This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
Why do you delete a article about Daniel Niazi, when I`ve sources about this guy?
From Frank Robert, Wikipedia Fundation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.68.124 ( talk) 20:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jenks - just seeing if all's well. It's been nearly 10 days since your last post, after you said you intended to be back on WP in 18 hours. Of course it's none of my beeswax, but just thought I'd check in. Dohn joe ( talk) 17:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 09:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)The redirect page at /?title=0371&redirect=no needs to be duplicated (identical) both at "0372" and at "0373".
The suggested edit summary is~~ [[037_]] redirects to [[Non-geographic telephone numbers in the United Kingdom#030, 033, 034 and 037 prefix|Non-geographic telephone numbers in the United Kingdom]]. ~~or similar. Thanks! --
79.67.249.97 (
talk)
11:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I think this ANI discussion is supposed to be about you, I can't find a single diff to support the accusations but it looks like it's probably related to the American Dad seasons RM. - filelakeshoe ( t / c) 18:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Portoholic ( talk) 10:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Just curious to know where you found the date of birth for Reg Conole ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.27.208.190 ( talk) 10:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Last March, when closing a move discussion at Talk:Erotica (Madonna album)#Requested move, you wrote: "The unwritten convention is that an article not at the primary topic needs a completely unambiguous disambiguator and, unsurprisingly, most of the RM "regulars" who have commented here have expressed that opinion." Jenks24 (talk) 09:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
The same guideline issue was raised at VPP under the heading of partially disambiguated titles. You might be interested to read my closure there. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 13:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be so kind as to move this article to my userspace or sandbox? He appears to me to be quite notable and I'd like to have a look at the article that was deleted. Thanks. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 16:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Why did you delete the page Baltazar? I didn't see your reason for deleting it. That's why I am wondering. I think you forgot to mention that in your reason for deletion of the page. Thanks in advance --- 68.229.239.155 ( talk) 23:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPA for English. Since you had some involvement with the IPA for English redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cathfolant ( talk) 21:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Can I get you to review this decision? The deletion discussion was obviously deluded and done by people with no knowledge of the matter. The Big Model is the reference for meta-discussions in roleplaying games, you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who knows anything about roleplaying theory who is not familiar with it. It's to roleplaying theory what the Kopenhagen Model is to quantum theory. If the article needed clean-up or work, that is one thing, but removing the article does a major disservice to Wikipedia. Plus the article as I remember it was not a stub but actually well-written. Just because no roleplaying fan is monitoring the deletion talk page daily doesn't mean the subject matter is not important. There are probably several thousand pages on Wikipedia that are less noteable.
.Tom. ( talk) 14:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi please unprotect this Template:Latest stable software release/Invision Power Board page please. It is no longer being vandalised. 90.204.133.243 ( talk) 17:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to second that sentiment Glad to see you active here again, you've been missed. Wbm1058 ( talk) 18:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Likewise. You've been missed! Dohn joe ( talk) 18:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jenks. It's nice to see you around again. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
For your information, see the ongoing discussion on
Talk:Conservation status#Capitalisation of conservation statuses.
Coreyemotela (
talk)
21:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC).
I had moved the years because there seems to be common agreement, had it few times, and recently on the talk page of admin Edgar.
