This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Upcoming Ariana Grande album. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Upcoming Ariana Grande album until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Heartfox. An AfD discussion for Harajuku Girls (song) has started. Please feel free to comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ ( talk) 16:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I am terribly sorry for the unsuccessful FAC. I feel really bad because I put a placeholder and then failed to comment... at all. The prose is brilliant, but I understand that source reviewers can sometimes be confusing. That said, I wholeheartedly appreciate your efforts in constructing a comprehensive article for the betterment of this site, and the general public's interest. Fyi, my first successful FAC was 7 years after my first edit, so don't be dissuaded. Your first FAC was really neat and clean, as opposed to my monstrous first (several) attempts. You are handling the situation very well (I remember being very mad at those who opposed to my FACs..), so keep up the great work. HĐ ( talk) 16:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For the tremendous effort of putting together a holistic collection of Nielsen ratings. It's quite the undertaking, and your efforts are very appreciated ! Rswallis10 ( talk) 02:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Live-In you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Live-In, has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on January 16, 2021. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of some birds. Enjoy! |
Thank you! Heartfox ( talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Live-In you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Live-In for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi I'm just wondering if you ever resolved the issue with rowspans on Olivia Rodrigo's page? I agree with you 100% that a rowspan is needed and that IJBall's reasoning for reverting edits are only based on his personal opinion. Not sure how to move forward with this... D_bovair1988 ( talk) 20:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Ok sorry to bother you
Hello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) contestants".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox,
Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you should post a notice about this tagging on the talk page of the page creator. I was just looking at Ben Arogundade and it wasn't done in this case. It is very easy if you use Twinkle, once you set up your Preferences, the program will inform the page creator automatically. This should be done out of habit, even if it appears that the editor is no longer active. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I just saw your edit on Motherhood (ER) and I thought it was really helpful. However, I was just wondering if you knew a website where an archive of the USA Today page you cited could be found just to verify the information. Some Dude From North Carolina wanna talk? 23:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be willing to offer a review for my nomination of this article? As you might see, sourcing has been raised as an issue, so perhaps you can offer more thoughts on the remaining sources suggesting attention. Here is the guideline on source reviewing and quality for FAC, if you choose to do so. Thanks. isento ( talk) 06:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Valentine Greets!!! | |
Hello Heartfox,
love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of
Wikipedia, spread the
WikiLove by wishing each other
Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hi, Heartfox. Two AFDs discussion have started for The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) and I've Just Begun (Having My Fun). Please comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ ( talk) 04:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. I just wanted to say that I'm sorry for not participating in the above FAC. I am always happy to see a FAC on an obscure television show as that is one of my personal Wikipedia passion projects. Something about working on these one-season obscurities is so interesting to me as it reflects a lot about television and consumer interest at the time. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that you can reach out to me whenever if you need a review for something. Aoba47 ( talk) 19:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The Ultimate Boss ( talk) 23:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 21:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, One of the Boys (1989 TV series), has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on March 12, 2021. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of a frog. Enjoy! |
The article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:One of the Boys (1989 TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 13:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the newspaper sources in the Ratings list in the Golden Globe Awards article. I am using them to edit IMDb listings. I was wondering if you might have a good source to show that the Globes were not aired anywhere on TV from 1969 to 1972. Brndtnlsn ( talk) 20:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey!
I saw this and wanted to clarify something for you. I got a notification that an editor reverted my edit to
Justice (Justin Bieber album), I read their edit summary (which was basically the same as mine and which linked to
Template:Infobox song#released), I read the section, which made no mention that it was put in place 14 years ago, and I thought "hey, Taylor Swift released a bunch of songs solely to radio in promotion of Folklore and Evermore, and since this says to list the dates of singles that were only sent to radio as the day they were released from the album, I should change that". As well, most of the policies on Wikipedia were put in place more than a decade ago, so I don't see why you’re using all caps and telling me to revert when you don’t do that for anything else that was discussed in pre-2008 Wikipedia. Yes, Infobox instructions are not the MoS, but unless you can find something in the MoS that contradicts what is being said in the template doc, why are you even bringing it up? Lastly, what does I'm a bit tired of your unduly deference to instructions, whether they're relevant or not
mean? When do I defer from instructions so unduly that you get tired from it? Please clarify.
