Ar 1, Ar 2, Ar 3, Ar 4, Ar 5, Ar 6
Sadly I have no idea if it was based on personal experience or not. Would be nice to think he lived on a farm and had a pig, horse and donkey. Nice to see you back after another long absence, btw. -- Richardrj talk email 09:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
I knew you had to be a Mac user; moi aussi, although I do tend to prefer Safari to Firefox. What have you got qua hardware? I'm on a Power PC iMac desktop, sadly showing its age a little these days. Looking longingly at a new Intel-based model. See you like userboxes – I have a dinky little Apple one on my userpage, feel free to snatch and customise it if you wish. -- Richardrj talk email 10:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Julia. Thanks for the "prosification" and all. Regards, Efe ( talk) 07:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Well, for the kindness and for the "prosification" of one of my novel-related articles. Thanks Julia. Efe ( talk) 08:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
-- Efe ( talk) 07:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome. Hope the GA process goes smoothly. -- Efe ( talk) 07:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I hope you're still awake. As you can see here Talk:The Elegance of the Hedgehog/GA1, Skomorokh really don't want to fail the article, as "requested". Since I have added more, could you please fix a little if there are any obvious ungrammatical phrasing? Thanks, Julia. -- Efe ( talk) 12:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote The Elegance of the Hedgehog to good article status. |
As a sign of my gratitude. -- Efe ( talk) 02:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
User_talk:Catherineyronwode#Please_keep. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Verbal
chat
11:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Cheers for the quick edit! Much better! Have you read the book? One of my favorites of all time
I didn't exactly understand your problem at the DYK/T page ("having trouble with the format of references as given in the article"). Could you elaborate further? Thanks! Bsimmons666 ( talk) Friend? 21:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
![]()
The WikiProject Novels Newsletter
Issue 28 - November 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot ( talk) 05:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Mmph mmph mmph! -- Richardrj talk email 07:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jules (may I call you Jules?), thanks v much for the sound advice. Frankly it'll probably never happen, I have a full-time job and I don't have the time to devote to it, publisher or not, so it's likely to remain a pipe (pipa?) dream for the foreseeable future. As for why there's not already a biography, maybe just no-one's thought of it. -- Richardrj talk email 14:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
That Weir film looks great, I need to see it. (No girls in parasols though, I take it.) This car was also quite unpleasant. BTW my hero Leonard Cohen is visiting your part of the world next year [1], do go if you get the chance, his show is amazing. Still trying to get out of these blasted knots, typing with my nose is quite hard. -- Richardrj talk email 10:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
You are the queen of google. That was an utterly inspired piece of sleuthing. Note, jodhpurs could be replaced by lederhosen. Swish, -- Richardrj talk email 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
You deserve this as much as I do.
Bsimmons666 ( talk) Friend? 21:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Saw your Mexican singer response, nice work but you suggested a copy-paste approach to scanning those categories. Took me a while to work this one out but you can wikify them, it's just not very intuitive. You need to put a colon before the word Category as well, i.e. [[Category:Mexican singers]] doesn't work but [[:Category:Mexican singers]] gives Category:Mexican singers. Adios, -- Richardrj talk email 06:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the encouragement. I went to go see what edit I made and could not find myself in the article history. Gee, I'm starting to get amazing at this! :) LilHelpa ( talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
When writing a biography its quite normal to divide the events of the life from a description of the works. A list in which each stage of a person's life has a major heading and then each work etc also has a major heading is inappropriate and often confusing. Even though Ross's page is not long, it has been divided just as I would for any other artist/writer etc Life with several subheadings, then Work.
His work was not a series of events that followed the event of settling in Australia. His work began in the US and continued in Ausdtralia. That paragraph talking about his method and his subjects is not soemthing you can place chronologically.
Very few biographies require major headings for the chronologic sequence of the person's life. In general the major headings are: Life, Works (ie paintings, publications, albums or whatever), Honours, Influence etc.
The use of too many major headings and a lack of understanding about how to divide things into appropriate sections and sub-sections is an on-going wiki-problem.
