This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you Saharabad ( talk) 18:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed that you made some suggestions for the new Widespread Panic member articles I have created over the last several days ( Duane Trucks, Todd Nance and Domingo Ortiz). Thank you for the suggestions, I will fix the instrument capitalization issue. I am curious about the source issue though. They are all relatively short articles and contain between 6 and 9 reliable sources (established news websites, official band websites, etc.) which should reliably cite all of the information in them. What can I do to add further sources). The actual Widespread Panic article, which I would estimate is at least 7-10 times as long as any of them has 44 sources.-- Sk8punk3d288 ( talk) 00:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
"Tracklist" supposed to be "Track listing" and also, after 129k edits, don't you know that the # sign creates a numbered list? I'm referring to Snowfalls (Brian Keane album) - which I'll fix in the meantime. -- Jennica✿ / talk 16:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Just want to wish you a Happy Birthday, and thanks for all your good edits! Best, -- Discographer ( talk) 16:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jennica: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 ( Merry Christmas!) 17:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017! | |
Hello Jennica, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2017. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Solstice Greetings to you and Eris. Now re your edits to William T. Stearn Bibliography, I'm not sure if you noticed that the page is under very active construction with a view to GA or FA but every fly-by AWB operstor seems to want to change the layout which is making it unstable. Since I didn't see any rationale I'm reverting that. I hope you understand and don't mind. -- Michael Goodyear ( talk) 22:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know why you're choosing random times of the day to be looking at my edits and then editing pages I have, which you probably feel is justified because I looked at your edits at most three times in days past, saw that you had edited pages within my scope (album and band pages I edited months or years back) and that you were making broad changes to charts sections headings that I disagreed with, but I don't think you have any reason to still be doing it. I looked at your edits literally all of three times. I saw you had edited several pages on my watchlist, the most recent being Go Robot and Joy Enriquez (album), and so when I keep seeing "Jennica" pop up, it's getting to be a bit annoying when I know why you're doing it and that you would not have come across those pages otherwise. I've been through this with editors before. Unlike those editors, you seem to be a pretty decent editor, so please move on. Thank you. Ss 112 09:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
@ Ss112: well, I don't want any bad blood so to speak, between us. I am not doing it to be go against you, that's all.. I just simply like fixing the small things. I'm not trying to bother anybody.. -- Jennica✿ / talk 16:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I just want to let you know, as just happened with Made (Big Bang album), if you see me editing a page not long after you have, it's because I've edited it and it's on my watchlist. I added the US peak of that album and I watched it then, because Korean albums attract a lot of unsavoury changes. I have no interest in looking at your contributions after this argument, so your editing of Bitter Pill (album), which is on my watchlist as I put all of James's articles on there, probably because I edited Gavin James's articles earlier and you clicked through to it, did not go unnoticed. This isn't paranoia; it's you still finding ways to get around me asking you to stop looking at my edits. That includes still looking at them and clicking through to related articles and editing those. You have zero reason to be clicking through to my edits at all. Please just stop this already. Ss 112 20:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Jennica, while we've been doing this, you've looked at topics I've been editing again. Can you not help yourself? If you cannot contain yourself from clicking through my edits for no good reason, I will report you and have it asked of you that you not do it. This has gone on far too long. I have asked you to stop, and you can't even respect that. Us speaking here doesn't give you a free pass to look at what I'm doing while we are. You were told to not be a jerk; you definitely are being one by still doing it. I will not ask you again; next time will be reporting you. Ss 112 03:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Since the thread on ANI was closed by a non-admin: Can you please just not monitor me everyday, then? I don't mind if you look at the edit history of a page, see I've edited it, then maybe edit one or two pages I have recently. When that happens on a page you've come across by chance. That's whatever. But the thing I take issue with is somebody feeling the need to type in my username multiple times a day to see what I've been doing. I just feel that doesn't need to happen and is unreasonable. I'm sorry this has gone on so long and for the sarcasm and incivility on both our parts. Ss 112 05:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Great work on your updates. I'm not sure it's necessary to change CCM to contemporary Christian music, but when doing so, could you please watch for the capitalization of the the term? If it's the second or subsequent genre in an infobox or mid-sentence, such in the lede, the "C" should be lower case: contemporary Christian music. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 07:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Jennica for thanking my recent edit several minutes ago about the death of Debbie Reynolds. Shinzon5 ( talk) 01:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Jennica! Nice to meet you. First, I'm sorry for my irregular English (I know that is bad :). I saw your edit in the IndianBio's talk page about the issue with Madonna and the title "Entertainer". I agree with both point of view. Personally, I feel that I can re-open a "Requested move" in the future. In the past years, I opened some of "controversials" topics about music articles, like the Michael Jackson figures (including Thriller) when I obtained a general approval, and subsequently we have a better control on the best-seller list since then. Also, I did the same with the Queen of Pop's title. Those cases, are examples that were discussions over and over again through years, but are already fixed IMHO. With this disambiguation I feel that I can answer each oppose point of view with references including (mostly are "cycle answer") and yeah, they can read this haha. What do you think?. Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Jennica,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 23:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Jennica,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (
talk |
stand clear of the doors!) 17:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi
Thanks for your contribution to St. James, have not had a chance to read the changes properly as yet, so I am not responding to that area.