D🐶ggy54321 (
let's chat!)
22:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I will address everything after you indicate the source review has been completed, as I don't want to keep bothering you with pings and clouding up the nomination page with recurring notes of thanks. Please indicate it explicitly when done. I do understand if you regret taking on the source review of such a lengthy article, though. It sounds tedious! Regards.-- N Ø 01:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Yassin Bilal, music producer and music maker. I want an article in Wikipedia about my name and my work. Can you help me with that? Peace.maker14 ( talk) 04:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. Apologies for the message, but I remember that you mentioned possibly helping me with my current peer review for the Veronica Clare article and I was curious if you were still able to help. It seems like the peer review process was slowly becoming active, but it seems (at least to me) to have slipped back into its old state of dormancy. If you no longer have the time to do it, I completely understand. I just wanted to check in about this. I hope you have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 ( talk) 20:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, apologies for the random message. I have come across your comments in various FA nominations and was wondering if you'd be willing to leave some feedback here. The article became a GA in January and I wish to take to FA but would like to get as much feedback on how to improve it further. I'd really appreciate your comments. Thank you. -- Ashley yoursmile! 14:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The Reviewers Award | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 12:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks, Gog the Mild. I admire your dedication to the process and I can't imagine the time you must spend doing everything! Heartfox ( talk) 23:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
The Featured Article Medal | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks! Heartfox ( talk) 17:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
If you could by some chance leave input for the peer review linked above, then I'd very much appreciate that. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 03:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello again! I hope you are doing well and having a good week so far. Apologies for this random message. I was wondering if you could help me find the ratings for Katie Joplin? I completely understand if you say no. I was thinking about nominating the article for a FAC, but I am feeling insecure lately about FACs for some reason (and especially since this show is super obscure lol). Either way, have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 ( talk) 02:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you again for adding the ratings to the articles. Aoba47 ( talk) 04:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I have not finished going over all of your comments yet but have covered a good number of them, so could you try and respond soon in these areas? -- K. Peake 06:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
I've just posted about the latest update at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#U.S. TV ratings sources, but uh... yikes. Magitroopa ( talk) 19:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for the help with the Katie Joplin FAC. It was recently promoted as a FA. Your work on One of the Boys (1989 TV series) inspired to do this nomination as I genuinely did not believe the article would work in the FAC space (even though I had nominated other obscure, one-seasons shows in the past). I really enjoyed the experience with this FAC and I just wanted to thank you for inspiring me to do it in the first place! Aoba47 ( talk) 02:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
@ Aoba47: Congratulations on the promotion with 8(!) supports! If you need viewership/ratings for anything just let me know :) Heartfox ( talk) 00:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey there! From reading WP:SINGLE?, I'm not sure if The Music Network can be used as a radio release date for Australia? I am guessing no? Cool Marc ✉ 15:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Heartfox, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Shake It Off's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! -- TheSandDoctor Talk 01:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Simon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Boris Aronson The Firstborn Pyramid 1958.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{
self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for being kind and helpful. I really appreciate the time you have taken to review " Lights Up' and helped it become a FA. Viridian Bovary ( talk) 06:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
I just left comments for this. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 03:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I've brought it back to FAC. Since you gave it a source review the first time around, I was wondering if you might be interested in taking a second look. I've bulked up the reception section even more since the first nomination and believe the referencing is substantially improved overall. -- Bcschneider53 ( talk) 03:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox! I am very sorry to disturb you as I'm sure you're very busy. I have seen your comments at various FACs and have been impressed with your work at media and drama articles (and other articles too). I have opened up a peer review for My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic before hopefully nominating it for FAC; I was wondering if you would be able to leave comments here. If you are unable to or don't want to, that's totally understandable and fine. Thanks either way! Pamzeis ( talk) 00:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Heartfox, I wanted to check in with you regarding the source review for the FAC I am currently working on. If you're still interested, please