![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
![]() |
Happy holidays. | |
Best wishes for joy and prosperity. I'd like to wish you happy holidays and a happy new year. May 2017 bring you prosperity and joy. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 04:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
I'm still having trouble trying to figure out why "I Didn't Do It" was canceled or simply just not renewed—I can't remember which. Either way, it couldn't have been the ratings—or, at least, that couldn't have been the only reason if the ratings were part of the reason—because I just added a ratings section to the main article here, and the averages for the two seasons are actually quite excellent, better than the current series with their current seasons, in fact. (Also, adding the season averages together and dividing by two gives us an average of 2.08 million viewers for the series as a whole.) And if you take a look at the episode list, the only episode that had not so good total viewers was "Food Fight" from season two at 1.05 million viewers. Other than that, the second lowest was "Logan Finds Out!" also from season two at 1.58 million viewers, which is a good rating, so with the exception of one episode—"Food Fight"—not one episode dropped below the 1.55 million viewers mark. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 03:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
So I was doing some research today and learned that when it comes to the ratings aspect, networks don't really care so much about the total viewers, but more the demographics, such as 18–49. So while new episodes on Disney Channel between November 18 and December 11 received not so good total viewers, I guess it's not as bad as it seemed. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 02:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, IJBall. I just wanted to stop by and explain my edits at Melissa Benoist at Blake Jenner. You replaced the TMZ cite with a HuffPo cite with the edit summary that TMZ is not RS. It actually is RS when it's citing court documents or directly quoting people, though not when using anonymous sources — same as People or Us. But that's actually secondary. More notably, HuffPo was itself citing TMZ! : ) So it all goes back to the same source, and, obviously, researchers cite the original sources rather than the copycats that, as this one rightly did, attributed the original. Thanks for letting me explain.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
IJBall,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Does this look like a possible sockpuppet of Orchomen to you or just a run-of-the-mill editor making edits that don't really improve anything by looking at their contributions? I mean, they're not reverting me or using Orchomen's kind of summaries, but it could be Orchomen trying a new tactic to throw us off their trail, I don't know. Obviously just a theory as, unlike with Orchomen's confirmed sockpuppets, there's nothing here right now that strongly indicates or yells sockpuppet. Their contributions are to articles our group—me, you, GP, Michael, and Nyu—is watching, but I don't think that in itself can necessarily mean anything. (How do you access the interaction reports? Although I'm 100% sure we've all edited there first, haha!) I considered filing an SPI just to check, but I don't know if it's too early and I know the SPI clerks won't do checks unless there's at least some evidence that indicates that X is a sockpuppet of Y or what have you. (Pinging those who have been majorly involved in this since it started, other than the admins: MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, and Sro23.) Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
IJBall, Callmemirela, MPFitz1968, and Sro23, just an update that the SPI check by Bbb came back as possible, and then Rob commented that there doesn't seem to be enough evidence yet for a block, I guess, but that the allegation isn't without substance, so it seems he has his suspicions as well, there just isn't enough evidence for now. He said to re-report, though, if anything else comes up, so if you guys want to keep an eye on it or have something already that could further tighten the links and show it's our good ol' friend, that would be most appreciated! :) /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Orchomen/Archive#01_January_2017 Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
IJBall,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk)
08:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Look, I'm stalking you!
But seriously, nice to see you have much more time here, and I hope your vacation was awesome! (Now we can focus on working to get this latest most likely sock blocked. Ha. Ha. Ha.)
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if leaving a template counts as watching my page, so thought I'd notify you that I've left a response on my talk page. -- haha169 ( talk) 05:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I get it. It seems unlikely we'll see Dorothy's search for her mother again, but how do we make it clear this is a different Dorothy?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The one link rationale only works if the "official site" is controlled by the subject, and "The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable.", according to WP:EL. If you look at her Twitter account, it's the usual public interest social justice issues. These are fine, but her tweeting about MLK day and the usual social media items is not her tweeting about her notable activities. It's really stretch to include the Twitter account there and say it is directly related to the content of the article. In fact, including it is essentially linking offsite to a stream of unrelated information given in very subjective form, which is exactly what the EL policy seeks to avoid. 96.127.242.152 ( talk) 02:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I get them from IMDb or Amazon listings. The Editor 155 ( talk) 05:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a Request for Comment posted at Talk:New York Daily News#Request for Comment. You are being notified as a registered editor who has commented on that article's talk page or in a related move review. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Le nom Ferland est un nom typiquement français ! Elle est donc d'origine française ! Vous débattez sur de la forme alors que moi je débats sur du fond ! Vous pouvez supprimer les origines anglaise et autrichienne si vous le souhaitez, mais sachez qu'elle est bien d'origine française ! http://www.filae.com/nom-de-famille/FERLAND.html User:Jejesga06 22:55, 22 january 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I don't do much work on templates, but I saw you in the above article's edit history. Not sure this belongs in mainspace. Could you have a look? Catania Metro/Routemap. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 12:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matthew Underwood. Since you had some involvement with the Matthew Underwood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
In that case, would you like to go through the episode lists in my sandbox and do a mass change to "Episodes"?
