This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, i just noticed your December 2008 suggestion at Template talk:infobox nrhp. It happens wp:NRHP participants, including me, worked to include features to cover California Historical Landmarks and other designations into the NRHP infobox. Actually, those features have been in place for several months within an NRHP2 infobox test version, but just now the NRHP2 infobox was copied into the NRHP infobox. So, anyhow, there are new features and new documentation explaining it available, to cover places like Manzanar which is NRHP and California Historical Landmark and has other designations too. Also, for places that are California Historical Landmark and/or LAHCM but NOT also NRHP, i developed a local1 template. It is used in many articles within various list-articles of LAHCMs. Hope this responds to your suggestion! I'd be interested in corresponding, in terms of developing CA Historical Landmark articles, if you are interested. doncram ( talk) 12:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: List of school districts in Yolo County, California Shouldn't that page only include school districts? I saw that you added a bunch of private schools to the page. I sort of disagree that individual schools should be listed, otherwise it contradicts the title. Killiondude (talk) 00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rocksanddirt"
First off I'd like to thank you for answering why my page was deleted. But I'd like to ask you how I would cite my sources, because I read the page, but I still didn't truly understand how to cite them. The facebook group homepage states most of what was stated on the page, although some of the knowledge was through speech even if that. I could ask the creator to add all of the information that I stated and put it on a history section of the group. Yes although we are not a very large group, I believe that a wiki article will increase the popularity of the group and may lead us to eventually creating a website. Granted, it's simply a novelty idea, but then again so was the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and that has pretty much turned into a cult following. I even remember when it was a stupid idea on Something Awful forums. If sources are the problem, and the home website has an insufficient amount of data, then I will agree to drop the page. But if citing is just the problem, I would like help properly citing the page. Darkraptor ( talk) 07:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
First of all, thanks for your cordial attention.
I am not 100% error free writing in english because my native language is spanish, however i will be happy if you check any grammatical errors on the article that im writing about the Venezuelan pianist Zamora.
Thanks again.
Regards, -- Zfans ( talk) 00:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
To tell you the truth, Killiondude, I am open to you deleting them. That was my first time creating a whole article (I created a separate article for Alex Haley's Queen) I need some help so if you think that you're right, I have no qualms with it. Thankee for doing it!! Shalom, Rivka ( talk) 19:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
You should at least try to read what is on the talpage of the article. I've been working on the article in Spanish and this article is absolutely a joke. see WP:NPOV.-- Amnesico29 ( talk) 06:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. Thanks for your feedback. I'll continue my edits. Andremun ( talk) 21:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I joined wikipedia a few months ago and read a lot of guidelines before I ever posted. I tried being "adopted" but no one ever responded to my talkpage. (Then again, I didn't actively seek it.) It's just here, I'd like some input since it seems not a lot of people edit that particular page I was working on. I look forward to your input! Red Summer Rain ( talk) 22:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 20:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I am interested in starting am Ernest Hemingway project to improve content related to his life and works, and have proposed the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Ernest_Hemingway_project. Please share your thoughts there! kilbad ( talk) 16:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for checking ... I have added a couple relevent cites, may be able to do more - I'm aware of the OR problem, and if you've checked previous versions of the page you saw just how much "OR" from a POV slant I removed. It's a pretty difficult topic to reference well due to the fact that it really is about a specific product as well as a concept, otherwise we have nothing but the DIY section with the antique chair over a bucket picture - the references to particular makers have to do with technical differences in their approaches, and I intentionally linked to deep pages showing the inner works [which I have to assume is copyrighted and I can't use directly] ... and as a long time composter [and a compost toilet owner :eek: ], I've tried to "paint a picture" of the products [without favor] and the process [safe microbial composting] and how it fits into the sustainable- environmental- waste- management sphere - Wikipedia does, after all, ask for "expert input" on topics .... the "see also" section is large for now to forstall wandering crusaders adding to the article about other related but inappropriate topics, as the history seems to be that some consider any hole in the ground a "composting toilet" ... further advice on this or any of the other articles listed on my user page is welcome, thanks again Red58bill ( talk) 08:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I've made some improvement on the toilet article, adding ref/cites and removing inline brand mentions ..... google scholar did help some, but unfortunately most of the links there are to sites requiring purchase of the article, with no more than minimul abstracts available, although I got some leads to find other ways. Now I'm onto a different aspect of my mission - would appreciate it if you could check the idea on my talk page and add any comments you can contribute. Thanks Red58bill ( talk) 18:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the Comodo page, Killiondude. I haven't given up on it; I needed to show my proposed edits to the legal department and it took them almost two months to respond :P. I got your suggestion on my talk page that I do my edits right on the actual page. I am still struggling with how to do links and I don't want to put up a page that looks really sloppy. I'll let you know when i get something useable; just wanted to let you know that I appreciated your looking at it from a neutral perspective. Katharine908 ( talk) 17:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Wow, Killiondude. Thanks for updating the references on the Comodo page. I could see that I should have done it myself, and I definitely intended to get to it...one day. I appreciate it. Katharine908 ( talk) 13:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Killiondude,
Thanks for your response to my query on the Francis Andersen article. I see that if I want to expand this article I should look for references first and base my article primarily on information I find there. But to what extent is it appropriate to add some information based on my own personal knowledge of the topic?
