![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laksa. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Empire. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
I have to tell you - since in the last times you are not as much active on the article before - that suprisingly 123Steller roughly broke the consensus that is very amazing for me, since he wrote warm reconcilation in my personal page - check the clarification section - and also we made with together with you and Fakirbakir the consensus that 123Steller tried to override...I reverted it and I warned him, I hope you will act and stand up for wiki rules as you (and 123Steller) made about me earlier. Thanks ( KIENGIR ( talk) 23:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC))
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sophia Magdalena of Denmark. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hadith of Jesus Praying Behind Mahdi. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:First Anglo-Maratha War. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
As I told you, I did not see any consensus, and if I am understanding good you want to say the majority decides about consensus or what? (2:1) Then also I could say regarding the two other articles that User: Fakirbakir + Me vs. Hebel is 2-1...how could one editor and an ip address decide on such a "consensus"? Then better take it to the ANI since the consensus that I do not find is also unacceptable, since it is hindering the true content of the sources and removing very important pharapraphs, clear vandalism look like! Moreover the history does not start with sockpuppets, since before it was originally put by non-sockpuppets, so be careful with the explanation! And the most inmportant is, I did not reinstated anything former, since I added the pharapraph with modified content! ( KIENGIR ( talk) 02:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC))
Hello, I'll write something. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 00:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zionism. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maya civilization. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donetsk People's Republic. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
I undid Anjo's edit on Humberto Delgado, that definitely is a big claim that needs to be backed with a source. Good eye!
Best, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 16:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malcolm X. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lord Uxbridge's leg. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Ruby. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting information based on reliable sources just to make what some people here (Miguelist monarchic supporters) want? That's not what Wikipedia should be. Please replace the information in the article of King Carlos I of Portugal. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
My very exact opinion. This is not acceptable. Yes they were Dukes and Duchesses of Braganza. Surely this could have been abbreviated in the past. Whichever case you should not abbreviate history or historical facts. Their Royal House was not Braganza but rather Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The page is inaccurate in historical terms since the last five Portuguese Monarchs certainly used the term aforementioned to refer to their House. Historical accuracy not propaganda please. The Miguelist line of today does not rule over the Kingdom of Portugal since Portugal is a Republic. Even if this has anything to do with them.
You are basically telling any illegitimate relatives of the last Dynasty that could be living today their relation was a member of the Braganza House which is still represented today. Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is no longer represented. Houses can be represented certainly by legitimately related living relatives. There could be living relatives today. They would not be legitimately related and should not be entitled to represent it. Even illegitimately they should not be entitled to represent this House without approval from representatives of the Countries of Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland and the United Kingdom. Any representation would essentially be illegal and completely unofficial.
By posting this you are essentially enlisting any survivors of the last Royal Portuguese House into the House of Braganza.
Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is a defunct House. Braganza is a represented House. Serious mistake. Any representation of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha should fall into the House of Wettin [1] of which it is a cadet. This by being a cadet of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha [2]. The House of Wettin can be represented in the Countries of Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland Portugal and the United Kingdom. The House of Braganza is represented solely in the Country of Portugal. This is an extremely serious mistake on the part of Wikipedia. Let me explain. Any surviving members of this unrepresented House that read your page in Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland and the United Kingdom now think they are Portuguese. Wikipedia can be held accountable for this.
Wikipedia could be invading five different Countries with a page like this in favour of the Country of Portugal. Wikipedia is serving the Country of Portugal on these pages instead of registering history. I did not know Wikipedia to be a tool for nationalist propaganda instead of an historical encyclopaedia.
This amounts to an encyclopaedia like Wikipedia promoting illiteracy or simply not having enough understanding on this matter. This is not educated.
Nobody should be allowed to modify historical facts. The House of King Carlos I was "Bragança-Saxe-Coburgo e Gota" [3]. The relevant Wikipedia pages documenting the last Portuguese dynasty are therefore all inaccurate at least in the English translation in this respect. I volunteer to do all the corrections myself if someone can please approve this. Would appreciate a reply. Jccoelho99 ( talk) 02:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't find this acceptable if you may please substantiate who is responsible for the consensus Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. To my understanding the last Portuguese House was a cadet of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in turn a cadet of the House of Wettin. I think any Germans should be more considerate since you're taking the opinion of the Portuguese and your own. You're forgetting Belgium Bulgaria Poland and the United Kingdom. All these Countries can have relatives of Wettin as well. Even the Emperor of India was related to Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Having Portuguese citizenship I oppose you list the last Portuguese House as Braganza. The relation was much further reaching than that Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I also see Germany favouring only the Country of Portugal concerning this matter. You're neglecting relations you could have at five further Countries in doing so Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Further still to this. It was the Republic of Portugal that murdered King Carlos I. By listing a Portuguese House on his page you are covering up the fact that the Country of Portugal killed someone that had relatives in Belgium Bulgaria Poland Germany and the United Kingdom. You're giving the impression that only Portugal was accountable for the person Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1st century. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josip Broz Tito. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Germaine de Staël may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Legacy of George Washington. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:My Old Kentucky Home. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of people who have opened the Olympic Games. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Is there a problem you would like to address Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 21:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
As I've said before, you should learn to communicate better. It will save you heaps of trouble. As of now, you haven't actually told me anything useful at all. I'm not here to play guessing games with you. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 00:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I wasn't playing any guessing games. Not only that you just deleted or should I say archived my writings while it wasn't finished, you need to cool it Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 03:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Not really Alexis Ivanov, you can either tell me what you are on about and what the subject matter of your complaint to me is, or you don't. Both are fine with me. Stop being sanctimonious. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 19:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sabah. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Actually, your edit is the POV statement. To say that the Episcopal church "maintains" apostolic succession states a point of view. So I changed to "claims to maintain," which is a true statement, and I provided a citation to Pope Leo XIII's document, disputing the claim. Further, the bald statement that a church maintains apostolic succession is not subject to verification, because, to my knowledge, no one has ever produced a complete list of bishops, beginning with the Apostles, and continuing in an unbroken line to the present. If you are aware of such a source, I would be interested in having a citation to it. John Paul Parks ( talk) 02:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tamils. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ukrainians, you may be
blocked from editing. Your section-blanking, and subsequent repeated re-insertion of false information, accompanied by the removal of the cited correct information, constitutes vandalism. Your vandalism has already persisted to the point that I will not give you any further warnings, but will now go directly to the administrators.
