This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hello, JJMC89,
Your bot seems flawless but for some reason, this category was moved without moving the pages that were categorized in the previous category. Is there any way to fix this other than manually? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hi, good day! I would like to directly report to you an editor, whom you have removed of patroller role, due to multiple inappropriate draftifications, cut/paste moves, and inappropriate CSD. Seems like User:Spiderone haven't learned their lesson. He has explicitly draftified four of my recently-created articles:
Hilarious thing is he even tagged a non-official essay as basis for draftification. It is as if the sole source I have cited there is a non-independent and non-reliable one, which is untrue as those were not school websites — those were from the national basic education agency in the Philippines. I don't think draftification is necessary. The notability stub was enough. The article didn't even last for its first 24 hours before being taken on such action. I am supposed to expand the article and put another independent sources. That was unnecessary and unfair as well. Chances were not given. The created articles are with neutral point of view, without copyrighted contents and WP:COI. Personally, I look this one as an "insult" as the article were made in good faith.
I hope that this administrator looks into this matter. Thank you! ~ Pog ing Juan 12:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Please, can you check? One blocked user who does mostly vandalism and who is blocked as a sock is back. User is: ShkoHazhar ( talk · contribs) and sock case is this: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShkoDevAct. Thank you. Nubia86 ( talk) 18:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
I think this is wrong: Lapta_(game), Svaika. Please stop the bot. -- Лобачев Владимир ( talk) 14:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello @JJMC89
I have read A7 "that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant" and G11 too which says that it is promotional content and Wikipedia doesn't allow any type of promotional content. I don't know Bhupesh Bansal, every day I see posts of Rajnikant vs CID jokes (RVCJ) biggest content creator company made by Bhupesh. I didn't know about him but when I researched about him then I came to know his story and all media articles.
Bhupesh Bansal is an illustrator of the biggest content creator company named RVCJ. His posts are already viral all over India. Moreover, he has worked with other companies and Bollywood celebrities which shows that people have searched about him. I am not doing any promotional stuff for anyone just creating another page like I created others so that it can help readers.
I have created other articles too and I know the Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Just let me know where I was wrong and provide me your guidance so that I can create draft again with all reliable media links and submit it for review. Moreover, I had added reliable media links such as Midday, Deccan Chronicle, Asia Netnews, etc. Rajveer90 ( talk) 05:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I five times expanded The Quiet Achiever article back in 2011 and shortly thereafter added Fair Use pictures. At the time my rationale and copyright tag used was that they were historic images. They are the first 3 pictures of the ones showing the solar panels. Can you tell me IF this is correct to be able to use more than one Fair Use picture in an article. I am thinking of upgrading the article to Good Article status and want to make sure this is alright. Thanks for your input.-- Doug Coldwell ( talk) 19:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, should I nominate the files for deletion after I move them to the Wikimedia Commons? -- Mhhossein talk 19:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I've blocked the bot as I think it's making a wrong CFDS move - it has moved Category:Canarian footballers to Category:Footballers from Cantabria but these areas of Spain are separate ( Canary Islands and Cantabria), so I think it should be moving Category:Canarian footballers to Category:Footballers from the Canary Islands? Pinging @ Crowsus: who made the CFDS request. Once clarified I'll unblock. Giant Snowman 13:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89,
before you started you mass reverts of my edits, did you pause to recognize that all of them involve categories for which no main article exists, and at most one or two films? In the German WP (where I come from) such categories are always deleted, and I asked one of the experts here – it is at least unusual to create a category without a corresponding article. Another Admin here in the en-WP quick-deleted two categories which I had tagged with the same explanation "no corresponding article" – so you could have at least spoken to me before mass reverting. -- Sprachraum ( talk) 03:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, why have you declined [1] the request to move Foreign exchange to Foreign exchange (disambiguation)? — Granger ( talk · contribs) 07:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me out here please? Your edit summary doesn't give me any clues, so I have no idea what the problem was. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 06:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, i want to register a compliant Ernesto Kahan is the author of 29 books, won prizes, a peace activist etc. why did you delete it? Wikipedia must respect people like him. מתיאל ( talk) 15:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you closed the CfD, so I would like to ask you a general question about categories. Is it necessary for an article to be both in a general category and its subcategory? I know that some articles should, like Category:LGBT writers is a non-diffusing category of Category:Writers. But should an article like List of mammals of the Azores be in both Category:Lists of mammals by location and Category:Lists of mammals, or just the first one? And are the continent subcategories, like Category:Lists of mammals of Europe supposed to be just include article that are also in Category:Lists of mammals by location? If so, what's the point of them? Thanks — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 18:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you make this edit made removing the image, stating "Removed WP:NFCC violation(s). No valid non-free use rationale for this page" when the image in question has a valid non-free use rationale? ---- Pontificalibus 19:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I would like this AfD reinstated as I think it and the Category:American television stations with a three-letter call sign AfD did not notify or list WP:TVS or WP:WPRS, which would have brought more responses. Maybe against, maybe for. But, the respective groups should have been notified/listed. I respectfully request a full AfD with all members !voting. Not just four editors !voting or may or may not be TVS or WPRS editors. Thank you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:36 on March 12, 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Would you mind watching User talk:Sammi Brie#Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite/GA1 a bit? JJMC89 Bot removed File:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite.jpg from Aloha from Hawaii via Satellite, but the file is basically a duplicate of File:Elvis Presley Aloha From Hawaii LP Cover.jpg (there are some minor differences) and both might not be needed if it turns out that a rationale can be written for article about the actual broadcast. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 03:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
I went to this user page and there is a message saying that a category needs to be created for Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of EditorF even though this editor is already in this category. I thought there might be a mistake in the sockpuppet tag put on the user page which I'm reluctant to fiddle with so I'm hoping you could take a look at it. If this is just some misplaced message a script I've installed is popping up, then my apologies. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I used to always salt at admin level, but for the last few months I've had a thought (I know, right?). Why not salt at ECP, so that if someone like, say, that IgniteIndia sock were to make 500 constructive edits just so they could create the deleted page/s (only to have them immediately re-deleted) — maybe let them...? Probably a dumb idea, though. El_C 22:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, As I understand it, the Sandbox is where an editor prepares an article for publication. I was only using the Berrigan photo for placement until I get permission from a copyright owner for one of my subject. I am a bit astounded by this. I thought it was all private until finished, but if you can see it so can everyone else. One lives and learns - which is a good thing, I suppose. I guess I will have to prepare stuff offline in the future. Gladiator-Citizen ( talk) 05:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Howdy - not that I have any peculiar dog in this fight or dealings with the editor, I just happened to notice in passing... isn't it a little extreme to indef a highly productive editor with no previous issues, then choke off their talk page access so that they can't even ask for a review? Was whatever they did really so extreme that you are justified in kicking them off the project without even an explanatory note? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
There are at 20 odd articles screwed up right now because you deleted two taxonomy templates: Template:Taxonomy/Aeridostachya and Template:Taxonomy/Porpax. It's one thing to automatically delete articles created by banned users, another to delete templates used by articles created and edited by others. Can I ask you to please check for template transclusions in future. Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, I am an AfC reviewer and I have been renamed from "Kammill" to "Hulged". Will you please update the list. Thank you! – Hulged ⟨ talk⟩ 04:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Given this new ArbBom ruling [2], it would seem appropriate to have the material you redacted from the relevant article and talk page restored. Can I ask you to do so? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 15:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Further to this, you should probably read Beeblebrox's comment here: [3] AndyTheGrump ( talk) 02:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Could you please take a pause from nuking that sock's creations? Many, many pages you deleted had significant contributions by other users, making them ineligible for G5. Sro23 ( talk) 18:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, I wondered if you were to look into the Category: Conservatism in the United States as it seems to be overcrowded with multiple individuals in the same way as it was last year when the American Conservative people category was? Thank you. NihonBlue ( talk) 05:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
Your bot seems to work exceptionally well with CFD cases. In rare situations, I have found there can be a delay of a few hours or a day between deletion of a category and the removal of that category from pages. Do you think this is what happened with Category:Forgotten Realms locations? Or were there issues because all of the pages are redirects? Again, I think this is part of the 1% of times when there are problems with the bot. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89 (redirected bot?),
Can you please introduce yourself and then perhaps you might explain why you are removing content in my sandbox? Is there some rule I am unaware of that I have fallen foul of (I am new to Wikipedia, so that, very possible)?
ETA: I just looked at the relevent rules section. so yeah, OK. So how do I indicate in my sandbox article - that I will propose as an article to replace the existing one (on the invitation of LuckyLouie / Hob Gadling) - that (removed) content is to be placed there? I mean, how can I submit for review content that is permitted in an article, but not permitted in the actual submission? Sorry, I am a bit confused about this.
Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Tesldact Smih ( talk) 02:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Would you please draftify the article associated with this AfD you closed? I have the Argentine film encyclopedia and would like to beef up the draft in hopes of bringing it back. Thanks. -- DiamondRemley39 ( talk) 15:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, Made this userbox for editors such as yourself who use spihelper. Jerm ( talk) 01:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{
User wikipedia/spihelper}}
|
|
linked pages |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hello, JJMC89,
Your bot seems flawless but for some reason, this category was moved without moving the pages that were categorized in the previous category. Is there any way to fix this other than manually? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hi, good day! I would like to directly report to you an editor, whom you have removed of patroller role, due to multiple inappropriate draftifications, cut/paste moves, and inappropriate CSD. Seems like User:Spiderone haven't learned their lesson. He has explicitly draftified four of my recently-created articles:
Hilarious thing is he even tagged a non-official essay as basis for draftification. It is as if the sole source I have cited there is a non-independent and non-reliable one, which is untrue as those were not school websites — those were from the national basic education agency in the Philippines. I don't think draftification is necessary. The notability stub was enough. The article didn't even last for its first 24 hours before being taken on such action. I am supposed to expand the article and put another independent sources. That was unnecessary and unfair as well. Chances were not given. The created articles are with neutral point of view, without copyrighted contents and WP:COI. Personally, I look this one as an "insult" as the article were made in good faith.
I hope that this administrator looks into this matter. Thank you! ~ Pog ing Juan 12:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Please, can you check? One blocked user who does mostly vandalism and who is blocked as a sock is back. User is: ShkoHazhar ( talk · contribs) and sock case is this: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShkoDevAct. Thank you. Nubia86 ( talk) 18:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
I think this is wrong: Lapta_(game), Svaika. Please stop the bot. -- Лобачев Владимир ( talk) 14:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello @JJMC89
I have read A7 "that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant" and G11 too which says that it is promotional content and Wikipedia doesn't allow any type of promotional content. I don't know Bhupesh Bansal, every day I see posts of Rajnikant vs CID jokes (RVCJ) biggest content creator company made by Bhupesh. I didn't know about him but when I researched about him then I came to know his story and all media articles.
Bhupesh Bansal is an illustrator of the biggest content creator company named RVCJ. His posts are already viral all over India. Moreover, he has worked with other companies and Bollywood celebrities which shows that people have searched about him. I am not doing any promotional stuff for anyone just creating another page like I created others so that it can help readers.
I have created other articles too and I know the Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Just let me know where I was wrong and provide me your guidance so that I can create draft again with all reliable media links and submit it for review. Moreover, I had added reliable media links such as Midday, Deccan Chronicle, Asia Netnews, etc. Rajveer90 ( talk) 05:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I five times expanded The Quiet Achiever article back in 2011 and shortly thereafter added Fair Use pictures. At the time my rationale and copyright tag used was that they were historic images. They are the first 3 pictures of the ones showing the solar panels. Can you tell me IF this is correct to be able to use more than one Fair Use picture in an article. I am thinking of upgrading the article to Good Article status and want to make sure this is alright. Thanks for your input.-- Doug Coldwell ( talk) 19:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, should I nominate the files for deletion after I move them to the Wikimedia Commons? -- Mhhossein talk 19:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I've blocked the bot as I think it's making a wrong CFDS move - it has moved Category:Canarian footballers to Category:Footballers from Cantabria but these areas of Spain are separate ( Canary Islands and Cantabria), so I think it should be moving Category:Canarian footballers to Category:Footballers from the Canary Islands? Pinging @ Crowsus: who made the CFDS request. Once clarified I'll unblock. Giant Snowman 13:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89,
before you started you mass reverts of my edits, did you pause to recognize that all of them involve categories for which no main article exists, and at most one or two films? In the German WP (where I come from) such categories are always deleted, and I asked one of the experts here – it is at least unusual to create a category without a corresponding article. Another Admin here in the en-WP quick-deleted two categories which I had tagged with the same explanation "no corresponding article" – so you could have at least spoken to me before mass reverting. -- Sprachraum ( talk) 03:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, why have you declined [1] the request to move Foreign exchange to Foreign exchange (disambiguation)? — Granger ( talk · contribs) 07:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me out here please? Your edit summary doesn't give me any clues, so I have no idea what the problem was. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 06:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, i want to register a compliant Ernesto Kahan is the author of 29 books, won prizes, a peace activist etc. why did you delete it? Wikipedia must respect people like him. מתיאל ( talk) 15:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you closed the CfD, so I would like to ask you a general question about categories. Is it necessary for an article to be both in a general category and its subcategory? I know that some articles should, like Category:LGBT writers is a non-diffusing category of Category:Writers. But should an article like List of mammals of the Azores be in both Category:Lists of mammals by location and Category:Lists of mammals, or just the first one? And are the continent subcategories, like Category:Lists of mammals of Europe supposed to be just include article that are also in Category:Lists of mammals by location? If so, what's the point of them? Thanks — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 18:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you make this edit made removing the image, stating "Removed WP:NFCC violation(s). No valid non-free use rationale for this page" when the image in question has a valid non-free use rationale? ---- Pontificalibus 19:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I would like this AfD reinstated as I think it and the Category:American television stations with a three-letter call sign AfD did not notify or list WP:TVS or WP:WPRS, which would have brought more responses. Maybe against, maybe for. But, the respective groups should have been notified/listed. I respectfully request a full AfD with all members !voting. Not just four editors !voting or may or may not be TVS or WPRS editors. Thank you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:36 on March 12, 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Would you mind watching User talk:Sammi Brie#Talk:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite/GA1 a bit? JJMC89 Bot removed File:Aloha from Hawaii Via Satellite.jpg from Aloha from Hawaii via Satellite, but the file is basically a duplicate of File:Elvis Presley Aloha From Hawaii LP Cover.jpg (there are some minor differences) and both might not be needed if it turns out that a rationale can be written for article about the actual broadcast. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 03:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
I went to this user page and there is a message saying that a category needs to be created for Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of EditorF even though this editor is already in this category. I thought there might be a mistake in the sockpuppet tag put on the user page which I'm reluctant to fiddle with so I'm hoping you could take a look at it. If this is just some misplaced message a script I've installed is popping up, then my apologies. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I used to always salt at admin level, but for the last few months I've had a thought (I know, right?). Why not salt at ECP, so that if someone like, say, that IgniteIndia sock were to make 500 constructive edits just so they could create the deleted page/s (only to have them immediately re-deleted) — maybe let them...? Probably a dumb idea, though. El_C 22:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, As I understand it, the Sandbox is where an editor prepares an article for publication. I was only using the Berrigan photo for placement until I get permission from a copyright owner for one of my subject. I am a bit astounded by this. I thought it was all private until finished, but if you can see it so can everyone else. One lives and learns - which is a good thing, I suppose. I guess I will have to prepare stuff offline in the future. Gladiator-Citizen ( talk) 05:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Howdy - not that I have any peculiar dog in this fight or dealings with the editor, I just happened to notice in passing... isn't it a little extreme to indef a highly productive editor with no previous issues, then choke off their talk page access so that they can't even ask for a review? Was whatever they did really so extreme that you are justified in kicking them off the project without even an explanatory note? -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
There are at 20 odd articles screwed up right now because you deleted two taxonomy templates: Template:Taxonomy/Aeridostachya and Template:Taxonomy/Porpax. It's one thing to automatically delete articles created by banned users, another to delete templates used by articles created and edited by others. Can I ask you to please check for template transclusions in future. Peter coxhead ( talk) 20:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, I am an AfC reviewer and I have been renamed from "Kammill" to "Hulged". Will you please update the list. Thank you! – Hulged ⟨ talk⟩ 04:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Given this new ArbBom ruling [2], it would seem appropriate to have the material you redacted from the relevant article and talk page restored. Can I ask you to do so? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 15:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Further to this, you should probably read Beeblebrox's comment here: [3] AndyTheGrump ( talk) 02:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Could you please take a pause from nuking that sock's creations? Many, many pages you deleted had significant contributions by other users, making them ineligible for G5. Sro23 ( talk) 18:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, I wondered if you were to look into the Category: Conservatism in the United States as it seems to be overcrowded with multiple individuals in the same way as it was last year when the American Conservative people category was? Thank you. NihonBlue ( talk) 05:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
Your bot seems to work exceptionally well with CFD cases. In rare situations, I have found there can be a delay of a few hours or a day between deletion of a category and the removal of that category from pages. Do you think this is what happened with Category:Forgotten Realms locations? Or were there issues because all of the pages are redirects? Again, I think this is part of the 1% of times when there are problems with the bot. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89 (redirected bot?),
Can you please introduce yourself and then perhaps you might explain why you are removing content in my sandbox? Is there some rule I am unaware of that I have fallen foul of (I am new to Wikipedia, so that, very possible)?
ETA: I just looked at the relevent rules section. so yeah, OK. So how do I indicate in my sandbox article - that I will propose as an article to replace the existing one (on the invitation of LuckyLouie / Hob Gadling) - that (removed) content is to be placed there? I mean, how can I submit for review content that is permitted in an article, but not permitted in the actual submission? Sorry, I am a bit confused about this.
Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Tesldact Smih ( talk) 02:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Would you please draftify the article associated with this AfD you closed? I have the Argentine film encyclopedia and would like to beef up the draft in hopes of bringing it back. Thanks. -- DiamondRemley39 ( talk) 15:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, Made this userbox for editors such as yourself who use spihelper. Jerm ( talk) 01:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{
User wikipedia/spihelper}}
|
|
linked pages |