This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Why did you removed those images I put on the 2017 & 2018 United States articles? Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Appreciate the block of IP 113.249.57.13. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 07:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, thanks very much for your history-merging work. However, could you please try to clean up the Wikidata links after you're done, preferably within a few hours of the history merge? When pages are deleted here, a link to them is automatically deleted from Wikidata. They're not automatically restored however. I've fixed up a few of your recent history merges/splits. Graham 87 02:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, is it really necessary to delete all information about School strike for climate in the page - is seems to be really important movement in Europe in 2019. And I do not see anything wrong on activities of Skolstrejk för klimatet who expressed her/his interests at the user page... Definitely, it does not look like somebody who has profit from editing. If I would change the page in the same way, you will also revert it? Thank you. Jirka Dl ( talk) 14:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with Edwin Jackson. Since you know what you are doing in regard to restoring page histories, I am hoping I can ping you with a few others.
Can you clarify any of these.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Why are you placing the "does not appear to comply with the non-free content criteria" on so many license plate pages? In all of these cases these are the only images available so that we can show the recent history of license plates in each state where the pictures are posted, and so that we can show the progression from one license plate type to the next. The tag, "No free image could be created that would give similar information." has been placed on each of them since they were uploaded more than a year ago.
You tagged more than 10 files. One of them is: File:Nebraska 2017 license plate.JPG
What more do I, or anyone else, need to state to keep them?
Please "ping" we when you reply so that I know that you responded. Thanks! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 20:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
identification and critical commentary. Most files (those in lists/tables) with that license tag don't have critical commentary. — JJMC89 01:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your responses. I believe that Stefan2's objection was that I had posted too many non-free images to a table. There was no commentary on the rationale I had posted to those images. According to Images "The following list is not exhaustive but contains the most common cases where non-free images may be used ...," and it lists "stamps and currencies" and multiple other examples where these images are allowed. Why shouldn't license plates be allowed since the list is not exhaustive? What other way do we have to illustrate current license plates? The same link goes for using these images in tables. The easiest way for display license plates is in the table format. Again, while this use is not standard, nor encouraged, it is allowed on a case-by-case basis. The information at Images is very broad with many exceptions, that it seems like all of these images are in compliance with the non-free rationale.
What "critical commentary" are you looking for? Are you expecting every non-free image to be posted to a talk page, and to then obtain consensus to post to the article? Are you looking for a stronger justification for each image? Where can I find good examples to use as a basis for being in compliance?
The problem for newer editors remains that trying to figure out all of the incredibly fine details, that fact that so much information is hidden in a "WP" SOMEWHERE, the fact that so many administrators don't explain how to fix a problem in simple terms, makes it nearly impossible to be in compliance with everything. For instance, where is there an example of "critical commentary" that meets these standards? The person/administrator/bot could have pointed me in the right direction to solve the issue we are discussing here, but instead, I'm left wondering what I really need to do to come into compliance.
So back to my original question. What do I actually need to do keep these images? Thanks! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 11:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
All non-free images must meet each non-free content criterion; failure to meet those overrides any acceptable allowance here.Use in lists like the vehicle registration plates articles generally don't satisfy criterion 8 (see WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFC#CS). The critical commentary must be in the article; I don't know what talk pages have to do with critical commentary. Most of the plates don't have any commentary, let alone critical.
To depict the state's license plate.(what many of the rationales state) does not satisfy WP:NFC#CS. Plates that look similar to another (e.g. File:Arkansas Purple Hear license plate.jpg compared to File:Arkansas Persian Gulf Veteran license plate.jpg) can be compared using text, which is free ( WP:NFCC#1). The only way to keep non-replaceable ones is to have critical commentary about them in the articles. Most of these uses aren't what I would call fixable. — JJMC89 08:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
the item is itself the subject of sourced commentary in the article. It is your responsibility to meet the criteria, not mine ( WP:NFCCE). IMO, the fix for the violations is to delete the images, since I don't believe compliance will be achieved. — JJMC89 05:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Could you please enter the name of the Anthology in the List of poetry anthologies ? It is a very good anthology.