Just wanted to add some info which may clarify the contributions to St. James:
In light of Intellectual Property Rights, one form of which, relates to the rights arising through culture, be it food, drink, or expressions of art, I felt that it was necessary to capture some info on St. James.
Also as there is the possibility that a part of POS may be preserved and God knows when an approach to UNESCO for review as a World Heritage Site or should artifacts be discovered, this information may become important. Curaco has a UNESCO sitein Willemstad.
Also, given that the city is located within a bay or Gulf, there may be evidence of use by the Caribs or Arawaks which may make the area even more important.
If you are interested in reading about preservation of historical places, re Indentured Labourers, perhaps you can check the page for Icacos or Cedros as there are iimages of one of the older barracks which were used and which has been preserved.
Jennifer N Bailey ( talk) 23:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
I nominated the " Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" for GA awhile back and have had no takers surprisingly (it is a Beatles song after all) . Anyways, I was wondering if you are interested in reviewing articles, and if you wanted to start with this one? It should be rather easy because I brought it to GA before, and, not to sound arrogant, I should have passed. If it is not your thing, that is okay, but if you do end up reviewing the article, I am very appreciative. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 07:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Please don't add tags like this without providing a coherent explanation and seeking the agreement of other editors to the changes you wish to see. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 08:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the notes on formatting. Regarding Puchito Records discography, the table method does not favor mobile use. The table method works well, sometimes (as is the case the Steve Turre discography). But, in the case of Puchito (historic info), the table method limits info, particularly when trying to identify matrix numbers, OCLCs, ISSNs, catalog numbers, and the like. With respect to citations/notes, when the cites begin to stack-up, segmenting is easier to manage. It's just an opinion. With respect to using reflists, I'm happy with regular floating columns. Your comment about bold vs. semicolon headers, I was unaware that it does not work well for screen reader users. Eurodog ( talk) 23:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Not that i have any personal objection to it, but several of your edits to Mariah Carey articles I have on my watchlist came up and I saw that you had changed "singer and songwriter" to "singer-songwriter". I agree(?) that it essentially means the same thing, but if I'm not mistaken, there was a discussion in the Wikipedia music community some time ago about "singer-songwriter" implying a certain category of musician (as in, somebody who writes all their own material) as distinct from a "singer and songwriter" (as in, somebody who sings and writes sometimes). I think it was a bunch of editors being a bit picky, but all I'm saying is don't be surprised if some people have an objection to it, as I believe that discussion took place somewhere along the line. Ss 112 18:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Just letting you know, I noticed a user (Alinblack) who, coincidentally, recently appears to have undone a move you performed. Instead of undoing the move directly, they restored content at I Idolize You (Massive Ego Single) with the claim that the information is "about the single" (despite it being an incorrect namespace and capitalisation). Perhaps you can request it be re-moved at WP:RM/TR (or just revert their edits to each page, as they didn't move it, just copypasted) and leave them a message on their talk page about it being incorrect? Ss 112 05:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 02:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
The article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1984 (Van Halen album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 03:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey can you do me a favor by adding a "personnel" section in the Starboy article, based off the album's liner notes here. If you can do it that is. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 14:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jennica, just a minor note, it's perfectly acceptable for people to edit as IPs. The edits on Starboy do not appear to be disruptive, just minor content disputes. Please try to engage the other editors on the talk page. Protection should not be used to try to stop IPs from contributing. Remember to assume good faith, there seem to be other logged in editors that agree with some of the IP edits, such as this edit. -- ferret ( talk) 01:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok Jennica, you're all set. Your older archives are all together at User talk:Jennica/Archive 1 now. The latest is in User talk:Jennica/Archive 2. Your archives header should be good to go now. -- ferret ( talk) 02:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jennica, would you be so kind to ecxplain me, what is unconstructive in my contribution to Ceca (singer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.76.158.162 ( talk) 12:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
