![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks Kethrus,
Apologies for not leaving a question earlier. I'm a bit new to this Wikipedia editing. I made a few edits years ago and one the other day. I'm still not sure of the protocols, etc.
My issue is that I'm kind of a bit peeved that Wiki Editor Bleaney (see /info/en/?search=User:Bleaney has dis-approved or otherwise reversed my edit on a page concerning a School in Leamington Spa.
See: [ [1]]
I am a webdesigner and all I did was to link the (previously unlkinked) name of the School to it's new website. The note left by Bleaney simply remarks "Not needed".
Can you help resolve this issue, please? I did think to approach Bleaney directly but I'm afraid I'm not sure how to.
Any assistance would be gratefully received.
Kind rgds,
Chris Xpher ( talk) 20:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
No worries, I was just reverted myself recently for adding that award to the last Champions League article, so I was familiar with the situation. Cheers. – Pee Jay 17:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Kethrus.
Why you reverted my edits? Do you know Spanish orthography? (referring to Colegio San Bartolomé la Merced) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodriguma ( talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou so much kethrus . i really dont know sandbox but now i understood what is sand box and thankyou so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by GamingElic ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
[2] He's a real criminal of a continuous oil damage event of temples and shrines. But I can't write about this because he isn't reported by a real name in Japan news yet. It'll do nothing but be on a weekly magazine, and it's put out immediately by a Japanese edition. If English Wikipedia the same, I'll give up.-- 永続繁栄 ( talk) 18:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
-- 54Whisper ( talk) 19:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at 54Whisper's talk page.
Hi
I was adding a section about the inaccuracies of the film. Below is what I typed and please note it is backed up by an online review in The Guardian newspaper.
Maureen Flanagan, a close friend of the Kray family was interviewed by The Guardian newspaper about how accurate the portrayal of the twins in the movie was, and although she respected Hardy's performances as being more accurate than the Kemp brothers in the 1990 Kray's film she did question much of the storyline and relationship between the characters. The family of Frances Kray (nee Shea) were not happy with the portrayal of their family member nor were members of the Kray family on the inaccurate relationship between Reggie and Frances. Family members have stated that Reggie was more devoted to Frances than portrayed in the film and it was never known to either family that Reggie was ever physically abusive to her as shown in one scene in the film after a drunken Reggie confronts his wife in a bedroom. The murder scene of Jack "the hat" Mcvitie shows Jack taunting Reggie over the loss of his ex-wife and repeating her name which then triggers Reggie to murder him. There is no account of these words being spoken at all, and former gang members who were present in the room stated that Ronnie was encouraging his brother to finish Mcvitie off. The very final scene shows Reggie walking out of the house along a canal path when in fact he and his brother ordered their gang members to dispose of the body and calmly left together in a car. The ending of the film also shows the Kray's former financial advisor Leslie Payne seated dead in the back of a car, indicating that the twins had ordered his murder. Although in reality Ronnie Kray had tried to plan Payne's murder it never actually happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.41.254 ( talk) 22:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the citations for this article are not sufficient to identify the subject as notable:
/info/en/?search=Draft:California_Mission_Walkers
It has been documented in the San Diego Union Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, and KPBS, as well as numerous websites relating to the California Missions. Would including these Mission-related websites as secondary sources be sufficient to meet the requirements?
Note that this subject also "connects" well with existing articles on El Camino Real California, Spanish Missions in California, and Camino de Santiago, each of which could reasonably link to the California Mission Walkers.
Wygk (
talk)
01:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
References
I really don't know what else I need to do here. I have looked at several other game pages here on Wikipedia with literally 1 reference to their game's store page, and 1 reference to their official website and they get approved. What am I doing wrong here? It is extremely frustrating, can you please elaborate what I am doing wrong? I am sorry, I am not trying to sound snide. I just don't understand how other pages are doing the same thing, and getting OK'd, but this submission is declined.
Jenilya ( talk) 03:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Jenilya: If this is about the same game (which it appears to be) it might be worth adding that to the article and adding a reference to that, because that gives a little more significance to the article (in my eyes). I'll ask for a second opinion once this is done. --I am Kethrus Talk to me! 04:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I have fixed the citations, so they better reflect the sources, 2 of which are for national newspapers in their respective countries. One you would have to verify through microfiche since it's too old, but that may be doable at the newspaper's HQ (still in print). I looked at the original spanish language wikipedia entry and there are a lot more reference material listed but it's mostly printed books that exist in europe and I have no way to access here in the US, so not sure how I could list or verify those? Thanks for any help... also should I just translate the spanish entry? I figured without having a way to check the referenced data it would not be possible for me to verify and hard for someone else unless they've collected all those books. Thanks again. Pasanf ( talk) 04:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.203.126.33 ( talk • contribs)
Hi,
I have modified the update so many times that now, most of the relevant stuff have been removed from it. Have added links to external references like newspapers, portals etc for providing you the proof that we are notable in terms of company size and structure. What more is required to be added..please be precise. Even another company in the same segment- Policybazaar.com has similar stuff and content. Why did that get approved? Tusharpx ( talk) 09:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for informing about the Notability of Academics. I studied that page and realized I should have added information pertinent to notability in academia. Therefore, I have added the information about James Storer being Department Chair (Notability criteria number 5) and also he being the Chair of the highest impact factor conference in Data Compression from 1991 to 2012, and Co-chair from 2013 to present, this is notability criteria number 8. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria
Let me know, what other changes I can make to make sure his notability is verifiable.