Check the newspaper articles about it:
4) https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/67-countries-500-people-one-book-of-poems/article22671241.ece
Please consider Atul Bhattacharyya ( talk) 14:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Are you able to move the page Ali Mohammed Ghedi to Ali Gedi please? It is the common name and the term used by most reliable sources. Thank you. 92.13.131.231 ( talk) 09:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, could you please review my request at WP:RFP/AWB? Cheers! GN-z11 ☎ ★ 18:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, when doing imports you should have an option to "Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally" that is off by default. If most of the article was worked on by users that are not regulars here, leaving it off is normally best - since it gives interwiki notations in the history. This is a newish feature but also makes it very clear in histories which edits were imported. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 22:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello - thank you for closing Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 26#Latest stable software release template. The 2nd entry in the nomination was supposed to be Latest stable software release templates (plural) but I missed the final "s". Would you mind deleting Latest stable software release templates please to avoid a procedural RfD. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I undeleted your G13 and accepted the article. He has an extensive article in the serbian WP, as is specified on the draft. DGG ( talk ) 09:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: noticing your revert, I was wondering why. Thank you for your time. Lotje ( talk) 04:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
About this TfD closure you made. The result is correct & OK with me, no problem in there. Now as I and esp. Doc James wrote in the discussion, the replacement is not "procedural" as the nom wrote (that is, it's not blind replace editing). In your closing, the readers might miss this, as it is not explicitly in there. You think it could be made more explicit? (like: "replace with Template:Infobox medical condition (new) or Template:Medical resources, depending on the content (as ws ...)". - DePiep ( talk) 09:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
If an RfD has no discussion after a week, then the default action is to delete rather than relist, per WP:RGUIDE. — Xezbeth ( talk) 06:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, You edited the initials of the poet on my user page. Any better ideas? Shawarma 21:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawarma98 ( talk • contribs)
Was curious if you could take a glance at the only remaining TFD that is open on Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_6. I am an involved party so I cannot close it. Since you are not, would love your unbiased opinion on whether it can be closed or whether it needs to be relisted. Thanks! -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated the page Draft:Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology for deletion under G5. The creator was blocked for promoting the NGP institute, doesn't this page too be considered for deletion as it was created by the same banned user, and its purpose too looks to be promoting NGP??. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
I am asking because you used the rollback.-- Myrtonos ( talk) 07:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. May I ask if there are any similarities between this new article and Draft:Vijay Kumar (treasurer) which you G5'd last month? Thanks, Flapjacktastic ( talk) 18:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, just flagging up this edit by your bot. I would have assumed that the use of a picture of a book cover in an article about the book qualifies as fair use, so this seems like a false positive. – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn’t realize you’d gained the administrative mantle. Congratulations!🎉 Cheers from 99, on the road. 50.74.13.242 ( talk) 03:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Just curious why you deleted Criminal Minds (season 15). I had created this redirect and pointed it to the main Crimnal Minds page because it seems like a likely search term. Why would WP:R2 apply to that? - Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 13:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Accepted drafts at AfC get redirected by the program to the article talk page, When there is a draft that has the same title as a main page, and was presumably used for a copy-paste to the main article or a preliminary version of it, it too is usually redirected to the talk page, not the article itself. (though some aadmins simply delete it if it does not actually form par tof the article history) . I adjusted the redirect target here to match the usual convention. DGG ( talk ) 23:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I am ZaxoteZ. Need a draft page to approve. Draft:Zee Keralam ZaxoteZ ( talk) 18:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Could you take a look at this file? It has been overwritten twice in the past day by the same editor. The first overwrite was undone, but I'm quite sure how that was done. My AGF guess as to what is happening is that Shamsun N Tushar is a new editor who is unfamiliar with uploading images and who for some reason (perhaps there's a COI of some kind) feels that the originally uploaded version of the file needs to be replaced. It's hard to tell where these new files are coming from, so it's hard to assess their copyright status. Unlike free files, overwriting a non-free file is essentially a defaut-deletion of the older versions per WP:F5; so, it might be better for this editor to discuss the image on the article's talk page to see if there's a consensus to change it. If there is such a consensus, the image can either be replaced or updated accordingly. Since the two images are so different, it might be better to upload the replacement image as a separate file altogether. Anyway, just wondering if you could restore the older version, and then I can post a message on this editor's user talk explaining what they should do. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89, What should be done to this photo as the photo is not being used in any article. Shamsun N Tushar ( talk) 03:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Makes it such that the translation tool does not work. I have thus moved back. Not seeing were the discussion was. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 10:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89, I did not understand that I had to make my comments on this page here. Another editor Alanscottwalker and I changed the article about Edgewater Beach Hotel to highlight that photo in contrast with a photo with the hotel & resort removed, replaced with boxy high rises. I have not been involved with photo deletions before, and do not appreciate what you have done. I see that the discussion is closed, but I think you should re-open it, and include comments from and the editor who made use of that photo. We do not see a replacement for it. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 04:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if you can help me at all, but I've got a user giving me abuse on my talk page, all because I did something wrong on Wikipedia.
Is there a way to block this person from contacting me?
They've basically told me "enjoy my last days on wiki"...
If you go to my edit history on my talk page, you will see what they said.
I can't be bothered to argue over something I made a mistake over.
Thanks L1amw90 ( talk) 16:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey, do me a favor and have a look at my AIV report. It's an edit warrior from Australia, across a variety of IPs in a variety of articles. They just reverted again on Larry Elder--and I have to go deal with some Nipponese Dog fool... Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 04:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Why did you removed those images I put on the 2017 & 2018 United States articles? Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Appreciate the block of IP 113.249.57.13. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 07:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, thanks very much for your history-merging work. However, could you please try to clean up the Wikidata links after you're done, preferably within a few hours of the history merge? When pages are deleted here, a link to them is automatically deleted from Wikidata. They're not automatically restored however. I've fixed up a few of your recent history merges/splits. Graham 87 02:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, is it really necessary to delete all information about School strike for climate in the page - is seems to be really important movement in Europe in 2019. And I do not see anything wrong on activities of Skolstrejk för klimatet who expressed her/his interests at the user page... Definitely, it does not look like somebody who has profit from editing. If I would change the page in the same way, you will also revert it? Thank you. Jirka Dl ( talk) 14:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with Edwin Jackson. Since you know what you are doing in regard to restoring page histories, I am hoping I can ping you with a few others.
Can you clarify any of these.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Why are you placing the "does not appear to comply with the non-free content criteria" on so many license plate pages? In all of these cases these are the only images available so that we can show the recent history of license plates in each state where the pictures are posted, and so that we can show the progression from one license plate type to the next. The tag, "No free image could be created that would give similar information." has been placed on each of them since they were uploaded more than a year ago.
You tagged more than 10 files. One of them is: File:Nebraska 2017 license plate.JPG
What more do I, or anyone else, need to state to keep them?
Please "ping" we when you reply so that I know that you responded. Thanks! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 20:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
identification and critical commentary. Most files (those in lists/tables) with that license tag don't have critical commentary. — JJMC89 01:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your responses. I believe that Stefan2's objection was that I had posted too many non-free images to a table. There was no commentary on the rationale I had posted to those images. According to Images "The following list is not exhaustive but contains the most common cases where non-free images may be used ...," and it lists "stamps and currencies" and multiple other examples where these images are allowed. Why shouldn't license plates be allowed since the list is not exhaustive? What other way do we have to illustrate current license plates? The same link goes for using these images in tables. The easiest way for display license plates is in the table format. Again, while this use is not standard, nor encouraged, it is allowed on a case-by-case basis. The information at Images is very broad with many exceptions, that it seems like all of these images are in compliance with the non-free rationale.