Blucdgl (
talk)
22:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1971 Bangladesh genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of South America. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince Aimone, Duke of Aosta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recoleta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State of Palestine. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop modifying the edits made on those various Slavic pages. West Slavic is not merely linguistic differences, it is cultural too as well, hence why they are branches. Ukrainian culture is not similar to Polish culture. Ukrainians are Eastern Slavic and practice Orthodoxy, Polish are Western Slavic and practice Roman Catholicism. You seem to be fixated with these Slavic pages, tell me why? You are not even Slavic, you are from the Netherlands so how could you possibly know? I am of Polish and Croat origin, I know far more in this subject manner more than you ever will. Stop changing these articles or face actions from a moderator.
Stop saying "we" when it is merely just you. And there are no academic sources that you have provided that state the Ukrainian culture is similar to Poland, therefore rendering it useless and removed. Ukrainian is an Eastern Slavic culture closely related linguistically and genetically to other fellow Eastern Slavs such as Belarusians and Russians. Polish is a Western Slavic language and culture with linguistic, cultural, and genetic ties to Slovakia and the Czech Republic. You stated that the only differences are linguistic, that is FALSE. Seems as if you do not know Slavic culture (How possibly could you? You're a Netherlander).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cayman Islands. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Potato chip. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Arab–Israeli conflict. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Potato chip. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erfurt massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please check the recent edits between me and Yopie in the Austria-Hungary article. Yopie very unprofessionally reverted my edit, the details you are able to read...answer these questions and act if it's necessary:
1. Is it true that Czech and Polish were official languages of Austria-Hungary (it is possible only for the Austrian side of the Monarchy anyway)?
2. If some regional lanugages would be official, would it omit the officiality of the German langauge, moreover the German official names of the cities (as they were under Austrian administration)?
I think - and my recent edit shows this it a minimum that German names are official names, the question is if the Czech and Polish names can be also fairly put in this status..
Thanks ( KIENGIR ( talk) 13:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC))
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constitution of Medina. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you insist on adding an edit which includes a source recognized as unreliable since 2005 (see the talk page)? Everything was fine until an ultra-nationalist added this unreliable source again. Why do you support it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:B410:5700:E5:BD2B:70B7:BE19 ( talk) 02:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
No, i don't mean this user!! I mean the user "Judist" who started this on 20th of May, see history section! If you take a look on his contributions you'll see he is an ultra-nationalist... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:B410:5700:E5:BD2B:70B7:BE19 ( talk) 02:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
shoy (
reactions)
16:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 13:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.119.175.240 (
talk)
Hello, you seem to have undid my contribution to the page Kingdom of Hungary by removing Polish from the list of "other languages" spoken. You then told me that I had no source, meanwhile the other languages listed as spoken have no source themselves. Please do not be biased and hypocritical. The Kingdom of Hungary covered a portion of territory that is now modern day Poland. Poland and Hungary have had very close ties during the long history of Central Europe, for example the Congress of Visegrád summits around the same time as the kingdom. There is and was no absolute reason for you to remove Polish from the list of other languages spoken. Thank you. 69.119.175.240 ( talk) 17:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC) 69.119.175.240
Hello, sir. Your help with the vandalism of the 99 and 199 Harry's IP is appreciated. He is unstoppable, probably the pages targeted by these should be semi-protected. Judist ( talk) 21:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Grange, Broadhembury. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Historiography on Carlism during the Francoist era. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chris Kyle. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
Thanks for the ping on my talk. I'm sorry I didn't get back to you earlier, I haven't been online much recently, but I'm glad the "Romay-Habsburg" situation solved itself. Hope all is well with you friend!
Best, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 21:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Falklands War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Anjo-sozinho (
talk)
20:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your POV with your article revertions. You just want to cover up the real information about the History of Portugal and you constantly give titles of fantasy to the Miguelist pretenders. Just to remember one of the most relevant fact from the History of Portugal: the Portuguese Monarchic Constitution promulgated in 1838 (and never revoked) in article 98 categorically states as follows: "The collateral line of the ex-infant Dom Miguel and all his descendants are perpetually excluded from the succession". Also Queen Maria II of Portugal and Portuguese Cortes declared King Miguel without his royal status and also declared him, and all of his descendants, forever ineligible to succeed to the Portuguese crown and forbade them, under death pennalty, to return to Portugal. This decision was supported by the Portuguese Republic. It's important to everyone here in Wikipedia remember this historical fact. Duarte Nuno and Duarte Pio «of Braganza» are JUST pretenders. Please, replace the correct information. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 20:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
You made Miguelist promotion and now it's clear to see that. And you call "Prince" and "Duke" to someone that is just a pretender... have you neutrality? No. But you are happy publishing false information after claiming neutrality to the other pretendants articles... OMG! Please... Now, in Portugal, anyone takes as serious the Miguelist pretenders because they only spread false information as you are doing here. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 21:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Who are you to affirm that Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Braganza is not a bastard daughter of King Carlos I of Portugal? She is also cited as "Princess Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg, duchess of Braganza" in CHILCOTE, Ronald H.; The Portuguese Revolution: State and Class in the Transition to Democracy, page 37. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; Reprint edition (August 31, 2012). And she is cited by several historicians and authors as the real legitimated daughter of King Carlos. Read:
These sources are sufficiently varied to attest that this is not a simple assumption on the lady of parenthood. The article of Maria Pia of Braganza are quite vandalized and neutralized, so not even understand why they do not allow more issues to rectify what is missing. But what is not admitted is the amount of false titles attributed to Miguelist pretenders. They may be descendants of ancient kings (but it is also controversial), but what is factual is that those titles are not officially recognized in Portugal and they are still used and challenged by other famous throne pretenders. Your activity here in Wikipedia only promotes the absence of neutrality and the publication of false titles in favor of these people.
