This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for removing User:I think 2 + 2 = 22.'s account. Gh5046 ( talk) 02:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Waiting for response at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Kender#Conditions. :) BOZ ( talk) 18:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree to hold removing more of Gavin.collins tags until they are done moderating. However, once it is established that he did nothing more then cut and paste a block of tags into every RPG article he could find. I'm going right back to preventing the removal of the hard and honest work people have done. -- Cozret ( talk) 19:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there some reason that it matters? KnightLago ( talk) 19:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Have you seen the last note on User_talk:Jimbo's_vandalism_sock_puppet? If that is a shared IP, you may not want to block new account creation. 18.85.46.159 ( talk) 17:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind looking under the recent edit that I did under Wikipedia:Changing username, and let me know if you approve it.-- JoeCool950 ( talk) 07:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I've got one more question, I thought I'd ask you on your talk page instead, if I do have two accounts and like the other better, is there a way to cancel the other account? Not now, but just wondering? -- Joey Kaminski ( talk) 03:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
It has a theme song at the beginning of each show. What do you mean by multiple the songs?-- Angel David Commune with Heaven My Angelic Gifts 20:01, 10 May, 2008 (User Talker Contributor)
Please remove vandals' slanderous editing comments from the editing history of Heath Ledger; please see previous requests at WP:ANI (c. April 28 and earlier) and related Page Protection Request: diffs.. Thank you. (I'll be offline.) -- NYScholar ( talk) 05:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for adding a redirect to Morag Bellingham as per my request. I am trying to clean up the Home and Away page and because there has been several deletions of character pages there are a few dead links. I'm trying to redirect these pages to the list of character page because there is relevant information about the characters there but there are a few pages that have been salted, so i was wondering if you could add the redirects to them for me, of if i have to make a request as i did at WP:RPP. I need redirects on the following pages.
Page links removed
If you can add those for me i would appreciate it, if i need to formally request it let me know. Ive tried to format it so you can just copy and paste the redirect code. Any issues just let me know. Thanks Printer222 ( talk) 04:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
i have been looking at the page history of a Grawp account here and saw that on Feb 2 of 08 you tagged the account as such with the comment of bust. I am a little confused because either the timing is wrong or i as not an admin cant see the deleted contributions but if you tagged it back then why didn't you block it? I am a little confused and hopefully you can help. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 07:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) here looks like this past 24 hrs hes going all out. Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 07:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[1]-- xgmx ( T | C | D | R | DR)
Jéské, I've now taken your stance and will not sprotect my talk page. I see how when those channers do the whole talk page flood out of pure frustration :D. I'm sitting back and letting it come. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
He Jéské. Don't you think it's time to unprotect Platinum? Who knows, there might be more info about the game tomorrow. - Face 22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry 'bout the 4chan talk page joke, but I couldn't resist. I did do it in 2 edits in case someone decided it needed to be reverted, which to my surprise, took less than 15 minutes. I noticed you were an admin and if I could trouble you for a quick favor, I'd appreciate it very much--could you look over Capitol View/Stifft's Station, it's an article I created and after rewriting it, I'd like it reassessed. I think it may be up to B class standards now, but for the sake of transparency, don't want to rate it that way myself. Broooooooce ( talk) 15:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
IF you get a chance, could you possibly semi the articles of "Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood" & "Sonic Unleashed"? They've undergone CONSTANT vanadalizing. Thank you very much if you can. It'd be MUCH appreciated. Skeletal_SLJCOAAATR_Soul_Striker_of_Vengence ( talk) 02:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Jeske! I'll ask there. Skeletal_SLJCOAAATR_Soul_Striker_of_Vengence ( talk) 19:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
In case you didn't know, you were attacked in this spurious comment. Corvus cornix talk 19:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
There are three users that have claimed at
Super Smash Bros. (series) that, basically, any white glove that has been in a video game prior to the release of SSB is Master Hand. A couple users and I have repeatedly tried to explain to them that their claims are original research, but they're being very stubborn. And honestly, I think it's the same person using two usernames and his IP.
Can you look into this and try to straighten them out? And if I were to keep reverting his/their additions to the article, would 3RR still apply?