And thinking about it now, it probably should have been the other way around all this time. "Episode list" on the main articles and "Episodes" on the episode lists.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
04:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Liv and Maddie#Duplicate plot summaries.
Geraldo Perez, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H
I don't know how much clearer I can be on other articles not setting precedence over other articles. (As a reminder, this is the user who I think has lost their rights to freely make edits, and you agreed, IJBall.) Amaury ( talk | contribs) 17:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Did you ever see the discussion I just started? This edit was reverted last year and I decided to get consensus, but only Amaury responded. Did you ever see the edit? The discussion exists at Talk:Liv and Maddie#Duplicate plot summaries. So far there hasn't been another reply from another user and I get the feeling that Amaury just doesn't like me at all. He claims this article doesn't need to follow the guidelines of other articles but I don't see why it shouldn't. I don't get the point of it not being like other Disney Channel and Nickelodeon teen sitcom articles. The lead lacks context and their does not seem to be a point in listing two plot summaries, especially when both lack certain details. Are there any other editors that should be involved in this discussion? Geraldo Perez failed to chime in this time like he usually does (I don't know why). Kkjj ( talk) 05:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Given that it's an imported series, I think it's actually started out quite well, certainly better than Disney Channel's imported Backstage and The Lodge overall. Backstage's first season had an average of 0.95 million viewers while The Lodge's first season had an average of 0.73 million viewers. Combining the averages, that is an average of 0.84 million viewers between the two series. For some extra information, Backstage's first two episodes average to 1.18 million viewers and The Lodge's first two episodes average to 0.77 million viewers. And if you combine those averages, you get an average of 0.98 million viewers between the two series for their first two episodes. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 02:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at
PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Got the alert here, but just a heads up that I won't be able to check it until I get back in approximately four hours as my college blocks email ports. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 19:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I read something a while ago that negotiations for a second season of The Other Kingdom were in the works, most likely because it's not fair to leave us on a cliffhanger like that. Obviously, we'll need a reliable source, but knows? It might get renewed. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:K.C. Undercover#WP:DEFINING categories. Could use some extra attention to the article. This isn't the first time I've tangoed with this user. Feel free to add to the started discussion.
Geraldo Perez,
MPFitz1968,
Nyuszika7H
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Nickelodeon won 2016 in regard to viewers: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/ratings/2016/12/28/nickelodeon-wins-2016-with-kids-and-total-viewers-outperforms-competition-by-double-digits-40211/20161228nickelodeon01/ Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
IJBall, MPFitz1968: And ta-dah! List of Stuck in the Middle episodes#Season 2 (2017). Additionally, rank five and 0.45 million for 18–49. Are you blown away? Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
I brought this up on Nyuszika7H's talk page a while ago—please see here!—and now that I've gone through and fixed the directing and writing credits, I wanted to revisit this and see what you, as well as Nyu, thought. This only includes episodes two through six which each featured two mini-episodes, but were still obviously one episode, as the first episode was just one big episode.
I'll use the fifth episode—Un Film de Duda/Homeroom Wars—since that's what I have on the Nick site right now for an example. Currently, the guest stars are displayed like so:
Guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Pearce Joza as Logan, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi, Laura Harman as Miss Tolomeo,
Davis Cleveland as Icuzio, Kelly Perine as Principal Platt
However, watching the end credits, you'll see Un Film de Duda Guest Starring and Homeroom Wars Guest Starring, so should it instead be like this?
