|
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bright's Passage cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Murdoch Mysteries episodes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Walter Görlitz:I've just looked into the page's history, and from what I can see, you're the only editor who reverted Mickeydee15's removal of references. In fact, you even broke the three revert rule in the space of just a few hours on the 10th/11th October 2016.
You have yet to provide a convincing reason why the references should remain, when seemingly every other Episode List article on Wikipedia does not have them. Somebody (with a lot more experience than me) answered my query with a view that supports mine. I think there's more than enough reason for me to remove the references from the page, but I'm not going to (yet), because the last time someone stood up to you on this, you had an admin ban them for " edit warring", despite the fact that you were just as guilty under the 3RR.
If you can agree to just drop this, I'll remove the references, the article will be in line with all the other Episode Lists articles, and everyone can just move on. If not, I'm going to take this to an admin, because you're treating the article as if it's yours, and having people punished because they're making perfectly reasonable edits that you don't like. Klock101 ( talk) 21:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
"A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge." - WP:PRIMARY. Titles of episodes that have already aired are referencing the primary source themselves. This is an accepted convention on episode lists. An inline citation is not needed for past episode titles or air dates. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 22:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The disagreeing editor has begun an RFC at Talk:List of Murdoch Mysteries episodes § References removed, and continues their attacks there. Alex|The|Whovian ? 06:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Use a footnote? If I knew how, I would... I wrote on the talk page asking for you, which you apparently didn't see. Instead of deleting it, why don't use write the footnote.
Oh and I cant' put "when it actually aired" since it's only the second episode and I can't see the future......
Mickeydee15 ( talk) 21:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
"Makes them easier to find"? That makes no sense. The reference is used for three episodes back to back. Trust me, it will be very easy to find.
I moved it down to the third episode, again, because this way it won't be deleted and doesn't have to moved for the next two weeks. Mickeydee15 ( talk) 22:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Klock101. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bright's Passage cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Murdoch Mysteries episodes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Walter Görlitz:I've just looked into the page's history, and from what I can see, you're the only editor who reverted Mickeydee15's removal of references. In fact, you even broke the three revert rule in the space of just a few hours on the 10th/11th October 2016.
You have yet to provide a convincing reason why the references should remain, when seemingly every other Episode List article on Wikipedia does not have them. Somebody (with a lot more experience than me) answered my query with a view that supports mine. I think there's more than enough reason for me to remove the references from the page, but I'm not going to (yet), because the last time someone stood up to you on this, you had an admin ban them for " edit warring", despite the fact that you were just as guilty under the 3RR.
If you can agree to just drop this, I'll remove the references, the article will be in line with all the other Episode Lists articles, and everyone can just move on. If not, I'm going to take this to an admin, because you're treating the article as if it's yours, and having people punished because they're making perfectly reasonable edits that you don't like. Klock101 ( talk) 21:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
"A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge." - WP:PRIMARY. Titles of episodes that have already aired are referencing the primary source themselves. This is an accepted convention on episode lists. An inline citation is not needed for past episode titles or air dates. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 22:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The disagreeing editor has begun an RFC at Talk:List of Murdoch Mysteries episodes § References removed, and continues their attacks there. Alex|The|Whovian ? 06:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Use a footnote? If I knew how, I would... I wrote on the talk page asking for you, which you apparently didn't see. Instead of deleting it, why don't use write the footnote.
Oh and I cant' put "when it actually aired" since it's only the second episode and I can't see the future......
Mickeydee15 ( talk) 21:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
"Makes them easier to find"? That makes no sense. The reference is used for three episodes back to back. Trust me, it will be very easy to find.
I moved it down to the third episode, again, because this way it won't be deleted and doesn't have to moved for the next two weeks. Mickeydee15 ( talk) 22:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Klock101. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)