Sushant Pujari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 ( talk) 23:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC) reply

The article Chetan Dahiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to fame yet. WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie ( talk) 20:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chetan Dahiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetan Dahiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Coderzombie ( talk) 20:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Komal Thacker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komal Thacker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 ( talk) 20:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello Harishpednekar. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Sushant Pujari, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Harishpednekar. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Harishpednekar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. BubbaJoe123456 ( talk) 21:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Alice Fabbrica, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:03, 28 December 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Mery Racauchi (Artist), appears to be WP:COI/ WP:PAID editing without proper disclosure. I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title). You may submit it for review using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC) reply

You were asked on 27 December to clarify your paid status before making any other edit, but have ignored that request (section headed "December 2019"). Unless you comply with our WP:Terms of Use governing paid editing you will not be allowed to edit further. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Mery Racauchi, is WP:COI/ WP:PAID content and should be submitted through the AfC process. I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title). You may submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC) reply

must go through WP:AFC due to being WP:PAID

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mery Racauchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mery Racauchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alice Fabbrica, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Harishpednekar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Alice Fabbrica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jalen Folf (talk) 04:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC) reply