What "critical commentary" are you looking for? Are you expecting every non-free image to be posted to a talk page, and to then obtain consensus to post to the article? Are you looking for a stronger justification for each image? Where can I find good examples to use as a basis for being in compliance?
The problem for newer editors remains that trying to figure out all of the incredibly fine details, that fact that so much information is hidden in a "WP" SOMEWHERE, the fact that so many administrators don't explain how to fix a problem in simple terms, makes it nearly impossible to be in compliance with everything. For instance, where is there an example of "critical commentary" that meets these standards? The person/administrator/bot could have pointed me in the right direction to solve the issue we are discussing here, but instead, I'm left wondering what I really need to do to come into compliance.
So back to my original question. What do I actually need to do keep these images? Thanks! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 11:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
All non-free images must meet each non-free content criterion; failure to meet those overrides any acceptable allowance here.Use in lists like the vehicle registration plates articles generally don't satisfy criterion 8 (see WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFC#CS). The critical commentary must be in the article; I don't know what talk pages have to do with critical commentary. Most of the plates don't have any commentary, let alone critical.
To depict the state's license plate.(what many of the rationales state) does not satisfy WP:NFC#CS. Plates that look similar to another (e.g. File:Arkansas Purple Hear license plate.jpg compared to File:Arkansas Persian Gulf Veteran license plate.jpg) can be compared using text, which is free ( WP:NFCC#1). The only way to keep non-replaceable ones is to have critical commentary about them in the articles. Most of these uses aren't what I would call fixable. — JJMC89 08:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
the item is itself the subject of sourced commentary in the article. It is your responsibility to meet the criteria, not mine ( WP:NFCCE). IMO, the fix for the violations is to delete the images, since I don't believe compliance will be achieved. — JJMC89 05:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Could you please enter the name of the Anthology in the List of poetry anthologies ? It is a very good anthology.
Check the newspaper articles about it:
4) https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/67-countries-500-people-one-book-of-poems/article22671241.ece
Please consider Atul Bhattacharyya ( talk) 14:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Are you able to move the page Ali Mohammed Ghedi to Ali Gedi please? It is the common name and the term used by most reliable sources. Thank you. 92.13.131.231 ( talk) 09:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, could you please review my request at WP:RFP/AWB? Cheers! GN-z11 ☎ ★ 18:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, when doing imports you should have an option to "Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally" that is off by default. If most of the article was worked on by users that are not regulars here, leaving it off is normally best - since it gives interwiki notations in the history. This is a newish feature but also makes it very clear in histories which edits were imported. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 22:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello - thank you for closing Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 26#Latest stable software release template. The 2nd entry in the nomination was supposed to be Latest stable software release templates (plural) but I missed the final "s". Would you mind deleting Latest stable software release templates please to avoid a procedural RfD. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 21:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I undeleted your G13 and accepted the article. He has an extensive article in the serbian WP, as is specified on the draft. DGG ( talk ) 09:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89: noticing your revert, I was wondering why. Thank you for your time. Lotje ( talk) 04:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
About this TfD closure you made. The result is correct & OK with me, no problem in there. Now as I and esp. Doc James wrote in the discussion, the replacement is not "procedural" as the nom wrote (that is, it's not blind replace editing). In your closing, the readers might miss this, as it is not explicitly in there. You think it could be made more explicit? (like: "replace with Template:Infobox medical condition (new) or Template:Medical resources, depending on the content (as ws ...)". - DePiep ( talk) 09:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
If an RfD has no discussion after a week, then the default action is to delete rather than relist, per WP:RGUIDE. — Xezbeth ( talk) 06:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, You edited the initials of the poet on my user page. Any better ideas? Shawarma 21:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shawarma98 ( talk • contribs)