In your infobox changes using AWB, you need to insert an endash (–) between dates instead of a hyphen (-). See this as an example. EddieHugh ( talk) 17:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, can you be a little more careful when using find and replace? Over on Almirante Latorre-class battleship, there were more colons in that section than just the ones being used to indent. :-) Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Per the discussion at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore [1]. It is a wp:self published source. Woovee ( talk) 20:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
In good faith you made some edits to Sesame Street that fixed errors in a pair of prior edits. But those edits were clearly vandalism or test edits that had no business being on that article and instead of fixing them they should have been reverted on sight. While assuming good faith is a part of the Wikipedia ethos, it must be tempered by some common sense and scripts must be used with decision making fully engagaed. I ask you, if you're using them to more carefully review your edits before saving them. oknazevad ( talk) 21:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
There appears to be an editor with a changing IP (usually beginning with 73.81) that geolocates to Pennsylvania/Delaware wanting to move "Castle on the Hill" first in order of singles from ÷ on related Ed Sheeran articles because "it comes first alphabetically" and citing some apparent precedent on Rihanna's Anti when there's no policy or established reason to do this. Can you please monitor this and revert when you see it? I'm quite convinced this IP is an editor that's been blocked and is now editing through IPs, because they've cited Wikipedia policies, which is quite rare for IPs to do. Ss 112 18:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Ss112: - I say report it to AIV. If you don't want to, I can. At least it might stop the warring for a day or something. By the way do you have any opinion on this topic? -- Jennica✿ / talk 01:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This whole thing is quite stupid and childish, if I may say. Just because YOU think that SOY is the more prominent single doesn't mean that everyone agrees with that. You can't use YOUR reason as a rule that needs to be followed. I'm all for discussing this, but your reasoning doesn't make sense at all, and is purely your personal opinion. And as far as me blanking the Bebe Rexha page, they used the template used for "Digital Distortion" and just added a few things, which is vandalism, so I had every right to do that. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Um, so even thought the entire page was vandalism, it should still have been allowed to be a page? Do you logic? Do you even try to abide by any rules other than the ones you make up for yourself The way I looked at it was this: a page had been made prematurely, it clearly needed more time to create, so making it a redirect seemed like the most logical option. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Um, all I saw was the cover for DD and what looked like most of the information on that page copied over. That seemed like a bunch of vandalism that shouldn't have been a page. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Why do you even care about this so much? I know it's hypocritical of me to ask, but I'm just wondering. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
So you're agreeing with someone who has no reason whatsoever to have them in one order, but not with someone who wants them in alphabetical order? No, you're right, that makes perfect sense. 73.81.156.252 ( talk) 04:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
It would have been nice if you'd said something at WT:NFL before making that change, but I guess it does make sense. Your edit summaries could do with a bit of improvement, however. Would you mind changing every season to match? – Pee Jay 22:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm now convinced more than ever that that IP is indeed a sockpuppeting blocked user, except since they're IP hopping every few hours there's little. They changed IPs again to make the final few edits to your talk page. IPs rarely fight issues like this, and it's quite obviously a little power trip they're having, which is blatant blocked user behaviour—the "I have to have it my way and you're all wrong!" pettiness. If only the administrator who protected the pages had looked a bit further into it, they might have seen this, but admins rarely want to touch the issue of sockpuppeting requiring CheckUser, it seems. Ss 112 09:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, because alphabetical order, as opposed to personal preference, is blatantly incorrect. The only person on a little power trip here is you, get over yourself. You're ridiculous. 73.81.156.206 ( talk) 15:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I would like to suggest that all involved parties take this to the talk page of the article. This is a content dispute and best handled at the article's so other interested editors can see it and understand the outcome. -- ferret ( talk) 15:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, since you are the user with the most edit counts and the most user boxes on her/his user page, I hope you can help me with my question. I want to keep the same code on my :de: and :en: user page, mainly info for editing that I need regularly, but also very few user boxes. Now, I wanted to have at least one fun user box, that is an edited beer barrel with "AGF" added. But it is only hosted on the German wikipedia (not on commons), and I cannot figure it out how that can be tweaked so that it works for my :en: userpage as well. I add the code (commented out) for you to look at, but feel free to reject when you not feel like it or when it is absolutely not your area of expertise.