I should also like to point regarding him being the inventor of first Lunar Landar game, I have included many sources, articles, periodicals which cite the same. Also Wikipedia's page on Lunar Lander video game series ( /info/en/?search=Lunar_Lander_(video_game_series), already mentions his name (see section Lundar Lander (1969) "Lunar was originally written in the FOCAL programming language for the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) PDP-8 computer by Jim Storer while a student at Lexington High School (Massachusetts) in the fall of 1969", but I have not cited wikipedia as source but cited the original sources that were cited in that Wikipedia article.
Thank you for your effort and time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamaaditya ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Coy Tinker (
talk) 06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Dear Sir/Madam, I am fully aware that the Wikipedia verifiability policy requires inline citations for quotations.
Please note that, the contents for this article are supported by a single source, which is product’s official website. For this article I have found all the information form the product’s official website. I have modified and drafted all the details from neutral point of view. I assure you that the source is reliable for viewers to verify and to find additional information
I have already listed the source in general reference section and marked the source title. Please help me to review this article and check if I have used the citations in right order. Thanks very much.
Coy Tinker (
talk)
06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Coy Tinker ( talk) 06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I am a bit puzzled on what constitutes notable citations.
The press releases cited are from the beta release of the product a few years ago, would a newer one help ? Or do you need to see something specifically about the design approach of the product and its academic/industry relevance ? An example of what kind of citation would make this article more "notable" will help a lot.
thx - kavi Kavi.saralweb ( talk) 23:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Just a quick note to let you know I responded to your comment over at Talk:Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz ( talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
With all due respect, and I really do mean that, Facebook is the main source of information for bands like this. The band's record label- a very well established label- hasn't even updated their page in some time. However, they do take to Facebook to update fans on news. Speaking purely on the basis of a fan of all music, this is now the normal way of things for bands in certain genres. Just a couple of weeks ago another band I like announced the very unexpected broadcast of a new song they had not yet told anyone about. And they did it through a Facebook post. And really, that was it. I think it took over a week for it to be reported off of Facebook. And, like the band in my submission, the band's label only issued statements on Facebook.
I hope you see what I'm trying to say. If I were writing an article about- I'm just pulling something totally hypothetical- a new model of car Ford has announced, it would be very easy for me to just link to their website and any websites that may be partners of Ford and so on. It would be ridiculous of me to use Facebook as an anchor source. But this is a smaller genre of music, and the fans are very loyal, and, as one of those fans, I was just hoping to add more information for anyone out to see something new. The other sites I got information from and cited were sites which are more well known to those that listen to this spectrum of music. I also would like to note that the one with the track listings and album art is the website the band opted to give the information to, as did the record label. I'm not sure if that site was read, but that part is mentioned throughout the article and at the bottom of the page. There are also direct quotes from the band members to that article. So again, I hope I'm getting my point across about this. I did take the Facebook post away, but I do still think it is pertinent. At least for now, because I am not too sure how much more we are going to get until possibly after the release of the album.
And one last thing- I genuinely hope that this entry is being taken as an entry worthy of spreading, because there really are a good amount of people out there who can, and will, appreciate it. It always makes me happy when I can type in the name of whatever band or album and it comes up, because it didn't used to be like that. Bands like this or bands with small, but loyal followings, lightly distributed albums, or just anything along those lines- it would be deleted almost instantly. And it does breed a bit of contempt. I have nothing but the utmost respect for Wikipedia and its mission, but I do think it can sometimes be a little narrow minded in what its collective majority sees as being worthy of notation. I know that I feel that if something exists and is part of culture on a socially or historically relevant scale, no matter the size, it deserves to be included into such a vast collection of knowledge such a Wikipedia. The more knowledge, the better. And as long as there is honesty and conviction behind the submission, I feel like it should be given a chance. People use Wikipedia to enrich themselves with knowledge of all sorts, and even the smallest piece of information can spark a whole new interest, hobby, obsession, etc. And I say THAT... because it has happened to me quite a few times on Wikipedia. From very small entries.