Amandajm ( talk) 12:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thank you for contributing to my "greatest" poll on the Reference Desk! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 05:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
In addition, your selection for Greatest Actor, David Gulpilil, won! Congratulations! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 05:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
[2] And that's when you bought one of these and you've never looked back since! -- Richardrj talk email 10:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey Julia
WRT your comments on the renegade president-elect, you may be amused to know that the floral arrangements for the BBC's regnal opening were handled by Rebel Rebel. The Queen comes to snip a ribbon in London and finds modern-day Guy Fawkes in a white van. BrainyBabe ( talk) 19:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for all your messages.. I've been around a little bit as an IP, but just decided to log in and contribute as Froth again ヽ(´ー`)ノ .froth. ( talk) 18:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the push, I've started the page. Would you have time to help? It's very basic, and I'm not especially great at placing images or finding the right categories. I began organizing it by individual mythology, but an organization by motif might be just as good and more interesting, once there is more material. I found it fascinating too :) WikiJedits ( talk) 22:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Julia:
I see that we are editing the same article.
I first heard the word 'morphodite' when I played the role of the corpse in the play "Crossing the Bar".
I later learned that Harper Lee used the word in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and, just the other day, that Truman Capote also used it. I'm guessing that it was a fav word when they were childhood friends.
Best wishes, CBHA ( talk) 03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought I'd keep both sides of the conversation on my talk page. --- OtherDave ( talk) 00:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 01:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
My pleasure! Thank you for doing so much work on the article, and for contributing to DYK. Best, — Politizer talk/ contribs 07:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Julia, for the nomination and following it through. I can't navigate that DYK page at all, so confusing :) so thank you very much for all your efforts. And of course for the kindness to think of it! Best, WikiJedits ( talk) 18:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, this might be only of marginal interest, but there I know a joke about a white horse, and it may be the only one there is. Perhaps there is a place for it in the article.
A white horse comes into a bar and asks for a whisky. The bartender asks “What sort of whisky would you like?’ and the white horse says “I’m not sure. What have you got”. So the bartender says, “Well, how about a Black and White?”
“I don’t think so”, says the white horse.
“Ballantynes, then”. “Nope”, comes the reply.
“Johnny Walker?” “Not today, I don’t think.”
“Teacher’s?”. “No, not that one”.
“A nice shot of Dimple, perhaps?”. “Well perhaps on another occasion”.
“Black Bottle?” “No.”
“Chivas Regal?” Ahhhhh…..no thank you.”
“The Famous Grouse?” “No thanks”
“Dewar’s, then?”. “Not for me”.
Then the bartender has a brainwave. “Wait!”, he says. “We’ve got a whisky named right after you!”
“What?,” says the white horse, “Eric?”
Well, you either love it or hate it, but you’ll never ever forget…the name of the White Horse.” Myles325a ( talk) 07:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
The normal setting is 200px to keep the image sizes within some reasonable limits. It is good to have decent images on wikipedia but for aesthetic reasons(sic and so as to not overdo the factual text information and also to not push the copyright (fair use issues) it is good to load images of this size and definition. Also if they can be of a common size that gives a more professional impact when reviewing a number of book and novel pages/articles. Also I notice that the caption talks of the hardback cover - the key thing is that it normally should be the "1st" edition cover. If this is the case it is that which should be asserted by the caption,thanks for all you contributions to such articles. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 09:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello Julia:
Thank you for the information about a "lotus in a pond".
You seem to have knowledge of a very broad range of subjects. I feel I am being educated, informed and entertained when I read your notes. CBHA ( talk) 05:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Julia,
Thanks! I would have had to have been virtually psychic, or perhaps 'psychically virtual', to have thought of that! I have cleared it.