Could be that I simply cannot use the {{Babel-code in :en:... I looked into your code with your user boxes and not a single "Babel" there, many years ago I used to play around way more with user boxes than I do now and was just starting to use :en: also, not only :de: and I think I recall that quite some issues started when I tried to have the same start page like I try now (again)... after I removed all fancy looking stuff and only kept sober dry info...
Cheers, --
Rava77 (
talk) 22:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
P.S. The "your / you’re" and the similar other ones are hilarious. Also somehow sad, seeing as how often you see these same three mistake over and over, like with then/than & its/it's, when all three are so simple. Just because they sound alike, but they are nothing alike...</ramble>
The article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1984 (Van Halen album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I was planning on doing the GA review for Van Halen (album) but I see you've withdrawn it. If it were available I'd start reviewing immediately. Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Van Halen 1984 Back cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Recently Garagepunk66 and I created a project for garage rock here. I realize content creation is not your main objective, but I think this is worth joining because, when it gets in full swing, dozens of articles, including ones about albums, will be created. I recruited some fairly new users so formatting errors will undoubtedly arise in the beginning. For that reason, you may want to join and look over the listed editors' histories every once in awhile or the talk page to do your thing. If you do not want to, I understand; I just thought it was worth mentioning. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 03:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
DBaK ( talk) 08:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello User:Jennica, can you add genre(s) for UK top 5 single You Don't Know Me (Jax Jones song), as it's one of the only modern song pages with no genres listed, thanks. It sounds like tropical house, dancehall-pop (reggae fusion) or afrobeat inspired.-- 2A02:C7D:892B:3D00:C8AD:711B:476A:8BE8 ( talk) 20:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you Saharabad ( talk) 18:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed that you made some suggestions for the new Widespread Panic member articles I have created over the last several days ( Duane Trucks, Todd Nance and Domingo Ortiz). Thank you for the suggestions, I will fix the instrument capitalization issue. I am curious about the source issue though. They are all relatively short articles and contain between 6 and 9 reliable sources (established news websites, official band websites, etc.) which should reliably cite all of the information in them. What can I do to add further sources). The actual Widespread Panic article, which I would estimate is at least 7-10 times as long as any of them has 44 sources.-- Sk8punk3d288 ( talk) 00:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
"Tracklist" supposed to be "Track listing" and also, after 129k edits, don't you know that the # sign creates a numbered list? I'm referring to Snowfalls (Brian Keane album) - which I'll fix in the meantime. -- Jennica✿ / talk 16:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Just want to wish you a Happy Birthday, and thanks for all your good edits! Best, -- Discographer ( talk) 16:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jennica: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 ( Merry Christmas!) 17:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017! | |
Hello Jennica, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2017. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Solstice Greetings to you and Eris. Now re your edits to William T. Stearn Bibliography, I'm not sure if you noticed that the page is under very active construction with a view to GA or FA but every fly-by AWB operstor seems to want to change the layout which is making it unstable. Since I didn't see any rationale I'm reverting that. I hope you understand and don't mind. -- Michael Goodyear ( talk) 22:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know why you're choosing random times of the day to be looking at my edits and then editing pages I have, which you probably feel is justified because I looked at your edits at most three times in days past, saw that you had edited pages within my scope (album and band pages I edited months or years back) and that you were making broad changes to charts sections headings that I disagreed with, but I don't think you have any reason to still be doing it. I looked at your edits literally all of three times. I saw you had edited several pages on my watchlist, the most recent being Go Robot and Joy Enriquez (album), and so when I keep seeing "Jennica" pop up, it's getting to be a bit annoying when I know why you're doing it and that you would not have come across those pages otherwise. I've been through this with editors before. Unlike those editors, you seem to be a pretty decent editor, so please move on. Thank you. Ss 112 09:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