Another question: since this is the biography of an author, how many of his published works would it be appropriate to list?
Thanks for your encouragement.
Sincerely,
Tekone —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tekone Yoshimori (
talk •
contribs) 23:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I wondering if you would be interested in undergoing formal Dispute Resolution, instead of participating in these edit wars, which have continually proved that they solve nothing. There are clearly two sides to this matter. A more experienced and higher level administrator is needed to solve this problem. I will not request resolution until you and several other users support the idea. Standleylake40 ( talk) 00:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
So I took the plunge and made my first page, and you tagged it (is that the correct terminology?) as needing cleanup. I'm eager to do this, but am having trouble finding out exactly what I need to do. I know from previous experience with editors here that you folks are awfully busy, so I don't expect you to tell me excatly what I need to do, but some broad hints would be useful. For example, I already know that the capitalization in the title is nonstandard, but don't see how it can be edited in the same way the rest of the page can. Looking forward to hearing from you.-- 24.18.105.64 ( talk) 05:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Would you have time this month to co-nominate the Spokane article? The reason I ask is because this week Im off on spring break right now and have a little more time to goof off and do stuff on Wikipedia; I dont know if this is the case with you though. If I remember right, a FAC could last as little as 2 weeks or something, and go on for I forget how long... Anyway, if another time works better for you, or you dont to co-nominate it anymore for any reason, thats fine too. Oh, and thanks for fixing Nehrams' list. Anon134 ( talk) 05:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Historic Sites is opened up. I took the liberty of assuming your support for the wikiproject meant you wanted to join as a member, and I copied your signature to the Members list on the main page. Please visit and add to, or remove, your listing there. It would be great to hear about what you're interested in the Wikiproject becoming, in your member comment and/or at the Talk page, shortcut wt:HSITES. Thanks for your support! doncram ( talk) 17:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I suppose we can get a quick and dirty "second" opinion if we need to. Then one of those requests for comment, which take forever for some reason. Another tack is to alternate reversions with me and "get" him on the 3 revert rule. Mediation is way too time consuming and too early to discuss. I'll try to follow your lead here. He's going to lose, it's just a matter of when and how soon. If we could dream up a face-saving way, I'd take it, but unfortunately here, it's all or nothing. Student7 ( talk) 11:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
...for the attempted help.....well, I'm pretty sure I'm trying to create one of those graph pages that shows (in graph form) how many edits you've done. Buddpaul ( talk) 23:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For always being there to lend a helping hand and making Wikipedia a better place. Thank you. Anon134 ( talk) 06:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
Shubinator ( talk) 20:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude, it appears that whether it is appropriate to capitalize mammal common names is a contentious issue that to my knowledge has never been resolved. My understanding is that the Wikipedia policy is that changes from lower to upper case or vice versa are forbidden at least until some decision is made about this issue. I am on the side that prefers lower case (since these names are not proper nouns, and there is no tradition of capitalizing them in formal prose - meaning other encyclopedias, scientific journals, serious books, etc.). I thus request that you not make such changes. Thanks, WolfmanSF ( talk) 04:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
That "upmerge" wasn't done for a reason— the userbox had been modified and people though the category wasn't in use. Why do you think someone never "merged" it? Tothwolf ( talk) 06:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you've worked on any of the web browser categories yet, but it looks like they had a similar thing happen. The category code in the userboxes appears to have been removed and it has left many of the categories very empty. I'll see what I can find out and we'll try to get this mess all sorted out and fixed though. You might want to hold off on any other big "Wikipedians ..." category changes until we can sort it all out though. Tothwolf ( talk) 09:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Suddenly I'm seeing many instances of cases where bracketed terms that didn't link to other pages now appear as strikeout. On my page List of Washington Freshwater Fish, I went through and removed the brackets, so the strikeout disappears. Is this is what we are supposed to do when we encounter stuff like this? Busaccsb ( talk) 00:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
test
It seems to me like some of that is important information that can assist those editors that remain. It should not have been removed, IMHO. Dr. Cash ( talk) 18:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah thanks, exactly what was intended. Didn't even notice it! Thanks! - Allied45 ( talk) 07:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I think when I re-welcomed them, I thought that they could have been a dynamic IP address, so I wanted to encourage them to get an account. My bad for being completely oblivious. Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
So, I can now see why you like wikipedia so much. It is quite interesting, and now I see why you can waste hours at a time finding new things. Well, maybe wasting is the wrong word to use. But, nonetheless, I have found a new hobby, and I have you to thank. Unfortunately, I am not sure how many people I want to tell because having wikipedia as a hobby kind of sounds geeky to me :) So, I am done, and I see it says to sign a post by typing four tildes, interesting. Well, you know who wrote this, so no need to sign my name :) The End 67.159.149.199 ( talk) 21:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it's annoying, but at least it's an indication that the editor has seen the posting. The effort to hide/delete the talk page archive is more of a problem. Will Beback talk 06:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Ooh, ta very much! As you prob guessed, it was a stupid typo. Chzz ► 10:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the feedback you gave on the page I'm working on. I still have some work to do, but once I'm finished, what would be the best way to move the article into the mainspace without losing the edit history? Thanks! Marisko ( talk) 15:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude,
You were nice enough to help me when I accidently published a rough draft of my article on Managment due diligence on the main page. You moved it back to my user page. Upon completion of the article, I moved it back to the main page, but I noticed that when I do a seach, the username version of the article still appears. Is this correct and normal, or did I miss a step in my procedure?