Un Film de Duda guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Pearce Joza as Logan, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi, Laura Harman as Miss Tolomeo
Homeroom Wars guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi,
Davis Cleveland as Icuzio, Kelly Perine as Principal Platt
(Also two separate lines.) Thoughts? Amaury ( talk | contribs) 20:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, Sro23
I have a strong hunch this editor is our good ol' "friend." We'll find out if and when they revert me with a combative or lack of an edit summary. I'm keeping an eye on it. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
I've added Dudas iscariot to the most recent Orchomen report at WP:SPI – it's clear that this is another Orchomen sock. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Poor Orchomen – no friends: nothing else to do but waste his time here...
--
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
BTW, a belated thanks to NeilN for protecting my Talk page – it's my personal policy never to request protection of my Talk page, but in this case I believe the level of disruption justified it. (If there are any IP editors looking to contact me over the next 24 hours, best to grab me at an article Talk page, I suppose...) -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 17:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Is this something you were still planning on doing, at least with the articles in my
sandbox? I figured you should be the one to do it since you started the whole thing.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
18:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of Girl Meets World characters#Morgan Matthews character description.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I think we can definitely say Shel Bailey and Bubba Ganter are recurring.
List of Game Shakers episodes.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
02:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
I just updated
List of Crashletes episodes#Season 2 (2016–17) and
Jagger Eaton's Mega Life#Episodes with episode entries. I can honestly see both series being renewed for third and second seasons, respectively. Sports and documentaries with a mix of sports are quite good categories for any network to have, but especially Nickelodeon since it has that World Wide Day of Play event and focuses on wanting kids to go outside a play, so it could always use series like that. Despite the ratings seeming low, that's to be expected for those types of series, and, while I know
this isn't a reliable source, I can honestly believe it when they say Jagger Eaton's Mega Life started out very strong. In my opinion, both Crashletes and Jagger Eaton's Mega Life have been receiving fair ratings, including 18–49, though I'm thinking they, as well as Disney Channel, probably—although I'm not 100% certain—pay more attention to the 12–34 range, even for their sitcoms because it is a kids' network. The only significant break both series have had was not having any new episodes after November 14 and 15 of last year until January 8 of this year, but that's normal for all networks due to the holidays, so it doesn't really count, in my opinion. Both series have been airing pretty consistently, and I know that's one reason you gave as to why you think Lab Rats: Elite Force is likely canceled as it went from having a long break after April 13 until July 25 and then another long break until September 10, all last year. Although generally speaking for any series, I will note that that doesn't necessarily mean anything as look at the scheduling that's been going on with Henry Danger's third season, and we know it's coming back for a fourth season.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
05:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
If you could temporarily watch it and keep an eye on it, that would be great (see page history). I'm not going to be available in a bit, and I won't really be fully available until around 12:30 PM. I have high suspicions this is Orchomen again, making incorrect edits such as "the pair reveal," where it should correctly be "the pair reveals." That would be correct if this were in the series in the UK, but it's not. I've already added to the SPI. Mentioning MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, and Sro23 as well. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to apologize and I have avoid an edit war. This is an apology message. I have stop edit warring for now and I let go. I am here right now now cause I am very sorry. I know that the Canadian link is redundant. If you read my apology message please accept my apology. Could you warn User:Onel5969 for never adding links for Actress and Canadian is redundant and avoid an edit war. So please forgive me and It won't happen again. Thanks. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D ( talk) 06:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
It must be super hard!