Eebahgum (
talk)
14:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear
Julia, thanks for
updating your remark, which I'd originally found unjustly critical (N.B. subjective take, of course) and
posted in haste for clarification. I know that you're a diligent respondent to
Ref Desk queries and field a lot of diverse topics, which I appreciate and respect. As I'm unavoidably intermittent in participating while no less devoted, and (what can't be otherwise known) sometimes catch flak from listserv-forum
colleagues for being too, well, aggressively wordy—it aggrieved me that what I'd written on that query seemed unacceptable to you. Thanks for hearing me out, and best wishes for our future joint efforts! -- Cheers,
Deborahjay (
talk)
08:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Further: Wow, thanks for the indeed-cheering words, 'preciate that. Moreover, this has brought back to me how important my written communications are, even (especially!) those written at off-hours (as my WP contributions perforce must be). See you on (not
in ;-) the
Lists! --
Deborahjay (
talk)
09:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Strange.. Aye SSL sounds pretty unconventional. At least not heard it here in India. Anyway, thanks a lot :) -- RohanDhruva ( talk) 13:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words... and the delicious snack! Matt Deres ( talk) 17:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the follow up message. Anyone can nominate for deletion per the AfD process. I use Twinkle which makes the nomination process very easy. – ukexpat ( talk) 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
There are two ways to install it - the first (easier) way is to add it as a gadget in your preferences. The second (harder) way is to add it to your monobook.js file as described in Twinkle. Hope this helps! – ukexpat ( talk) 01:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Jules. You want cuteness, though, check out these guys or, closer to home for you, these ones. Say ahhhh! -- Richardrj talk email 11:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for improving that critical discussion in the Deren article earlier today. Looking at the article as it now stands, I've relocated the text into the article on Meshes of the Afternoon itself, to avoid weighing down the biography page. The critical text is still light on references but I've commented in what I think are the article sources so that they can be improved. AllyD ( talk) 15:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
No worries, I just knew it had to be you :) -- Richardrj talk email 13:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
...but honestly, who'd be able to tell? Half Shadow 00:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you :) DuncanHill ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Just got Persona 4 an hour ago, too. It's always nice when I have a new game. But then, I have so many... Half Shadow 00:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Wow, how sweet. Advance Merry Christmas too from the Philippines. -- Efe ( talk) 00:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Julia. May yours be a good one too. -- JackofOz ( talk) 01:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
And lang may yer lum reek, too. --- OtherDave ( talk) 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Awesome! Thanks Julia. All of the best to you too! Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 06:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Ar 1, Ar 2, Ar 3, Ar 4, Ar 5, Ar 6
Sadly I have no idea if it was based on personal experience or not. Would be nice to think he lived on a farm and had a pig, horse and donkey. Nice to see you back after another long absence, btw. -- Richardrj talk email 09:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
I knew you had to be a Mac user; moi aussi, although I do tend to prefer Safari to Firefox. What have you got qua hardware? I'm on a Power PC iMac desktop, sadly showing its age a little these days. Looking longingly at a new Intel-based model. See you like userboxes – I have a dinky little Apple one on my userpage, feel free to snatch and customise it if you wish. -- Richardrj talk email 10:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Julia. Thanks for the "prosification" and all. Regards, Efe ( talk) 07:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Well, for the kindness and for the "prosification" of one of my novel-related articles. Thanks Julia. Efe ( talk) 08:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
-- Efe ( talk) 07:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome. Hope the GA process goes smoothly. -- Efe ( talk) 07:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I hope you're still awake. As you can see here Talk:The Elegance of the Hedgehog/GA1, Skomorokh really don't want to fail the article, as "requested". Since I have added more, could you please fix a little if there are any obvious ungrammatical phrasing? Thanks, Julia. -- Efe ( talk) 12:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote The Elegance of the Hedgehog to good article status. |
As a sign of my gratitude. -- Efe ( talk) 02:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
User_talk:Catherineyronwode#Please_keep. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Verbal
chat
11:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Cheers for the quick edit! Much better! Have you read the book? One of my favorites of all time
I didn't exactly understand your problem at the DYK/T page ("having trouble with the format of references as given in the article"). Could you elaborate further? Thanks! Bsimmons666 ( talk) Friend? 21:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
![]()
The WikiProject Novels Newsletter
Issue 28 - November 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot ( talk) 05:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Mmph mmph mmph! -- Richardrj talk email 07:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jules (may I call you Jules?), thanks v much for the sound advice. Frankly it'll probably never happen, I have a full-time job and I don't have the time to devote to it, publisher or not, so it's likely to remain a pipe (pipa?) dream for the foreseeable future. As for why there's not already a biography, maybe just no-one's thought of it. -- Richardrj talk email 14:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
That Weir film looks great, I need to see it. (No girls in parasols though, I take it.) This car was also quite unpleasant. BTW my hero Leonard Cohen is visiting your part of the world next year [1], do go if you get the chance, his show is amazing. Still trying to get out of these blasted knots, typing with my nose is quite hard. -- Richardrj talk email 10:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
You are the queen of google. That was an utterly inspired piece of sleuthing. Note, jodhpurs could be replaced by lederhosen. Swish, -- Richardrj talk email 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
You deserve this as much as I do.