consider leaving a comment there so the FAC coordinators can see the review is still active. If you're busy and no longer can complete the review, that's totally fine; please just leave a note explaining that on the FAC page so others will know the source review is not ongoing. Thanks! RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I'll try to remember that one - thanks for the fix. Girth Summit (blether) 22:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey again. Sorry for this super random message. I just wanted to reach out and see how you are doing. I hope you are having a good weekend so far! Aoba47 ( talk) 01:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy's Got the Heat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. I hope you are doing well and staying warm this season. My FAC has stalled, so I wonder if you could leave some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fearless (Taylor Swift album)/archive1? I would appreciate your input very much. Sorry for bothering you this way, and many thanks in advance. Best, Ippantekina ( talk) 09:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:13 East, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rupert Hotel fire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again! I currently have Hannah Montana up as a Featured Article Candidate. If you are able to, I would appreciate your comments on the nomination, and thought you might be interested in the topic. I always appreciate any of your feedback, but I understand if you are unable to. Thank you! SatDis ( talk) 03:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again. I hope you are doing well and staying safe. Apologies for this random message and request. Since you did the source review for my FAC on " No Panties", I was wondering if you could possibly do one of my current FAC which is about another largely forgotten early 2000s song (" Laundromat")? I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. I just thought that I should ask since the FACs are somewhat similar in topic. I would be more than happy to assist you in any of your Wikipedia projects. Either way, have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 ( talk) 03:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you today for Here Is Mariah Carey, "about a 1993 video album by Mariah Carey filmed primarily at Proctor's Theater in Schenectady, New York. It is probably one of her most famous performances, having been watched by almost 20 million people on television during its original NBC broadcast and receiving a Platinum certification from RIAA."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
videos and television
Thank you for quality articles such as Here Is Mariah Carey, The Masked Singer (American TV series), One of the Boys (1989 TV series) and Live-In, for quality reviewing, for expanding, updating and corrections with specific edit summaries, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2723 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Please join this convo: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#AllAccess_radio :) Tree Critter ( talk) 07:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for closing that discussion. I wanted to ask how you took into account the non-neutral nature of the statement that led the RFC for the first four days that it was open, during which 75 editors !voted? BilledMammal ( talk) 03:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think you fairly summarised the arguments against the change; specifically the fact that The Times style guide still endorses "she" and "her" for ships, which was raised by several editors. This was the strongest counter-argument to the style guide-based argument for change imo. Ficaia ( talk) 05:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I have to agree with others here that are taking issue with your close. In the opening line of your close you stated: "In this RfC, there were slightly more editors supporting the MOS change than those in favour of keeping the status quo...
". That itself shows there was no consensus among the number of editors that took part in the RfC, which just leaves the strength of the arguments of one side vs. the other, and again, I don't see how a clear consensus for change could be determined. This was an very contentious issue, with numerous editors taking part. Some had already stated that it should be an admin close at the very least, if not one by panel. While I think there are merits to those positions, right now, I believe that at the very least you should undo your close and allow other processes to take up the issue. -
wolf
13:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
This is a courtesy notice advising you that a close review has been requested at WP:AN for the RfC regarding pronouns for ships that you recently closed. The close review may be found here. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, just wanted to say thank you for volunteering the time to read the MOS ships RFC and write a thoughtful close, and deal with the predictable post-close discussion. FWIW I think when our own guidelines already say to use gender neutral language, and 55% of editors and most style guides say the same, that's consensus, but apparently a sizable number of editors want to wait another two years until it's 60%. It reminds me of the change from "Kiev" to "Kyiv", and I'll never understand why so many editors fight so hard against what is obviously inevitable. Anyway, I appreciate the time you've volunteered for the project here even if it ends up getting overturned to no consensus. Thanks again, Levivich 02:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Upcoming Ariana Grande album. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Upcoming Ariana Grande album until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Heartfox. An AfD discussion for Harajuku Girls (song) has started. Please feel free to comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ ( talk) 16:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I am terribly sorry for the unsuccessful FAC. I feel really bad because I put a placeholder and then failed to comment... at all. The prose is brilliant, but I understand that source reviewers can sometimes be confusing. That said, I wholeheartedly appreciate your efforts in constructing a comprehensive article for the betterment of this site, and the general public's interest. Fyi, my first successful FAC was 7 years after my first edit, so don't be dissuaded. Your first FAC was really neat and clean, as opposed to my monstrous first (several) attempts. You are handling the situation very well (I remember being very mad at those who opposed to my FACs..), so keep up the great work. HĐ ( talk) 16:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For the tremendous effort of putting together a holistic collection of Nielsen ratings. It's quite the undertaking, and your efforts are very appreciated ! Rswallis10 ( talk) 02:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Live-In you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 20:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Live-In, has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on January 16, 2021. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of some birds. Enjoy! |
Thank you! Heartfox ( talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Live-In you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Live-In for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 21:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi I'm just wondering if you ever resolved the issue with rowspans on Olivia Rodrigo's page? I agree with you 100% that a rowspan is needed and that IJBall's reasoning for reverting edits are only based on his personal opinion. Not sure how to move forward with this... D_bovair1988 ( talk) 20:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Ok sorry to bother you
Hello, Heartfox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) contestants".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox,
Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you should post a notice about this tagging on the talk page of the page creator. I was just looking at Ben Arogundade and it wasn't done in this case. It is very easy if you use Twinkle, once you set up your Preferences, the program will inform the page creator automatically. This should be done out of habit, even if it appears that the editor is no longer active. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I just saw your edit on Motherhood (ER) and I thought it was really helpful. However, I was just wondering if you knew a website where an archive of the USA Today page you cited could be found just to verify the information. Some Dude From North Carolina wanna talk? 23:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be willing to offer a review for my nomination of this article? As you might see, sourcing has been raised as an issue, so perhaps you can offer more thoughts on the remaining sources suggesting attention. Here is the guideline on source reviewing and quality for FAC, if you choose to do so. Thanks. isento ( talk) 06:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Valentine Greets!!! | |
Hello Heartfox,
love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of
Wikipedia, spread the
WikiLove by wishing each other
Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hi, Heartfox. Two AFDs discussion have started for The Real Thing (Gwen Stefani song) and I've Just Begun (Having My Fun). Please comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ ( talk) 04:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. I just wanted to say that I'm sorry for not participating in the above FAC. I am always happy to see a FAC on an obscure television show as that is one of my personal Wikipedia passion projects. Something about working on these one-season obscurities is so interesting to me as it reflects a lot about television and consumer interest at the time. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that you can reach out to me whenever if you need a review for something. Aoba47 ( talk) 19:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The Ultimate Boss ( talk) 23:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 21:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, One of the Boys (1989 TV series), has passed the GA-criteria, becoming a good article on March 12, 2021. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this interesting image of a frog. Enjoy! |
The article One of the Boys (1989 TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:One of the Boys (1989 TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 13:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the newspaper sources in the Ratings list in the Golden Globe Awards article. I am using them to edit IMDb listings. I was wondering if you might have a good source to show that the Globes were not aired anywhere on TV from 1969 to 1972. Brndtnlsn ( talk) 20:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey!
I saw this and wanted to clarify something for you. I got a notification that an editor reverted my edit to
Justice (Justin Bieber album), I read their edit summary (which was basically the same as mine and which linked to
Template:Infobox song#released), I read the section, which made no mention that it was put in place 14 years ago, and I thought "hey, Taylor Swift released a bunch of songs solely to radio in promotion of Folklore and Evermore, and since this says to list the dates of singles that were only sent to radio as the day they were released from the album, I should change that". As well, most of the policies on Wikipedia were put in place more than a decade ago, so I don't see why you’re using all caps and telling me to revert when you don’t do that for anything else that was discussed in pre-2008 Wikipedia. Yes, Infobox instructions are not the MoS, but unless you can find something in the MoS that contradicts what is being said in the template doc, why are you even bringing it up? Lastly, what does I'm a bit tired of your unduly deference to instructions, whether they're relevant or not
mean? When do I defer from instructions so unduly that you get tired from it? Please clarify.