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi IJBall. Have you considered running for adminship recently? From a look at your contributions and stats I think you'd make a good candidate and could do some productive work with the toolset if interested. I notice, however, that you're "ambivalent" about adminship, and saw that you'd put it off for the time being last year. Let me know your thoughts. Best, Sam Walton ( talk) 19:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I think I have a good project for you, something a little more important, I think, than simply changing "Episode list" to "Episodes." Going through the articles in my sandbox—and any others of your choice—and adjusting the categories and navigation menus, such as when an article includes a Nickelodeon navigation table, so they're in the right order as well as have the proper spacing between them. For example, separating navigation from categories and categories from stub tags. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 06:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Now that we have more than one genre—comedy from Variety and sitcom and adventure from Screener—I'm having trouble trying to think of how to revise the lead to reflect that with wording that's not awkward. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 19:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
![]() |
Happy holidays. | |
Best wishes for joy and prosperity. I'd like to wish you happy holidays and a happy new year. May 2017 bring you prosperity and joy. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 04:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
I'm still having trouble trying to figure out why "I Didn't Do It" was canceled or simply just not renewed—I can't remember which. Either way, it couldn't have been the ratings—or, at least, that couldn't have been the only reason if the ratings were part of the reason—because I just added a ratings section to the main article here, and the averages for the two seasons are actually quite excellent, better than the current series with their current seasons, in fact. (Also, adding the season averages together and dividing by two gives us an average of 2.08 million viewers for the series as a whole.) And if you take a look at the episode list, the only episode that had not so good total viewers was "Food Fight" from season two at 1.05 million viewers. Other than that, the second lowest was "Logan Finds Out!" also from season two at 1.58 million viewers, which is a good rating, so with the exception of one episode—"Food Fight"—not one episode dropped below the 1.55 million viewers mark. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 03:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
So I was doing some research today and learned that when it comes to the ratings aspect, networks don't really care so much about the total viewers, but more the demographics, such as 18–49. So while new episodes on Disney Channel between November 18 and December 11 received not so good total viewers, I guess it's not as bad as it seemed. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 02:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, IJBall. I just wanted to stop by and explain my edits at Melissa Benoist at Blake Jenner. You replaced the TMZ cite with a HuffPo cite with the edit summary that TMZ is not RS. It actually is RS when it's citing court documents or directly quoting people, though not when using anonymous sources — same as People or Us. But that's actually secondary. More notably, HuffPo was itself citing TMZ! : ) So it all goes back to the same source, and, obviously, researchers cite the original sources rather than the copycats that, as this one rightly did, attributed the original. Thanks for letting me explain.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
IJBall,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Does this look like a possible sockpuppet of Orchomen to you or just a run-of-the-mill editor making edits that don't really improve anything by looking at their contributions? I mean, they're not reverting me or using Orchomen's kind of summaries, but it could be Orchomen trying a new tactic to throw us off their trail, I don't know. Obviously just a theory as, unlike with Orchomen's confirmed sockpuppets, there's nothing here right now that strongly indicates or yells sockpuppet. Their contributions are to articles our group—me, you, GP, Michael, and Nyu—is watching, but I don't think that in itself can necessarily mean anything. (How do you access the interaction reports? Although I'm 100% sure we've all edited there first, haha!) I considered filing an SPI just to check, but I don't know if it's too early and I know the SPI clerks won't do checks unless there's at least some evidence that indicates that X is a sockpuppet of Y or what have you. (Pinging those who have been majorly involved in this since it started, other than the admins: MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, and Sro23.) Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
IJBall, Callmemirela, MPFitz1968, and Sro23, just an update that the SPI check by Bbb came back as possible, and then Rob commented that there doesn't seem to be enough evidence yet for a block, I guess, but that the allegation isn't without substance, so it seems he has his suspicions as well, there just isn't enough evidence for now. He said to re-report, though, if anything else comes up, so if you guys want to keep an eye on it or have something already that could further tighten the links and show it's our good ol' friend, that would be most appreciated! :) /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Orchomen/Archive#01_January_2017 Amaury ( talk | contribs) 04:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
IJBall,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk)
08:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Look, I'm stalking you!
But seriously, nice to see you have much more time here, and I hope your vacation was awesome! (Now we can focus on working to get this latest most likely sock blocked. Ha. Ha. Ha.)
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if leaving a template counts as watching my page, so thought I'd notify you that I've left a response on my talk page. -- haha169 ( talk) 05:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I get it. It seems unlikely we'll see Dorothy's search for her mother again, but how do we make it clear this is a different Dorothy?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The one link rationale only works if the "official site" is controlled by the subject, and "The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable.", according to WP:EL. If you look at her Twitter account, it's the usual public interest social justice issues. These are fine, but her tweeting about MLK day and the usual social media items is not her tweeting about her notable activities. It's really stretch to include the Twitter account there and say it is directly related to the content of the article. In fact, including it is essentially linking offsite to a stream of unrelated information given in very subjective form, which is exactly what the EL policy seeks to avoid. 96.127.242.152 ( talk) 02:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I get them from IMDb or Amazon listings. The Editor 155 ( talk) 05:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a Request for Comment posted at Talk:New York Daily News#Request for Comment. You are being notified as a registered editor who has commented on that article's talk page or in a related move review. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Le nom Ferland est un nom typiquement français ! Elle est donc d'origine française ! Vous débattez sur de la forme alors que moi je débats sur du fond ! Vous pouvez supprimer les origines anglaise et autrichienne si vous le souhaitez, mais sachez qu'elle est bien d'origine française ! http://www.filae.com/nom-de-famille/FERLAND.html User:Jejesga06 22:55, 22 january 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I don't do much work on templates, but I saw you in the above article's edit history. Not sure this belongs in mainspace. Could you have a look? Catania Metro/Routemap. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 12:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Matthew Underwood. Since you had some involvement with the Matthew Underwood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
In that case, would you like to go through the episode lists in my sandbox and do a mass change to "Episodes"?
