This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
I have sent you an email to your Wikimedia mail id. Please do check it. Adithyak1997 ( talk) 17:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hey there, JJMC89! I uploaded an image, File:Microsoft 1984-Scott McGregor, Charles Simonyi, and Gordon Letwin.jpg a few days ago. Later that day, JJMC89 bot rightfully tagged it with {{non free reduce}} and clued me in to WP:IMAGERES. I downsized the image to bring it in line with the policy (far as I can tell). The policy calls for images to be "no more than about 100,000 pixels (0.1 megapixels)". The new version I uploaded was ~128,000 pixels. I tried making it smaller but you start to lose the subjects' eyes so their faces really start to lose meaning. I included this rationale in my comment alongside the new version upload. But the bot tagged the image again today—is 100,000 pixels a strictly enforced community standard and should I find a way to crop the image/make it smaller, or is there a way to mark images as already reviewed in some way for the bot? — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 20:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
As others have noted, the bot, twice now, has removed a cropped, low-res, pre-1978 promotional image of a TV-series logo and the show's deceased host. There is a appropriate FUR at the image page. Despite the bot's claims, I can find nothing inadequate or inappropriate about the use of this non-free image. Perhaps someone could explain what purportedly is missing from the FUR? -- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I use my sandbox as a temporary scratch pad, white board, etc. In this case, it was a drop point for a portion of an article so I could run reFill on it without running reFill on the entire (huge) article. What was your purpose in editing my (otherwise worthless) scratch pad content? Would it be more appropriate for me to blank my scratchpad when I'm done using it thusly? Normal Op ( talk) 07:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
On Image:KVWC-AM 2020.png, your bot has tagged the image for image reduction per WP:IMAGERES three times now.
Per WP:IMAGERES, images with a 4:3 aspect ratio to be shown at 320x240 pixels (common for screenshots from TV, films, and videogames), while allowing common cover art to be shown at 250x400 pixels.
The image in question is on the low end of both of the highest numbers listed, it sits at 300x372 pixels. Image reduction is not necessary. In fact, I have reduced it even further
on the page it's used on by using the image at "200px", which shrinks it even further.
I ask that you, please, fix your bot to recognize the policy it is quoting, recognize the image is within the specified widths in the quoted policy, or whitelist the image in question. Thank you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:07 on July 4, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome • #BlackLivesMatter
320x240 pixelsand
250x400 pixelsare what is listed, not 100.000 pixels. I'm at 300x372, below BOTH of the high numbers listed. I'm below 320 and I'm below 400. So, go bother someone else. Image is within policy. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:12 on July 6, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome • #BlackLivesMatter
no more than about 100,000 pixelsbased on its dimensions. Per this helpful tool, using the examples given, 320 x 240 actually could be increased to get to 100,000 pixels and 250 x 400 is right at 100,000 pixel. You can't take both high numbers and mash them together to claim you are under. Your file is 300 x 372, and in order to comply, it has to become 284 x 352. I've gone ahead and done that and uploaded it. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm still within the highest numbers listed, in the future if you are uploading non-free images, I suggest you simply disregard the given dimensions in the example, and just use the tool I linked earlier. That way you can input your current dimensions for the image in question, and see if they are at 100,000 pixels or need to be adjusted. 100,000 pixels is what you need to consider as the image's limit, not the example dimensions. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 14:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I've just created a new draft for the Noble Team. Any help would be greatly appreciated! The Optimistic One ( talk) 18:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
I noticed there is a conflict between User:JJMC89 bot and User:ErfgoedBot. ErfgoedBot is programmed to put pictures that it IDs as National Register of Historic Places into Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum so they can be properly identified with reference numbers in a template. The picture in question - File:SherbornMA_SewallWareHouse.jpg - is a WP File and does not support the Commons template. This picture is 'non free' (NFCC#9), so once ErfgoedBot puts in the list, JJMC89 bot removes it. They are now caught in an epic battle between putting in the list and removing it from the list. I don't know what the solution is. Any insight as to how this can be resolved? Thanks Einbierbitte ( talk) 18:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, we have yet another new user who thinks substandard articles need to be draftified because their own article was draftified. The user moved eight articles on bands to drafts, some of these articles were made in 2005 and have 1000+ views/month. The leftover redirects were all deleted.
