![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
[1] Don't worry, it can happen to the best of us.
...doesn't make it less hilarious, though. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, your cascade protection of your social psychology subpage protected {{ tnavbar}}. Oc t ane [ improve me 31.07.07 0023 (UTC)
Nice to hear that I inspired that close and that some people appreciate my sense of humour. Will ( talk) 01:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Oops! The page isn't as clear as when i last used it. Therequiembellishere 19:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg. But it seems the original uploader has uploaded a similar image under the same name. Should this be speedily deleted? Hong Qi Gong ( Talk - Contribs) 17:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
My dear IronGargoyle, I've hesitated when thinking about the appropriate words to express how much your incredibly kind words, and the wonderful gift you graciously gave me have moved me. It's not often that an editor whose name is familiar to me, and whom I look up to so deeply, as I do to you, comes over to my talk page bearing such a breathtaking gesture for little me. Many times, I try to struggle to find the way to put all the wonderful feelings that the magic of kindness can create, only to end up realizing that, I cannot; and it's best not to spoil the sweet spark with words. For this reason, may my brief, but heartfelt "thank you, my new friend!" and the charm woven within the little gift of poetry above be a token of my gratitude, and a tiny token of a beautiful newfound friendship. Have a wonderful day! :) Love, Phaedriel - 21:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for zapping the Generations template! Yeehaw! 'bout time that happened. The next step is to merge all of that Strauss and Howe junk into one page. I'm new to Wikipedia, so any help you can lend would be much obliged! :) -- Dylanfly 14:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I was looking around and came across your page and it had a long line of nonsense letters right in the middle. I was trying to get rid of that since it had been done by someone else.... I didn't think I had bothered anything that was supposed to be there!!!! Yikes! I'm so sorry! Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, -- El on ka 01:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you might have made a mistake on one of your recent template deletions and consequently broke existing articles. If I am interpreting the deletion discussion correctly, the Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_July_29#Korean_name_tables deletion review and your subsequent deletion action was for unused templates which redirected to koreanname, not for the template koreanname itself, which is now deleted. Ref. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Koreanname, the koreanname template is used on several articles which now display a red link. e.g. Korean People's Army, Seomjin River, and Kim Il-sung. -- Michael Devore 02:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that these redirects still haven't been deleted per the debate. :) Regards. PC78 12:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw you closed this discussion with "adjust and keep all". What happens if nobody makes the discussed adjustments? Am I free to re-nominate them after some time period? Thanks for your advice, Andrwsc 01:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg
You did mistake again. You decided as a original image the low resolution image, and as a fake the high resolution image. Those decisions violate natural science theory. How do you think about it? --
Hare-Yukai
13:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
-- Wizardman 02:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the {{usertalkpage}} update. Much apreciated. Stealthrabbit Say it, baby, say it! 02:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I am really not trying to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, I did not indiscriminately tag articles I went through a catagory and its subcatagories and tagged articles that I felt showed no evidence of meeting WP:NN and WP:FICT - they have no secondary sources and no real world content - I do not see how placing tags disrupts Wikipedia as if there is evidence of notability then people should just add it to the article and remove the tag. I withdraw my nomination for the multiple deletions after I was informed that the relavent Wikiproject was actively working to remedy the situation. I do not see placing tags as stepping on anyones toes and I a sorry that other people feel that I have done this in order to be disruptive or prove a point. My general feeling is that there are a lot of articles on fictional works which do not meet the notability guidelines as set out in WP:NN and WP:FICT and that this has to be remedied. I am sorry to have troubled you however I think you coul assume good faith before accusing me of purposeful disrupting the project. [[ Guest9999 00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)]]
These modifications are just for better thing. You have to accept it. If you have some doubts, we should do argument in somewhere. -- Hare-Yukai 21:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
While I appreciate your desire to implement the recent decision made at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 20#Template:Talk page, I take great exception to what seems to me to be a highly irregular "discussion", and the alterating of my carefully chosen notice to my communicants by replacing a help-style template for them with a template with a completely different purpose. (If I'd wanted that at the top of my user talk page, I would have chosen it instead or incorporated it into my talk page header.)
It looks like few of the template users participated in the discussion. I know I certainly had not noticed the TFD notice, given I had only one communication during the TfD period, and had jumped directly to the discussion rather than think to look at the (usually) unchanging text at the top of my talk page. If there were so few of us users, I think it would have been considerate to have posted a notice to each of us so we'd be sure to notice. If there were many of us, and perhaps even if not, the TfD can hardly be considered any reasonable consensus.
Can you give me a good reason why you felt it necessary to nominate this template, and why I shouldn't file a request for a review? Thank you for your assistance. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 02:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, though, I specifically said I don't want the disclaimer template, and you put it in my talk page anyway. That's not cool. - BalthCat 05:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User talk:MrStalker may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --
MrStalker
talk
07:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Your vandalism of the apartheid article is not appreciated. If you're the sort of pathetic low-life who gets off this sort of thing, kindly take up graffiti. Robertson-Glasgow 15:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the talk-page template switch (I read the preceding conversation on this page, so I understand what it was about). You would probably want to add some sort of Wikilink into the summary so that people don't think you're just making changes arbitrarily, however. I was going to yell at you before I what the issue is really about, and I'm probably more patient than most people. In any case, have a nice way and happy editing. Alekjds talk 22:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am sorry I am not sure where to put a comment :O) You helped out with my article Arden Wohl...but someone keeps deleting out that she was in Vogue magazine in July and trying to get the article deleted again...what should I do..so annoying! Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 ( talk • contribs)
Certainly. I just keep confusing the two different ways of closing things :) >Radiant< 07:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! It had been bothering me for ages that the project was so split up and messy, categories all over the place and the like. I've sorted out the to do list over at the project so hopefully we're getting there! Next plan is to get Kingda Ka to GA, would be a much needed boost for the project - nearly every other article is a stub or start class. Thanks again for the barnstar! :) Seaserpent85 Talk 22:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
hi there, would you be able to give any recommendations of fixing up this article to save from deletion? thanks! :O) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.205.212.5 ( talk • contribs)
Hello. You removed a notability tag - which I replaced - please see Talk:Gulf of Lune 87.102.17.39 19:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
My RFA | |
I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. |
Hi there, just to let you know that WP:ROCO has been given an overhaul. As you are listed as a participant, I just thought I'd let you know that there's a new to-do section and much clearer guidelines for roller coaster articles. Hope to see you over there! Seaserpent85 Talk 09:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the good picture Image:Revolution SFMM.jpg, but it's actually a picture of Viper (Six Flags Magic Mountain). ALTON .ıl 05:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I as looking through the Baldwin-Wallace College article, thinking of taking some shots and uploading them. I then saw that you've uploaded some yourself. I must say that they're really good shots, much better than I could've done. Keep up the good work :) Wizardman 03:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
On a personal note, thanks so much for the nom! hmwith talk 21:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I cleaned up the Steven Holcomb article if you wish to look. Chris 14:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 02:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar. Walton One 08:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I suggest discussing it with User:BrownHairedGirl and/or at the WP:RINGS talk first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uthanc ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I thought I should point out that Carcharoth raised this issue at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Article_tagging_dispute, and I have responded there to the issues raised. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 10:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate those who have raised concerns here, and I particularly thank Carcharoth for his attempts at mediating this dispute. I have commented regarding my behavior at WP:AN. The dispute has been resolved as far as I'm concerned, and I have no interests in editing on this topic in the near future due to my busy schedule. IronGargoyle 23:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
See Talk:Cirith Ungol#Notability_tag_restored_again. Wouldn't it be better to discuss the article rather than simply removing the tags which identify where it needs improvement? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
[1] Don't worry, it can happen to the best of us.