Can you provide reason that why year is important to add on the title when more common title is available? OccultZone ( Talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Jenks - if you are at all interested in jumping back into the issue, I'd love some help designing a well-thought-out RFC. User:Peter coxhead also seemed to show some interest in doing so. Let me know. Dohn joe ( talk) 17:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this - I didn't know what to do about the old redirect. Making it point to the right target makes complete sense. Ivanvector ( talk) 06:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that one. I usually don't bother seeking out getting vandals blocked but that one was particularly persistent. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 14:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, not sure I understand your actions here when you came a different conclusion here. Seems as no one was involved in either dicussion that they were both no consensus and should probably stay where they are? Fenix down ( talk) 16:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for fixing that page move. I wasn't sure how to do that properly. User:Aspects cleared it up for me on my Talk page. -- Nabarry ( talk) 15:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Since you seem to be an expert in this area, I ask that you snow close Talk:Przewalski's_horse#Requested_move; especially considering it has now degenerated into personal attack 'votes'. Dreadstar ☥ 03:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
I assume your recent reverts of a cut and paste move were in good faith. Although cut and paste moves are frowned upon, this move is to undo a double move that should not have occured (violation of WP:BRD. Unfortunately when a double move is performed a cut and paste is the only way of undoing the change. If raised at WP:RM the admins can only undo the move this way. Unfortunately, your reversion has actually broken an intended redirect because Northeast North America blackout of 2003 was not the intended location of the article but was intended as a redirect. The original article title was arrived at by concensus and the move was against this concensus. I B Wright ( talk) 15:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
You may wish to consider move protecting 2011 Southwest blackout as this is also subject to a similar unilateral move attempt. I B Wright ( talk) 15:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
OK, I'll accept that. It had got such a mess, the scope for confusion was always there. Yes - I just didn't look back far enough in the edit history. I B Wright ( talk) 16:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Please can you explain how you came to your decision in more detail? -- Richhoncho ( talk) 12:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm obviously involved here but I don't think there was consenus for the move you undertook following this discussion. Four people (myself included) opposed any move, and those who supported a move seemed to support a move to Júlio César Soares de Espíndola, so I am unsure where how you got the page to where you did. Giant Snowman 11:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:15 Éxitos (Alejandra Guzmán album). Only 1 editor in the discussion suggested this. I suggest that is not a mandate to implement it. Are you planning to break up the dab page into half a dozen different separate dabs for 10 15 20 25 30 Éxitos? In ictu oculi ( talk) 11:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Many thanks Jenks24 on behalf of our community for moving page on 'Greeks in Caucasus' to 'Caucasus Greeks', much appreciated. A Gounaris ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC) |
BMK ( talk) 08:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
There are always two (or more) sides to every discussion, Jenks24, but it is not an admin's place to extend a discussion period to allow one of those sides to have more time to gather responses. You seem not to understand what the proper role of an admin is, so why don't you explain yourself at [ AN/I], where I have filed a complaint about your actions? BMK ( talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Can you please let me know the reason behind deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page? Iqbal is one of the well known Islamic Scholar as well as prominent Personality in Dubai. He had been written so many articles in so many titles, those were published in so many magazines and news papers. His "Science Miracle - அறிவியல் அதிசயம்" (Tamil Language) articles were published in Indian Tamil Leading News Paper Dina Thanthi' Supplementary "Ilaigar Malar" and those articles were combined as Book, it was released Tamil leading publisher "Poombuhar Pathippagam". Please refer the below links, Request you to kindly consider him for Wiki Page.
Nm.imthiyas ( talk) 16:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. G S Palmer ( talk • contribs) 00:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! This is just to let you know that I mentioned you at ANI, in the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Undiscussed page moves by SMcCandlish. I hope you don't mind. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Following your discussion comment at the latest Madonna RM (thank you!), I decided not to post this there as I fear that the nom may not find it funny, which would make it abusive. But what I first wrote there was...
Agree. Unstable equilibrium. That's of course unless we update the relevant policy. We could set a threshold of, say, six identical RMs, and an additional requirement of no consensus as to whether or not there is consensus. Then update the bot to add a new section below the RM Backlog, with a suitable section heading. Perhaps we could call the section Hell, following the superb insights of Huis Clos into what hell could really be like. Three equally comfortable armchairs, and three people fighting over which is the most comfortable. That guy could write.
Admins are of course not allowed to tell anybody to go to hell, and I don't think we should change that policy, but we could I think get the bot do it. Andrewa ( talk) 20:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
"Ryan Renolyds" is Protrayed as Dead Pool in XMen Orgins film. Is False. Deadpool was indeed a different character in the film a.k.a Weapon XI.(s in 2009 film X-Men Origins: Wolverine.) [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.95.120 ( talk)
I had looked at it before actually, but as it's outside the "simple" European fonts, and Hawaii isn't Hawaiian speaking, had stood back, but now if you're leaving it open I'd like to comment. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
You closed three move discussions that I started, suggesting that I try AFC or DRV. However, these are not new articles, nor am I disputing the original closes on the AFDs, so how do you propose I use either or those procedures? BOZ ( talk) 12:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for moving SRK. There are a few loose ends that I am not sure how to fix. The Wikimedia Commons and Wikiquote links do not work now. Wikimedia Commons used to have a lot of pictures, but now I only see one on the new name and two when I try the old name. What happened? BollyJeff | talk 01:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You did a SWAP to accomplish a move, but left the old version in kind of a confusing place. Could you move Template:R to character list entry (which contains the history) to Template:R from character (which was the original name associated with this history). Thanks. -- Netoholic @ 20:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
There's no source that "club music related to electronic dance music". Can you delete please? 183.171.170.116 ( talk) 13:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Editor,
Please make a review "Tbomas Rathnam" wiki page.