Satoryu (
talk) 19:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
One of the users is contesting your decision. They keep removing the archive notice. - Sukecchi ( talk) 01:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I upgraded your protection to full-protection. I don't see a need for this template to be edited at all, and the most malicious of vandals will just register an account and wait until they can vandalize again. -- tariqabjotu 07:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know anything about the above article but, note you had some input on the talk page. An article called Ballard Designs has recently been created and at present looks like advertising but, has a internal link to IAC so I had a look at IAC. Was wondering if you had any further input on improving IAC as it hasn't been touched in a very long time and is still in desperate need of help. Thanks. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 13:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 21:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
The person's back again, so can you semi my talk page again for a longer period? Maybe two weeks? Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 17:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks again. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 06:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
( trolling removed by Jéské ( v^_^v Trump XXI); content remains in history)
Erm, Adidasnike619. Newbie. So he was trying to out my real name? Oh. Well, thanks for everything. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 19:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Could you have a look at this user page and related talk discussion? I think you may have better luck. 199.74.101.189 ( talk) 02:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
No, but my request is ultimately related to Wikipedia. I'd like to use that magazine as a source in an article. I figured I'd leave a message at the Pokemon project, because it seemed plausible that a project member would have a copy of the magazine sitting around. Zagalejo ^^^ 07:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The PCP is dead, dude. Very dead. Utterly inactive, other than the few compalints taht the 25 list articles are uninformative, lack pictures; the occasional game debate (mergers); etc. Nobody even cared when Cassandra requested help on possibly recreating the speices articles on the Simple English Wikipedia; nobody has signed her SEWP Wikiproject Pokemon page. hbdragon88 ( talk) 08:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm not the one harassing Imperial Star Destroyer, and don't remove my questions just because. -- Cronobacter ( talk) 21:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
He's not the guy who's harrassing me. He's one my distant friends at school. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 18:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi you protected the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) - however user User:The-G-Unit-Boss has edited the section which was part of the editing war and removed a review with legitimate source and also added a review which is not a notable source - neither is it a link its an image uploaded via imageshack, thats the Smooth magazine review - and it's also breaking copyrigh procedures by scanning a magazine without having permisson. Could you please revert his edit to the page you first protected the site too. Youngbyrd ( talk) 22:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi you fully protected the user page of User:Marnifrances some months back. It seems a little accessive, would you remove the full protection or at least reduce it to semi protection. Cheers. — Realist2 ( Come Speak To Me) 15:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I was just about to tell you about those odd IPs. :P Sure we can't all simply guard that page 24/7? The meme annoys me (well HERE it annoys me) but I don't mind keeping an eye on it. - Warthog Demon 02:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page...you might want to be aware of this: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikzilla. AKRadecki Speaketh 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I was curious how I could have violated a "neutral point of view" condition by merely adjusting an article's syntax to be less awkward. I have been contributing for a long time anonymously and am well aware of neutrality requirements. The only possibly non-neutral edit I made was my note that Diablo II ladder seasons have had inconsistent lengths, which is a fact, and I included no commentary on whether or not that was a bad thing. The previous version included the same information in a syntactically odd structure. I merely re-worded.
I don't understand why you reverted all my edits to their previously odd wordings, e.g. my change of "The exact real number of patches is impossible to determine as Battle.net has the capability of making minor server-side patches to address immediate issues" to "The precise patch count is impossible to determine because Blizzard has the capability to make minor server-side patches to address urgent issues." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polkiousness ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm a little confused by your alias:
( v^_^v Mrrph-mph!)
Is this a kirby meme? 68.148.164.166 ( talk) 11:58, 13 July 200
Hi there,
I was told in the past to bring IP blocking to the WP:RfP, but it seems it's wrong (based on your comments). Can you tell me where please? This IP has been vandalizing the same set of articles again and again, for the past week or so, I started asking to source the changes but recently the account is even changing already sourced data. I have posted several messages in the IP talk page with no help.
Also, I did not get the use of /* */, in my first days of using Wikipedia I was told this is the way to make comments, and have been using them sine then. What did you mean "unless ...".