Bsimmons666 ( talk) Friend? 21:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Saw your Mexican singer response, nice work but you suggested a copy-paste approach to scanning those categories. Took me a while to work this one out but you can wikify them, it's just not very intuitive. You need to put a colon before the word Category as well, i.e. [[Category:Mexican singers]] doesn't work but [[:Category:Mexican singers]] gives Category:Mexican singers. Adios, -- Richardrj talk email 06:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the encouragement. I went to go see what edit I made and could not find myself in the article history. Gee, I'm starting to get amazing at this! :) LilHelpa ( talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
When writing a biography its quite normal to divide the events of the life from a description of the works. A list in which each stage of a person's life has a major heading and then each work etc also has a major heading is inappropriate and often confusing. Even though Ross's page is not long, it has been divided just as I would for any other artist/writer etc Life with several subheadings, then Work.
His work was not a series of events that followed the event of settling in Australia. His work began in the US and continued in Ausdtralia. That paragraph talking about his method and his subjects is not soemthing you can place chronologically.
Very few biographies require major headings for the chronologic sequence of the person's life. In general the major headings are: Life, Works (ie paintings, publications, albums or whatever), Honours, Influence etc.
The use of too many major headings and a lack of understanding about how to divide things into appropriate sections and sub-sections is an on-going wiki-problem.
Amandajm ( talk) 12:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thank you for contributing to my "greatest" poll on the Reference Desk! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 05:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
In addition, your selection for Greatest Actor, David Gulpilil, won! Congratulations! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 05:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
[2] And that's when you bought one of these and you've never looked back since! -- Richardrj talk email 10:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey Julia
WRT your comments on the renegade president-elect, you may be amused to know that the floral arrangements for the BBC's regnal opening were handled by Rebel Rebel. The Queen comes to snip a ribbon in London and finds modern-day Guy Fawkes in a white van. BrainyBabe ( talk) 19:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for all your messages.. I've been around a little bit as an IP, but just decided to log in and contribute as Froth again ヽ(´ー`)ノ .froth. ( talk) 18:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the push, I've started the page. Would you have time to help? It's very basic, and I'm not especially great at placing images or finding the right categories. I began organizing it by individual mythology, but an organization by motif might be just as good and more interesting, once there is more material. I found it fascinating too :) WikiJedits ( talk) 22:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Julia:
I see that we are editing the same article.
I first heard the word 'morphodite' when I played the role of the corpse in the play "Crossing the Bar".
I later learned that Harper Lee used the word in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and, just the other day, that Truman Capote also used it. I'm guessing that it was a fav word when they were childhood friends.
Best wishes, CBHA ( talk) 03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought I'd keep both sides of the conversation on my talk page. --- OtherDave ( talk) 00:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 01:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
My pleasure! Thank you for doing so much work on the article, and for contributing to DYK. Best, — Politizer talk/ contribs 07:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Julia, for the nomination and following it through. I can't navigate that DYK page at all, so confusing :) so thank you very much for all your efforts. And of course for the kindness to think of it! Best, WikiJedits ( talk) 18:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, this might be only of marginal interest, but there I know a joke about a white horse, and it may be the only one there is. Perhaps there is a place for it in the article.
A white horse comes into a bar and asks for a whisky. The bartender asks “What sort of whisky would you like?’ and the white horse says “I’m not sure. What have you got”. So the bartender says, “Well, how about a Black and White?”
“I don’t think so”, says the white horse.