I assume R2 deletions are done in batches, but I'm wondering what could be done so that we catch these obviously bad draftifications. There was recently a thread about these overlooked draftifications at the Village Pump, but nothing came of it.
Like, the leftover redirect from Xutos & Pontapés in mainspace to User talk:Xutos & Pontapés is obviously incorrect and should have been reversed rather than deleted. Kukl (band) was created in 2005 and so the draftification should have been reverted instead of the leftover redirect being deleted.
So, I'm wondering, does CAT:R2 fill too quickly for an admin to check over the history each redirect, and if so, would it be better to propose a technical solution where Twinkle checks the history and warns the admin before deleting the leftovers of bad moves?
– Thjarkur (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The bot is failing to process category changes listed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working#Move but it's not obvious why. Timrollpickering ( talk) 10:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
When at the top of the section the bot skips the whole lot; when further down the bot processes the ones before it. Timrollpickering ( talk) 11:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not being rude, I was just wondering about making all-time favorite movies, and I trying to replace with the file: texts from movies in this wiki, I'm just working on it, I'll clear things out from the red texts, and changing with a File:StarWarsMoviePoster1977.jpg. I'm being nice to you. -- Stephenfisher2001 ( talk) 22:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Please do not delete Draft:Oliolie, instead delete the backup that was in my sandbox. The Draft:Oliolie has had changes made to it since I took the backup and placed it in my sandbox.
And, wow, going forward I will backup any data I submit to Wikipedia on my own storage if using the sandbox area is going to result in all of these headaches with removed data. I know you mean well, and *I* misunderstood that my sandbox page was public. But, I would have thought that my use of the sandbox area vs the Draft: namespace page would have been clear -- instead the page with the most recent edit was deleted? Thank you! Wikin00b1979 ( talk) 07:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
It shows that my account was blocked recently after I made a legitimate edit of an article. Idk why but I do remember vandalizing a page when I was in 5th grade when I was a stupid kid so maybe I was ip banned? I have since graduated high school and just want to be able to contribute to this incredible free source of information as free information is something I strongly believe in and am passionate about. I'm just a bit confused on why I was banned recently and I don't mind if you don't wanna lift it I'm just confused. SalehiLiam ( talk) 10:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I assume the recent category move to Category:Removed statutes was meant to go to "Removed statues" (not "statutes). I further assume that your trusty bot can fix that as I certainly have no idea how that works... - SummerPhD v2.0 05:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello guest, i've responded you that your editing that did in the ICSYV Dutch, German and Romanian counterparts. Can you read this discussion about groupings of ICSYV categories? Makoy Canlas ( talk) 02:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Could you ask your bot to kindly leave something like Note: Nonfree image removed behind? Otherwise it makes nonsense of discussions. Ideally the note would include a diff or something of the removal so editors can track down what happened. Or here's another idea: add the colon in front of File: e.g. File:Queen Elizabeth.jpg -- I assume you know what that does. (Admittedly there may be some issues to work out there.) E Eng 04:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: There's another round of categories the bot will only remove the template on the first one. It's not clear what the problem is at all. Examples include Category:GAA people from County Antrim and Category:GAA people from County Armagh. Timrollpickering ( talk) 21:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
|action=
should be used for {{
old CfD}}. For the first category that was listed, it firured it out by parsing it from the discssion but couldn't for the others.