Etc... Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 22:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
Sorry to hear about all the trouble that Anjo is causing you. I commented on the admin talkboard and hopefully that will aid in your case. Reason, , and composure are on our side.
Cheers, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 22:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey,
I definitely understand your wanting to put that disclaimer there. Im just trying to enunciate it a bit better than just stating something that comes off as very obvious in my mind. look at this and tell me what you think.
Cheers, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 23:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Cristiano Tomás, I think it's great what you wrote there. But I would leave out the Rosario Podimani section..... Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 23:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
You're playing with my face? You are replacing fantasy titles as if they were true titles of royalty; you are eliminating all the Infobox/Pretender in Miguelist pretender articles (and tell that they are real members of royalty in a Republic); you are reverting all information just to promote lies and in a brazenly non-neutral way... and you dare to accuse me? I ask you to stop these attacks. We can not allow lies here. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 21:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
I was wondering if you think there's enough material to suggest a blocking of AS on the admin board. I really didn't want to come to that, but this issue keeps coming back and is diverting my attention from other articles I'd much rather be working on. Not to mention he acts against WP, consensus, takes personal stabs at people, and disrupts wiki stability. I think it would justified to prevent future possible disruptions and edit wars. Let me know what you think.
Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 23:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Cristiano Tomás: You continue to agree attack me for silencing me, it's a shame. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Your edits to the article Count of Valentinois popped up on my STiki feed. I see edit summary you made, but I'm not clear on why the excessive blanking was necessary. The article certainly needed to cleanup, but the "excessive detail" is puzzling. There was a lot of detail, yes, but it seemed relevant. I didn't want to revert it without checking in with you, though. Prof. Mc ( talk) 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
It was very hard work without disturbing, destroying and look foolish? Congratulations and welcome to the group of good editors and historians. Now we just need to reference each part very well but mostly write the historical truth of everything.
Thank you. -- Siredejoinville ( talk) 22:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of metallurgy in South Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seamlessness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Please explain what do you mean in WP:deny in your revert? And why you didn't consider that issue is under active discussion and pointless and unsubstantiated reverts won't change situation. -- g. balaxaZe ★ 16:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abkhazia. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm Italian, I'm not a monarchist but I know perfectly that Amedeo is the head of the House. Here in Italy only the ignorant ones don't know that because of the gossip which follow too much Emanuele Filiberto. I put the website of Italian monarchists only for show something concrete. Jewels Jules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
So i found the Umberto II's letters which were send to Vittorio Emanuele. They say that the head is Amedeo. That's the original translation: http://www.crocerealedisavoia.it/files/lettere/19630718_UIIaVE_en.pdf You said we need concrete sources, so, I think that's pretty concrete. In this letter he says "...what I wrote you in 1960...", in 1960 Umberto wrote him that he couldn't change the secular laws of succession of the house. The laws of succession of the house say esplicitally that sons who marry without the permission of the father, loose all their rights. Is that enaugh? Jewels Jules ( talk) 21:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Dear Hebel, now I have some doubts about your conoscence of the events. In 1960 the famous italian gossip magazine "Chi" interview Vittorio Emanuele, who sayed he wanted to marry. Umberto read it and sayed to his son the house's laws of succession, Vittorio Emanuele decided to don't marry. In '66 another interwiew sayed that Vittorio Emanuele wanted marry with a non noble women. Umberto asked again and Vittorio Emanuele sayed was all invented. For marry without loose rights he made himself "Vittorio Emanuele IV of Italy" and with a "royal decrete" cancelled the law and, at finally he married. Umberto disapproved that and the succession passed to Amedeo. VIttorio Emanuele and Amedeo fought in tribunal for the use of the suriname "di Savoia", won Amedeo. And, according to me, can be a person who evades taxes, sell arms, have killed a person to be the king of a nation? I don't think. Jewels Jules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 23:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
I again think you haven't understood. The surname "di Savoia" can be used only by the head and his sons. The surname of Amedeo before 2006 was officialy "di Savoia-Aosta". I explain you the events. Amedeo has got a little-medium wine company in Tuscany, where he lives and used like brand "di Savoia", his cousin claim that surname for his companies and accused Amedeo for violation of copiright. In tribunal Vittorio Emanuele won the first meeting, but lost the second and the third. The laws of the House are totally indipendent from the state. We need to separate Savoy and Italy in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 09:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hunter Valley wine. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
I can finish the job for you. I didn't touch it for upwards of a week, but when nobody did anything to the category I assumed the change was accepted and went forward. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
See Néstor Kirchner#Post-presidency, the issue is described and referenced there. See also List of first gentlemen in the United States, for people holding this distinction in the US states. See also here, an article that discuss this for Bill Clinton, in case Hillary wins the elections. It says "Though he’d be smashing the glass floor for men in America by becoming the first gentleman (which would be his official title), Bill Clinton would be far from the world’s first first man.". I hope this makes it clear. Cambalachero ( talk) 21:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Gibraltar. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Where is the consensus? The "consensus" based on your opinion or the consensus based on bibliographic information? You deleted factual references to placed the POV information ("assumed in her life"). That's not correct. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 15:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
archived.
archived
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Could you please take a look when you can? Some new litvinist appeared and keeps adding POV content. – Sabbatino ( talk) 16:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
I know Sabbatino, I'm just joking. Let's wait until the next incident so we have more beef to report them with. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 17:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
He's back... – Sabbatino ( talk) 12:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
You are saying about 'diversity of opinions', but you only saving the one opinion about GDL lecacy. So in fact you are acting opposite way. So I can describe it is as lie and duplicity.
The articles that you are not allowing to edits have no something about
neutral point of view, bacause it grounded in discussion of few points of few.