@ Ss112: well, I don't want any bad blood so to speak, between us. I am not doing it to be go against you, that's all.. I just simply like fixing the small things. I'm not trying to bother anybody.. -- Jennica✿ / talk 16:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I just want to let you know, as just happened with Made (Big Bang album), if you see me editing a page not long after you have, it's because I've edited it and it's on my watchlist. I added the US peak of that album and I watched it then, because Korean albums attract a lot of unsavoury changes. I have no interest in looking at your contributions after this argument, so your editing of Bitter Pill (album), which is on my watchlist as I put all of James's articles on there, probably because I edited Gavin James's articles earlier and you clicked through to it, did not go unnoticed. This isn't paranoia; it's you still finding ways to get around me asking you to stop looking at my edits. That includes still looking at them and clicking through to related articles and editing those. You have zero reason to be clicking through to my edits at all. Please just stop this already. Ss 112 20:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Jennica, while we've been doing this, you've looked at topics I've been editing again. Can you not help yourself? If you cannot contain yourself from clicking through my edits for no good reason, I will report you and have it asked of you that you not do it. This has gone on far too long. I have asked you to stop, and you can't even respect that. Us speaking here doesn't give you a free pass to look at what I'm doing while we are. You were told to not be a jerk; you definitely are being one by still doing it. I will not ask you again; next time will be reporting you. Ss 112 03:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Since the thread on ANI was closed by a non-admin: Can you please just not monitor me everyday, then? I don't mind if you look at the edit history of a page, see I've edited it, then maybe edit one or two pages I have recently. When that happens on a page you've come across by chance. That's whatever. But the thing I take issue with is somebody feeling the need to type in my username multiple times a day to see what I've been doing. I just feel that doesn't need to happen and is unreasonable. I'm sorry this has gone on so long and for the sarcasm and incivility on both our parts. Ss 112 05:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Great work on your updates. I'm not sure it's necessary to change CCM to contemporary Christian music, but when doing so, could you please watch for the capitalization of the the term? If it's the second or subsequent genre in an infobox or mid-sentence, such in the lede, the "C" should be lower case: contemporary Christian music. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 07:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Jennica for thanking my recent edit several minutes ago about the death of Debbie Reynolds. Shinzon5 ( talk) 01:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Jennica! Nice to meet you. First, I'm sorry for my irregular English (I know that is bad :). I saw your edit in the IndianBio's talk page about the issue with Madonna and the title "Entertainer". I agree with both point of view. Personally, I feel that I can re-open a "Requested move" in the future. In the past years, I opened some of "controversials" topics about music articles, like the Michael Jackson figures (including Thriller) when I obtained a general approval, and subsequently we have a better control on the best-seller list since then. Also, I did the same with the Queen of Pop's title. Those cases, are examples that were discussions over and over again through years, but are already fixed IMHO. With this disambiguation I feel that I can answer each oppose point of view with references including (mostly are "cycle answer") and yeah, they can read this haha. What do you think?. Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Jennica,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
TheAmazingPeanuts (
talk) 23:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Jennica,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (
talk |
stand clear of the doors!) 17:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hi
Thanks for your contribution to St. James, have not had a chance to read the changes properly as yet, so I am not responding to that area.
Just wanted to add some info which may clarify the contributions to St. James:
In light of Intellectual Property Rights, one form of which, relates to the rights arising through culture, be it food, drink, or expressions of art, I felt that it was necessary to capture some info on St. James.
Also as there is the possibility that a part of POS may be preserved and God knows when an approach to UNESCO for review as a World Heritage Site or should artifacts be discovered, this information may become important. Curaco has a UNESCO sitein Willemstad.
Also, given that the city is located within a bay or Gulf, there may be evidence of use by the Caribs or Arawaks which may make the area even more important.
If you are interested in reading about preservation of historical places, re Indentured Labourers, perhaps you can check the page for Icacos or Cedros as there are iimages of one of the older barracks which were used and which has been preserved.