User:JJMC89 bot III/tasks/CFDW has the details on what the bot is looking for on the working page. —
JJMC89
03:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Hi, hope you're doing well. Is it allowed to upload images posted on Twitter to Commons Wikipedia? I want to use this image on Saifi Sopori article. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 01:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I'm just curious why your bot hasn't picked up in the two NFCC10c violations in Granger Smith; there are other NFCCP problems with this two album cover being used in that article, but I'm just curious how your bot goes about finding files that have the NFCC10c and NFCC9 issues. Does the bot only pick up certain files at a certain time, or does it catch all such violations throughout Wikipedia at the time it makes one of its runs. Mind you, I'm not complaining; just trying to get a better feel for how bots work. — Marchjuly ( talk) 10:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
|Article=
will count) and have done most of the coding work, but I still have to find time to test the new code to make sure there are no false positives before I deploy it.) In this case the title is present even though that isn't the article that the NFUR is for.Greetings JJMC89. Its been quite a while since I created the page gudban. I was under the impression that copyright vios were removed. User Buidhe seems to have been under the same impression. If you are aware of any existing vios, then I'd be glad to assist. But I am eager to figure out the status of the page promptly. Thanks. Auxerre dejufan ( talk) 19:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
In this edit: [1] did removing the useless "Wikipedia project page" short description restore the useless and wrong "Wikimedia project page" short description? If so, would a blank short description work? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you removed File:PDVD 038.JPG from List of Tom and Jerry characters. Accordingly, the reason you gave was "Criterion 8, because the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding." However, I believe the file complies with the non-free content criteria as used in the article, because:
Nevertheless, if your decision to remove that image is based on this policy, I respect your decision. BTW, this clarification is based on that image and not on other images that I assume you also removed. Thanks for your reply. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 09:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
The JJMC89 bot hit some drafts I submitted to AfS with "WP:NFCC#9: Non-free files are only permitted in articles" messages. So, if that citation is needed to meet the notability and quality bar so it can be approved as an article then what action is to be taken? The jpg file in question is an organizational chart that shows that the text added to the draft about the governance structure of the organization the article is about is accurate and true. Due to coding on the page the jpg comes from, a link directly to a page instead of the jpg may not work. -- Ian Korman ( talk) 02:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Can you take a look at this since you're an SPI clerk? I've got no idea why it was tagged for speedy deletion because the page seems to be exactly where it's supposed to be. I went to WP:SPI and started a new investgation per "How to open an investigation". I followed the instrucitons and the page was created. I'm going to assume that whatever the problem is that it's good-faith error either by me or the editor who tagged the page for speedy, but something weird is happening. Somehow the sentence "Please move this page to the WP space. Thanks. Regards, Marchjuly (talk) 10:09 am, Today (UTC+9)" got added to my original report and I don't know how. I don't think I've ever signed a post "Regards, Marchjuly" and I can't image any reason why I would ask this to be moved to the WP space if I put in the WT space by mistake. Something really doesn't seem right here, but perhaps there's an explanation for it all. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please could you tweak the way your bot processes the CFD Retain section?
From these instructions the bot entered "keep" rather than "no consensus"; [2] perhaps it should have skipped those two lines pending clearer instructions (e.g. "– No consensus to merge").