You clean up historical articles from any not-Lietuvan (in modern sense) line without any certain argumentation. And you deleted everything.
And that's when Grand Duchy of Lithuania article filled with the names of the princes with -as ending. But could you mention this kind of names in at least one chronicle? I am not. Same as the language. What's the proof that modern Lithuanian used the Duchy? There not, it just hypothesis and it's better for everybody to read about it not so uniquely. If I am wrong - please let me know the source proofs of this statements.
You edit's surely not grounded on Wikipedia neutral principals and very similar to vandalize what also supported by other cases, such as with Ukrainian below. If you will no stop this erroneous activity you will be forced to be blocked from editing due negative censorship and propaganda of one historical version without any evidence.
21:14, 09 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craft37by ( talk • contribs)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assault rifle. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:McCarthyism. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North Yemen Civil War. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it is true, you have to update article about Kajkavian language. Look at the Croatian article Kajkavski književni jezik. That can not be a factoid. -- BrunoMed ( talk) 15:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
OK. Why are you doing this? Are you really so stupid or for no reason you hate Croats? Then you re not for Wikipedia, do something useful for Wikipedia on your language. And, please, source your stupidness. -- BrunoMed ( talk) 15:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
You've passed WP:3RR on this. Suggest you self-revert. -- NeilN talk to me 15:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth Dilling. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Please don't remove academic sources. Xx236 ( talk) 12:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of Friars Minor. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iraq War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philippines v. China. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hindupur. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dersim massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
There is a lengthy discussion ongoing covering the issues that were the subject of your edits to the list of sovereign states page. There is no consensus to change the page to remove the bulleting of associated states or Serranilla bank and Bajo Nuevo bank, if you look through the discussion you will see I am not alone in this point of view. If you have a different point of view, I strongly suggest you contribute to the discussion on the talk page rather than edit warring in an attempt to force through changes that have no consensus as can clearly be seen in the ongoing discussion on the talk page. XavierGreen ( talk) 01:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
XavierGreen (
talk)
02:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
On the site en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jimmy_Dore&action=history you deleted a chapter with the comment "Seems like a BLP issue to me." Please clarify why this seems so to you in the Talk section of the corresponding article before starting an edit-war. -- Yukterez ( talk) 02:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Hebel, you made some claims in your edit here. Could you please explain? Ziko ( talk) 12:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, thought I'd tell you that 178.203.232.187 ( talk · contribs) is a banned editor, see WP:PERUNBAN. Good work! Doug Weller talk 19:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Hebel, I don´t want to do any "warring", I´m only adding relevant and correct information. Article 57 of the Grundgesetz provides that the president of the bundesrat deputizes the federal president. Not only if the president steps down, dies or such, but also for example if the president is abroad on a state visit, temporarily ill or something like this. [6] So he has in fact a much more important role than for example the US-Vice President. I admit that this adds some information to the infoboxes, but that´s the way it is: The president of the bundesrat is elected only for one year and usually the office rotates between the states (so it can happen that a president has ten deputies during his terms or even more...). I (being german myself) think that this is pretty important information, but if you have a better idea, how id could be implemented in the articles, I would be glad if you would make proposition. Yours Alektor89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alektor89 ( talk • contribs) 19:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I got your point, thank you for the answer. Do you think it would be a better idea to add them to the list of the german presidents ( /info/en/?search=List_of_German_presidents) in a new column on the right side? That would not make the list that much bigger if smaller letters are used (The list needs a revision anyway, because the divison between partitioned germany and reunited germany is problematic, because it suggests reunited germany is an new formed state, which is not the case (the new states just joined the federal republic). but that´s another cup of tea...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alektor89 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eritrea. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello sir Hebel
Why reverting my edits in Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers and Moussa Ag Amastan and Ouarzazate ?
I created a
Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers/header and a new subpage
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Berbers/Members
So why reverting my edits ?--
Anẓar (
talk)
21:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry because I reverted your contribution two times
So we can't remove a WikiProject template or what ?--
Anẓar (
talk)
00:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Let me try to explain what I was doing.
On the three history pages, the user in question seems to be on a quest to cram Spartacus Educational links into as many pages as possible, with no other editing activity. This is usually not a good sign and many of these edits have already been reverted on the basis that this is not an RS.
On Evie Hudak, the edit is of low quality (filled with external links in the article body and in a tone of unthinking praise for the subject of the article) and from an account with a very obvious COI. Such an account should propose edits on the talk page for uninvolved editors to consider, not leap in with a big edit about how marvellous the subject of the article is.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Han Chinese. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Last month you reverted an edit of mine at the above article with the edit summary " it was just a title". I believe these sections of the infobox are not supposed to show dates that a pretender held a title; they are supposed to show regnal dates. Otherwise, Michael I of Romania's infobox would give dates to the present, since he still uses the title, and Albert, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein's infobox would give the dates 1921-1931 for his "reign" (even though he did not actually reign over anything). 1947 is therefore a more appropriate date because that is the year that the Empire dissolved. Celia Homeford ( talk) 10:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in 21st-century France. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you see the corresponding article in Italian.-- Civa61 ( talk) 23:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menelik II. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alexander the Great. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diesel engine. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New York. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Talk:Austro-Hungarian_Compromise_of_1867#User:_Hebel_deleted_the_reference_sentence_about_the_passport -- Enginerfactories ( talk) 12:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
The article, New York, is about the U.S. state of New York. The link in the article is clearly referring to New York City, and therefore should point there. bd2412 T 20:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cedar Fire (2003). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Qais13's sockpuppet's have come back. (I'm also pretty sure that this is him).-- JorisEnter ( talk) 11:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I'm not going to insist, because I don't want to get bored with that, this was the last time I tried to do something that I would find more appropriate. -- B.Lameira ( talk) 20:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laksa. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Empire. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
I have to tell you - since in the last times you are not as much active on the article before - that suprisingly 123Steller roughly broke the consensus that is very amazing for me, since he wrote warm reconcilation in my personal page - check the clarification section - and also we made with together with you and Fakirbakir the consensus that 123Steller tried to override...I reverted it and I warned him, I hope you will act and stand up for wiki rules as you (and 123Steller) made about me earlier. Thanks ( KIENGIR ( talk) 23:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC))
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of oldest living people. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sophia Magdalena of Denmark. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hadith of Jesus Praying Behind Mahdi. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:First Anglo-Maratha War. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
As I told you, I did not see any consensus, and if I am understanding good you want to say the majority decides about consensus or what? (2:1) Then also I could say regarding the two other articles that User: Fakirbakir + Me vs. Hebel is 2-1...how could one editor and an ip address decide on such a "consensus"? Then better take it to the ANI since the consensus that I do not find is also unacceptable, since it is hindering the true content of the sources and removing very important pharapraphs, clear vandalism look like! Moreover the history does not start with sockpuppets, since before it was originally put by non-sockpuppets, so be careful with the explanation! And the most inmportant is, I did not reinstated anything former, since I added the pharapraph with modified content! ( KIENGIR ( talk) 02:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC))
Hello, I'll write something. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 00:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zionism. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maya civilization. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donetsk People's Republic. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
I undid Anjo's edit on Humberto Delgado, that definitely is a big claim that needs to be backed with a source. Good eye!
