This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, there! I'm a bit puzzled by the removal of the image from the fable article. Looking at the history of the image, there's a claim there that there was ORTS permission and a non-free use rationale. It was a long time ago when I wrote the article and got permission and I may not now have access to the email address through which I sought it. I'd be grateful if you would explain the grounds for your action. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 08:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Moved message to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Automating news support, awaiting your response there. — The Transhumanist 23:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for interrupting but you have not provided enough information on what exact violation did my changes to the article did.I have restored the article until a summary is provided and we come into a conclusion.Thank you for your time and effort. AlbusWhite— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbusTheWhite ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 2 August 2018 8UTC) (UTC)
You tagged the photo in the file above for deletion, but it is not clear why you did this. Can you please provide a clearer explanation as to why this file does not meet the non-free use rationale? Everything required for the non-free use rationale, both the name the article is used in and a rationale, is posted to the file details. Thank you! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 09:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you were a participant in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 27#File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg, I thought you should know about c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
can you post them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Deletions? It's much more honest for those of us who don't have every Scout image watchlisted.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 22:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Is this something that can be addressed by expanding the discussion of rationale on the image page for either one of these 2 images which seem to have direct rationale by name-of-article and name included on image? JohnWickTwo ( talk) 01:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Of course. With thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:E944:EA6A:CEDE:919E ( talk) 17:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hi JJMC89, Could you please tell me what's the problem with this picture File:Johann Iskrić.jpg? Thank you for your answer. Regards, -- Silve rije 18:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I see that you removed some links to draft pages, like here. The new link is red though, so it's better not to leave any link in such cases. Did you have a specific mainspace article in mind? — Ynhockey ( Talk) 08:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you provide some suggestions for improving the draft Netmeds page. I had submitted it and thought it may be okay. Thanks. சென்னை ( talk) 02:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand? [4]— CYBERPOWER ( Around) 02:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent work reviewing new articles and redirects. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 01:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
According to WP:ELYES, the official websites of an article's subject should be linked on the wiki article. As elections articles, it seems to me that the campaign websites of the candidates involved certainly count as "subjects" of the article, and they should be linked. Nothing in WP:EL explicitly bans or discourages linking to campaign websites, so it's all a matter of interpretation. Nevermore27 ( talk) 04:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
I believe you have incorrectly put a deletion on my image. This image is fair use and would not be appropriate to use any other image. If you still do not believe this to be true, please mark it for a deletion that allows for debate. TheUSConservative ( talk) 17:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, there! I'm a bit puzzled by the removal of the image from the fable article. Looking at the history of the image, there's a claim there that there was ORTS permission and a non-free use rationale. It was a long time ago when I wrote the article and got permission and I may not now have access to the email address through which I sought it. I'd be grateful if you would explain the grounds for your action. Sweetpool50 ( talk) 08:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Moved message to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Automating news support, awaiting your response there. — The Transhumanist 23:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for interrupting but you have not provided enough information on what exact violation did my changes to the article did.I have restored the article until a summary is provided and we come into a conclusion.Thank you for your time and effort. AlbusWhite— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbusTheWhite ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 2 August 2018 8UTC) (UTC)
You tagged the photo in the file above for deletion, but it is not clear why you did this. Can you please provide a clearer explanation as to why this file does not meet the non-free use rationale? Everything required for the non-free use rationale, both the name the article is used in and a rationale, is posted to the file details. Thank you! Zcarstvnz ( talk) 09:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you were a participant in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 July 27#File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg, I thought you should know about c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
can you post them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Deletions? It's much more honest for those of us who don't have every Scout image watchlisted.-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 22:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Is this something that can be addressed by expanding the discussion of rationale on the image page for either one of these 2 images which seem to have direct rationale by name-of-article and name included on image? JohnWickTwo ( talk) 01:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Of course. With thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:E944:EA6A:CEDE:919E ( talk) 17:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hi JJMC89, Could you please tell me what's the problem with this picture File:Johann Iskrić.jpg? Thank you for your answer. Regards, -- Silve rije 18:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I see that you removed some links to draft pages, like here. The new link is red though, so it's better not to leave any link in such cases. Did you have a specific mainspace article in mind? — Ynhockey ( Talk) 08:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you provide some suggestions for improving the draft Netmeds page. I had submitted it and thought it may be okay. Thanks. சென்னை ( talk) 02:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand? [4]— CYBERPOWER ( Around) 02:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent work reviewing new articles and redirects. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 01:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
According to WP:ELYES, the official websites of an article's subject should be linked on the wiki article. As elections articles, it seems to me that the campaign websites of the candidates involved certainly count as "subjects" of the article, and they should be linked. Nothing in WP:EL explicitly bans or discourages linking to campaign websites, so it's all a matter of interpretation. Nevermore27 ( talk) 04:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
I believe you have incorrectly put a deletion on my image. This image is fair use and would not be appropriate to use any other image. If you still do not believe this to be true, please mark it for a deletion that allows for debate. TheUSConservative ( talk) 17:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)