Update few things and undo the delete.-- Praisewinner ( talk) 15:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Requested moves are seven days. I changed the article title because there was a clear consensus to use the project guidelines and the OP said they were done discussing this. This is an article that is the proper name of organizations. The OP even started a discussion at the MOS subpage for Hawaiian related articles. I changed that article because the RFM was long over seven days. Its the 14th of July now and that original request was from June 22. I didn't move it myself until July 1 which was after nine days.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 09:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
"originating editor did admit he made the request without assuming good faith and made the request as a tactical maneuver to head me off after" – Hi User:Jenks24. I never admitted to this; you can read this in the discussion. I have no more comments about this.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 03:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I understand your concern about this with an admin action now being undone twice, but I assure you nothing improper has happened. Ideally RMs are resolved after a week, but we have a little of a backlog of RMs waiting for closure so it can take longer than we'd like for someone to get around to assessing the consensus and making a closure. The only reason I undid my close was because I made a promise several years ago not to close any RMs related to diacritics and I realised after making that close that I'd overstepped my bounds. Regarding KAVEBEAR's starting of the RM, it's important to note that WP:RM/CM states "Unlike certain other request processes on Wikipedia, nominations should not be neutral. Strive to make your point as best you can; use evidence and make reference to applicable policies and guidelines". So if you are used to other processes on Wikipedia I can understand why KAVEBEAR's nomination may have seemed improper, but for the purposes of RM it was acceptable. Of course this doesn't mean that we only choose between the nominator's proposal and the current title, but other options don't have to be presented as part of the nomination. Hope this helps, Jenks24 ( talk) 10:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
Why do you delete a article about Daniel Niazi, when I`ve sources about this guy?
From Frank Robert, Wikipedia Fundation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.68.124 ( talk) 20:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jenks - just seeing if all's well. It's been nearly 10 days since your last post, after you said you intended to be back on WP in 18 hours. Of course it's none of my beeswax, but just thought I'd check in. Dohn joe ( talk) 17:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 09:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)The redirect page at /?title=0371&redirect=no needs to be duplicated (identical) both at "0372" and at "0373".
The suggested edit summary is~~ [[037_]] redirects to [[Non-geographic telephone numbers in the United Kingdom#030, 033, 034 and 037 prefix|Non-geographic telephone numbers in the United Kingdom]]. ~~or similar. Thanks! --
79.67.249.97 (
talk)
11:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I think this ANI discussion is supposed to be about you, I can't find a single diff to support the accusations but it looks like it's probably related to the American Dad seasons RM. - filelakeshoe ( t / c) 18:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Portoholic ( talk) 10:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Just curious to know where you found the date of birth for Reg Conole ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.27.208.190 ( talk) 10:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Last March, when closing a move discussion at Talk:Erotica (Madonna album)#Requested move, you wrote: "The unwritten convention is that an article not at the primary topic needs a completely unambiguous disambiguator and, unsurprisingly, most of the RM "regulars" who have commented here have expressed that opinion." Jenks24 (talk) 09:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
The same guideline issue was raised at VPP under the heading of partially disambiguated titles. You might be interested to read my closure there. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 13:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be so kind as to move this article to my userspace or sandbox? He appears to me to be quite notable and I'd like to have a look at the article that was deleted. Thanks. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 16:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Why did you delete the page Baltazar? I didn't see your reason for deleting it. That's why I am wondering. I think you forgot to mention that in your reason for deletion of the page. Thanks in advance --- 68.229.239.155 ( talk) 23:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPA for English. Since you had some involvement with the IPA for English redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cathfolant ( talk) 21:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Can I get you to review this decision? The deletion discussion was obviously deluded and done by people with no knowledge of the matter. The Big Model is the reference for meta-discussions in roleplaying games, you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who knows anything about roleplaying theory who is not familiar with it. It's to roleplaying theory what the Kopenhagen Model is to quantum theory. If the article needed clean-up or work, that is one thing, but removing the article does a major disservice to Wikipedia. Plus the article as I remember it was not a stub but actually well-written. Just because no roleplaying fan is monitoring the deletion talk page daily doesn't mean the subject matter is not important. There are probably several thousand pages on Wikipedia that are less noteable.