Best, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 16:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malcolm X. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of current state leaders by date of assumption of office. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lord Uxbridge's leg. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Ruby. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
You are deleting information based on reliable sources just to make what some people here (Miguelist monarchic supporters) want? That's not what Wikipedia should be. Please replace the information in the article of King Carlos I of Portugal. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
My very exact opinion. This is not acceptable. Yes they were Dukes and Duchesses of Braganza. Surely this could have been abbreviated in the past. Whichever case you should not abbreviate history or historical facts. Their Royal House was not Braganza but rather Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The page is inaccurate in historical terms since the last five Portuguese Monarchs certainly used the term aforementioned to refer to their House. Historical accuracy not propaganda please. The Miguelist line of today does not rule over the Kingdom of Portugal since Portugal is a Republic. Even if this has anything to do with them.
You are basically telling any illegitimate relatives of the last Dynasty that could be living today their relation was a member of the Braganza House which is still represented today. Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is no longer represented. Houses can be represented certainly by legitimately related living relatives. There could be living relatives today. They would not be legitimately related and should not be entitled to represent it. Even illegitimately they should not be entitled to represent this House without approval from representatives of the Countries of Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland and the United Kingdom. Any representation would essentially be illegal and completely unofficial.
By posting this you are essentially enlisting any survivors of the last Royal Portuguese House into the House of Braganza.
Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is a defunct House. Braganza is a represented House. Serious mistake. Any representation of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha should fall into the House of Wettin [1] of which it is a cadet. This by being a cadet of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha [2]. The House of Wettin can be represented in the Countries of Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland Portugal and the United Kingdom. The House of Braganza is represented solely in the Country of Portugal. This is an extremely serious mistake on the part of Wikipedia. Let me explain. Any surviving members of this unrepresented House that read your page in Belgium Bulgaria Germany Poland and the United Kingdom now think they are Portuguese. Wikipedia can be held accountable for this.
Wikipedia could be invading five different Countries with a page like this in favour of the Country of Portugal. Wikipedia is serving the Country of Portugal on these pages instead of registering history. I did not know Wikipedia to be a tool for nationalist propaganda instead of an historical encyclopaedia.
This amounts to an encyclopaedia like Wikipedia promoting illiteracy or simply not having enough understanding on this matter. This is not educated.
Nobody should be allowed to modify historical facts. The House of King Carlos I was "Bragança-Saxe-Coburgo e Gota" [3]. The relevant Wikipedia pages documenting the last Portuguese dynasty are therefore all inaccurate at least in the English translation in this respect. I volunteer to do all the corrections myself if someone can please approve this. Would appreciate a reply. Jccoelho99 ( talk) 02:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't find this acceptable if you may please substantiate who is responsible for the consensus Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. To my understanding the last Portuguese House was a cadet of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in turn a cadet of the House of Wettin. I think any Germans should be more considerate since you're taking the opinion of the Portuguese and your own. You're forgetting Belgium Bulgaria Poland and the United Kingdom. All these Countries can have relatives of Wettin as well. Even the Emperor of India was related to Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Having Portuguese citizenship I oppose you list the last Portuguese House as Braganza. The relation was much further reaching than that Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I also see Germany favouring only the Country of Portugal concerning this matter. You're neglecting relations you could have at five further Countries in doing so Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Further still to this. It was the Republic of Portugal that murdered King Carlos I. By listing a Portuguese House on his page you are covering up the fact that the Country of Portugal killed someone that had relatives in Belgium Bulgaria Poland Germany and the United Kingdom. You're giving the impression that only Portugal was accountable for the person Jccoelho99 ( talk) 04:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1st century. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josip Broz Tito. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1896–1954). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Germaine de Staël may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Legacy of George Washington. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1865–95). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:My Old Kentucky Home. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of people who have opened the Olympic Games. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Is there a problem you would like to address Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 21:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
As I've said before, you should learn to communicate better. It will save you heaps of trouble. As of now, you haven't actually told me anything useful at all. I'm not here to play guessing games with you. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 00:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I wasn't playing any guessing games. Not only that you just deleted or should I say archived my writings while it wasn't finished, you need to cool it Alexis Ivanov ( talk) 03:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Not really Alexis Ivanov, you can either tell me what you are on about and what the subject matter of your complaint to me is, or you don't. Both are fine with me. Stop being sanctimonious. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 19:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sabah. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Actually, your edit is the POV statement. To say that the Episcopal church "maintains" apostolic succession states a point of view. So I changed to "claims to maintain," which is a true statement, and I provided a citation to Pope Leo XIII's document, disputing the claim. Further, the bald statement that a church maintains apostolic succession is not subject to verification, because, to my knowledge, no one has ever produced a complete list of bishops, beginning with the Apostles, and continuing in an unbroken line to the present. If you are aware of such a source, I would be interested in having a citation to it. John Paul Parks ( talk) 02:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:YouTube. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tamils. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ukrainians, you may be
blocked from editing. Your section-blanking, and subsequent repeated re-insertion of false information, accompanied by the removal of the cited correct information, constitutes vandalism. Your vandalism has already persisted to the point that I will not give you any further warnings, but will now go directly to the administrators.