Thanks
Ohio Boy ( talk) 20:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you. I appreciate your guidance and patience with "rookies."
Ohio Boy ( talk) 21:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for responding so quickly. I'm actually in the process of uploading it right now -- it's a rather big file (resolution) -- will wikipedia automatically resize it when it's on the page? And how do I cite it once it's uploaded? AC ( talk) 22:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
. You could add the URL of the uploaded image to the template, along with the other information about it.
Killiondude (
talk) 22:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Uhm why exactly did you WP:CSD#A1 Comparison of Internet Relay Chat networks? Don't tell me people delete articles under construction now? -- Tothwolf ( talk) 07:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
// roux 08:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
KuyaBriBri Talk 13:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your feedback on the article! Could you please take a look at my reply at WP:FEED? -- Modbear ( talk) 18:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the constructive feedback. I plan to address the recommendations over the next few days.
Off topic; I spent 6 years living in North Highlands and working at the McClellan AFB, which I understand is now closed. My oldest daughter was born in there in 1979 and we moved from California to Pittsburgh, PA in 1980.
Northern California is still one of my favorite places, but we are now firmly rooted in Littleton, CO (suburb of Denver).
Thanks again,
Jimpeoples ( talk) 15:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I've tried getting an infobox discussion started on South Park discussion pages before, to no avail. Maybe there's a shadow society of infobox experts who are dedicated to closely guarding the secret. Or not. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. - SoSaysChappy ( talk) 17:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the help on that, that was my next situation, but what I needed help with was on the infobox to the immediate right to my page. (Y'know where the cover artwork is placed.) On every other Incubus album page, there's like a bar, inside of it, it should say Incubus Chronology. And underneath it says Last Album (so-and-so) This Album (So-and-so) and Next Album (So-and so). All I'm wondering is if there's some subtle difference between the way I place my Infobox and the way everyone else placed their infobox. Iwishiknew ( talk) 18:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude! Thanks for your help and erm sorry if this shouldn't go here, hehe :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mezod ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your suggestions and guidance with regards to my work on Almutawakel. I just got the page up and I hope everything works out with it. Hopefully I added enough references to keep the article alive. If you happen to see anything I could do to help improve the article, please let me know. Thanks again. Sullyman15 ( talk) 08:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 16:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
Just as a P.S. to our IRC chat, I wanted to mention this quote;
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced.*
–Jimmy Wales
*Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved on 2009-04-08.
I certainly consider myself to be very inclusionist; however, that doesn't give an excuse for unreferenced info. To me, being inclusionist means that you err on the side of caution regarding notability etc. when considering if an article should exist - and in that respect, I do tend toward inclusion of as much stuff as possible, as long as it's referenced. As regards the facts though - the content of the articles - I'm in agreement with the JimboQuote. Chzz ► 19:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Re. Weatherstar4000 ( talk · contribs) and username issue; I've re-checked their response in User_talk:Weatherstar4000#Question_about_your_user_name, and I'm happy with it; I don't see any "suggestion that the account is operated by a group" ? Chzz ► 15:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
(BTW, pls talkback me; I don't watch stuff, ty) Chzz ► 15:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
It's no problem. :) — neuro (talk) (review) 11:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 18:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't see any of my adoptees on that list, but thank you for being observant. ---- ♥Soccer5525♥ Talk To Me! 15:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
great thx! -- ♥Soccer 5525♥ 18:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
for the WP:LIKETHIS tip. Regards, Trafford09 ( talk) 20:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn ( talk) 05:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm the guy that posted that thing on the Guild Wars page (About how Guild Wars is gay, which it isn't), no I don't believe it was constructive or anything like that. I was doing it to prove a point to a friend: That Wikipedia is a reputable source and if anything un-constructive is posted, then it will be changed within a matter of minutes. Thank you for assisting in this manner.