.Tom. ( talk) 14:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi please unprotect this Template:Latest stable software release/Invision Power Board page please. It is no longer being vandalised. 90.204.133.243 ( talk) 17:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to second that sentiment Glad to see you active here again, you've been missed. Wbm1058 ( talk) 18:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Likewise. You've been missed! Dohn joe ( talk) 18:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jenks. It's nice to see you around again. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
For your information, see the ongoing discussion on
Talk:Conservation status#Capitalisation of conservation statuses.
Coreyemotela (
talk)
21:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC).
I had moved the years because there seems to be common agreement, had it few times, and recently on the talk page of admin Edgar.
Can you provide reason that why year is important to add on the title when more common title is available? OccultZone ( Talk) 15:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Jenks - if you are at all interested in jumping back into the issue, I'd love some help designing a well-thought-out RFC. User:Peter coxhead also seemed to show some interest in doing so. Let me know. Dohn joe ( talk) 17:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this - I didn't know what to do about the old redirect. Making it point to the right target makes complete sense. Ivanvector ( talk) 06:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that one. I usually don't bother seeking out getting vandals blocked but that one was particularly persistent. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 14:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, not sure I understand your actions here when you came a different conclusion here. Seems as no one was involved in either dicussion that they were both no consensus and should probably stay where they are? Fenix down ( talk) 16:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for fixing that page move. I wasn't sure how to do that properly. User:Aspects cleared it up for me on my Talk page. -- Nabarry ( talk) 15:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Since you seem to be an expert in this area, I ask that you snow close Talk:Przewalski's_horse#Requested_move; especially considering it has now degenerated into personal attack 'votes'. Dreadstar ☥ 03:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
I assume your recent reverts of a cut and paste move were in good faith. Although cut and paste moves are frowned upon, this move is to undo a double move that should not have occured (violation of WP:BRD. Unfortunately when a double move is performed a cut and paste is the only way of undoing the change. If raised at WP:RM the admins can only undo the move this way. Unfortunately, your reversion has actually broken an intended redirect because Northeast North America blackout of 2003 was not the intended location of the article but was intended as a redirect. The original article title was arrived at by concensus and the move was against this concensus. I B Wright ( talk) 15:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
You may wish to consider move protecting 2011 Southwest blackout as this is also subject to a similar unilateral move attempt. I B Wright ( talk) 15:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
OK, I'll accept that. It had got such a mess, the scope for confusion was always there. Yes - I just didn't look back far enough in the edit history. I B Wright ( talk) 16:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Please can you explain how you came to your decision in more detail? -- Richhoncho ( talk) 12:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm obviously involved here but I don't think there was consenus for the move you undertook following this discussion. Four people (myself included) opposed any move, and those who supported a move seemed to support a move to Júlio César Soares de Espíndola, so I am unsure where how you got the page to where you did. Giant Snowman 11:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:15 Éxitos (Alejandra Guzmán album). Only 1 editor in the discussion suggested this. I suggest that is not a mandate to implement it. Are you planning to break up the dab page into half a dozen different separate dabs for 10 15 20 25 30 Éxitos? In ictu oculi ( talk) 11:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Many thanks Jenks24 on behalf of our community for moving page on 'Greeks in Caucasus' to 'Caucasus Greeks', much appreciated. A Gounaris ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC) |
BMK ( talk) 08:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
There are always two (or more) sides to every discussion, Jenks24, but it is not an admin's place to extend a discussion period to allow one of those sides to have more time to gather responses. You seem not to understand what the proper role of an admin is, so why don't you explain yourself at [ AN/I], where I have filed a complaint about your actions? BMK ( talk) 08:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Can you please let me know the reason behind deletion of MJ Mohamed Iqbal Page? Iqbal is one of the well known Islamic Scholar as well as prominent Personality in Dubai. He had been written so many articles in so many titles, those were published in so many magazines and news papers. His "Science Miracle - அறிவியல் அதிசயம்" (Tamil Language) articles were published in Indian Tamil Leading News Paper Dina Thanthi' Supplementary "Ilaigar Malar" and those articles were combined as Book, it was released Tamil leading publisher "Poombuhar Pathippagam". Please refer the below links, Request you to kindly consider him for Wiki Page.