Blucdgl (
talk)
22:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1971 Bangladesh genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of South America. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince Aimone, Duke of Aosta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recoleta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State of Palestine. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional Sindicalista. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop modifying the edits made on those various Slavic pages. West Slavic is not merely linguistic differences, it is cultural too as well, hence why they are branches. Ukrainian culture is not similar to Polish culture. Ukrainians are Eastern Slavic and practice Orthodoxy, Polish are Western Slavic and practice Roman Catholicism. You seem to be fixated with these Slavic pages, tell me why? You are not even Slavic, you are from the Netherlands so how could you possibly know? I am of Polish and Croat origin, I know far more in this subject manner more than you ever will. Stop changing these articles or face actions from a moderator.
Stop saying "we" when it is merely just you. And there are no academic sources that you have provided that state the Ukrainian culture is similar to Poland, therefore rendering it useless and removed. Ukrainian is an Eastern Slavic culture closely related linguistically and genetically to other fellow Eastern Slavs such as Belarusians and Russians. Polish is a Western Slavic language and culture with linguistic, cultural, and genetic ties to Slovakia and the Czech Republic. You stated that the only differences are linguistic, that is FALSE. Seems as if you do not know Slavic culture (How possibly could you? You're a Netherlander).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cayman Islands. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Potato chip. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Arab–Israeli conflict. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Potato chip. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erfurt massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please check the recent edits between me and Yopie in the Austria-Hungary article. Yopie very unprofessionally reverted my edit, the details you are able to read...answer these questions and act if it's necessary:
1. Is it true that Czech and Polish were official languages of Austria-Hungary (it is possible only for the Austrian side of the Monarchy anyway)?
2. If some regional lanugages would be official, would it omit the officiality of the German langauge, moreover the German official names of the cities (as they were under Austrian administration)?
I think - and my recent edit shows this it a minimum that German names are official names, the question is if the Czech and Polish names can be also fairly put in this status..
Thanks ( KIENGIR ( talk) 13:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC))
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constitution of Medina. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avedis Zildjian Company. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you insist on adding an edit which includes a source recognized as unreliable since 2005 (see the talk page)? Everything was fine until an ultra-nationalist added this unreliable source again. Why do you support it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:B410:5700:E5:BD2B:70B7:BE19 ( talk) 02:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
No, i don't mean this user!! I mean the user "Judist" who started this on 20th of May, see history section! If you take a look on his contributions you'll see he is an ultra-nationalist... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:B410:5700:E5:BD2B:70B7:BE19 ( talk) 02:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
shoy (
reactions)
16:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 13:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.119.175.240 (
talk)
Hello, you seem to have undid my contribution to the page Kingdom of Hungary by removing Polish from the list of "other languages" spoken. You then told me that I had no source, meanwhile the other languages listed as spoken have no source themselves. Please do not be biased and hypocritical. The Kingdom of Hungary covered a portion of territory that is now modern day Poland. Poland and Hungary have had very close ties during the long history of Central Europe, for example the Congress of Visegrád summits around the same time as the kingdom. There is and was no absolute reason for you to remove Polish from the list of other languages spoken. Thank you. 69.119.175.240 ( talk) 17:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC) 69.119.175.240
Hello, sir. Your help with the vandalism of the 99 and 199 Harry's IP is appreciated. He is unstoppable, probably the pages targeted by these should be semi-protected. Judist ( talk) 21:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Grange, Broadhembury. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Historiography on Carlism during the Francoist era. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chris Kyle. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
Thanks for the ping on my talk. I'm sorry I didn't get back to you earlier, I haven't been online much recently, but I'm glad the "Romay-Habsburg" situation solved itself. Hope all is well with you friend!
Best, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 21:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Falklands War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Anjo-sozinho (
talk)
20:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your POV with your article revertions. You just want to cover up the real information about the History of Portugal and you constantly give titles of fantasy to the Miguelist pretenders. Just to remember one of the most relevant fact from the History of Portugal: the Portuguese Monarchic Constitution promulgated in 1838 (and never revoked) in article 98 categorically states as follows: "The collateral line of the ex-infant Dom Miguel and all his descendants are perpetually excluded from the succession". Also Queen Maria II of Portugal and Portuguese Cortes declared King Miguel without his royal status and also declared him, and all of his descendants, forever ineligible to succeed to the Portuguese crown and forbade them, under death pennalty, to return to Portugal. This decision was supported by the Portuguese Republic. It's important to everyone here in Wikipedia remember this historical fact. Duarte Nuno and Duarte Pio «of Braganza» are JUST pretenders. Please, replace the correct information. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 20:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
You made Miguelist promotion and now it's clear to see that. And you call "Prince" and "Duke" to someone that is just a pretender... have you neutrality? No. But you are happy publishing false information after claiming neutrality to the other pretendants articles... OMG! Please... Now, in Portugal, anyone takes as serious the Miguelist pretenders because they only spread false information as you are doing here. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 21:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Who are you to affirm that Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Braganza is not a bastard daughter of King Carlos I of Portugal? She is also cited as "Princess Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg, duchess of Braganza" in CHILCOTE, Ronald H.; The Portuguese Revolution: State and Class in the Transition to Democracy, page 37. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; Reprint edition (August 31, 2012). And she is cited by several historicians and authors as the real legitimated daughter of King Carlos. Read:
These sources are sufficiently varied to attest that this is not a simple assumption on the lady of parenthood. The article of Maria Pia of Braganza are quite vandalized and neutralized, so not even understand why they do not allow more issues to rectify what is missing. But what is not admitted is the amount of false titles attributed to Miguelist pretenders. They may be descendants of ancient kings (but it is also controversial), but what is factual is that those titles are not officially recognized in Portugal and they are still used and challenged by other famous throne pretenders. Your activity here in Wikipedia only promotes the absence of neutrality and the publication of false titles in favor of these people.