Jennifer N Bailey ( talk) 23:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
I nominated the " Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" for GA awhile back and have had no takers surprisingly (it is a Beatles song after all) . Anyways, I was wondering if you are interested in reviewing articles, and if you wanted to start with this one? It should be rather easy because I brought it to GA before, and, not to sound arrogant, I should have passed. If it is not your thing, that is okay, but if you do end up reviewing the article, I am very appreciative. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 07:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Please don't add tags like this without providing a coherent explanation and seeking the agreement of other editors to the changes you wish to see. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 08:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the notes on formatting. Regarding Puchito Records discography, the table method does not favor mobile use. The table method works well, sometimes (as is the case the Steve Turre discography). But, in the case of Puchito (historic info), the table method limits info, particularly when trying to identify matrix numbers, OCLCs, ISSNs, catalog numbers, and the like. With respect to citations/notes, when the cites begin to stack-up, segmenting is easier to manage. It's just an opinion. With respect to using reflists, I'm happy with regular floating columns. Your comment about bold vs. semicolon headers, I was unaware that it does not work well for screen reader users. Eurodog ( talk) 23:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Not that i have any personal objection to it, but several of your edits to Mariah Carey articles I have on my watchlist came up and I saw that you had changed "singer and songwriter" to "singer-songwriter". I agree(?) that it essentially means the same thing, but if I'm not mistaken, there was a discussion in the Wikipedia music community some time ago about "singer-songwriter" implying a certain category of musician (as in, somebody who writes all their own material) as distinct from a "singer and songwriter" (as in, somebody who sings and writes sometimes). I think it was a bunch of editors being a bit picky, but all I'm saying is don't be surprised if some people have an objection to it, as I believe that discussion took place somewhere along the line. Ss 112 18:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Just letting you know, I noticed a user (Alinblack) who, coincidentally, recently appears to have undone a move you performed. Instead of undoing the move directly, they restored content at I Idolize You (Massive Ego Single) with the claim that the information is "about the single" (despite it being an incorrect namespace and capitalisation). Perhaps you can request it be re-moved at WP:RM/TR (or just revert their edits to each page, as they didn't move it, just copypasted) and leave them a message on their talk page about it being incorrect? Ss 112 05:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 02:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
The article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1984 (Van Halen album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 03:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey can you do me a favor by adding a "personnel" section in the Starboy article, based off the album's liner notes here. If you can do it that is. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 14:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jennica, just a minor note, it's perfectly acceptable for people to edit as IPs. The edits on Starboy do not appear to be disruptive, just minor content disputes. Please try to engage the other editors on the talk page. Protection should not be used to try to stop IPs from contributing. Remember to assume good faith, there seem to be other logged in editors that agree with some of the IP edits, such as this edit. -- ferret ( talk) 01:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok Jennica, you're all set. Your older archives are all together at User talk:Jennica/Archive 1 now. The latest is in User talk:Jennica/Archive 2. Your archives header should be good to go now. -- ferret ( talk) 02:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jennica, would you be so kind to ecxplain me, what is unconstructive in my contribution to Ceca (singer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.76.158.162 ( talk) 12:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
In your infobox changes using AWB, you need to insert an endash (–) between dates instead of a hyphen (-). See this as an example. EddieHugh ( talk) 17:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, can you be a little more careful when using find and replace? Over on Almirante Latorre-class battleship, there were more colons in that section than just the ones being used to indent. :-) Best, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Per the discussion at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore [1]. It is a wp:self published source. Woovee ( talk) 20:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
In good faith you made some edits to Sesame Street that fixed errors in a pair of prior edits. But those edits were clearly vandalism or test edits that had no business being on that article and instead of fixing them they should have been reverted on sight. While assuming good faith is a part of the Wikipedia ethos, it must be tempered by some common sense and scripts must be used with decision making fully engagaed. I ask you, if you're using them to more carefully review your edits before saving them. oknazevad ( talk) 21:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