And thinking about it now, it probably should have been the other way around all this time. "Episode list" on the main articles and "Episodes" on the episode lists.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
04:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Liv and Maddie#Duplicate plot summaries.
Geraldo Perez, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H
I don't know how much clearer I can be on other articles not setting precedence over other articles. (As a reminder, this is the user who I think has lost their rights to freely make edits, and you agreed, IJBall.) Amaury ( talk | contribs) 17:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Did you ever see the discussion I just started? This edit was reverted last year and I decided to get consensus, but only Amaury responded. Did you ever see the edit? The discussion exists at Talk:Liv and Maddie#Duplicate plot summaries. So far there hasn't been another reply from another user and I get the feeling that Amaury just doesn't like me at all. He claims this article doesn't need to follow the guidelines of other articles but I don't see why it shouldn't. I don't get the point of it not being like other Disney Channel and Nickelodeon teen sitcom articles. The lead lacks context and their does not seem to be a point in listing two plot summaries, especially when both lack certain details. Are there any other editors that should be involved in this discussion? Geraldo Perez failed to chime in this time like he usually does (I don't know why). Kkjj ( talk) 05:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Given that it's an imported series, I think it's actually started out quite well, certainly better than Disney Channel's imported Backstage and The Lodge overall. Backstage's first season had an average of 0.95 million viewers while The Lodge's first season had an average of 0.73 million viewers. Combining the averages, that is an average of 0.84 million viewers between the two series. For some extra information, Backstage's first two episodes average to 1.18 million viewers and The Lodge's first two episodes average to 0.77 million viewers. And if you combine those averages, you get an average of 0.98 million viewers between the two series for their first two episodes. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 02:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at
PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Got the alert here, but just a heads up that I won't be able to check it until I get back in approximately four hours as my college blocks email ports. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 19:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I read something a while ago that negotiations for a second season of The Other Kingdom were in the works, most likely because it's not fair to leave us on a cliffhanger like that. Obviously, we'll need a reliable source, but knows? It might get renewed. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:K.C. Undercover#WP:DEFINING categories. Could use some extra attention to the article. This isn't the first time I've tangoed with this user. Feel free to add to the started discussion.
Geraldo Perez,
MPFitz1968,
Nyuszika7H
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Nickelodeon won 2016 in regard to viewers: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/ratings/2016/12/28/nickelodeon-wins-2016-with-kids-and-total-viewers-outperforms-competition-by-double-digits-40211/20161228nickelodeon01/ Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
IJBall, MPFitz1968: And ta-dah! List of Stuck in the Middle episodes#Season 2 (2017). Additionally, rank five and 0.45 million for 18–49. Are you blown away? Amaury ( talk | contribs) 21:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
I brought this up on Nyuszika7H's talk page a while ago—please see here!—and now that I've gone through and fixed the directing and writing credits, I wanted to revisit this and see what you, as well as Nyu, thought. This only includes episodes two through six which each featured two mini-episodes, but were still obviously one episode, as the first episode was just one big episode.
I'll use the fifth episode—Un Film de Duda/Homeroom Wars—since that's what I have on the Nick site right now for an example. Currently, the guest stars are displayed like so:
Guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Pearce Joza as Logan, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi, Laura Harman as Miss Tolomeo,
Davis Cleveland as Icuzio, Kelly Perine as Principal Platt
However, watching the end credits, you'll see Un Film de Duda Guest Starring and Homeroom Wars Guest Starring, so should it instead be like this?