Thanks, Miguel.mateo ( talk) 02:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I have listed this page for AFD, but it has not been deleted yet. Please help in speedy deleting this page or fix the AFD request if needed. Thanks. Spinacia ( talk) 03:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Siuglobal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User talk:Siuglobal|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
E Wing (
talk) 11:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Peter J. Deperro, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter J. Deperro. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface ( talk) 17:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Oops. Thanks for letting me know; I had meant to set it for 24 hours but I've made a number of indef username and VOA blocks lately so I'm out of the habit of setting shorter ones for IP vandalism. No need to go to AN/I. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Fixed now. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
:) - NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for deleting the page that User: Disneysuit had written to attack me. I am very hurt by his actions and have already apologized to him "in case I had hurt him in any way" and I'm glad that someone came around the corner to help me out in this situation. I just wanted to ask you one thing: now that he is unblocked, is there a way to keep him from personally attacking me of all people? I see he has a tendency to do so. Again, thanks so much. I feel better. Aparna BlackPearl14 00:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Aparna would like to give Jéské Couriano the following barnstar for helping her with preventing personal attacks :) Aparna BlackPearl14 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
That one went over my head. – xeno ( talk) 18:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I am writing you because you removed the editorial cartoon about NCLB.
The section is a list of articles, news releases and cartoons that was heavily tilted in favor of the White House, the law and the President.
It seems to me to be an abuse of the administrator's role to remove a cartoon because you don't like it, thereby restoring the bias of the list. Political cartoons are often quite tough as are editorials.
Many folks think the President and the Ed Secretary have twisted facts in trying to sell this law and its results. That viewpoint deserves listing here along with all the White House information.
What if folks opposed to NCLB deleted the White House releases?
Would that be fair and balanced?
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 00:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
Your action is the equivalent of censorship and I will file a complaint if you persist. It is not up to you to decide which editorials belong or which cartoons belong. That is a violation of basic Wikipedia balance precepts.
Cartoons and editorials are often quite strong. Who are you to decide what is OK?
This has nothing to do with original reseach. Editorials and cartoons are opinion by definition and since the heading lists "editorials" you have no grounds for deleting the cartoon other than personal preferences which are not part of your role here.
Your action violates balance and free speech.
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 02:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
But their argument made no sense, because this is a list of editorials, not independent research.
Your action is censorship and so is theirs. You and they are offended by the cartoon and have exceeded your proper role.
The complaint proceeds . . .
- Sorf ane 16:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jéské Couriano , If you have time and are willing to share your point of view. Can you give your comment arguments about the current discussion in the bates method article. Paragraph : The American acadamy of opthalmology link listed in the external link section ? appreciate your comment, Seeyou ( talk) 20:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the protection on the discography. It may not have been clear from my formatting, but I was requesting protection for
Nicole Wray as well.
Kww (
talk) 01:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Interesting. May I ask which user told you that? Cheers, Face 22:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I have un-resolved the incident. I feel it is incumbent on us to do a RFCU and contact local authorities in cases like this. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that got pointed out on IRC. Don't really care either way, though - if they're going to be dicks and copy you-know-who, they get the same as he does, IMO. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
We have an RfC/U for Seeyou, so I think we need to back off on confronting him on article talk pages concerning his problematic behavior. Eventually, we'll have to look at getting Seeyou banned or blocked. -- Ronz ( talk) 01:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
But I suppose that your prerogitive. They seem awfully insistent, whoever they are, but then it doesn't seem to be hard to make enemies here. Half Shadow 03:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
"Black Pearl" suggested I contact you. There is an ongoing edit war over the Elizabeth Swann and Will Turnder pages. An annoymous editor (70.106.102.56) continually reverts edits, even though the information he/she adds is incorrect or is just badly written (endlessly repeating the word "frock" throughout a paragraph). Others have complained directly to this person and warned him/her to explain or defend why the changes were made and have pointed out that his/her information is incorrect. Unfortunately, this person refuses to give any reason for reverting edits. I posted an explanation on the "Elizabeth" discussion page to present my side and invited this person to respond, but he/she only continues to revert edits w/o giving any reason.