MasterNobuo ( talk) 07:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the complement. Great reference, too. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Since I trust you the most, I was hoping you'd be able to help. My page is up for deletion due to unverifiability(word?) and lack of references. I don't know how to make a hyperlink, so I'm asking you to try. The page I found has the following URL- incubus-online-view.com/page0/page34/demos.php -and I need that put down as a reference or an external link after I first say it's an unreleased demo. PLEASE HELP Iwishiknew ( talk) 16:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
oops, forgot the link (although you may still know it) Let Me Tell Ya 'Bout Root Beer Iwishiknew ( talk) 17:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
UGH! They deleted my page! I don't get why! I'm going to try to get it reposted by talking it out with my wikipage assassin. Iwishiknew ( talk) 20:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I saw what you said to User talk:97.106.43.95
It doesn't matter if I'm an admin or not, you still have to follow the rules. That is, WP:CIVIL and WP:ATTACK. You can't attack others in your edit summaries, nor in your comments toward them anywhere else on Wikipedia. Failure to follow the rules will lead to a block from editing. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Well not only is that user doing that but user 97.106.43.95 is also writing info that he/she cannot prove and he/she has been asked to do so but still user 97.106.43.95 keeps stating something that needs a Reference link to be proven. Also that user is giving out only warnings to people when he/she doesn't the power to do so. [1] [2]
Whoever is an admin needs to be made aware of user 97.106.43.95, although I’m sure there dealing with a lot of troublemakers here on wiki. But I just thought you or someone should know of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.23.10.241 ( talk) 21:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
It didn't work, so I'm going to assume it's the Browser, but Thank you very much for your asistance.-- Skater ( talk) 02:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. It looks like you're right and I won't be able to move them to the main site (too bad, I was looking forward to doing a bunch of these on other locals). Out of curiosity though, you mentioned the neutral point of view which I thought I kept. Did it come across as otherwise? Balfred1980 ( talk) 00:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I know very little with respect to the policies of Wikipedia regarding biographies. If you decide to delete my entry then that is your perogative and I will respect that decision. Information regarding myself can be found very easily by doing a google search. I'm a broadcasting journalist and host of a popular internet talk radio show. I've interviewed many famous personalities. I tried posting with guidelines of other notables, but your format is terribly confusing. Steven Shaman ( talk) 19:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, sorry bout all the sections (I'll explain why I do this eventually) Anyway, thanks for responding to my page and my question is... would this count as reliable? Incubus ??? Iwishiknew ( talk) 22:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words. Glad to help. I've been around for a few years. My former user ID was my name (basically, first and last). I decided to take a lower profile, so I edited anonymously for a little while. Now I'm test-driving the new user ID. -- SharkxFanSJ ( talk) 13:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
hi i am new to this thing. i dont really know what to do. so i was woundering if by any chance you could like be me teacher or something like that. so i know it is you when or if you reply to me could you please write {{teach}} like that at the start of the message. one other question if you dont want to answere that is fine but how old are you?? thank heaps Rmcca21 ( talk) 02:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
I apologies about the reverting his talk page. It was not meant to be hostile, but I believed that there was supposed to be some kind of record of warnings because after so many warnings a final warning/type of block was in order.-- Christopher Kraus ( talk) 01:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Shubinator ( talk) 17:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response to my request for help. I see there are many people who also stated their gratitude for your help. Very nice of you to make yourself so available! Please go to User talk:Pknkly/Helpme Requests#Admin sending private message to user for an update. Pknkly ( talk) 21:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Does talk to me work? Chzz ► 18:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
Talkback|Emmette Hernandez Coleman}}
If you do not mind, please post the response there.--
Emmette Hernandez Coleman (
talk) 22:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi K-dude ... Do you have a source for the Yolo County Courthouse being on the National Register? I ask because it doesn't come up in a search of the NRIS database nor does the California Office of Historic Preservation website indicate that it's on the NRHP. -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 03:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
hello talk to me Rmcca21 ( talk) 04:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
No worries, restored. Just your luck to be experimenting with CSD templates on one of the few days where there's no backlog =). I also deleted User:Killiondude/template test, would you like that restored as well? Lankiveil ( speak to me) 06:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC).
Well, thanks for your response! I'm glad someone's explained it properly. All right, I'll see what I can do and make it actually correct if it's going to stay; nothing too much, but some things need to be tweaked. thanks, THARIRI ( talk) 21:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Also (unrelated but not worth a section),
Chzz ► 14:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
FlyingToaster Barnstar
Hello Killiondude! Thank you so much for your support in my
recent RfA, which passed with a tally of 126/32/5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust. To "central" California!