There appears to be an editor with a changing IP (usually beginning with 73.81) that geolocates to Pennsylvania/Delaware wanting to move "Castle on the Hill" first in order of singles from ÷ on related Ed Sheeran articles because "it comes first alphabetically" and citing some apparent precedent on Rihanna's Anti when there's no policy or established reason to do this. Can you please monitor this and revert when you see it? I'm quite convinced this IP is an editor that's been blocked and is now editing through IPs, because they've cited Wikipedia policies, which is quite rare for IPs to do. Ss 112 18:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Ss112: - I say report it to AIV. If you don't want to, I can. At least it might stop the warring for a day or something. By the way do you have any opinion on this topic? -- Jennica✿ / talk 01:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This whole thing is quite stupid and childish, if I may say. Just because YOU think that SOY is the more prominent single doesn't mean that everyone agrees with that. You can't use YOUR reason as a rule that needs to be followed. I'm all for discussing this, but your reasoning doesn't make sense at all, and is purely your personal opinion. And as far as me blanking the Bebe Rexha page, they used the template used for "Digital Distortion" and just added a few things, which is vandalism, so I had every right to do that. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Um, so even thought the entire page was vandalism, it should still have been allowed to be a page? Do you logic? Do you even try to abide by any rules other than the ones you make up for yourself The way I looked at it was this: a page had been made prematurely, it clearly needed more time to create, so making it a redirect seemed like the most logical option. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Um, all I saw was the cover for DD and what looked like most of the information on that page copied over. That seemed like a bunch of vandalism that shouldn't have been a page. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Why do you even care about this so much? I know it's hypocritical of me to ask, but I'm just wondering. 73.81.150.34 ( talk) 03:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
So you're agreeing with someone who has no reason whatsoever to have them in one order, but not with someone who wants them in alphabetical order? No, you're right, that makes perfect sense. 73.81.156.252 ( talk) 04:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
It would have been nice if you'd said something at WT:NFL before making that change, but I guess it does make sense. Your edit summaries could do with a bit of improvement, however. Would you mind changing every season to match? – Pee Jay 22:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm now convinced more than ever that that IP is indeed a sockpuppeting blocked user, except since they're IP hopping every few hours there's little. They changed IPs again to make the final few edits to your talk page. IPs rarely fight issues like this, and it's quite obviously a little power trip they're having, which is blatant blocked user behaviour—the "I have to have it my way and you're all wrong!" pettiness. If only the administrator who protected the pages had looked a bit further into it, they might have seen this, but admins rarely want to touch the issue of sockpuppeting requiring CheckUser, it seems. Ss 112 09:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, because alphabetical order, as opposed to personal preference, is blatantly incorrect. The only person on a little power trip here is you, get over yourself. You're ridiculous. 73.81.156.206 ( talk) 15:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I would like to suggest that all involved parties take this to the talk page of the article. This is a content dispute and best handled at the article's so other interested editors can see it and understand the outcome. -- ferret ( talk) 15:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, since you are the user with the most edit counts and the most user boxes on her/his user page, I hope you can help me with my question. I want to keep the same code on my :de: and :en: user page, mainly info for editing that I need regularly, but also very few user boxes. Now, I wanted to have at least one fun user box, that is an edited beer barrel with "AGF" added. But it is only hosted on the German wikipedia (not on commons), and I cannot figure it out how that can be tweaked so that it works for my :en: userpage as well. I add the code (commented out) for you to look at, but feel free to reject when you not feel like it or when it is absolutely not your area of expertise.
Could be that I simply cannot use the {{Babel-code in :en:... I looked into your code with your user boxes and not a single "Babel" there, many years ago I used to play around way more with user boxes than I do now and was just starting to use :en: also, not only :de: and I think I recall that quite some issues started when I tried to have the same start page like I try now (again)... after I removed all fancy looking stuff and only kept sober dry info...
Cheers, --
Rava77 (
talk) 22:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
P.S. The "your / you’re" and the similar other ones are hilarious. Also somehow sad, seeing as how often you see these same three mistake over and over, like with then/than & its/it's, when all three are so simple. Just because they sound alike, but they are nothing alike...</ramble>
The article 1984 (Van Halen album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1984 (Van Halen album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jclemens -- Jclemens ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I was planning on doing the GA review for Van Halen (album) but I see you've withdrawn it. If it were available I'd start reviewing immediately. Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Van Halen 1984 Back cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Recently Garagepunk66 and I created a project for garage rock here. I realize content creation is not your main objective, but I think this is worth joining because, when it gets in full swing, dozens of articles, including ones about albums, will be created. I recruited some fairly new users so formatting errors will undoubtedly arise in the beginning. For that reason, you may want to join and look over the listed editors' histories every once in awhile or the talk page to do your thing. If you do not want to, I understand; I just thought it was worth mentioning. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 03:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
DBaK ( talk) 08:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello User:Jennica, can you add genre(s) for UK top 5 single You Don't Know Me (Jax Jones song), as it's one of the only modern song pages with no genres listed, thanks. It sounds like tropical house, dancehall-pop (reggae fusion) or afrobeat inspired.-- 2A02:C7D:892B:3D00:C8AD:711B:476A:8BE8 ( talk) 20:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)