“Ballantynes, then”. “Nope”, comes the reply.
“Johnny Walker?” “Not today, I don’t think.”
“Teacher’s?”. “No, not that one”.
“A nice shot of Dimple, perhaps?”. “Well perhaps on another occasion”.
“Black Bottle?” “No.”
“Chivas Regal?” Ahhhhh…..no thank you.”
“The Famous Grouse?” “No thanks”
“Dewar’s, then?”. “Not for me”.
Then the bartender has a brainwave. “Wait!”, he says. “We’ve got a whisky named right after you!”
“What?,” says the white horse, “Eric?”
Well, you either love it or hate it, but you’ll never ever forget…the name of the White Horse.” Myles325a ( talk) 07:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
The normal setting is 200px to keep the image sizes within some reasonable limits. It is good to have decent images on wikipedia but for aesthetic reasons(sic and so as to not overdo the factual text information and also to not push the copyright (fair use issues) it is good to load images of this size and definition. Also if they can be of a common size that gives a more professional impact when reviewing a number of book and novel pages/articles. Also I notice that the caption talks of the hardback cover - the key thing is that it normally should be the "1st" edition cover. If this is the case it is that which should be asserted by the caption,thanks for all you contributions to such articles. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 09:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello Julia:
Thank you for the information about a "lotus in a pond".
You seem to have knowledge of a very broad range of subjects. I feel I am being educated, informed and entertained when I read your notes. CBHA ( talk) 05:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Julia,
Thanks! I would have had to have been virtually psychic, or perhaps 'psychically virtual', to have thought of that! I have cleared it.
Eebahgum (
talk)
14:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear
Julia, thanks for
updating your remark, which I'd originally found unjustly critical (N.B. subjective take, of course) and
posted in haste for clarification. I know that you're a diligent respondent to
Ref Desk queries and field a lot of diverse topics, which I appreciate and respect. As I'm unavoidably intermittent in participating while no less devoted, and (what can't be otherwise known) sometimes catch flak from listserv-forum
colleagues for being too, well, aggressively wordy—it aggrieved me that what I'd written on that query seemed unacceptable to you. Thanks for hearing me out, and best wishes for our future joint efforts! -- Cheers,
Deborahjay (
talk)
08:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Further: Wow, thanks for the indeed-cheering words, 'preciate that. Moreover, this has brought back to me how important my written communications are, even (especially!) those written at off-hours (as my WP contributions perforce must be). See you on (not
in ;-) the
Lists! --
Deborahjay (
talk)
09:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Strange.. Aye SSL sounds pretty unconventional. At least not heard it here in India. Anyway, thanks a lot :) -- RohanDhruva ( talk) 13:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words... and the delicious snack! Matt Deres ( talk) 17:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the follow up message. Anyone can nominate for deletion per the AfD process. I use Twinkle which makes the nomination process very easy. – ukexpat ( talk) 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
There are two ways to install it - the first (easier) way is to add it as a gadget in your preferences. The second (harder) way is to add it to your monobook.js file as described in Twinkle. Hope this helps! – ukexpat ( talk) 01:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Jules. You want cuteness, though, check out these guys or, closer to home for you, these ones. Say ahhhh! -- Richardrj talk email 11:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for improving that critical discussion in the Deren article earlier today. Looking at the article as it now stands, I've relocated the text into the article on Meshes of the Afternoon itself, to avoid weighing down the biography page. The critical text is still light on references but I've commented in what I think are the article sources so that they can be improved. AllyD ( talk) 15:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
No worries, I just knew it had to be you :) -- Richardrj talk email 13:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
...but honestly, who'd be able to tell? Half Shadow 00:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you :) DuncanHill ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Just got Persona 4 an hour ago, too. It's always nice when I have a new game. But then, I have so many... Half Shadow 00:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Wow, how sweet. Advance Merry Christmas too from the Philippines. -- Efe ( talk) 00:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Julia. May yours be a good one too. -- JackofOz ( talk) 01:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
And lang may yer lum reek, too. --- OtherDave ( talk) 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Awesome! Thanks Julia. All of the best to you too! Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 06:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)