Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
Power, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
05:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brutality. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 05:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Brutality, you may be
blocked from editing.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Crowbar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 13:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding definitions to DAB pages. They do not belong, there is a link to Wikitionary that holds the definitions and if someone wants the definition they can click the link. ~ GB fan 12:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The word you added did not change the meaning in any way.
The word that you added did not change the meaning in any way. [1] - SummerPhD v2.0 14:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Daniel Bryan YES Movement Sticker.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:YESMovement.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:YESMovement.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi JMDGamotia, I just cleaned up Cascade and stumbled across your edit [2] which directly links to another dab Collisional cascading which is incorrect per WP:INTDAB. Collisional cascading was missing a redirect (now created) to use for that. We never pipe on dabs, so "Collisional cascading (disambiguation)" piping (which attempts to fix something which should be fixed elsewhere) seems to not understand that it's the direct link that's important. I have concerns that you're making many dab page edits, and there's a high error rate per WP:MOSDAB e.g. Mortar. Can you please familiarise yourself with the guide before making more dab edits. Widefox; talk 22:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Please can you discuss this at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#User:JMDGamotia, regards Widefox; talk 22:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit to the
disambiguation page
Angeline. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the
disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:
and other dabs - please discuss at dab project Widefox; talk 12:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. please discuss this disruption at the dab project Widefox; talk 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mortar. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Widefox; talk 13:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Can you confirm you're getting this message?
Widefox;
talk
16:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
No
Hello, JMDGamotia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
15:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. There are two weapons called "Shillelagh". The Shillelagh missile (a weapon). And the Shillelagh club (a weapon). I do not know what prompted your decision to move the latter to a title which causes confusion with the former. But I do not see it as an improvement. If anything, in my view, what we now have is a greater DAB issue. Than we had before. Unless there is a specific or strong rationale for the change, then I believe it should be reverted. At least pending a discussion. On how to address the additional DAB issues that may precipitate. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Stuff like this piece I reverted you on is not rewording. You need to use accurate edit summaries. And a disambiguation note is not needed for articles that are already disambiguated. But I see that you have been warned times before on your talk page about your disambiguation edits. You need to listen, or face being WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 18:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Let me concur with what Flyer22 Reborn said above. Your edit summaries are very misleading and you need to learn how to disambiguate properly. Please read the relevant policies and don't just ignore these messages from other uses. Also, I just reverted a move you made to Toto (band) that was unnecessary and undiscussed. Please discuss on the talk page if you disagree. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 08:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Laser brain
(talk)
14:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Being ready to edit without using disruptive edits
Decline reason:
This does not address the concerns raised. Yamla ( talk) 14:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Getting ready to edit any article without suffering disruptive edits Juan Miguel ( talk) 09:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You still don't address the reason for your block or explain what you will do on Wikipedia if unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. If you continue to make unblock requests without doing those things, your ability to edit this page can be revoked. 331dot ( talk) 09:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Just ending the block Juan Miguel ( talk) 09:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is a collaborative project; you must be able to communicate coherently with other editors. Your three unblock requests fail to demonstrate this, suggesting insufficient proficiency in written English. Therefore your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 09:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21253 was submitted on Apr 18, 2018 13:54:40. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 13:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21379 was submitted on Apr 30, 2018 09:34:34. This review is now closed.
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
Power, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
05:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brutality. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 05:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Brutality, you may be
blocked from editing.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Crowbar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 13:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding definitions to DAB pages. They do not belong, there is a link to Wikitionary that holds the definitions and if someone wants the definition they can click the link. ~ GB fan 12:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The word you added did not change the meaning in any way.
The word that you added did not change the meaning in any way. [1] - SummerPhD v2.0 14:09, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Daniel Bryan YES Movement Sticker.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:YESMovement.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:YESMovement.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi JMDGamotia, I just cleaned up Cascade and stumbled across your edit [2] which directly links to another dab Collisional cascading which is incorrect per WP:INTDAB. Collisional cascading was missing a redirect (now created) to use for that. We never pipe on dabs, so "Collisional cascading (disambiguation)" piping (which attempts to fix something which should be fixed elsewhere) seems to not understand that it's the direct link that's important. I have concerns that you're making many dab page edits, and there's a high error rate per WP:MOSDAB e.g. Mortar. Can you please familiarise yourself with the guide before making more dab edits. Widefox; talk 22:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Please can you discuss this at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#User:JMDGamotia, regards Widefox; talk 22:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit to the
disambiguation page
Angeline. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the
disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:
and other dabs - please discuss at dab project Widefox; talk 12:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. please discuss this disruption at the dab project Widefox; talk 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mortar. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Widefox; talk 13:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Can you confirm you're getting this message?
Widefox;
talk
16:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
No
Hello, JMDGamotia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
15:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. There are two weapons called "Shillelagh". The Shillelagh missile (a weapon). And the Shillelagh club (a weapon). I do not know what prompted your decision to move the latter to a title which causes confusion with the former. But I do not see it as an improvement. If anything, in my view, what we now have is a greater DAB issue. Than we had before. Unless there is a specific or strong rationale for the change, then I believe it should be reverted. At least pending a discussion. On how to address the additional DAB issues that may precipitate. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Stuff like this piece I reverted you on is not rewording. You need to use accurate edit summaries. And a disambiguation note is not needed for articles that are already disambiguated. But I see that you have been warned times before on your talk page about your disambiguation edits. You need to listen, or face being WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 18:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Let me concur with what Flyer22 Reborn said above. Your edit summaries are very misleading and you need to learn how to disambiguate properly. Please read the relevant policies and don't just ignore these messages from other uses. Also, I just reverted a move you made to Toto (band) that was unnecessary and undiscussed. Please discuss on the talk page if you disagree. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 08:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Laser brain
(talk)
14:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Being ready to edit without using disruptive edits
Decline reason:
This does not address the concerns raised. Yamla ( talk) 14:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Getting ready to edit any article without suffering disruptive edits Juan Miguel ( talk) 09:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You still don't address the reason for your block or explain what you will do on Wikipedia if unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. If you continue to make unblock requests without doing those things, your ability to edit this page can be revoked. 331dot ( talk) 09:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Just ending the block Juan Miguel ( talk) 09:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is a collaborative project; you must be able to communicate coherently with other editors. Your three unblock requests fail to demonstrate this, suggesting insufficient proficiency in written English. Therefore your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 09:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21253 was submitted on Apr 18, 2018 13:54:40. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 13:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
JMDGamotia ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21379 was submitted on Apr 30, 2018 09:34:34. This review is now closed.