Un Film de Duda guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Pearce Joza as Logan, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi, Laura Harman as Miss Tolomeo
Homeroom Wars guest stars: Jackson A. Dunn as Elmer, Dallas Liu as Carter, Meyrick Murphy as Dallas, Daniella Perkins as Sophia, Megan Richie as Gigi,
Davis Cleveland as Icuzio, Kelly Perine as Principal Platt
(Also two separate lines.) Thoughts? Amaury ( talk | contribs) 20:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, Sro23
I have a strong hunch this editor is our good ol' "friend." We'll find out if and when they revert me with a combative or lack of an edit summary. I'm keeping an eye on it. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
I've added Dudas iscariot to the most recent Orchomen report at WP:SPI – it's clear that this is another Orchomen sock. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Poor Orchomen – no friends: nothing else to do but waste his time here...
--
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
16:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
BTW, a belated thanks to NeilN for protecting my Talk page – it's my personal policy never to request protection of my Talk page, but in this case I believe the level of disruption justified it. (If there are any IP editors looking to contact me over the next 24 hours, best to grab me at an article Talk page, I suppose...) -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 17:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Is this something you were still planning on doing, at least with the articles in my
sandbox? I figured you should be the one to do it since you started the whole thing.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
18:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:List of Girl Meets World characters#Morgan Matthews character description.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I think we can definitely say Shel Bailey and Bubba Ganter are recurring.
List of Game Shakers episodes.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
02:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
I just updated
List of Crashletes episodes#Season 2 (2016–17) and
Jagger Eaton's Mega Life#Episodes with episode entries. I can honestly see both series being renewed for third and second seasons, respectively. Sports and documentaries with a mix of sports are quite good categories for any network to have, but especially Nickelodeon since it has that World Wide Day of Play event and focuses on wanting kids to go outside a play, so it could always use series like that. Despite the ratings seeming low, that's to be expected for those types of series, and, while I know
this isn't a reliable source, I can honestly believe it when they say Jagger Eaton's Mega Life started out very strong. In my opinion, both Crashletes and Jagger Eaton's Mega Life have been receiving fair ratings, including 18–49, though I'm thinking they, as well as Disney Channel, probably—although I'm not 100% certain—pay more attention to the 12–34 range, even for their sitcoms because it is a kids' network. The only significant break both series have had was not having any new episodes after November 14 and 15 of last year until January 8 of this year, but that's normal for all networks due to the holidays, so it doesn't really count, in my opinion. Both series have been airing pretty consistently, and I know that's one reason you gave as to why you think Lab Rats: Elite Force is likely canceled as it went from having a long break after April 13 until July 25 and then another long break until September 10, all last year. Although generally speaking for any series, I will note that that doesn't necessarily mean anything as look at the scheduling that's been going on with Henry Danger's third season, and we know it's coming back for a fourth season.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
05:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
If you could temporarily watch it and keep an eye on it, that would be great (see page history). I'm not going to be available in a bit, and I won't really be fully available until around 12:30 PM. I have high suspicions this is Orchomen again, making incorrect edits such as "the pair reveal," where it should correctly be "the pair reveals." That would be correct if this were in the series in the UK, but it's not. I've already added to the SPI. Mentioning MPFitz1968, Callmemirela, and Sro23 as well. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to apologize and I have avoid an edit war. This is an apology message. I have stop edit warring for now and I let go. I am here right now now cause I am very sorry. I know that the Canadian link is redundant. If you read my apology message please accept my apology. Could you warn User:Onel5969 for never adding links for Actress and Canadian is redundant and avoid an edit war. So please forgive me and It won't happen again. Thanks. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D ( talk) 06:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
It must be super hard!
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
17:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi IJBall. Have you considered running for adminship recently? From a look at your contributions and stats I think you'd make a good candidate and could do some productive work with the toolset if interested. I notice, however, that you're "ambivalent" about adminship, and saw that you'd put it off for the time being last year. Let me know your thoughts. Best, Sam Walton ( talk) 19:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I think I have a good project for you, something a little more important, I think, than simply changing "Episode list" to "Episodes." Going through the articles in my sandbox—and any others of your choice—and adjusting the categories and navigation menus, such as when an article includes a Nickelodeon navigation table, so they're in the right order as well as have the proper spacing between them. For example, separating navigation from categories and categories from stub tags. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 06:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Now that we have more than one genre—comedy from Variety and sitcom and adventure from Screener—I'm having trouble trying to think of how to revise the lead to reflect that with wording that's not awkward. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 19:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)