Nm.imthiyas ( talk) 16:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. G S Palmer ( talk • contribs) 00:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! This is just to let you know that I mentioned you at ANI, in the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Undiscussed page moves by SMcCandlish. I hope you don't mind. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 00:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Following your discussion comment at the latest Madonna RM (thank you!), I decided not to post this there as I fear that the nom may not find it funny, which would make it abusive. But what I first wrote there was...
Agree. Unstable equilibrium. That's of course unless we update the relevant policy. We could set a threshold of, say, six identical RMs, and an additional requirement of no consensus as to whether or not there is consensus. Then update the bot to add a new section below the RM Backlog, with a suitable section heading. Perhaps we could call the section Hell, following the superb insights of Huis Clos into what hell could really be like. Three equally comfortable armchairs, and three people fighting over which is the most comfortable. That guy could write.
Admins are of course not allowed to tell anybody to go to hell, and I don't think we should change that policy, but we could I think get the bot do it. Andrewa ( talk) 20:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
"Ryan Renolyds" is Protrayed as Dead Pool in XMen Orgins film. Is False. Deadpool was indeed a different character in the film a.k.a Weapon XI.(s in 2009 film X-Men Origins: Wolverine.) [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.95.120 ( talk)
I had looked at it before actually, but as it's outside the "simple" European fonts, and Hawaii isn't Hawaiian speaking, had stood back, but now if you're leaving it open I'd like to comment. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
You closed three move discussions that I started, suggesting that I try AFC or DRV. However, these are not new articles, nor am I disputing the original closes on the AFDs, so how do you propose I use either or those procedures? BOZ ( talk) 12:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for moving SRK. There are a few loose ends that I am not sure how to fix. The Wikimedia Commons and Wikiquote links do not work now. Wikimedia Commons used to have a lot of pictures, but now I only see one on the new name and two when I try the old name. What happened? BollyJeff | talk 01:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You did a SWAP to accomplish a move, but left the old version in kind of a confusing place. Could you move Template:R to character list entry (which contains the history) to Template:R from character (which was the original name associated with this history). Thanks. -- Netoholic @ 20:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
There's no source that "club music related to electronic dance music". Can you delete please? 183.171.170.116 ( talk) 13:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Editor,
Please make a review "Tbomas Rathnam" wiki page.
Update few things and undo the delete.-- Praisewinner ( talk) 15:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Requested moves are seven days. I changed the article title because there was a clear consensus to use the project guidelines and the OP said they were done discussing this. This is an article that is the proper name of organizations. The OP even started a discussion at the MOS subpage for Hawaiian related articles. I changed that article because the RFM was long over seven days. Its the 14th of July now and that original request was from June 22. I didn't move it myself until July 1 which was after nine days.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 09:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
"originating editor did admit he made the request without assuming good faith and made the request as a tactical maneuver to head me off after" – Hi User:Jenks24. I never admitted to this; you can read this in the discussion. I have no more comments about this.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 03:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I understand your concern about this with an admin action now being undone twice, but I assure you nothing improper has happened. Ideally RMs are resolved after a week, but we have a little of a backlog of RMs waiting for closure so it can take longer than we'd like for someone to get around to assessing the consensus and making a closure. The only reason I undid my close was because I made a promise several years ago not to close any RMs related to diacritics and I realised after making that close that I'd overstepped my bounds. Regarding KAVEBEAR's starting of the RM, it's important to note that WP:RM/CM states "Unlike certain other request processes on Wikipedia, nominations should not be neutral. Strive to make your point as best you can; use evidence and make reference to applicable policies and guidelines". So if you are used to other processes on Wikipedia I can understand why KAVEBEAR's nomination may have seemed improper, but for the purposes of RM it was acceptable. Of course this doesn't mean that we only choose between the nominator's proposal and the current title, but other options don't have to be presented as part of the nomination. Hope this helps, Jenks24 ( talk) 10:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)