Flying
Toaster
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
Talkback|Emmette Hernandez Coleman}}
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, i just noticed your December 2008 suggestion at Template talk:infobox nrhp. It happens wp:NRHP participants, including me, worked to include features to cover California Historical Landmarks and other designations into the NRHP infobox. Actually, those features have been in place for several months within an NRHP2 infobox test version, but just now the NRHP2 infobox was copied into the NRHP infobox. So, anyhow, there are new features and new documentation explaining it available, to cover places like Manzanar which is NRHP and California Historical Landmark and has other designations too. Also, for places that are California Historical Landmark and/or LAHCM but NOT also NRHP, i developed a local1 template. It is used in many articles within various list-articles of LAHCMs. Hope this responds to your suggestion! I'd be interested in corresponding, in terms of developing CA Historical Landmark articles, if you are interested. doncram ( talk) 12:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: List of school districts in Yolo County, California Shouldn't that page only include school districts? I saw that you added a bunch of private schools to the page. I sort of disagree that individual schools should be listed, otherwise it contradicts the title. Killiondude (talk) 00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rocksanddirt"
First off I'd like to thank you for answering why my page was deleted. But I'd like to ask you how I would cite my sources, because I read the page, but I still didn't truly understand how to cite them. The facebook group homepage states most of what was stated on the page, although some of the knowledge was through speech even if that. I could ask the creator to add all of the information that I stated and put it on a history section of the group. Yes although we are not a very large group, I believe that a wiki article will increase the popularity of the group and may lead us to eventually creating a website. Granted, it's simply a novelty idea, but then again so was the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and that has pretty much turned into a cult following. I even remember when it was a stupid idea on Something Awful forums. If sources are the problem, and the home website has an insufficient amount of data, then I will agree to drop the page. But if citing is just the problem, I would like help properly citing the page. Darkraptor ( talk) 07:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
First of all, thanks for your cordial attention.
I am not 100% error free writing in english because my native language is spanish, however i will be happy if you check any grammatical errors on the article that im writing about the Venezuelan pianist Zamora.
Thanks again.
Regards, -- Zfans ( talk) 00:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
To tell you the truth, Killiondude, I am open to you deleting them. That was my first time creating a whole article (I created a separate article for Alex Haley's Queen) I need some help so if you think that you're right, I have no qualms with it. Thankee for doing it!! Shalom, Rivka ( talk) 19:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
You should at least try to read what is on the talpage of the article. I've been working on the article in Spanish and this article is absolutely a joke. see WP:NPOV.-- Amnesico29 ( talk) 06:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. Thanks for your feedback. I'll continue my edits. Andremun ( talk) 21:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I joined wikipedia a few months ago and read a lot of guidelines before I ever posted. I tried being "adopted" but no one ever responded to my talkpage. (Then again, I didn't actively seek it.) It's just here, I'd like some input since it seems not a lot of people edit that particular page I was working on. I look forward to your input! Red Summer Rain ( talk) 22:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 20:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I am interested in starting am Ernest Hemingway project to improve content related to his life and works, and have proposed the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Ernest_Hemingway_project. Please share your thoughts there! kilbad ( talk) 16:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for checking ... I have added a couple relevent cites, may be able to do more - I'm aware of the OR problem, and if you've checked previous versions of the page you saw just how much "OR" from a POV slant I removed. It's a pretty difficult topic to reference well due to the fact that it really is about a specific product as well as a concept, otherwise we have nothing but the DIY section with the antique chair over a bucket picture - the references to particular makers have to do with technical differences in their approaches, and I intentionally linked to deep pages showing the inner works [which I have to assume is copyrighted and I can't use directly] ... and as a long time composter [and a compost toilet owner :eek: ], I've tried to "paint a picture" of the products [without favor] and the process [safe microbial composting] and how it fits into the sustainable- environmental- waste- management sphere - Wikipedia does, after all, ask for "expert input" on topics .... the "see also" section is large for now to forstall wandering crusaders adding to the article about other related but inappropriate topics, as the history seems to be that some consider any hole in the ground a "composting toilet" ... further advice on this or any of the other articles listed on my user page is welcome, thanks again Red58bill ( talk) 08:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I've made some improvement on the toilet article, adding ref/cites and removing inline brand mentions ..... google scholar did help some, but unfortunately most of the links there are to sites requiring purchase of the article, with no more than minimul abstracts available, although I got some leads to find other ways. Now I'm onto a different aspect of my mission - would appreciate it if you could check the idea on my talk page and add any comments you can contribute. Thanks Red58bill ( talk) 18:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the Comodo page, Killiondude. I haven't given up on it; I needed to show my proposed edits to the legal department and it took them almost two months to respond :P. I got your suggestion on my talk page that I do my edits right on the actual page. I am still struggling with how to do links and I don't want to put up a page that looks really sloppy. I'll let you know when i get something useable; just wanted to let you know that I appreciated your looking at it from a neutral perspective. Katharine908 ( talk) 17:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Wow, Killiondude. Thanks for updating the references on the Comodo page. I could see that I should have done it myself, and I definitely intended to get to it...one day. I appreciate it. Katharine908 ( talk) 13:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Killiondude,
Thanks for your response to my query on the Francis Andersen article. I see that if I want to expand this article I should look for references first and base my article primarily on information I find there. But to what extent is it appropriate to add some information based on my own personal knowledge of the topic?