I appreciate your time! Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalcomplex ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for hearing me out. I feel you were fair and open to what I was saying, and I do appreciate that. Please do know that as time goes on, I'll be adding new sources and, when the time comes, removing the Facebook post as a main post. I'd rather have it from the label's website, but, like I said, they haven't updated their news section in a while. Since July, actually. But they're very active on Facebook. So I'll add the label's official release on its own site whenever they get around to it. I think they add information in large batches at a time. Anyway, like I said, I do want things to look cleaner and well sourced. So the help has been great and thanks for all the new information! Digitalcomplex ( talk) 00:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus - My article for Ramona Sakiestewa was rejected! I had really thought I had understood all the guidelines for an article on her. Is there any specific portion or segment of the article that's keeping it from being approved? I appreciate your sharing your critique and any clarification on what I am missing. Thanks Tons. Robin : MondeR — Preceding unsigned comment added by MondeR ( talk • contribs)
Thanks Kethrus! The Draft space is definitely easier to edit within. I went ahead and made a number of inline citations using the publication sources. I then removed said sources from the Further Reading section. I think it should be in pretty good shape. Please let me know if there are any other segments that need refinement. I appreciate your help! - MondeR - Robin /info/en/?search=Draft:Ramona_Sakiestewa
@ Kethrus: Apologies sir, but there seems to be more activity on my wikipedia entry from the same people who were editing it before, negatively, along with the account of my wife melissa chiu. i have added 2 requests to the talk page for benjamin Genocchio for editors to review what i believe are factual errors that have been inserted into the entry over the last 48 hours. They are continuing to edit the entry but i am staying out of it lest i be accused again of a conflict-- this is what they used, over my wife's account, to block me before. i really don't know why my tiny entry and that of my wife have become the subject of such fascination for these two editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgenocchio ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the reminder! Much appreciated :) Lirazelf ( talk) 13:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Steven Rich in Panama's talk page.
Dear Kethrus,
I left you a message on my Help Me after I followed your good advice and made changes to my Lead section in my Draft. I just want you to revisit to see my changes and make more suggestions. Thanks. Steven Rich in Panama ( talk) 14:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the page and a reviewer will review it, and either accept it or suggest improvements. --
Kethrus |
talk to me
17:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at ggiacos's talk page.
{{ping|Kethrus}}
to your talk page, and follow it with a message. Also, please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~
--
Kethrus |
talk to me
14:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Hello Kethrus, my nomination was in good faith, do not take it otherwise. I am aware of WP:VALIDALT but I felt somebody is trying to impersonate you, so I took precautionary step. However, thank you for the confirmation. Regards. Hitro talk 21:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have protected Mudar Zahran for 1 week, due to concerns about potential WP:BLP violations. You will be aware that the inclusion of various pieces of potentially libelous (albeit sourced) information has been included and reverted over the past few days, and that concerns have been raised about the reliability of those sources. I am hoping that all involved parties could try to reach agreement on the sources while the page is protected via discussion of the article's talk page. I am posting this message on the talk page of all editors that appear to have been involved in adding or reverting the information. TigerShark ( talk) 23:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Can quoting from obituaries and other articles in newspapers be accepted? Not sure if I can find an obituary for 1959. I only have the newspaper articles. I know of no other way to substantiate the information. I do have shipping records that show when he immigrated to US. I have his marriage certificate. I have copy of where his grave is. Are those the kind of things that will accepted?
Beverlz (
talk)
14:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Beverlz
Yes, THE subject edited the page that was established by SOMEONE ELSE. By objective accounts, R. Baxter Miller is one of the leading African American critics of the late 20th and early twenty-first centuries. See BLACK SOUTHERN VOICES (1992) OR simply Google the scores of web pages that document the importance of his scholarship. The author Raoullah (sp?) is a libelous graduate student with a vendetta. Rather than discrediting a well-respected scholar, he dishonors himself.
It's libelous incompetence, and, you know, it's really sad.
Ron Miller — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.217.22 ( talk) 14:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Global Cycling Network, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is a credible claim of notability on this page. Whether or not this actually meets WP:GNG is not in the domain of A7. If you do not believe that this is a sufficient claim of notability, take it to WP:AFD. A7 does not mean "not notable" - it means "no claim of notability was made". That is clearly not true here. Thank you. Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 20:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus!
I am currently writing an article for my client Spark and am having a hard time finding reliable sources because most sources are not based off any database or "reliable" website. Any help?
Best regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SparkOfficial ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I have been through the submission process a number of times. I have asked for help and different editors have told me different things, and one even helped make some changes before the draft was rejected.
