rukh Khan has starred in six films produced by Dharma Productions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Dharma Productions films. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on getting this one through! — Vensatry (ping) 20:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the FAC for
Enthiran. Feel free to leave comments.
—
Ssven2
Speak 2 me
04:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Krimuk. I'm just posting to let you know that List of films released by Yash Raj Films – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 3. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Will you help me? Can you review this article or nominate for GA; I want this article in a GA class, So please.... Hetika ( talk) 17:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I have a question regarding the use of videos as sources. In the performers section of 84th Academy Awards list, some users (including ' Atomic Meltdown) want to put the songs (or actually singing about the Best Picture nominees in tune with popular songs) that host Billy Crystal performed in his opening monologue. Atomic Meltdown uses this article from The Hollywood Reporter as a source. The article contains a video of Billy Crystal performing the songs, but the article itself does not say or indicate word for word in the text what he is actually singing (i.e. singing about Midnight in Paris to the tune of "The Last Time I Saw Paris"). I know what Crystal sang is true, but for the sake of Wikipedia standards, is this acceptable?
BTW, could you review the 63rd Academy Awards?
Hi. Hope you're well. I'm sure I wasn't the first to come across this on the FA. I think Biyer Phool maybe a 1996 film not 1992 as stated in the now dead NDTV link. Here's a BFI directory entry: [ [1]], and on the Bengali film directory book it's listed on pg. 258 as a 1996 release [ [2]] (unfortunately only snippet view maybe you could find a hard copy at your location). Cowlibob ( talk) 18:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Krimuk! I need your help. After expanding the article of Rashi Khanna, i searched for a free image and found it at Bollywood Hungama here. But i don't know how to upload a free image from Bollywood Hungama and especially the usage of OTRS. Can you please explain me about OTRS in brief? Or, if you feel it as a waste of time, can you upload it? Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 06:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Seems like there is a stiff competition between Ranaut and Chopra for the "Best Actress" title this time. — Vensatry (ping) 14:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
If this report is true, Shahid Kapoor will certainly win this time. — Vensatry (ping) 17:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
You need not feel disappointed for Shahid. Watch this trailer man, I'm sure you'll like it. This guy deserves more than anyone! — Vensatry (ping) 16:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to intrude, but It's nice that Chopra left those roles for the so-called Bimbos that's why Ranaut got what she has got. She must thank her, No? Jokes apart, yes I do feel the film was weak but not laughable. It's main problem was it's cliched writing by a new writer, who had only written TV show or whatever. A director's work is to work according to the script. I think If they would have removed the filmi drama It would have been much better. But, It was destined to happen so that Ranaut can get awards, which was only possible when Mary Kom felt like a weak fil. No matter how much Chopra worked hard. Still, Chopra's best performance is her most underrated one that is Barfi!.— Prashant 19:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Also, Rani's reasons were different for not doing Mary Kom. As she did not wanted to burn her hands witha first time Director. Remember Aiyya, which was the dumber film ever made starring her. Mardaani too was also like Mary Kom. If you go by the experience then, mardaani was abig dissapointment as it was from director of Parineeta awhile Mary Kom was director's debut.— Prashant 20:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Featured Article
|
![]() |
Congrats Krimuk! Great to see her!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Please restore your old signature, it was much better!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Krimuk. This is my first time meeting you, and I have heard a lot about you. I respect your choices of favorite actors, but what about other Bollywood actors like Ajay Devgan, Salman Khan, Akshay Kumar, Shahid Kapoor etc.
Thank you, Maheshreddy2 ( talk) 10:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Could you proofread 83rd Academy Awards for featured list promotion? I would appreciate the help.
Hi Krimuk90,
I was putting together my 3rd sockpuppet investigation for Richa101091, when I came across a likely sock User:Shwayze, who you accused of being a sock of User:Shez 15. I thought you may be interested in checking out this investigation and further linking these accounts. This seems to be a HUGE meat/sock farm for Indian-related film topics. Don't forget to check the archived cases against Richa101091 as well. This is obviously someone (or more likely someone's) creating hundreds of sock accounts to avoid detection. - War wizard90 ( talk) 04:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I thought you may like to know that I blocked the IPs from sending emails :)
Hi. Thanks for the welcome back. I had one query, for the above list why is "BH Surfer's Choice awards" included when they are basically a result of an internet poll? Cowlibob ( talk) 16:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I require your help in this issue for which i explain the things in detail :
It began with an IP user adding content from a non reliable source to this article which was reverted twice by me. When that IP added it for the third time, i restrained from reverting it adhering to WP:3RR and explained that user patiently about that non reliable source in its talk page. I approached Materialscientist who reverted that edit and added the article to his watchlist. Now another IP adds the same info, same source with same errors. Now, my question is, can i revert its edit? Becasue i dont know whether 3RR is violated because of reverting a user's edit or any user's edit.
I want to bring the article to GA status which i nominated on 15 December 2014 for the same, and i dont want it to fail in its GAR on the grounds of lack of stability i.e. due to edit warring. Please suggest / help me in this issue. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala ( talk) 16:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello friend, first I'd like to express my immense appreciation to your on-going, wonderful work should I say, on the various articles you've been involved with. What I meant by this comment is definitely not to belittle your work - much before we all were lucky to see you join WP, this article had been years in the making, and the opposition was really tough to deal with. I realised that the quality required is really high and the research was really a challenging task, which included books, going through old magazines, looking everywhere and fighting many folks for what seemed to be an impossible mission. We all know that Zinta is known not for her work in films only; the variety of her activities is diverse and her image is extremely complex to put into paper. Other than that, it all happened at a time when many foreign WP editors were not really ready to accept an article on an Indian actress they were not that familiar with; it seemed too hard to digest for many. I must note that in my comment I didn't make any statements on anyone's work, and didn't refer to any specific article. Actually the article I'm most proud of (for whatever reason) is Dimple Kapadia, which was an enjoyable and highly satisfying project for me. Right now, there are really great, great articles, and your efforts are truly appreciated. Anyhow, for whatever wrong I might have said, I sincerely apologise, and I really am in complete awe of your efforts. Keep up the good work. Shahid • Talk2me 00:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the 2nd FAC for the article. Please do let me know if you would like to make any comments. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 02:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)