The article ThumMusic System has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki ( talk) 03:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Thummer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Eusebius (
talk)
22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, JumPlamondon
Recently, I found your uploaded image on English Wikipedia is nominated for deletion.
The reason for deletion may be "copyright infringement".
But, on Wikimedia Commons, if you send permission mail to Wikimedia Foundation,
the image is kept, and it can be referred from other Wikipedia Projects (including English Wikipedia).
If you kindly grant to permission for use of the image on Wikimedia Commons,
please send a permission mail (OTRS [1]) in the formats of Email templates [2]
to Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>.
Best Regards, -- Shoulder-synth ( talk) 00:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Technology evangelism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology evangelism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - EdoDodo talk 08:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello JimPlamondon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Dynamic tonality have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon,
Thank you for creating Tony Seba.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Links to books on Amazon, while worthy, do not satisfy Wikipedia requirements for notability. Please find more references, and get them onto the article before somebody puts it up for deletion. The article resides at this level of risk. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 03:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
I cannot help but wonder:
An article you recently created,
Tony Seba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Yeeno (
talk) 🍁
03:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Tony Seba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Riteboke ( talk) 06:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, JimPlamondon!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk)
06:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
|
Please do not use WP for personal promotion as you have done here. I reverted your edits so that a neutral editor who is not the subject of the article can have a chance to improve the article. They might even use the sources you contributed. I encourage you to read WP:COI carefully. With that in mind, do you have a conflict of interest on Draft:Tony Seba? That would include having a financial interest in the subject's work, knowing them, or being paid to create the article. --- Possibly ☎ 07:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
None. I am a fan of Tony's work. I've never met him or corresponded with him, though. He hasn't even accepted my LinkedIn connection request. 😉 -- JimPlamondon ( talk) 06:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
I was gently reminded by Whiteguru that links an author's books to Amazon pages do not, by themselves, prove notability. Fair enough.
However, it is unclear to me whether an article on Tony Seba needs to prove that HE is notable, or that his BOOKS are notable.
I have addressed this issue in two ways:
The article on Tony Seba is not unambiguously promotional, because:
The Wikipedia article on RethinkX, the company that Tony Seba co-founded, has more discussion of the criticisms of the ideas presented in Tony's books. If that's what you think is missing, please let me know, and I will add some of that discussion to this page.
Which begs the question:
Respectfully, -- JimPlamondon ( talk) 08:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Tony Seba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Tony Seba".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Dynamic tonality. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
04:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The article ThumMusic System has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki ( talk) 03:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Thummer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Eusebius (
talk)
22:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, JumPlamondon
Recently, I found your uploaded image on English Wikipedia is nominated for deletion.
The reason for deletion may be "copyright infringement".
But, on Wikimedia Commons, if you send permission mail to Wikimedia Foundation,
the image is kept, and it can be referred from other Wikipedia Projects (including English Wikipedia).
If you kindly grant to permission for use of the image on Wikimedia Commons,
please send a permission mail (OTRS [1]) in the formats of Email templates [2]
to Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>.
Best Regards, -- Shoulder-synth ( talk) 00:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Technology evangelism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology evangelism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - EdoDodo talk 08:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello JimPlamondon, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Dynamic tonality have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon,
Thank you for creating Tony Seba.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Links to books on Amazon, while worthy, do not satisfy Wikipedia requirements for notability. Please find more references, and get them onto the article before somebody puts it up for deletion. The article resides at this level of risk. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 03:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
I cannot help but wonder:
An article you recently created,
Tony Seba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Yeeno (
talk) 🍁
03:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Tony Seba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Riteboke ( talk) 06:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, JimPlamondon!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk)
06:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
|
Please do not use WP for personal promotion as you have done here. I reverted your edits so that a neutral editor who is not the subject of the article can have a chance to improve the article. They might even use the sources you contributed. I encourage you to read WP:COI carefully. With that in mind, do you have a conflict of interest on Draft:Tony Seba? That would include having a financial interest in the subject's work, knowing them, or being paid to create the article. --- Possibly ☎ 07:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
None. I am a fan of Tony's work. I've never met him or corresponded with him, though. He hasn't even accepted my LinkedIn connection request. 😉 -- JimPlamondon ( talk) 06:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
I was gently reminded by Whiteguru that links an author's books to Amazon pages do not, by themselves, prove notability. Fair enough.
However, it is unclear to me whether an article on Tony Seba needs to prove that HE is notable, or that his BOOKS are notable.
I have addressed this issue in two ways:
The article on Tony Seba is not unambiguously promotional, because:
The Wikipedia article on RethinkX, the company that Tony Seba co-founded, has more discussion of the criticisms of the ideas presented in Tony's books. If that's what you think is missing, please let me know, and I will add some of that discussion to this page.
Which begs the question:
Respectfully, -- JimPlamondon ( talk) 08:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Tony Seba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, JimPlamondon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Tony Seba".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Dynamic tonality. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
04:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)