It also appears this person uses other IP addresses to revert edits, apparently to make it look as if other "annonymous" editors are in agreement. Thanks for any help you can provide. PNW Raven ( talk) 15:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
A little assistance would be greatly appreciated here: [2] as he is personally attacking myself and others once again. Thank you very much! BlackPearl14 Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 20:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
I've written this up, and although he's been blocked again in the last 24 hours for another 48. I don't want any more trouble with him as it really hurts! This is my "formal" compliant ;) Note the quotation marks around "formal" ;)
I'm complaining against 72.189.4.182 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log).
The IP 72.189.4.182 [3] has continually harassed me, as well as others (including administrators who have blocked him). In addition, he has concocted false claims (look at links; e.g. that I work for Disney when I am clearly not old enough to) and is legally threatening us and others. There are several forms of proof, e.g. here [4]; [5]; [6]; [7]; [8]; [9]; [10]. This user is none other than Royce Mathew (the previously blocked User:Disneysuit, who is continually breaking several Wikipolicies. BlackPearl14 Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 01:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Why the Tropic Thunder reverts? I don't feel that having more of the fictional links is that unreasonable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.70.15 ( talk) 07:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
They certainly don't (although I can see how "Booty Sweat" could cause confusion if one had not seen the film in question), and they are unarguably relevant to the online promotion of the movie. That said, I'll defer to your judgement. -Me 67.180.70.15 ( talk) 07:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Despite the agreement on Talk:Yoshi, this editor continues to remove the lead image. Can you block him or something? He is repeatedly edit-warring while being aware that none support him. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 05:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
The title of my article was called Travelonly. Thank you for your response and I will save it in my sandbox to work on it. Ftymchuk ( talk) 04:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I have changed a few things on my newly created user subpage. Are you able to access it? What else can I do to improve on this article? I did read the SPAM do's and don'ts. Thank you for your suggestions. ftymchuk ( talk) 04:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for helping me. I have created the sub page and have re read the spamming guidelines. Can you do me a huge favour and let me know what I can do differently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftymchuk ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I truly appreciate your patients. Can you see the revised article? I beleive it's in the right place now. -- ftymchuk ( talk) 17:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
I feel that the relationship with MBNA and the travel rewards program which is unique to Travelonly very important and notable. Is there something I am missing? -- ftymchuk ( talk) 20:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! :)
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ ( talk) 15:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for removing User:I think 2 + 2 = 22.'s account. Gh5046 ( talk) 02:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Waiting for response at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Kender#Conditions. :) BOZ ( talk) 18:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree to hold removing more of Gavin.collins tags until they are done moderating. However, once it is established that he did nothing more then cut and paste a block of tags into every RPG article he could find. I'm going right back to preventing the removal of the hard and honest work people have done. -- Cozret ( talk) 19:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there some reason that it matters? KnightLago ( talk) 19:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Have you seen the last note on User_talk:Jimbo's_vandalism_sock_puppet? If that is a shared IP, you may not want to block new account creation. 18.85.46.159 ( talk) 17:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind looking under the recent edit that I did under Wikipedia:Changing username, and let me know if you approve it.-- JoeCool950 ( talk) 07:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I've got one more question, I thought I'd ask you on your talk page instead, if I do have two accounts and like the other better, is there a way to cancel the other account? Not now, but just wondering? -- Joey Kaminski ( talk) 03:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
It has a theme song at the beginning of each show. What do you mean by multiple the songs?-- Angel David Commune with Heaven My Angelic Gifts 20:01, 10 May, 2008 (User Talker Contributor)
Please remove vandals' slanderous editing comments from the editing history of Heath Ledger; please see previous requests at WP:ANI (c. April 28 and earlier) and related Page Protection Request: diffs.. Thank you. (I'll be offline.) -- NYScholar ( talk) 05:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for adding a redirect to Morag Bellingham as per my request. I am trying to clean up the Home and Away page and because there has been several deletions of character pages there are a few dead links. I'm trying to redirect these pages to the list of character page because there is relevant information about the characters there but there are a few pages that have been salted, so i was wondering if you could add the redirects to them for me, of if i have to make a request as i did at WP:RPP. I need redirects on the following pages.
Page links removed
If you can add those for me i would appreciate it, if i need to formally request it let me know. Ive tried to format it so you can just copy and paste the redirect code. Any issues just let me know. Thanks Printer222 ( talk) 04:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
i have been looking at the page history of a Grawp account here and saw that on Feb 2 of 08 you tagged the account as such with the comment of bust. I am a little confused because either the timing is wrong or i as not an admin cant see the deleted contributions but if you tagged it back then why didn't you block it? I am a little confused and hopefully you can help. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 07:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) here looks like this past 24 hrs hes going all out. Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 07:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[1]-- xgmx ( T | C | D | R | DR)
Jéské, I've now taken your stance and will not sprotect my talk page. I see how when those channers do the whole talk page flood out of pure frustration :D. I'm sitting back and letting it come. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
He Jéské. Don't you think it's time to unprotect Platinum? Who knows, there might be more info about the game tomorrow. - Face 22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry 'bout the 4chan talk page joke, but I couldn't resist. I did do it in 2 edits in case someone decided it needed to be reverted, which to my surprise, took less than 15 minutes. I noticed you were an admin and if I could trouble you for a quick favor, I'd appreciate it very much--could you look over Capitol View/Stifft's Station, it's an article I created and after rewriting it, I'd like it reassessed. I think it may be up to B class standards now, but for the sake of transparency, don't want to rate it that way myself. Broooooooce ( talk) 15:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
IF you get a chance, could you possibly semi the articles of "Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood" & "Sonic Unleashed"? They've undergone CONSTANT vanadalizing. Thank you very much if you can. It'd be MUCH appreciated. Skeletal_SLJCOAAATR_Soul_Striker_of_Vengence ( talk) 02:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Jeske! I'll ask there. Skeletal_SLJCOAAATR_Soul_Striker_of_Vengence ( talk) 19:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
In case you didn't know, you were attacked in this spurious comment. Corvus cornix talk 19:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
There are three users that have claimed at
Super Smash Bros. (series) that, basically, any white glove that has been in a video game prior to the release of SSB is Master Hand. A couple users and I have repeatedly tried to explain to them that their claims are original research, but they're being very stubborn. And honestly, I think it's the same person using two usernames and his IP.
Can you look into this and try to straighten them out? And if I were to keep reverting his/their additions to the article, would 3RR still apply?
Satoryu (
talk) 19:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
One of the users is contesting your decision. They keep removing the archive notice. - Sukecchi ( talk) 01:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I upgraded your protection to full-protection. I don't see a need for this template to be edited at all, and the most malicious of vandals will just register an account and wait until they can vandalize again. -- tariqabjotu 07:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know anything about the above article but, note you had some input on the talk page. An article called Ballard Designs has recently been created and at present looks like advertising but, has a internal link to IAC so I had a look at IAC. Was wondering if you had any further input on improving IAC as it hasn't been touched in a very long time and is still in desperate need of help. Thanks. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 13:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 21:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
The person's back again, so can you semi my talk page again for a longer period? Maybe two weeks? Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 17:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks again. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 06:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
( trolling removed by Jéské ( v^_^v Trump XXI); content remains in history)
Erm, Adidasnike619. Newbie. So he was trying to out my real name? Oh. Well, thanks for everything. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 19:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Could you have a look at this user page and related talk discussion? I think you may have better luck. 199.74.101.189 ( talk) 02:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
No, but my request is ultimately related to Wikipedia. I'd like to use that magazine as a source in an article. I figured I'd leave a message at the Pokemon project, because it seemed plausible that a project member would have a copy of the magazine sitting around. Zagalejo ^^^ 07:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The PCP is dead, dude. Very dead. Utterly inactive, other than the few compalints taht the 25 list articles are uninformative, lack pictures; the occasional game debate (mergers); etc. Nobody even cared when Cassandra requested help on possibly recreating the speices articles on the Simple English Wikipedia; nobody has signed her SEWP Wikiproject Pokemon page. hbdragon88 ( talk) 08:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm not the one harassing Imperial Star Destroyer, and don't remove my questions just because. -- Cronobacter ( talk) 21:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
He's not the guy who's harrassing me. He's one my distant friends at school. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 18:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi you protected the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) - however user User:The-G-Unit-Boss has edited the section which was part of the editing war and removed a review with legitimate source and also added a review which is not a notable source - neither is it a link its an image uploaded via imageshack, thats the Smooth magazine review - and it's also breaking copyrigh procedures by scanning a magazine without having permisson. Could you please revert his edit to the page you first protected the site too. Youngbyrd ( talk) 22:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi you fully protected the user page of User:Marnifrances some months back. It seems a little accessive, would you remove the full protection or at least reduce it to semi protection. Cheers. — Realist2 ( Come Speak To Me) 15:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I was just about to tell you about those odd IPs. :P Sure we can't all simply guard that page 24/7? The meme annoys me (well HERE it annoys me) but I don't mind keeping an eye on it. - Warthog Demon 02:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page...you might want to be aware of this: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikzilla. AKRadecki Speaketh 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I was curious how I could have violated a "neutral point of view" condition by merely adjusting an article's syntax to be less awkward. I have been contributing for a long time anonymously and am well aware of neutrality requirements. The only possibly non-neutral edit I made was my note that Diablo II ladder seasons have had inconsistent lengths, which is a fact, and I included no commentary on whether or not that was a bad thing. The previous version included the same information in a syntactically odd structure. I merely re-worded.