Etc... Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 22:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
Sorry to hear about all the trouble that Anjo is causing you. I commented on the admin talkboard and hopefully that will aid in your case. Reason, , and composure are on our side.
Cheers, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 22:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey,
I definitely understand your wanting to put that disclaimer there. Im just trying to enunciate it a bit better than just stating something that comes off as very obvious in my mind. look at this and tell me what you think.
Cheers, Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 23:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Cristiano Tomás, I think it's great what you wrote there. But I would leave out the Rosario Podimani section..... Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 23:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
You're playing with my face? You are replacing fantasy titles as if they were true titles of royalty; you are eliminating all the Infobox/Pretender in Miguelist pretender articles (and tell that they are real members of royalty in a Republic); you are reverting all information just to promote lies and in a brazenly non-neutral way... and you dare to accuse me? I ask you to stop these attacks. We can not allow lies here. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 21:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey Hebel,
I was wondering if you think there's enough material to suggest a blocking of AS on the admin board. I really didn't want to come to that, but this issue keeps coming back and is diverting my attention from other articles I'd much rather be working on. Not to mention he acts against WP, consensus, takes personal stabs at people, and disrupts wiki stability. I think it would justified to prevent future possible disruptions and edit wars. Let me know what you think.
Cristiano Tomás ( talk) 23:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Cristiano Tomás: You continue to agree attack me for silencing me, it's a shame. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 23:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Your edits to the article Count of Valentinois popped up on my STiki feed. I see edit summary you made, but I'm not clear on why the excessive blanking was necessary. The article certainly needed to cleanup, but the "excessive detail" is puzzling. There was a lot of detail, yes, but it seemed relevant. I didn't want to revert it without checking in with you, though. Prof. Mc ( talk) 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
It was very hard work without disturbing, destroying and look foolish? Congratulations and welcome to the group of good editors and historians. Now we just need to reference each part very well but mostly write the historical truth of everything.
Thank you. -- Siredejoinville ( talk) 22:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of metallurgy in South Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seamlessness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Please explain what do you mean in WP:deny in your revert? And why you didn't consider that issue is under active discussion and pointless and unsubstantiated reverts won't change situation. -- g. balaxaZe ★ 16:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abkhazia. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm Italian, I'm not a monarchist but I know perfectly that Amedeo is the head of the House. Here in Italy only the ignorant ones don't know that because of the gossip which follow too much Emanuele Filiberto. I put the website of Italian monarchists only for show something concrete. Jewels Jules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
So i found the Umberto II's letters which were send to Vittorio Emanuele. They say that the head is Amedeo. That's the original translation: http://www.crocerealedisavoia.it/files/lettere/19630718_UIIaVE_en.pdf You said we need concrete sources, so, I think that's pretty concrete. In this letter he says "...what I wrote you in 1960...", in 1960 Umberto wrote him that he couldn't change the secular laws of succession of the house. The laws of succession of the house say esplicitally that sons who marry without the permission of the father, loose all their rights. Is that enaugh? Jewels Jules ( talk) 21:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Dear Hebel, now I have some doubts about your conoscence of the events. In 1960 the famous italian gossip magazine "Chi" interview Vittorio Emanuele, who sayed he wanted to marry. Umberto read it and sayed to his son the house's laws of succession, Vittorio Emanuele decided to don't marry. In '66 another interwiew sayed that Vittorio Emanuele wanted marry with a non noble women. Umberto asked again and Vittorio Emanuele sayed was all invented. For marry without loose rights he made himself "Vittorio Emanuele IV of Italy" and with a "royal decrete" cancelled the law and, at finally he married. Umberto disapproved that and the succession passed to Amedeo. VIttorio Emanuele and Amedeo fought in tribunal for the use of the suriname "di Savoia", won Amedeo. And, according to me, can be a person who evades taxes, sell arms, have killed a person to be the king of a nation? I don't think. Jewels Jules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 23:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
I again think you haven't understood. The surname "di Savoia" can be used only by the head and his sons. The surname of Amedeo before 2006 was officialy "di Savoia-Aosta". I explain you the events. Amedeo has got a little-medium wine company in Tuscany, where he lives and used like brand "di Savoia", his cousin claim that surname for his companies and accused Amedeo for violation of copiright. In tribunal Vittorio Emanuele won the first meeting, but lost the second and the third. The laws of the House are totally indipendent from the state. We need to separate Savoy and Italy in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewels Jules ( talk • contribs) 09:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hunter Valley wine. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
I can finish the job for you. I didn't touch it for upwards of a week, but when nobody did anything to the category I assumed the change was accepted and went forward. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
See Néstor Kirchner#Post-presidency, the issue is described and referenced there. See also List of first gentlemen in the United States, for people holding this distinction in the US states. See also here, an article that discuss this for Bill Clinton, in case Hillary wins the elections. It says "Though he’d be smashing the glass floor for men in America by becoming the first gentleman (which would be his official title), Bill Clinton would be far from the world’s first first man.". I hope this makes it clear. Cambalachero ( talk) 21:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Gibraltar. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Where is the consensus? The "consensus" based on your opinion or the consensus based on bibliographic information? You deleted factual references to placed the POV information ("assumed in her life"). That's not correct. Anjo-sozinho ( talk) 15:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
archived.
archived
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Could you please take a look when you can? Some new litvinist appeared and keeps adding POV content. – Sabbatino ( talk) 16:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
I know Sabbatino, I'm just joking. Let's wait until the next incident so we have more beef to report them with. Gerard von Hebel ( talk) 17:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
He's back... – Sabbatino ( talk) 12:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
You are saying about 'diversity of opinions', but you only saving the one opinion about GDL lecacy. So in fact you are acting opposite way. So I can describe it is as lie and duplicity.
