![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The introduction to my edits on Wikipedia.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits to
Angela and Friends did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
2.216.191.10 (
talk)
14:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Emergency with Angela Griffin, especially if it involves
living persons. Thank you.
2.216.191.10 (
talk)
15:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Mount Pleasant (TV series) with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Zad
68
15:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Angela Griffin.
FrostedΔ
14
15:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Goodnight
mush
Talk
15:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Hto9950 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am very sorry for the actions that I done and I will never do it again.
Accept reason:
Unblocked per discussion below. Acroterion (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I fully understand that I will leave the wiki-cop actions to administrators and make more constructive edits, because I didn't even know that the wiki-cop activities were limited to administrators. I did actually know that playing wiki-cop whilst logged out would be disruptive editing. Hto9950 ( talk) 17:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Please re-read the content you restored [1]: it's completely unacceptable for you to insist on restoring defamation: you clearly weren't reading the material. Again, please refrain from enforcement-type activities for the time being. This is a condition of your unblocking and I expect you to keep your promise. Acroterion (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
HTO, I hope you will go back and remove the CONUS material for the various articles you edited. The particular term is WP:JARGON and not appropriate for general articles. Thanks so very much. -- S. Rich ( talk) 20:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Re your message: I don't understand what you are trying to ask me. LOLYOUTROLLED ( talk · contribs) has already been blocked and no further action is necessary at this time. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 19:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Can someone change my revert limitation from 3RR per every 24 hours to 1RR per 1 week on each article? I want to follow stricter revert limitations because I wish to focus more on editing and content work than just reverting edits? Thanks Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 20:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Please stay at the last clean version, as of 10:30, 22 November 2012. The anonymous IPs 81.182.80.131, 188.36.195.210, 81.182.80.131 and 81.183.165.65 are confirmed by a SPI investigations to belong to the banned user Stubes99, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99/Archive#12_December_2012 Irji2012
If you reinstate his edits, remember that you "take complete responsibility for the content." ( Wikipedia:Ban#Enforcement_by_reverting) ( talk) 21:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I need indefinite move protection on my user page and my talk page because, except for accepted username changes, there is no reason for the page to be moved by anyone. Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Per LTA, when I revert to a version by banned Stubes99 by one of the three IPs, Iaaasi will create a new account and then use that to undo the revision that I made which has played a large part in the Stubes99 dispute on Lajos Kossuth. Per this category page he currently has 96 sockpuppets as of 17 December 2012 (we have found 132 sockpuppets, 31 of them are IPv4 accounts and one of the sockpuppets is an IPv6 account 2605:F700:C0:1:0:0:1DE4:1454) ; when I revert an edit by one of the sockpuppeteers as ban evasion to last version by one of these IPs above, then that count will increase up to 133 when he creates a new account to revert my revisions done on that page. If I see a sockpuppet of Iaaasi, I will add a comment to say that "one of the accounts/IPs have been used to evade a ban." Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 15:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Hto. You told this user that his/her username violates policy. Are they connected to a website or something else with the name "onlineshoppinglover"? (Their edits have been deleted). Otherwise, the name is fine. NTox · talk 05:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to say that, but I will be permanently leaving the project (courtesy vanishing) in March 2014. At that time, I will place the Retired tag and notify ArbCom of the situation (which will be the last words I will say on Wikipedia). Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 21:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
If you do, I will delete it on sight. Evildoer187 ( talk) 18:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The introduction to my edits on Wikipedia.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits to
Angela and Friends did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
2.216.191.10 (
talk)
14:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Emergency with Angela Griffin, especially if it involves
living persons. Thank you.
2.216.191.10 (
talk)
15:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Mount Pleasant (TV series) with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Zad
68
15:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Angela Griffin.
FrostedΔ
14
15:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Goodnight
mush
Talk
15:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Hto9950 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am very sorry for the actions that I done and I will never do it again.
Accept reason:
Unblocked per discussion below. Acroterion (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
I fully understand that I will leave the wiki-cop actions to administrators and make more constructive edits, because I didn't even know that the wiki-cop activities were limited to administrators. I did actually know that playing wiki-cop whilst logged out would be disruptive editing. Hto9950 ( talk) 17:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Please re-read the content you restored [1]: it's completely unacceptable for you to insist on restoring defamation: you clearly weren't reading the material. Again, please refrain from enforcement-type activities for the time being. This is a condition of your unblocking and I expect you to keep your promise. Acroterion (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
HTO, I hope you will go back and remove the CONUS material for the various articles you edited. The particular term is WP:JARGON and not appropriate for general articles. Thanks so very much. -- S. Rich ( talk) 20:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Re your message: I don't understand what you are trying to ask me. LOLYOUTROLLED ( talk · contribs) has already been blocked and no further action is necessary at this time. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 19:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Can someone change my revert limitation from 3RR per every 24 hours to 1RR per 1 week on each article? I want to follow stricter revert limitations because I wish to focus more on editing and content work than just reverting edits? Thanks Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 20:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Please stay at the last clean version, as of 10:30, 22 November 2012. The anonymous IPs 81.182.80.131, 188.36.195.210, 81.182.80.131 and 81.183.165.65 are confirmed by a SPI investigations to belong to the banned user Stubes99, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99/Archive#12_December_2012 Irji2012
If you reinstate his edits, remember that you "take complete responsibility for the content." ( Wikipedia:Ban#Enforcement_by_reverting) ( talk) 21:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I need indefinite move protection on my user page and my talk page because, except for accepted username changes, there is no reason for the page to be moved by anyone. Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 12:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Per LTA, when I revert to a version by banned Stubes99 by one of the three IPs, Iaaasi will create a new account and then use that to undo the revision that I made which has played a large part in the Stubes99 dispute on Lajos Kossuth. Per this category page he currently has 96 sockpuppets as of 17 December 2012 (we have found 132 sockpuppets, 31 of them are IPv4 accounts and one of the sockpuppets is an IPv6 account 2605:F700:C0:1:0:0:1DE4:1454) ; when I revert an edit by one of the sockpuppeteers as ban evasion to last version by one of these IPs above, then that count will increase up to 133 when he creates a new account to revert my revisions done on that page. If I see a sockpuppet of Iaaasi, I will add a comment to say that "one of the accounts/IPs have been used to evade a ban." Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 15:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Hto. You told this user that his/her username violates policy. Are they connected to a website or something else with the name "onlineshoppinglover"? (Their edits have been deleted). Otherwise, the name is fine. NTox · talk 05:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to say that, but I will be permanently leaving the project (courtesy vanishing) in March 2014. At that time, I will place the Retired tag and notify ArbCom of the situation (which will be the last words I will say on Wikipedia). Hto9950 ( talk | contribs) 21:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
If you do, I will delete it on sight. Evildoer187 ( talk) 18:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)