What specifically do I need to change in order for the draft to be accepted?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.8.126 ( talk) 16:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
-- 23:29, Wednesday, September 23, 2015 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
You reverted in this edit with no edit summary. That edit removed references. Could you please explain? Many thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
In future, please really, really, really try to inspect your edits and use edit summaries. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Kethrus, thanks for the help. I have read the article on valid references and now I am aware of it now. Please note for the product in my article is the first release of the company so that I can’t find any references other to their official web. So here how can I prove the company's website as a reliable source to show the notability? Coy Tinker ( talk) 08:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Oh ok, so the references are not suitable. If I remove them completely, will I be able to get the draft accepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.8.126 ( talk • contribs)
I fixed the cut and paste move. I did not undelete the revision with your speedy deletion tagging after the move, but I think it is no longer necessary. Best wishes, — Kusma ( t· c) 16:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
This Wikipedia page used to exist, but was replaced by a redirect. I need to cancel the redirect and bring the original page back so that I can edit it. But I can't find the original page, all I can find is a translation of an earlier version of the original page into Chinese. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/WISE_0535-7500 The Chinese version is lacking at least one line of text that used to be in the English version.
The lost English version may be hidden under a synonym, possibly "WISE J053516.80-750024.9" or "WISE J0535-7500".
Please help with finding (or reconstructing by back-translation) the original English version of the this webpage. Mollwollfumble (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
if i add the following references as citations for the first line "James Kenji Lopez-Alt, know as Kenji, (born October 31, 1979) is an American chef and food writer." would that suffice? http://www.foodandwine.com/articles/40-big-food-thinkers-under-40-kenji-lopez-alt http://www.grubstreet.com/2015/09/kenji-lopez-alt-grub-street-diet.html http://www.seattletimes.com/life/food-drink/the-food-lab-a-must-have-for-at-home-cooks-books-for-cooks/
I guess I'm struggling with which sources to include and how to include them. Also it would help me if you think this is a process issue (as in we need the proper documentation) or a conceptual one (i.e. you really DO NOT think that this person is notable enough to warrant their own wikipedia page)
Hi i appreciate you stopping by and fixing up my draft. I have my conversation about this page with a different reviewer here /info/en/?search=User_talk:Onel5969#National_Benefit_Authority_Page , it looks like he is busy as i didn't hear back from him in the past 2 days. Would you be able to approve it? Ntb613 ( talk) 19:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
REFERENCES FOR THE PAPER
The article has 16 REFERENCES, all of which are RELIABLE and VERIABLE - they are books, journals, reports and General History Volumes. This paper was well-researched
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 00:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
REVISIONS
I have taken out all the external links in the paper -they are not needed. There were there because I didn't want to create an "orphan" article. The paper is appropriately referenced now - if you look at the REFERENCES list.
Please let me know that you have seen the changes and are reviewing the paper as needed.
I have not received any feedback for 12 hours now.
Thanks,
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 12:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
UPDATES
Please let me know the status of my submission. Please note that the article is appropriately and verifiably REFERENCED - changes were made September 24.
I am awaiting your response.
Thanks,
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 13:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't need assistance!
This must be some kind of bloated status that you have.
I took out all the internet references.
I have a verifiable reference list containing 16 citations of books, articles and papers. I have reloaded the paper.
You insist all I did was spam-like blank out references. This is simply false!!
I posted the wiki entry Kurankyi Taylor many years ago and it was later edited by his grandson.
This posting on James Eggay Taylor uses some of the same sources.
But, from your bloated high horse, you must think my effort not worthy of your time that you have volunteered.
If you took the time to review carefully, you will discover that you have blinders on.
Good for you!!
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 20:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 20:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Just wanted to make you aware of the changes that were made to the KRCB-FM article, which I listed on the AfD page. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kethrus, It is so good that you gave me the time of day. I have been on this site for a number of years and understand its philosophy. Yes, not a `soapbox' especially for political reasons. However, some of us would like to offer interesting items for posterity because life is changing so fast with a whole boom of modern technology that happenings in past years now seem quaint! Thus, I feel that whatever I add to this notion as a ninety year old could be of some historical interest! Kay Lipton 110.23.51.242 ( talk) 00:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I remove these spaces because it looks kinda messy on the page. Having them removed looks neater for the reader and for the editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Please stop - you are spamming the Stiki queue, which is becoming unusable (I'll explain in a moment). Materialscientist ( talk) 03:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
HEllo,Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. I am sure you can see I am new to the submission process. I do believe in the submission and I would like to continue to work with you to get it included. I hope you will assist me in this matter.
50.24.183.89 ( talk) 06:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC) 9/28/15
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks Kethrus,
Apologies for not leaving a question earlier. I'm a bit new to this Wikipedia editing. I made a few edits years ago and one the other day. I'm still not sure of the protocols, etc.