I don't understand why you reverted all my edits to their previously odd wordings, e.g. my change of "The exact real number of patches is impossible to determine as Battle.net has the capability of making minor server-side patches to address immediate issues" to "The precise patch count is impossible to determine because Blizzard has the capability to make minor server-side patches to address urgent issues." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polkiousness ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm a little confused by your alias:
( v^_^v Mrrph-mph!)
Is this a kirby meme? 68.148.164.166 ( talk) 11:58, 13 July 200
Hi there,
I was told in the past to bring IP blocking to the WP:RfP, but it seems it's wrong (based on your comments). Can you tell me where please? This IP has been vandalizing the same set of articles again and again, for the past week or so, I started asking to source the changes but recently the account is even changing already sourced data. I have posted several messages in the IP talk page with no help.
Also, I did not get the use of /* */, in my first days of using Wikipedia I was told this is the way to make comments, and have been using them sine then. What did you mean "unless ...".
Thanks, Miguel.mateo ( talk) 02:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I have listed this page for AFD, but it has not been deleted yet. Please help in speedy deleting this page or fix the AFD request if needed. Thanks. Spinacia ( talk) 03:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Siuglobal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User talk:Siuglobal|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
E Wing (
talk) 11:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Peter J. Deperro, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter J. Deperro. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface ( talk) 17:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Oops. Thanks for letting me know; I had meant to set it for 24 hours but I've made a number of indef username and VOA blocks lately so I'm out of the habit of setting shorter ones for IP vandalism. No need to go to AN/I. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Fixed now. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
:) - NawlinWiki ( talk) 21:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for deleting the page that User: Disneysuit had written to attack me. I am very hurt by his actions and have already apologized to him "in case I had hurt him in any way" and I'm glad that someone came around the corner to help me out in this situation. I just wanted to ask you one thing: now that he is unblocked, is there a way to keep him from personally attacking me of all people? I see he has a tendency to do so. Again, thanks so much. I feel better. Aparna BlackPearl14 00:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Aparna would like to give Jéské Couriano the following barnstar for helping her with preventing personal attacks :) Aparna BlackPearl14 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
That one went over my head. – xeno ( talk) 18:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I am writing you because you removed the editorial cartoon about NCLB.
The section is a list of articles, news releases and cartoons that was heavily tilted in favor of the White House, the law and the President.
It seems to me to be an abuse of the administrator's role to remove a cartoon because you don't like it, thereby restoring the bias of the list. Political cartoons are often quite tough as are editorials.
Many folks think the President and the Ed Secretary have twisted facts in trying to sell this law and its results. That viewpoint deserves listing here along with all the White House information.
What if folks opposed to NCLB deleted the White House releases?
Would that be fair and balanced?
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 00:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
Your action is the equivalent of censorship and I will file a complaint if you persist. It is not up to you to decide which editorials belong or which cartoons belong. That is a violation of basic Wikipedia balance precepts.
Cartoons and editorials are often quite strong. Who are you to decide what is OK?
This has nothing to do with original reseach. Editorials and cartoons are opinion by definition and since the heading lists "editorials" you have no grounds for deleting the cartoon other than personal preferences which are not part of your role here.
Your action violates balance and free speech.
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 02:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
But their argument made no sense, because this is a list of editorials, not independent research.
Your action is censorship and so is theirs. You and they are offended by the cartoon and have exceeded your proper role.
The complaint proceeds . . .
- Sorf ane 16:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jéské Couriano , If you have time and are willing to share your point of view. Can you give your comment arguments about the current discussion in the bates method article. Paragraph : The American acadamy of opthalmology link listed in the external link section ? appreciate your comment, Seeyou ( talk) 20:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the protection on the discography. It may not have been clear from my formatting, but I was requesting protection for
Nicole Wray as well.
Kww (
talk) 01:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Interesting. May I ask which user told you that? Cheers, Face 22:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
I have un-resolved the incident. I feel it is incumbent on us to do a RFCU and contact local authorities in cases like this. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that got pointed out on IRC. Don't really care either way, though - if they're going to be dicks and copy you-know-who, they get the same as he does, IMO. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
We have an RfC/U for Seeyou, so I think we need to back off on confronting him on article talk pages concerning his problematic behavior. Eventually, we'll have to look at getting Seeyou banned or blocked. -- Ronz ( talk) 01:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
But I suppose that your prerogitive. They seem awfully insistent, whoever they are, but then it doesn't seem to be hard to make enemies here. Half Shadow 03:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
"Black Pearl" suggested I contact you. There is an ongoing edit war over the Elizabeth Swann and Will Turnder pages. An annoymous editor (70.106.102.56) continually reverts edits, even though the information he/she adds is incorrect or is just badly written (endlessly repeating the word "frock" throughout a paragraph). Others have complained directly to this person and warned him/her to explain or defend why the changes were made and have pointed out that his/her information is incorrect. Unfortunately, this person refuses to give any reason for reverting edits. I posted an explanation on the "Elizabeth" discussion page to present my side and invited this person to respond, but he/she only continues to revert edits w/o giving any reason.
It also appears this person uses other IP addresses to revert edits, apparently to make it look as if other "annonymous" editors are in agreement. Thanks for any help you can provide. PNW Raven ( talk) 15:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
A little assistance would be greatly appreciated here: [2] as he is personally attacking myself and others once again. Thank you very much! BlackPearl14 Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 20:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
I've written this up, and although he's been blocked again in the last 24 hours for another 48. I don't want any more trouble with him as it really hurts! This is my "formal" compliant ;) Note the quotation marks around "formal" ;)
I'm complaining against 72.189.4.182 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log).
The IP 72.189.4.182 [3] has continually harassed me, as well as others (including administrators who have blocked him). In addition, he has concocted false claims (look at links; e.g. that I work for Disney when I am clearly not old enough to) and is legally threatening us and others. There are several forms of proof, e.g. here [4]; [5]; [6]; [7]; [8]; [9]; [10]. This user is none other than Royce Mathew (the previously blocked User:Disneysuit, who is continually breaking several Wikipolicies. BlackPearl14 Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 01:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Why the Tropic Thunder reverts? I don't feel that having more of the fictional links is that unreasonable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.70.15 ( talk) 07:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
They certainly don't (although I can see how "Booty Sweat" could cause confusion if one had not seen the film in question), and they are unarguably relevant to the online promotion of the movie. That said, I'll defer to your judgement. -Me 67.180.70.15 ( talk) 07:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Despite the agreement on Talk:Yoshi, this editor continues to remove the lead image. Can you block him or something? He is repeatedly edit-warring while being aware that none support him. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 05:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
The title of my article was called Travelonly. Thank you for your response and I will save it in my sandbox to work on it. Ftymchuk ( talk) 04:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I have changed a few things on my newly created user subpage. Are you able to access it? What else can I do to improve on this article? I did read the SPAM do's and don'ts. Thank you for your suggestions. ftymchuk ( talk) 04:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for helping me. I have created the sub page and have re read the spamming guidelines. Can you do me a huge favour and let me know what I can do differently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftymchuk ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I truly appreciate your patients. Can you see the revised article? I beleive it's in the right place now. -- ftymchuk ( talk) 17:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
I feel that the relationship with MBNA and the travel rewards program which is unique to Travelonly very important and notable. Is there something I am missing? -- ftymchuk ( talk) 20:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! :)
As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ ( talk) 15:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)