Another question: since this is the biography of an author, how many of his published works would it be appropriate to list?
Thanks for your encouragement.
Sincerely,
Tekone —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tekone Yoshimori (
talk •
contribs) 23:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I wondering if you would be interested in undergoing formal Dispute Resolution, instead of participating in these edit wars, which have continually proved that they solve nothing. There are clearly two sides to this matter. A more experienced and higher level administrator is needed to solve this problem. I will not request resolution until you and several other users support the idea. Standleylake40 ( talk) 00:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
So I took the plunge and made my first page, and you tagged it (is that the correct terminology?) as needing cleanup. I'm eager to do this, but am having trouble finding out exactly what I need to do. I know from previous experience with editors here that you folks are awfully busy, so I don't expect you to tell me excatly what I need to do, but some broad hints would be useful. For example, I already know that the capitalization in the title is nonstandard, but don't see how it can be edited in the same way the rest of the page can. Looking forward to hearing from you.-- 24.18.105.64 ( talk) 05:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Would you have time this month to co-nominate the Spokane article? The reason I ask is because this week Im off on spring break right now and have a little more time to goof off and do stuff on Wikipedia; I dont know if this is the case with you though. If I remember right, a FAC could last as little as 2 weeks or something, and go on for I forget how long... Anyway, if another time works better for you, or you dont to co-nominate it anymore for any reason, thats fine too. Oh, and thanks for fixing Nehrams' list. Anon134 ( talk) 05:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Historic Sites is opened up. I took the liberty of assuming your support for the wikiproject meant you wanted to join as a member, and I copied your signature to the Members list on the main page. Please visit and add to, or remove, your listing there. It would be great to hear about what you're interested in the Wikiproject becoming, in your member comment and/or at the Talk page, shortcut wt:HSITES. Thanks for your support! doncram ( talk) 17:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I suppose we can get a quick and dirty "second" opinion if we need to. Then one of those requests for comment, which take forever for some reason. Another tack is to alternate reversions with me and "get" him on the 3 revert rule. Mediation is way too time consuming and too early to discuss. I'll try to follow your lead here. He's going to lose, it's just a matter of when and how soon. If we could dream up a face-saving way, I'd take it, but unfortunately here, it's all or nothing. Student7 ( talk) 11:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
...for the attempted help.....well, I'm pretty sure I'm trying to create one of those graph pages that shows (in graph form) how many edits you've done. Buddpaul ( talk) 23:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For always being there to lend a helping hand and making Wikipedia a better place. Thank you. Anon134 ( talk) 06:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
Shubinator ( talk) 20:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude, it appears that whether it is appropriate to capitalize mammal common names is a contentious issue that to my knowledge has never been resolved. My understanding is that the Wikipedia policy is that changes from lower to upper case or vice versa are forbidden at least until some decision is made about this issue. I am on the side that prefers lower case (since these names are not proper nouns, and there is no tradition of capitalizing them in formal prose - meaning other encyclopedias, scientific journals, serious books, etc.). I thus request that you not make such changes. Thanks, WolfmanSF ( talk) 04:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
That "upmerge" wasn't done for a reason— the userbox had been modified and people though the category wasn't in use. Why do you think someone never "merged" it? Tothwolf ( talk) 06:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you've worked on any of the web browser categories yet, but it looks like they had a similar thing happen. The category code in the userboxes appears to have been removed and it has left many of the categories very empty. I'll see what I can find out and we'll try to get this mess all sorted out and fixed though. You might want to hold off on any other big "Wikipedians ..." category changes until we can sort it all out though. Tothwolf ( talk) 09:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Suddenly I'm seeing many instances of cases where bracketed terms that didn't link to other pages now appear as strikeout. On my page List of Washington Freshwater Fish, I went through and removed the brackets, so the strikeout disappears. Is this is what we are supposed to do when we encounter stuff like this? Busaccsb ( talk) 00:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
test
It seems to me like some of that is important information that can assist those editors that remain. It should not have been removed, IMHO. Dr. Cash ( talk) 18:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah thanks, exactly what was intended. Didn't even notice it! Thanks! - Allied45 ( talk) 07:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I think when I re-welcomed them, I thought that they could have been a dynamic IP address, so I wanted to encourage them to get an account. My bad for being completely oblivious. Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
So, I can now see why you like wikipedia so much. It is quite interesting, and now I see why you can waste hours at a time finding new things. Well, maybe wasting is the wrong word to use. But, nonetheless, I have found a new hobby, and I have you to thank. Unfortunately, I am not sure how many people I want to tell because having wikipedia as a hobby kind of sounds geeky to me :) So, I am done, and I see it says to sign a post by typing four tildes, interesting. Well, you know who wrote this, so no need to sign my name :) The End 67.159.149.199 ( talk) 21:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it's annoying, but at least it's an indication that the editor has seen the posting. The effort to hide/delete the talk page archive is more of a problem. Will Beback talk 06:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Ooh, ta very much! As you prob guessed, it was a stupid typo. Chzz ► 10:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the feedback you gave on the page I'm working on. I still have some work to do, but once I'm finished, what would be the best way to move the article into the mainspace without losing the edit history? Thanks! Marisko ( talk) 15:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude,
You were nice enough to help me when I accidently published a rough draft of my article on Managment due diligence on the main page. You moved it back to my user page. Upon completion of the article, I moved it back to the main page, but I noticed that when I do a seach, the username version of the article still appears. Is this correct and normal, or did I miss a step in my procedure?