My issue is that I'm kind of a bit peeved that Wiki Editor Bleaney (see /info/en/?search=User:Bleaney has dis-approved or otherwise reversed my edit on a page concerning a School in Leamington Spa.
See: [ [1]]
I am a webdesigner and all I did was to link the (previously unlkinked) name of the School to it's new website. The note left by Bleaney simply remarks "Not needed".
Can you help resolve this issue, please? I did think to approach Bleaney directly but I'm afraid I'm not sure how to.
Any assistance would be gratefully received.
Kind rgds,
Chris Xpher ( talk) 20:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
No worries, I was just reverted myself recently for adding that award to the last Champions League article, so I was familiar with the situation. Cheers. – Pee Jay 17:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Kethrus.
Why you reverted my edits? Do you know Spanish orthography? (referring to Colegio San Bartolomé la Merced) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodriguma ( talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou so much kethrus . i really dont know sandbox but now i understood what is sand box and thankyou so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by GamingElic ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
[2] He's a real criminal of a continuous oil damage event of temples and shrines. But I can't write about this because he isn't reported by a real name in Japan news yet. It'll do nothing but be on a weekly magazine, and it's put out immediately by a Japanese edition. If English Wikipedia the same, I'll give up.-- 永続繁栄 ( talk) 18:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
-- 54Whisper ( talk) 19:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at 54Whisper's talk page.
Hi
I was adding a section about the inaccuracies of the film. Below is what I typed and please note it is backed up by an online review in The Guardian newspaper.
Maureen Flanagan, a close friend of the Kray family was interviewed by The Guardian newspaper about how accurate the portrayal of the twins in the movie was, and although she respected Hardy's performances as being more accurate than the Kemp brothers in the 1990 Kray's film she did question much of the storyline and relationship between the characters. The family of Frances Kray (nee Shea) were not happy with the portrayal of their family member nor were members of the Kray family on the inaccurate relationship between Reggie and Frances. Family members have stated that Reggie was more devoted to Frances than portrayed in the film and it was never known to either family that Reggie was ever physically abusive to her as shown in one scene in the film after a drunken Reggie confronts his wife in a bedroom. The murder scene of Jack "the hat" Mcvitie shows Jack taunting Reggie over the loss of his ex-wife and repeating her name which then triggers Reggie to murder him. There is no account of these words being spoken at all, and former gang members who were present in the room stated that Ronnie was encouraging his brother to finish Mcvitie off. The very final scene shows Reggie walking out of the house along a canal path when in fact he and his brother ordered their gang members to dispose of the body and calmly left together in a car. The ending of the film also shows the Kray's former financial advisor Leslie Payne seated dead in the back of a car, indicating that the twins had ordered his murder. Although in reality Ronnie Kray had tried to plan Payne's murder it never actually happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.41.254 ( talk) 22:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the citations for this article are not sufficient to identify the subject as notable:
/info/en/?search=Draft:California_Mission_Walkers
It has been documented in the San Diego Union Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, and KPBS, as well as numerous websites relating to the California Missions. Would including these Mission-related websites as secondary sources be sufficient to meet the requirements?
Note that this subject also "connects" well with existing articles on El Camino Real California, Spanish Missions in California, and Camino de Santiago, each of which could reasonably link to the California Mission Walkers.
Wygk (
talk)
01:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
References
I really don't know what else I need to do here. I have looked at several other game pages here on Wikipedia with literally 1 reference to their game's store page, and 1 reference to their official website and they get approved. What am I doing wrong here? It is extremely frustrating, can you please elaborate what I am doing wrong? I am sorry, I am not trying to sound snide. I just don't understand how other pages are doing the same thing, and getting OK'd, but this submission is declined.
Jenilya ( talk) 03:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Jenilya: If this is about the same game (which it appears to be) it might be worth adding that to the article and adding a reference to that, because that gives a little more significance to the article (in my eyes). I'll ask for a second opinion once this is done. --I am Kethrus Talk to me! 04:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I have fixed the citations, so they better reflect the sources, 2 of which are for national newspapers in their respective countries. One you would have to verify through microfiche since it's too old, but that may be doable at the newspaper's HQ (still in print). I looked at the original spanish language wikipedia entry and there are a lot more reference material listed but it's mostly printed books that exist in europe and I have no way to access here in the US, so not sure how I could list or verify those? Thanks for any help... also should I just translate the spanish entry? I figured without having a way to check the referenced data it would not be possible for me to verify and hard for someone else unless they've collected all those books. Thanks again. Pasanf ( talk) 04:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
you son of a bitch, asshole, motherfucker, go fuck ur mothers cunt, trade ur wife sister — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.203.126.33 ( talk • contribs)
Hi,
I have modified the update so many times that now, most of the relevant stuff have been removed from it. Have added links to external references like newspapers, portals etc for providing you the proof that we are notable in terms of company size and structure. What more is required to be added..please be precise. Even another company in the same segment- Policybazaar.com has similar stuff and content. Why did that get approved? Tusharpx ( talk) 09:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for informing about the Notability of Academics. I studied that page and realized I should have added information pertinent to notability in academia. Therefore, I have added the information about James Storer being Department Chair (Notability criteria number 5) and also he being the Chair of the highest impact factor conference in Data Compression from 1991 to 2012, and Co-chair from 2013 to present, this is notability criteria number 8. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria
Let me know, what other changes I can make to make sure his notability is verifiable.