The articles that you are not allowing to edits have no something about
neutral point of view, bacause it grounded in discussion of few points of few.
You clean up historical articles from any not-Lietuvan (in modern sense) line without any certain argumentation. And you deleted everything.
And that's when Grand Duchy of Lithuania article filled with the names of the princes with -as ending. But could you mention this kind of names in at least one chronicle? I am not. Same as the language. What's the proof that modern Lithuanian used the Duchy? There not, it just hypothesis and it's better for everybody to read about it not so uniquely. If I am wrong - please let me know the source proofs of this statements.
You edit's surely not grounded on Wikipedia neutral principals and very similar to vandalize what also supported by other cases, such as with Ukrainian below. If you will no stop this erroneous activity you will be forced to be blocked from editing due negative censorship and propaganda of one historical version without any evidence.
21:14, 09 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craft37by ( talk • contribs)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assault rifle. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:McCarthyism. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:North Yemen Civil War. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it is true, you have to update article about Kajkavian language. Look at the Croatian article Kajkavski književni jezik. That can not be a factoid. -- BrunoMed ( talk) 15:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
OK. Why are you doing this? Are you really so stupid or for no reason you hate Croats? Then you re not for Wikipedia, do something useful for Wikipedia on your language. And, please, source your stupidness. -- BrunoMed ( talk) 15:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
You've passed WP:3RR on this. Suggest you self-revert. -- NeilN talk to me 15:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth Dilling. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Please don't remove academic sources. Xx236 ( talk) 12:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Order of Friars Minor. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iraq War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philippines v. China. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hindupur. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dersim massacre. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
There is a lengthy discussion ongoing covering the issues that were the subject of your edits to the list of sovereign states page. There is no consensus to change the page to remove the bulleting of associated states or Serranilla bank and Bajo Nuevo bank, if you look through the discussion you will see I am not alone in this point of view. If you have a different point of view, I strongly suggest you contribute to the discussion on the talk page rather than edit warring in an attempt to force through changes that have no consensus as can clearly be seen in the ongoing discussion on the talk page. XavierGreen ( talk) 01:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
XavierGreen (
talk)
02:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
On the site en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jimmy_Dore&action=history you deleted a chapter with the comment "Seems like a BLP issue to me." Please clarify why this seems so to you in the Talk section of the corresponding article before starting an edit-war. -- Yukterez ( talk) 02:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Hebel, you made some claims in your edit here. Could you please explain? Ziko ( talk) 12:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, thought I'd tell you that 178.203.232.187 ( talk · contribs) is a banned editor, see WP:PERUNBAN. Good work! Doug Weller talk 19:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Hebel, I don´t want to do any "warring", I´m only adding relevant and correct information. Article 57 of the Grundgesetz provides that the president of the bundesrat deputizes the federal president. Not only if the president steps down, dies or such, but also for example if the president is abroad on a state visit, temporarily ill or something like this. [6] So he has in fact a much more important role than for example the US-Vice President. I admit that this adds some information to the infoboxes, but that´s the way it is: The president of the bundesrat is elected only for one year and usually the office rotates between the states (so it can happen that a president has ten deputies during his terms or even more...). I (being german myself) think that this is pretty important information, but if you have a better idea, how id could be implemented in the articles, I would be glad if you would make proposition. Yours Alektor89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alektor89 ( talk • contribs) 19:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I got your point, thank you for the answer. Do you think it would be a better idea to add them to the list of the german presidents ( /info/en/?search=List_of_German_presidents) in a new column on the right side? That would not make the list that much bigger if smaller letters are used (The list needs a revision anyway, because the divison between partitioned germany and reunited germany is problematic, because it suggests reunited germany is an new formed state, which is not the case (the new states just joined the federal republic). but that´s another cup of tea...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alektor89 ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eritrea. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello sir Hebel
Why reverting my edits in Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers and Moussa Ag Amastan and Ouarzazate ?
I created a
Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers/header and a new subpage
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Berbers/Members
So why reverting my edits ?--
Anẓar (
talk)
21:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry because I reverted your contribution two times
So we can't remove a WikiProject template or what ?--
Anẓar (
talk)
00:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Let me try to explain what I was doing.
On the three history pages, the user in question seems to be on a quest to cram Spartacus Educational links into as many pages as possible, with no other editing activity. This is usually not a good sign and many of these edits have already been reverted on the basis that this is not an RS.
On Evie Hudak, the edit is of low quality (filled with external links in the article body and in a tone of unthinking praise for the subject of the article) and from an account with a very obvious COI. Such an account should propose edits on the talk page for uninvolved editors to consider, not leap in with a big edit about how marvellous the subject of the article is.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Han Chinese. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Last month you reverted an edit of mine at the above article with the edit summary " it was just a title". I believe these sections of the infobox are not supposed to show dates that a pretender held a title; they are supposed to show regnal dates. Otherwise, Michael I of Romania's infobox would give dates to the present, since he still uses the title, and Albert, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein's infobox would give the dates 1921-1931 for his "reign" (even though he did not actually reign over anything). 1947 is therefore a more appropriate date because that is the year that the Empire dissolved. Celia Homeford ( talk) 10:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in 21st-century France. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, you see the corresponding article in Italian.-- Civa61 ( talk) 23:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menelik II. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alexander the Great. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diesel engine. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New York. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Talk:Austro-Hungarian_Compromise_of_1867#User:_Hebel_deleted_the_reference_sentence_about_the_passport -- Enginerfactories ( talk) 12:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States). Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
The article, New York, is about the U.S. state of New York. The link in the article is clearly referring to New York City, and therefore should point there. bd2412 T 20:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cedar Fire (2003). Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Qais13's sockpuppet's have come back. (I'm also pretty sure that this is him).-- JorisEnter ( talk) 11:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I'm not going to insist, because I don't want to get bored with that, this was the last time I tried to do something that I would find more appropriate. -- B.Lameira ( talk) 20:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)