Thanks
Ohio Boy ( talk) 20:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you. I appreciate your guidance and patience with "rookies."
Ohio Boy ( talk) 21:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for responding so quickly. I'm actually in the process of uploading it right now -- it's a rather big file (resolution) -- will wikipedia automatically resize it when it's on the page? And how do I cite it once it's uploaded? AC ( talk) 22:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
. You could add the URL of the uploaded image to the template, along with the other information about it.
Killiondude (
talk) 22:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Uhm why exactly did you WP:CSD#A1 Comparison of Internet Relay Chat networks? Don't tell me people delete articles under construction now? -- Tothwolf ( talk) 07:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
// roux 08:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
KuyaBriBri Talk 13:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your feedback on the article! Could you please take a look at my reply at WP:FEED? -- Modbear ( talk) 18:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the constructive feedback. I plan to address the recommendations over the next few days.
Off topic; I spent 6 years living in North Highlands and working at the McClellan AFB, which I understand is now closed. My oldest daughter was born in there in 1979 and we moved from California to Pittsburgh, PA in 1980.
Northern California is still one of my favorite places, but we are now firmly rooted in Littleton, CO (suburb of Denver).
Thanks again,
Jimpeoples ( talk) 15:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I've tried getting an infobox discussion started on South Park discussion pages before, to no avail. Maybe there's a shadow society of infobox experts who are dedicated to closely guarding the secret. Or not. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. - SoSaysChappy ( talk) 17:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the help on that, that was my next situation, but what I needed help with was on the infobox to the immediate right to my page. (Y'know where the cover artwork is placed.) On every other Incubus album page, there's like a bar, inside of it, it should say Incubus Chronology. And underneath it says Last Album (so-and-so) This Album (So-and-so) and Next Album (So-and so). All I'm wondering is if there's some subtle difference between the way I place my Infobox and the way everyone else placed their infobox. Iwishiknew ( talk) 18:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Killiondude! Thanks for your help and erm sorry if this shouldn't go here, hehe :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mezod ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your suggestions and guidance with regards to my work on Almutawakel. I just got the page up and I hope everything works out with it. Hopefully I added enough references to keep the article alive. If you happen to see anything I could do to help improve the article, please let me know. Thanks again. Sullyman15 ( talk) 08:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 16:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
Just as a P.S. to our IRC chat, I wanted to mention this quote;
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced.*
–Jimmy Wales
*Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved on 2009-04-08.
I certainly consider myself to be very inclusionist; however, that doesn't give an excuse for unreferenced info. To me, being inclusionist means that you err on the side of caution regarding notability etc. when considering if an article should exist - and in that respect, I do tend toward inclusion of as much stuff as possible, as long as it's referenced. As regards the facts though - the content of the articles - I'm in agreement with the JimboQuote. Chzz ► 19:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Re. Weatherstar4000 ( talk · contribs) and username issue; I've re-checked their response in User_talk:Weatherstar4000#Question_about_your_user_name, and I'm happy with it; I don't see any "suggestion that the account is operated by a group" ? Chzz ► 15:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
(BTW, pls talkback me; I don't watch stuff, ty) Chzz ► 15:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
It's no problem. :) — neuro (talk) (review) 11:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 18:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't see any of my adoptees on that list, but thank you for being observant. ---- ♥Soccer5525♥ Talk To Me! 15:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
great thx! -- ♥Soccer 5525♥ 18:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
for the WP:LIKETHIS tip. Regards, Trafford09 ( talk) 20:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn ( talk) 05:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm the guy that posted that thing on the Guild Wars page (About how Guild Wars is gay, which it isn't), no I don't believe it was constructive or anything like that. I was doing it to prove a point to a friend: That Wikipedia is a reputable source and if anything un-constructive is posted, then it will be changed within a matter of minutes. Thank you for assisting in this manner.