I should also like to point regarding him being the inventor of first Lunar Landar game, I have included many sources, articles, periodicals which cite the same. Also Wikipedia's page on Lunar Lander video game series ( /info/en/?search=Lunar_Lander_(video_game_series), already mentions his name (see section Lundar Lander (1969) "Lunar was originally written in the FOCAL programming language for the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) PDP-8 computer by Jim Storer while a student at Lexington High School (Massachusetts) in the fall of 1969", but I have not cited wikipedia as source but cited the original sources that were cited in that Wikipedia article.
Thank you for your effort and time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamaaditya ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Coy Tinker (
talk) 06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Dear Sir/Madam, I am fully aware that the Wikipedia verifiability policy requires inline citations for quotations.
Please note that, the contents for this article are supported by a single source, which is product’s official website. For this article I have found all the information form the product’s official website. I have modified and drafted all the details from neutral point of view. I assure you that the source is reliable for viewers to verify and to find additional information
I have already listed the source in general reference section and marked the source title. Please help me to review this article and check if I have used the citations in right order. Thanks very much.
Coy Tinker (
talk)
06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Coy Tinker ( talk) 06:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I am a bit puzzled on what constitutes notable citations.
The press releases cited are from the beta release of the product a few years ago, would a newer one help ? Or do you need to see something specifically about the design approach of the product and its academic/industry relevance ? An example of what kind of citation would make this article more "notable" will help a lot.
thx - kavi Kavi.saralweb ( talk) 23:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Just a quick note to let you know I responded to your comment over at Talk:Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz ( talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
With all due respect, and I really do mean that, Facebook is the main source of information for bands like this. The band's record label- a very well established label- hasn't even updated their page in some time. However, they do take to Facebook to update fans on news. Speaking purely on the basis of a fan of all music, this is now the normal way of things for bands in certain genres. Just a couple of weeks ago another band I like announced the very unexpected broadcast of a new song they had not yet told anyone about. And they did it through a Facebook post. And really, that was it. I think it took over a week for it to be reported off of Facebook. And, like the band in my submission, the band's label only issued statements on Facebook.
I hope you see what I'm trying to say. If I were writing an article about- I'm just pulling something totally hypothetical- a new model of car Ford has announced, it would be very easy for me to just link to their website and any websites that may be partners of Ford and so on. It would be ridiculous of me to use Facebook as an anchor source. But this is a smaller genre of music, and the fans are very loyal, and, as one of those fans, I was just hoping to add more information for anyone out to see something new. The other sites I got information from and cited were sites which are more well known to those that listen to this spectrum of music. I also would like to note that the one with the track listings and album art is the website the band opted to give the information to, as did the record label. I'm not sure if that site was read, but that part is mentioned throughout the article and at the bottom of the page. There are also direct quotes from the band members to that article. So again, I hope I'm getting my point across about this. I did take the Facebook post away, but I do still think it is pertinent. At least for now, because I am not too sure how much more we are going to get until possibly after the release of the album.
And one last thing- I genuinely hope that this entry is being taken as an entry worthy of spreading, because there really are a good amount of people out there who can, and will, appreciate it. It always makes me happy when I can type in the name of whatever band or album and it comes up, because it didn't used to be like that. Bands like this or bands with small, but loyal followings, lightly distributed albums, or just anything along those lines- it would be deleted almost instantly. And it does breed a bit of contempt. I have nothing but the utmost respect for Wikipedia and its mission, but I do think it can sometimes be a little narrow minded in what its collective majority sees as being worthy of notation. I know that I feel that if something exists and is part of culture on a socially or historically relevant scale, no matter the size, it deserves to be included into such a vast collection of knowledge such a Wikipedia. The more knowledge, the better. And as long as there is honesty and conviction behind the submission, I feel like it should be given a chance. People use Wikipedia to enrich themselves with knowledge of all sorts, and even the smallest piece of information can spark a whole new interest, hobby, obsession, etc. And I say THAT... because it has happened to me quite a few times on Wikipedia. From very small entries.