For info, I have now added a visible link to your syntax page from that section on CFDW. – Fayenatic London 10:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
[all wikilinks] must be to a CfD page or a category. The bot will not process the rest of the section if any other wikilink is found.I've transcluded the bot information instead. — JJMC89 05:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Can you figure out why the "this file's entry" in the FFD template added to File:The Arrow of Time artwork.jpg is targeting WP:FFD#File:The Arrow of Time artwork.jpg and not Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 July 26? The other files being discussed on that same day are linking to the latter page. Did I muck something up when I added the FFD template to the file's page? -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
|logo=
→|log=
. —
JJMC89
23:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I've added another account to this SPI. If this one is also CU confirmed, then that seems to clearly indicate that the person (or persons?) behind these socks has no real intention of slowing down. So, I'm wondering if it might be better just to ask for WP:RPP since they might give up if they're unable to edit the article. I'm not sure if PP is applied in cases like this, and if not then maybe you can suggest another way to deal with this. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
I have sent you an email to your Wikimedia mail id. Please do check it. Adithyak1997 ( talk) 17:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Hey there, JJMC89! I uploaded an image, File:Microsoft 1984-Scott McGregor, Charles Simonyi, and Gordon Letwin.jpg a few days ago. Later that day, JJMC89 bot rightfully tagged it with {{non free reduce}} and clued me in to WP:IMAGERES. I downsized the image to bring it in line with the policy (far as I can tell). The policy calls for images to be "no more than about 100,000 pixels (0.1 megapixels)". The new version I uploaded was ~128,000 pixels. I tried making it smaller but you start to lose the subjects' eyes so their faces really start to lose meaning. I included this rationale in my comment alongside the new version upload. But the bot tagged the image again today—is 100,000 pixels a strictly enforced community standard and should I find a way to crop the image/make it smaller, or is there a way to mark images as already reviewed in some way for the bot? — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 20:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
As others have noted, the bot, twice now, has removed a cropped, low-res, pre-1978 promotional image of a TV-series logo and the show's deceased host. There is a appropriate FUR at the image page. Despite the bot's claims, I can find nothing inadequate or inappropriate about the use of this non-free image. Perhaps someone could explain what purportedly is missing from the FUR? -- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I use my sandbox as a temporary scratch pad, white board, etc. In this case, it was a drop point for a portion of an article so I could run reFill on it without running reFill on the entire (huge) article. What was your purpose in editing my (otherwise worthless) scratch pad content? Would it be more appropriate for me to blank my scratchpad when I'm done using it thusly? Normal Op ( talk) 07:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
On Image:KVWC-AM 2020.png, your bot has tagged the image for image reduction per WP:IMAGERES three times now.
Per WP:IMAGERES, images with a 4:3 aspect ratio to be shown at 320x240 pixels (common for screenshots from TV, films, and videogames), while allowing common cover art to be shown at 250x400 pixels.
The image in question is on the low end of both of the highest numbers listed, it sits at 300x372 pixels. Image reduction is not necessary. In fact, I have reduced it even further
on the page it's used on by using the image at "200px", which shrinks it even further.
I ask that you, please, fix your bot to recognize the policy it is quoting, recognize the image is within the specified widths in the quoted policy, or whitelist the image in question. Thank you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:07 on July 4, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome • #BlackLivesMatter
320x240 pixelsand
250x400 pixelsare what is listed, not 100.000 pixels. I'm at 300x372, below BOTH of the high numbers listed. I'm below 320 and I'm below 400. So, go bother someone else. Image is within policy. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:12 on July 6, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome • #BlackLivesMatter
no more than about 100,000 pixelsbased on its dimensions. Per this helpful tool, using the examples given, 320 x 240 actually could be increased to get to 100,000 pixels and 250 x 400 is right at 100,000 pixel. You can't take both high numbers and mash them together to claim you are under. Your file is 300 x 372, and in order to comply, it has to become 284 x 352. I've gone ahead and done that and uploaded it. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm still within the highest numbers listed, in the future if you are uploading non-free images, I suggest you simply disregard the given dimensions in the example, and just use the tool I linked earlier. That way you can input your current dimensions for the image in question, and see if they are at 100,000 pixels or need to be adjusted. 100,000 pixels is what you need to consider as the image's limit, not the example dimensions. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 14:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I've just created a new draft for the Noble Team. Any help would be greatly appreciated! The Optimistic One ( talk) 18:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
I noticed there is a conflict between User:JJMC89 bot and User:ErfgoedBot. ErfgoedBot is programmed to put pictures that it IDs as National Register of Historic Places into Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum so they can be properly identified with reference numbers in a template. The picture in question - File:SherbornMA_SewallWareHouse.jpg - is a WP File and does not support the Commons template. This picture is 'non free' (NFCC#9), so once ErfgoedBot puts in the list, JJMC89 bot removes it. They are now caught in an epic battle between putting in the list and removing it from the list. I don't know what the solution is. Any insight as to how this can be resolved? Thanks Einbierbitte ( talk) 18:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, we have yet another new user who thinks substandard articles need to be draftified because their own article was draftified. The user moved eight articles on bands to drafts, some of these articles were made in 2005 and have 1000+ views/month. The leftover redirects were all deleted.
I assume R2 deletions are done in batches, but I'm wondering what could be done so that we catch these obviously bad draftifications. There was recently a thread about these overlooked draftifications at the Village Pump, but nothing came of it.
Like, the leftover redirect from Xutos & Pontapés in mainspace to User talk:Xutos & Pontapés is obviously incorrect and should have been reversed rather than deleted. Kukl (band) was created in 2005 and so the draftification should have been reverted instead of the leftover redirect being deleted.
So, I'm wondering, does CAT:R2 fill too quickly for an admin to check over the history each redirect, and if so, would it be better to propose a technical solution where Twinkle checks the history and warns the admin before deleting the leftovers of bad moves?
– Thjarkur (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The bot is failing to process category changes listed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working#Move but it's not obvious why. Timrollpickering ( talk) 10:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
When at the top of the section the bot skips the whole lot; when further down the bot processes the ones before it. Timrollpickering ( talk) 11:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not being rude, I was just wondering about making all-time favorite movies, and I trying to replace with the file: texts from movies in this wiki, I'm just working on it, I'll clear things out from the red texts, and changing with a File:StarWarsMoviePoster1977.jpg. I'm being nice to you. -- Stephenfisher2001 ( talk) 22:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: Please do not delete Draft:Oliolie, instead delete the backup that was in my sandbox. The Draft:Oliolie has had changes made to it since I took the backup and placed it in my sandbox.
And, wow, going forward I will backup any data I submit to Wikipedia on my own storage if using the sandbox area is going to result in all of these headaches with removed data. I know you mean well, and *I* misunderstood that my sandbox page was public. But, I would have thought that my use of the sandbox area vs the Draft: namespace page would have been clear -- instead the page with the most recent edit was deleted? Thank you! Wikin00b1979 ( talk) 07:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
It shows that my account was blocked recently after I made a legitimate edit of an article. Idk why but I do remember vandalizing a page when I was in 5th grade when I was a stupid kid so maybe I was ip banned? I have since graduated high school and just want to be able to contribute to this incredible free source of information as free information is something I strongly believe in and am passionate about. I'm just a bit confused on why I was banned recently and I don't mind if you don't wanna lift it I'm just confused. SalehiLiam ( talk) 10:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I assume the recent category move to Category:Removed statutes was meant to go to "Removed statues" (not "statutes). I further assume that your trusty bot can fix that as I certainly have no idea how that works... - SummerPhD v2.0 05:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello guest, i've responded you that your editing that did in the ICSYV Dutch, German and Romanian counterparts. Can you read this discussion about groupings of ICSYV categories? Makoy Canlas ( talk) 02:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Could you ask your bot to kindly leave something like Note: Nonfree image removed behind? Otherwise it makes nonsense of discussions. Ideally the note would include a diff or something of the removal so editors can track down what happened. Or here's another idea: add the colon in front of File: e.g. File:Queen Elizabeth.jpg -- I assume you know what that does. (Admittedly there may be some issues to work out there.) E Eng 04:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: There's another round of categories the bot will only remove the template on the first one. It's not clear what the problem is at all. Examples include Category:GAA people from County Antrim and Category:GAA people from County Armagh. Timrollpickering ( talk) 21:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
|action=
should be used for {{
old CfD}}. For the first category that was listed, it firured it out by parsing it from the discssion but couldn't for the others.
User:JJMC89 bot III/tasks/CFDW has the details on what the bot is looking for on the working page. —
JJMC89
03:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Hi, hope you're doing well. Is it allowed to upload images posted on Twitter to Commons Wikipedia? I want to use this image on Saifi Sopori article. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears ( talk) 01:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I'm just curious why your bot hasn't picked up in the two NFCC10c violations in Granger Smith; there are other NFCCP problems with this two album cover being used in that article, but I'm just curious how your bot goes about finding files that have the NFCC10c and NFCC9 issues. Does the bot only pick up certain files at a certain time, or does it catch all such violations throughout Wikipedia at the time it makes one of its runs. Mind you, I'm not complaining; just trying to get a better feel for how bots work. — Marchjuly ( talk) 10:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
|Article=
will count) and have done most of the coding work, but I still have to find time to test the new code to make sure there are no false positives before I deploy it.) In this case the title is present even though that isn't the article that the NFUR is for.Greetings JJMC89. Its been quite a while since I created the page gudban. I was under the impression that copyright vios were removed. User Buidhe seems to have been under the same impression. If you are aware of any existing vios, then I'd be glad to assist. But I am eager to figure out the status of the page promptly. Thanks. Auxerre dejufan ( talk) 19:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
In this edit: [1] did removing the useless "Wikipedia project page" short description restore the useless and wrong "Wikimedia project page" short description? If so, would a blank short description work? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you removed File:PDVD 038.JPG from List of Tom and Jerry characters. Accordingly, the reason you gave was "Criterion 8, because the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding." However, I believe the file complies with the non-free content criteria as used in the article, because:
Nevertheless, if your decision to remove that image is based on this policy, I respect your decision. BTW, this clarification is based on that image and not on other images that I assume you also removed. Thanks for your reply. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 09:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
The JJMC89 bot hit some drafts I submitted to AfS with "WP:NFCC#9: Non-free files are only permitted in articles" messages. So, if that citation is needed to meet the notability and quality bar so it can be approved as an article then what action is to be taken? The jpg file in question is an organizational chart that shows that the text added to the draft about the governance structure of the organization the article is about is accurate and true. Due to coding on the page the jpg comes from, a link directly to a page instead of the jpg may not work. -- Ian Korman ( talk) 02:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Can you take a look at this since you're an SPI clerk? I've got no idea why it was tagged for speedy deletion because the page seems to be exactly where it's supposed to be. I went to WP:SPI and started a new investgation per "How to open an investigation". I followed the instrucitons and the page was created. I'm going to assume that whatever the problem is that it's good-faith error either by me or the editor who tagged the page for speedy, but something weird is happening. Somehow the sentence "Please move this page to the WP space. Thanks. Regards, Marchjuly (talk) 10:09 am, Today (UTC+9)" got added to my original report and I don't know how. I don't think I've ever signed a post "Regards, Marchjuly" and I can't image any reason why I would ask this to be moved to the WP space if I put in the WT space by mistake. Something really doesn't seem right here, but perhaps there's an explanation for it all. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please could you tweak the way your bot processes the CFD Retain section?
From these instructions the bot entered "keep" rather than "no consensus"; [2] perhaps it should have skipped those two lines pending clearer instructions (e.g. "– No consensus to merge").
For info, I have now added a visible link to your syntax page from that section on CFDW. – Fayenatic London 10:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
[all wikilinks] must be to a CfD page or a category. The bot will not process the rest of the section if any other wikilink is found.I've transcluded the bot information instead. — JJMC89 05:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Can you figure out why the "this file's entry" in the FFD template added to File:The Arrow of Time artwork.jpg is targeting WP:FFD#File:The Arrow of Time artwork.jpg and not Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 July 26? The other files being discussed on that same day are linking to the latter page. Did I muck something up when I added the FFD template to the file's page? -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
|logo=
→|log=
. —
JJMC89
23:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I've added another account to this SPI. If this one is also CU confirmed, then that seems to clearly indicate that the person (or persons?) behind these socks has no real intention of slowing down. So, I'm wondering if it might be better just to ask for WP:RPP since they might give up if they're unable to edit the article. I'm not sure if PP is applied in cases like this, and if not then maybe you can suggest another way to deal with this. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)