MasterNobuo ( talk) 07:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the complement. Great reference, too. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Since I trust you the most, I was hoping you'd be able to help. My page is up for deletion due to unverifiability(word?) and lack of references. I don't know how to make a hyperlink, so I'm asking you to try. The page I found has the following URL- incubus-online-view.com/page0/page34/demos.php -and I need that put down as a reference or an external link after I first say it's an unreleased demo. PLEASE HELP Iwishiknew ( talk) 16:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
oops, forgot the link (although you may still know it) Let Me Tell Ya 'Bout Root Beer Iwishiknew ( talk) 17:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
UGH! They deleted my page! I don't get why! I'm going to try to get it reposted by talking it out with my wikipage assassin. Iwishiknew ( talk) 20:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I saw what you said to User talk:97.106.43.95
It doesn't matter if I'm an admin or not, you still have to follow the rules. That is, WP:CIVIL and WP:ATTACK. You can't attack others in your edit summaries, nor in your comments toward them anywhere else on Wikipedia. Failure to follow the rules will lead to a block from editing. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Well not only is that user doing that but user 97.106.43.95 is also writing info that he/she cannot prove and he/she has been asked to do so but still user 97.106.43.95 keeps stating something that needs a Reference link to be proven. Also that user is giving out only warnings to people when he/she doesn't the power to do so. [1] [2]
Whoever is an admin needs to be made aware of user 97.106.43.95, although I’m sure there dealing with a lot of troublemakers here on wiki. But I just thought you or someone should know of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.23.10.241 ( talk) 21:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
It didn't work, so I'm going to assume it's the Browser, but Thank you very much for your asistance.-- Skater ( talk) 02:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. It looks like you're right and I won't be able to move them to the main site (too bad, I was looking forward to doing a bunch of these on other locals). Out of curiosity though, you mentioned the neutral point of view which I thought I kept. Did it come across as otherwise? Balfred1980 ( talk) 00:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I know very little with respect to the policies of Wikipedia regarding biographies. If you decide to delete my entry then that is your perogative and I will respect that decision. Information regarding myself can be found very easily by doing a google search. I'm a broadcasting journalist and host of a popular internet talk radio show. I've interviewed many famous personalities. I tried posting with guidelines of other notables, but your format is terribly confusing. Steven Shaman ( talk) 19:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, sorry bout all the sections (I'll explain why I do this eventually) Anyway, thanks for responding to my page and my question is... would this count as reliable? Incubus ??? Iwishiknew ( talk) 22:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words. Glad to help. I've been around for a few years. My former user ID was my name (basically, first and last). I decided to take a lower profile, so I edited anonymously for a little while. Now I'm test-driving the new user ID. -- SharkxFanSJ ( talk) 13:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
hi i am new to this thing. i dont really know what to do. so i was woundering if by any chance you could like be me teacher or something like that. so i know it is you when or if you reply to me could you please write {{teach}} like that at the start of the message. one other question if you dont want to answere that is fine but how old are you?? thank heaps Rmcca21 ( talk) 02:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
I apologies about the reverting his talk page. It was not meant to be hostile, but I believed that there was supposed to be some kind of record of warnings because after so many warnings a final warning/type of block was in order.-- Christopher Kraus ( talk) 01:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Shubinator ( talk) 17:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response to my request for help. I see there are many people who also stated their gratitude for your help. Very nice of you to make yourself so available! Please go to User talk:Pknkly/Helpme Requests#Admin sending private message to user for an update. Pknkly ( talk) 21:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Does talk to me work? Chzz ► 18:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
Talkback|Emmette Hernandez Coleman}}
If you do not mind, please post the response there.--
Emmette Hernandez Coleman (
talk) 22:12, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi K-dude ... Do you have a source for the Yolo County Courthouse being on the National Register? I ask because it doesn't come up in a search of the NRIS database nor does the California Office of Historic Preservation website indicate that it's on the NRHP. -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 03:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
hello talk to me Rmcca21 ( talk) 04:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
No worries, restored. Just your luck to be experimenting with CSD templates on one of the few days where there's no backlog =). I also deleted User:Killiondude/template test, would you like that restored as well? Lankiveil ( speak to me) 06:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC).
Well, thanks for your response! I'm glad someone's explained it properly. All right, I'll see what I can do and make it actually correct if it's going to stay; nothing too much, but some things need to be tweaked. thanks, THARIRI ( talk) 21:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Also (unrelated but not worth a section),
Chzz ► 14:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
FlyingToaster Barnstar
Hello Killiondude! Thank you so much for your support in my
recent RfA, which passed with a tally of 126/32/5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust. To "central" California!
Flying
Toaster
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
Talkback|Emmette Hernandez Coleman}}
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |