Hello, I'm
Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
10:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nbcwd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Korn because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Consider reading
WP:OWN before you start making edits to pages and claiming you will allow something to be on the page. Thank you —Preceding
undated comment added 02:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
System of a Down, you may be
blocked from editing. –
Richard
BB
07:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.
Ridernyc (
talk)
00:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ridernyc (
talk)
00:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I've reverted your edits to the WP:Genre warrior redirect because (1) we don't need 2 copies of the essay, (2) you can't just copy things without crediting the author, and (3) you can't just make it a policy by putting a category on it. 28bytes ( talk) 02:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
06:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reviews at teethofthedivine.com reliable. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
[[Universal Records|Universal]]
rather than [[Universal Records]]
)."[[Facedown Records|Facedown]]
rather than [[Facedown Records]]
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm
Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
list of groove metal bands, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Curb Chain (
talk)
03:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of screamo bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverstein ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Awakening (Blessthefall album). There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
03:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the article about the Korn single. I moved it to Faget (song), as the word Faget itself should be a disambiguation. Let me know if you have any questions. Jokestress ( talk) 02:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Ihy34 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't even know what I did wrong, I never abused my account. I k now i had various accounts as i made this one, but they were BACK-UPS in case my other accounts were hacked/etc. The only time sockpuppetry is on various accounts is when it's used to avoid blocks. During my 24 hour block i didn't ever use my back up accounts. I just waited for the block to expire. But suddenly this comes up. Wikipedia has said multiple accounts are okay, as long as you don't use them for sockpuppetry aka avoiding blocks. The admin "Elockid" didn't give a precise reason on why he blocked me. Ihy34 ( talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per Elockid's further explanation. Also, dirty sock masters don't really deserve further explanations. Syrthiss ( talk) 16:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm
Cindamuse. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person,
Make me famous, but that you didn’t support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. While a source was provided for the contentious information, this source does not meet the threshold for reliability, since it was a statement from the band about their former band member. As such, this content is considered contentious and not appropriate for the encyclopedia. It is important that we always maintain
neutrality. For more information about writing about living persons, see
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
Cindy(
talk to me)
02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Ashley Purdy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden ( talk) 13:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ashley Purdy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 20:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
10:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nbcwd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Korn because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Consider reading
WP:OWN before you start making edits to pages and claiming you will allow something to be on the page. Thank you —Preceding
undated comment added 02:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
System of a Down, you may be
blocked from editing. –
Richard
BB
07:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.
Ridernyc (
talk)
00:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ridernyc (
talk)
00:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I've reverted your edits to the WP:Genre warrior redirect because (1) we don't need 2 copies of the essay, (2) you can't just copy things without crediting the author, and (3) you can't just make it a policy by putting a category on it. 28bytes ( talk) 02:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
06:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reviews at teethofthedivine.com reliable. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
[[Universal Records|Universal]]
rather than [[Universal Records]]
)."[[Facedown Records|Facedown]]
rather than [[Facedown Records]]
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm
Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
list of groove metal bands, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Curb Chain (
talk)
03:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of screamo bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverstein ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Awakening (Blessthefall album). There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
03:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the article about the Korn single. I moved it to Faget (song), as the word Faget itself should be a disambiguation. Let me know if you have any questions. Jokestress ( talk) 02:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Ihy34 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I don't even know what I did wrong, I never abused my account. I k now i had various accounts as i made this one, but they were BACK-UPS in case my other accounts were hacked/etc. The only time sockpuppetry is on various accounts is when it's used to avoid blocks. During my 24 hour block i didn't ever use my back up accounts. I just waited for the block to expire. But suddenly this comes up. Wikipedia has said multiple accounts are okay, as long as you don't use them for sockpuppetry aka avoiding blocks. The admin "Elockid" didn't give a precise reason on why he blocked me. Ihy34 ( talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per Elockid's further explanation. Also, dirty sock masters don't really deserve further explanations. Syrthiss ( talk) 16:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm
Cindamuse. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person,
Make me famous, but that you didn’t support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. While a source was provided for the contentious information, this source does not meet the threshold for reliability, since it was a statement from the band about their former band member. As such, this content is considered contentious and not appropriate for the encyclopedia. It is important that we always maintain
neutrality. For more information about writing about living persons, see
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
Cindy(
talk to me)
02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Ashley Purdy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden ( talk) 13:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ashley Purdy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 20:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)