I appreciate your time! Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalcomplex ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for hearing me out. I feel you were fair and open to what I was saying, and I do appreciate that. Please do know that as time goes on, I'll be adding new sources and, when the time comes, removing the Facebook post as a main post. I'd rather have it from the label's website, but, like I said, they haven't updated their news section in a while. Since July, actually. But they're very active on Facebook. So I'll add the label's official release on its own site whenever they get around to it. I think they add information in large batches at a time. Anyway, like I said, I do want things to look cleaner and well sourced. So the help has been great and thanks for all the new information! Digitalcomplex ( talk) 00:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus - My article for Ramona Sakiestewa was rejected! I had really thought I had understood all the guidelines for an article on her. Is there any specific portion or segment of the article that's keeping it from being approved? I appreciate your sharing your critique and any clarification on what I am missing. Thanks Tons. Robin : MondeR — Preceding unsigned comment added by MondeR ( talk • contribs)
Thanks Kethrus! The Draft space is definitely easier to edit within. I went ahead and made a number of inline citations using the publication sources. I then removed said sources from the Further Reading section. I think it should be in pretty good shape. Please let me know if there are any other segments that need refinement. I appreciate your help! - MondeR - Robin /info/en/?search=Draft:Ramona_Sakiestewa
@ Kethrus: Apologies sir, but there seems to be more activity on my wikipedia entry from the same people who were editing it before, negatively, along with the account of my wife melissa chiu. i have added 2 requests to the talk page for benjamin Genocchio for editors to review what i believe are factual errors that have been inserted into the entry over the last 48 hours. They are continuing to edit the entry but i am staying out of it lest i be accused again of a conflict-- this is what they used, over my wife's account, to block me before. i really don't know why my tiny entry and that of my wife have become the subject of such fascination for these two editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgenocchio ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for the reminder! Much appreciated :) Lirazelf ( talk) 13:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Steven Rich in Panama's talk page.
Dear Kethrus,
I left you a message on my Help Me after I followed your good advice and made changes to my Lead section in my Draft. I just want you to revisit to see my changes and make more suggestions. Thanks. Steven Rich in Panama ( talk) 14:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the page and a reviewer will review it, and either accept it or suggest improvements. --
Kethrus |
talk to me
17:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at ggiacos's talk page.
{{ping|Kethrus}}
to your talk page, and follow it with a message. Also, please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~
--
Kethrus |
talk to me
14:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Hello Kethrus, my nomination was in good faith, do not take it otherwise. I am aware of WP:VALIDALT but I felt somebody is trying to impersonate you, so I took precautionary step. However, thank you for the confirmation. Regards. Hitro talk 21:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have protected Mudar Zahran for 1 week, due to concerns about potential WP:BLP violations. You will be aware that the inclusion of various pieces of potentially libelous (albeit sourced) information has been included and reverted over the past few days, and that concerns have been raised about the reliability of those sources. I am hoping that all involved parties could try to reach agreement on the sources while the page is protected via discussion of the article's talk page. I am posting this message on the talk page of all editors that appear to have been involved in adding or reverting the information. TigerShark ( talk) 23:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Can quoting from obituaries and other articles in newspapers be accepted? Not sure if I can find an obituary for 1959. I only have the newspaper articles. I know of no other way to substantiate the information. I do have shipping records that show when he immigrated to US. I have his marriage certificate. I have copy of where his grave is. Are those the kind of things that will accepted?
Beverlz (
talk)
14:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Beverlz
Yes, THE subject edited the page that was established by SOMEONE ELSE. By objective accounts, R. Baxter Miller is one of the leading African American critics of the late 20th and early twenty-first centuries. See BLACK SOUTHERN VOICES (1992) OR simply Google the scores of web pages that document the importance of his scholarship. The author Raoullah (sp?) is a libelous graduate student with a vendetta. Rather than discrediting a well-respected scholar, he dishonors himself.
It's libelous incompetence, and, you know, it's really sad.
Ron Miller — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.217.22 ( talk) 14:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Global Cycling Network, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is a credible claim of notability on this page. Whether or not this actually meets WP:GNG is not in the domain of A7. If you do not believe that this is a sufficient claim of notability, take it to WP:AFD. A7 does not mean "not notable" - it means "no claim of notability was made". That is clearly not true here. Thank you. Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 20:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kethrus!
I am currently writing an article for my client Spark and am having a hard time finding reliable sources because most sources are not based off any database or "reliable" website. Any help?
Best regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SparkOfficial ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I have been through the submission process a number of times. I have asked for help and different editors have told me different things, and one even helped make some changes before the draft was rejected.