Was curious if you could take a glance at the only remaining TFD that is open on Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_6. I am an involved party so I cannot close it. Since you are not, would love your unbiased opinion on whether it can be closed or whether it needs to be relisted. Thanks! -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated the page Draft:Dr. N.G.P. Institute of Technology for deletion under G5. The creator was blocked for promoting the NGP institute, doesn't this page too be considered for deletion as it was created by the same banned user, and its purpose too looks to be promoting NGP??. Daiyusha ( talk) 07:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
I am asking because you used the rollback.-- Myrtonos ( talk) 07:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. May I ask if there are any similarities between this new article and Draft:Vijay Kumar (treasurer) which you G5'd last month? Thanks, Flapjacktastic ( talk) 18:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, just flagging up this edit by your bot. I would have assumed that the use of a picture of a book cover in an article about the book qualifies as fair use, so this seems like a false positive. – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn’t realize you’d gained the administrative mantle. Congratulations!🎉 Cheers from 99, on the road. 50.74.13.242 ( talk) 03:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Just curious why you deleted Criminal Minds (season 15). I had created this redirect and pointed it to the main Crimnal Minds page because it seems like a likely search term. Why would WP:R2 apply to that? - Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 13:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Accepted drafts at AfC get redirected by the program to the article talk page, When there is a draft that has the same title as a main page, and was presumably used for a copy-paste to the main article or a preliminary version of it, it too is usually redirected to the talk page, not the article itself. (though some aadmins simply delete it if it does not actually form par tof the article history) . I adjusted the redirect target here to match the usual convention. DGG ( talk ) 23:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I am ZaxoteZ. Need a draft page to approve. Draft:Zee Keralam ZaxoteZ ( talk) 18:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Could you take a look at this file? It has been overwritten twice in the past day by the same editor. The first overwrite was undone, but I'm quite sure how that was done. My AGF guess as to what is happening is that Shamsun N Tushar is a new editor who is unfamiliar with uploading images and who for some reason (perhaps there's a COI of some kind) feels that the originally uploaded version of the file needs to be replaced. It's hard to tell where these new files are coming from, so it's hard to assess their copyright status. Unlike free files, overwriting a non-free file is essentially a defaut-deletion of the older versions per WP:F5; so, it might be better for this editor to discuss the image on the article's talk page to see if there's a consensus to change it. If there is such a consensus, the image can either be replaced or updated accordingly. Since the two images are so different, it might be better to upload the replacement image as a separate file altogether. Anyway, just wondering if you could restore the older version, and then I can post a message on this editor's user talk explaining what they should do. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@ JJMC89, What should be done to this photo as the photo is not being used in any article. Shamsun N Tushar ( talk) 03:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Makes it such that the translation tool does not work. I have thus moved back. Not seeing were the discussion was. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 10:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89, I did not understand that I had to make my comments on this page here. Another editor Alanscottwalker and I changed the article about Edgewater Beach Hotel to highlight that photo in contrast with a photo with the hotel & resort removed, replaced with boxy high rises. I have not been involved with photo deletions before, and do not appreciate what you have done. I see that the discussion is closed, but I think you should re-open it, and include comments from and the editor who made use of that photo. We do not see a replacement for it. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 04:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if you can help me at all, but I've got a user giving me abuse on my talk page, all because I did something wrong on Wikipedia.
Is there a way to block this person from contacting me?
They've basically told me "enjoy my last days on wiki"...
If you go to my edit history on my talk page, you will see what they said.
I can't be bothered to argue over something I made a mistake over.
Thanks L1amw90 ( talk) 16:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey, do me a favor and have a look at my AIV report. It's an edit warrior from Australia, across a variety of IPs in a variety of articles. They just reverted again on Larry Elder--and I have to go deal with some Nipponese Dog fool... Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 04:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)