D🐶ggy54321 (
let's chat!)
22:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I will address everything after you indicate the source review has been completed, as I don't want to keep bothering you with pings and clouding up the nomination page with recurring notes of thanks. Please indicate it explicitly when done. I do understand if you regret taking on the source review of such a lengthy article, though. It sounds tedious! Regards.-- N Ø 01:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Yassin Bilal, music producer and music maker. I want an article in Wikipedia about my name and my work. Can you help me with that? Peace.maker14 ( talk) 04:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. Apologies for the message, but I remember that you mentioned possibly helping me with my current peer review for the Veronica Clare article and I was curious if you were still able to help. It seems like the peer review process was slowly becoming active, but it seems (at least to me) to have slipped back into its old state of dormancy. If you no longer have the time to do it, I completely understand. I just wanted to check in about this. I hope you have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 ( talk) 20:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, apologies for the random message. I have come across your comments in various FA nominations and was wondering if you'd be willing to leave some feedback here. The article became a GA in January and I wish to take to FA but would like to get as much feedback on how to improve it further. I'd really appreciate your comments. Thank you. -- Ashley yoursmile! 14:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The Reviewers Award | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 12:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks, Gog the Mild. I admire your dedication to the process and I can't imagine the time you must spend doing everything! Heartfox ( talk) 23:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
The Featured Article Medal | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks! Heartfox ( talk) 17:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
If you could by some chance leave input for the peer review linked above, then I'd very much appreciate that. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 03:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello again! I hope you are doing well and having a good week so far. Apologies for this random message. I was wondering if you could help me find the ratings for Katie Joplin? I completely understand if you say no. I was thinking about nominating the article for a FAC, but I am feeling insecure lately about FACs for some reason (and especially since this show is super obscure lol). Either way, have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 ( talk) 02:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you again for adding the ratings to the articles. Aoba47 ( talk) 04:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I have not finished going over all of your comments yet but have covered a good number of them, so could you try and respond soon in these areas? -- K. Peake 06:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
I've just posted about the latest update at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#U.S. TV ratings sources, but uh... yikes. Magitroopa ( talk) 19:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for the help with the Katie Joplin FAC. It was recently promoted as a FA. Your work on One of the Boys (1989 TV series) inspired to do this nomination as I genuinely did not believe the article would work in the FAC space (even though I had nominated other obscure, one-seasons shows in the past). I really enjoyed the experience with this FAC and I just wanted to thank you for inspiring me to do it in the first place! Aoba47 ( talk) 02:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC) |
@ Aoba47: Congratulations on the promotion with 8(!) supports! If you need viewership/ratings for anything just let me know :) Heartfox ( talk) 00:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey there! From reading WP:SINGLE?, I'm not sure if The Music Network can be used as a radio release date for Australia? I am guessing no? Cool Marc ✉ 15:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Heartfox, I have opened a peer review for Red prior to taking it to FAC. I am reaching out as you commented on Shake It Off's FAC. If you have the time and are willing, I would greatly appreciate any comment or advice that you could give at the review. If you are unable, that is totally fine as well. Thank you! -- TheSandDoctor Talk 01:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Simon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Boris Aronson The Firstborn Pyramid 1958.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{
self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for being kind and helpful. I really appreciate the time you have taken to review " Lights Up' and helped it become a FA. Viridian Bovary ( talk) 06:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
I just left comments for this. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 03:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I've brought it back to FAC. Since you gave it a source review the first time around, I was wondering if you might be interested in taking a second look. I've bulked up the reception section even more since the first nomination and believe the referencing is substantially improved overall. -- Bcschneider53 ( talk) 03:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox! I am very sorry to disturb you as I'm sure you're very busy. I have seen your comments at various FACs and have been impressed with your work at media and drama articles (and other articles too). I have opened up a peer review for My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic before hopefully nominating it for FAC; I was wondering if you would be able to leave comments here. If you are unable to or don't want to, that's totally understandable and fine. Thanks either way! Pamzeis ( talk) 00:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Heartfox, I wanted to check in with you regarding the source review for the FAC I am currently working on. If you're still interested, please consider leaving a comment there so the FAC coordinators can see the review is still active. If you're busy and no longer can complete the review, that's totally fine; please just leave a note explaining that on the FAC page so others will know the source review is not ongoing. Thanks! RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I'll try to remember that one - thanks for the fix. Girth Summit (blether) 22:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey again. Sorry for this super random message. I just wanted to reach out and see how you are doing. I hope you are having a good weekend so far! Aoba47 ( talk) 01:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy's Got the Heat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. I hope you are doing well and staying warm this season. My FAC has stalled, so I wonder if you could leave some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fearless (Taylor Swift album)/archive1? I would appreciate your input very much. Sorry for bothering you this way, and many thanks in advance. Best, Ippantekina ( talk) 09:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:13 East, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
Hello, Heartfox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rupert Hotel fire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again! I currently have Hannah Montana up as a Featured Article Candidate. If you are able to, I would appreciate your comments on the nomination, and thought you might be interested in the topic. I always appreciate any of your feedback, but I understand if you are unable to. Thank you! SatDis ( talk) 03:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again. I hope you are doing well and staying safe. Apologies for this random message and request. Since you did the source review for my FAC on " No Panties", I was wondering if you could possibly do one of my current FAC which is about another largely forgotten early 2000s song (" Laundromat")? I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. I just thought that I should ask since the FACs are somewhat similar in topic. I would be more than happy to assist you in any of your Wikipedia projects. Either way, have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 ( talk) 03:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you today for Here Is Mariah Carey, "about a 1993 video album by Mariah Carey filmed primarily at Proctor's Theater in Schenectady, New York. It is probably one of her most famous performances, having been watched by almost 20 million people on television during its original NBC broadcast and receiving a Platinum certification from RIAA."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
videos and television
Thank you for quality articles such as Here Is Mariah Carey, The Masked Singer (American TV series), One of the Boys (1989 TV series) and Live-In, for quality reviewing, for expanding, updating and corrections with specific edit summaries, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2723 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Please join this convo: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#AllAccess_radio :) Tree Critter ( talk) 07:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for closing that discussion. I wanted to ask how you took into account the non-neutral nature of the statement that led the RFC for the first four days that it was open, during which 75 editors !voted? BilledMammal ( talk) 03:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think you fairly summarised the arguments against the change; specifically the fact that The Times style guide still endorses "she" and "her" for ships, which was raised by several editors. This was the strongest counter-argument to the style guide-based argument for change imo. Ficaia ( talk) 05:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I have to agree with others here that are taking issue with your close. In the opening line of your close you stated: "In this RfC, there were slightly more editors supporting the MOS change than those in favour of keeping the status quo...
". That itself shows there was no consensus among the number of editors that took part in the RfC, which just leaves the strength of the arguments of one side vs. the other, and again, I don't see how a clear consensus for change could be determined. This was an very contentious issue, with numerous editors taking part. Some had already stated that it should be an admin close at the very least, if not one by panel. While I think there are merits to those positions, right now, I believe that at the very least you should undo your close and allow other processes to take up the issue. -
wolf
13:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
This is a courtesy notice advising you that a close review has been requested at WP:AN for the RfC regarding pronouns for ships that you recently closed. The close review may be found here. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, just wanted to say thank you for volunteering the time to read the MOS ships RFC and write a thoughtful close, and deal with the predictable post-close discussion. FWIW I think when our own guidelines already say to use gender neutral language, and 55% of editors and most style guides say the same, that's consensus, but apparently a sizable number of editors want to wait another two years until it's 60%. It reminds me of the change from "Kiev" to "Kyiv", and I'll never understand why so many editors fight so hard against what is obviously inevitable. Anyway, I appreciate the time you've volunteered for the project here even if it ends up getting overturned to no consensus. Thanks again, Levivich 02:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)