...doesn't make it less hilarious, though. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 00:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, your cascade protection of your social psychology subpage protected {{ tnavbar}}. Oc t ane [ improve me 31.07.07 0023 (UTC)
Nice to hear that I inspired that close and that some people appreciate my sense of humour. Will ( talk) 01:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Oops! The page isn't as clear as when i last used it. Therequiembellishere 19:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg. But it seems the original uploader has uploaded a similar image under the same name. Should this be speedily deleted? Hong Qi Gong ( Talk - Contribs) 17:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
My dear IronGargoyle, I've hesitated when thinking about the appropriate words to express how much your incredibly kind words, and the wonderful gift you graciously gave me have moved me. It's not often that an editor whose name is familiar to me, and whom I look up to so deeply, as I do to you, comes over to my talk page bearing such a breathtaking gesture for little me. Many times, I try to struggle to find the way to put all the wonderful feelings that the magic of kindness can create, only to end up realizing that, I cannot; and it's best not to spoil the sweet spark with words. For this reason, may my brief, but heartfelt "thank you, my new friend!" and the charm woven within the little gift of poetry above be a token of my gratitude, and a tiny token of a beautiful newfound friendship. Have a wonderful day! :) Love, Phaedriel - 21:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for zapping the Generations template! Yeehaw! 'bout time that happened. The next step is to merge all of that Strauss and Howe junk into one page. I'm new to Wikipedia, so any help you can lend would be much obliged! :) -- Dylanfly 14:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I was looking around and came across your page and it had a long line of nonsense letters right in the middle. I was trying to get rid of that since it had been done by someone else.... I didn't think I had bothered anything that was supposed to be there!!!! Yikes! I'm so sorry! Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, -- El on ka 01:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you might have made a mistake on one of your recent template deletions and consequently broke existing articles. If I am interpreting the deletion discussion correctly, the Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_July_29#Korean_name_tables deletion review and your subsequent deletion action was for unused templates which redirected to koreanname, not for the template koreanname itself, which is now deleted. Ref. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Koreanname, the koreanname template is used on several articles which now display a red link. e.g. Korean People's Army, Seomjin River, and Kim Il-sung. -- Michael Devore 02:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that these redirects still haven't been deleted per the debate. :) Regards. PC78 12:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw you closed this discussion with "adjust and keep all". What happens if nobody makes the discussed adjustments? Am I free to re-nominate them after some time period? Thanks for your advice, Andrwsc 01:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg
You did mistake again. You decided as a original image the low resolution image, and as a fake the high resolution image. Those decisions violate natural science theory. How do you think about it? --
Hare-Yukai
13:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
-- Wizardman 02:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the {{usertalkpage}} update. Much apreciated. Stealthrabbit Say it, baby, say it! 02:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I am really not trying to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, I did not indiscriminately tag articles I went through a catagory and its subcatagories and tagged articles that I felt showed no evidence of meeting WP:NN and WP:FICT - they have no secondary sources and no real world content - I do not see how placing tags disrupts Wikipedia as if there is evidence of notability then people should just add it to the article and remove the tag. I withdraw my nomination for the multiple deletions after I was informed that the relavent Wikiproject was actively working to remedy the situation. I do not see placing tags as stepping on anyones toes and I a sorry that other people feel that I have done this in order to be disruptive or prove a point. My general feeling is that there are a lot of articles on fictional works which do not meet the notability guidelines as set out in WP:NN and WP:FICT and that this has to be remedied. I am sorry to have troubled you however I think you coul assume good faith before accusing me of purposeful disrupting the project. [[ Guest9999 00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)]]
These modifications are just for better thing. You have to accept it. If you have some doubts, we should do argument in somewhere. -- Hare-Yukai 21:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
While I appreciate your desire to implement the recent decision made at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 20#Template:Talk page, I take great exception to what seems to me to be a highly irregular "discussion", and the alterating of my carefully chosen notice to my communicants by replacing a help-style template for them with a template with a completely different purpose. (If I'd wanted that at the top of my user talk page, I would have chosen it instead or incorporated it into my talk page header.)
It looks like few of the template users participated in the discussion. I know I certainly had not noticed the TFD notice, given I had only one communication during the TfD period, and had jumped directly to the discussion rather than think to look at the (usually) unchanging text at the top of my talk page. If there were so few of us users, I think it would have been considerate to have posted a notice to each of us so we'd be sure to notice. If there were many of us, and perhaps even if not, the TfD can hardly be considered any reasonable consensus.
Can you give me a good reason why you felt it necessary to nominate this template, and why I shouldn't file a request for a review? Thank you for your assistance. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 02:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Seriously, though, I specifically said I don't want the disclaimer template, and you put it in my talk page anyway. That's not cool. - BalthCat 05:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
userpage of another user may be considered
vandalism. Specifically, your edit to
User talk:MrStalker may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --
MrStalker
talk
07:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Your vandalism of the apartheid article is not appreciated. If you're the sort of pathetic low-life who gets off this sort of thing, kindly take up graffiti. Robertson-Glasgow 15:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the talk-page template switch (I read the preceding conversation on this page, so I understand what it was about). You would probably want to add some sort of Wikilink into the summary so that people don't think you're just making changes arbitrarily, however. I was going to yell at you before I what the issue is really about, and I'm probably more patient than most people. In any case, have a nice way and happy editing. Alekjds talk 22:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I am sorry I am not sure where to put a comment :O) You helped out with my article Arden Wohl...but someone keeps deleting out that she was in Vogue magazine in July and trying to get the article deleted again...what should I do..so annoying! Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweety21 ( talk • contribs)
Certainly. I just keep confusing the two different ways of closing things :) >Radiant< 07:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! It had been bothering me for ages that the project was so split up and messy, categories all over the place and the like. I've sorted out the to do list over at the project so hopefully we're getting there! Next plan is to get Kingda Ka to GA, would be a much needed boost for the project - nearly every other article is a stub or start class. Thanks again for the barnstar! :) Seaserpent85 Talk 22:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
hi there, would you be able to give any recommendations of fixing up this article to save from deletion? thanks! :O) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.205.212.5 ( talk • contribs)
Hello. You removed a notability tag - which I replaced - please see Talk:Gulf of Lune 87.102.17.39 19:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
My RFA | |
I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. |
Hi there, just to let you know that WP:ROCO has been given an overhaul. As you are listed as a participant, I just thought I'd let you know that there's a new to-do section and much clearer guidelines for roller coaster articles. Hope to see you over there! Seaserpent85 Talk 09:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the good picture Image:Revolution SFMM.jpg, but it's actually a picture of Viper (Six Flags Magic Mountain). ALTON .ıl 05:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I as looking through the Baldwin-Wallace College article, thinking of taking some shots and uploading them. I then saw that you've uploaded some yourself. I must say that they're really good shots, much better than I could've done. Keep up the good work :) Wizardman 03:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
On a personal note, thanks so much for the nom! hmwith talk 21:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I cleaned up the Steven Holcomb article if you wish to look. Chris 14:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi( t| c| b| cn) 02:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar. Walton One 08:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I suggest discussing it with User:BrownHairedGirl and/or at the WP:RINGS talk first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uthanc ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I thought I should point out that Carcharoth raised this issue at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Article_tagging_dispute, and I have responded there to the issues raised. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 10:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate those who have raised concerns here, and I particularly thank Carcharoth for his attempts at mediating this dispute. I have commented regarding my behavior at WP:AN. The dispute has been resolved as far as I'm concerned, and I have no interests in editing on this topic in the near future due to my busy schedule. IronGargoyle 23:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
See Talk:Cirith Ungol#Notability_tag_restored_again. Wouldn't it be better to discuss the article rather than simply removing the tags which identify where it needs improvement? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)