What specifically do I need to change in order for the draft to be accepted?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.8.126 ( talk) 16:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
-- 23:29, Wednesday, September 23, 2015 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
You reverted in this edit with no edit summary. That edit removed references. Could you please explain? Many thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
In future, please really, really, really try to inspect your edits and use edit summaries. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Kethrus, thanks for the help. I have read the article on valid references and now I am aware of it now. Please note for the product in my article is the first release of the company so that I can’t find any references other to their official web. So here how can I prove the company's website as a reliable source to show the notability? Coy Tinker ( talk) 08:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Oh ok, so the references are not suitable. If I remove them completely, will I be able to get the draft accepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.8.126 ( talk • contribs)
I fixed the cut and paste move. I did not undelete the revision with your speedy deletion tagging after the move, but I think it is no longer necessary. Best wishes, — Kusma ( t· c) 16:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
This Wikipedia page used to exist, but was replaced by a redirect. I need to cancel the redirect and bring the original page back so that I can edit it. But I can't find the original page, all I can find is a translation of an earlier version of the original page into Chinese. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/WISE_0535-7500 The Chinese version is lacking at least one line of text that used to be in the English version.
The lost English version may be hidden under a synonym, possibly "WISE J053516.80-750024.9" or "WISE J0535-7500".
Please help with finding (or reconstructing by back-translation) the original English version of the this webpage. Mollwollfumble (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
if i add the following references as citations for the first line "James Kenji Lopez-Alt, know as Kenji, (born October 31, 1979) is an American chef and food writer." would that suffice? http://www.foodandwine.com/articles/40-big-food-thinkers-under-40-kenji-lopez-alt http://www.grubstreet.com/2015/09/kenji-lopez-alt-grub-street-diet.html http://www.seattletimes.com/life/food-drink/the-food-lab-a-must-have-for-at-home-cooks-books-for-cooks/
I guess I'm struggling with which sources to include and how to include them. Also it would help me if you think this is a process issue (as in we need the proper documentation) or a conceptual one (i.e. you really DO NOT think that this person is notable enough to warrant their own wikipedia page)
Hi i appreciate you stopping by and fixing up my draft. I have my conversation about this page with a different reviewer here /info/en/?search=User_talk:Onel5969#National_Benefit_Authority_Page , it looks like he is busy as i didn't hear back from him in the past 2 days. Would you be able to approve it? Ntb613 ( talk) 19:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
REFERENCES FOR THE PAPER
The article has 16 REFERENCES, all of which are RELIABLE and VERIABLE - they are books, journals, reports and General History Volumes. This paper was well-researched
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 00:26, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
REVISIONS
I have taken out all the external links in the paper -they are not needed. There were there because I didn't want to create an "orphan" article. The paper is appropriately referenced now - if you look at the REFERENCES list.
Please let me know that you have seen the changes and are reviewing the paper as needed.
I have not received any feedback for 12 hours now.
Thanks,
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 12:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
UPDATES
Please let me know the status of my submission. Please note that the article is appropriately and verifiably REFERENCED - changes were made September 24.
I am awaiting your response.
Thanks,
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 13:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't need assistance!
This must be some kind of bloated status that you have.
I took out all the internet references.
I have a verifiable reference list containing 16 citations of books, articles and papers. I have reloaded the paper.
You insist all I did was spam-like blank out references. This is simply false!!
I posted the wiki entry Kurankyi Taylor many years ago and it was later edited by his grandson.
This posting on James Eggay Taylor uses some of the same sources.
But, from your bloated high horse, you must think my effort not worthy of your time that you have volunteered.
If you took the time to review carefully, you will discover that you have blinders on.
Good for you!!
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 20:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Yoku shaw taylor ( talk) 20:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Just wanted to make you aware of the changes that were made to the KRCB-FM article, which I listed on the AfD page. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kethrus, It is so good that you gave me the time of day. I have been on this site for a number of years and understand its philosophy. Yes, not a `soapbox' especially for political reasons. However, some of us would like to offer interesting items for posterity because life is changing so fast with a whole boom of modern technology that happenings in past years now seem quaint! Thus, I feel that whatever I add to this notion as a ninety year old could be of some historical interest! Kay Lipton 110.23.51.242 ( talk) 00:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I remove these spaces because it looks kinda messy on the page. Having them removed looks neater for the reader and for the editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Please stop - you are spamming the Stiki queue, which is becoming unusable (I'll explain in a moment). Materialscientist ( talk) 03:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
HEllo,Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. I am sure you can see I am new to the submission process. I do believe in the submission and I would like to continue to work with you to get it included. I hope you will assist me in this matter.
50.24.183.89 ( talk) 06:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC) 9/28/15