Hi
Hello, I'm
Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
User talk:STATicVapor without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Katieh5584 (
talk)
20:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
User talk:STATicVapor, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Katieh5584 (
talk)
20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Acroterion
(talk)
20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Mike V •
Talk
20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Hacienda Guy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What are you talking about? I'v made constructive edits here on Wikipedia, this is not fair, I'm new to this website, I deserve a second chance I can surely prove to you I'm capable of making a good encyclopedia. I request to be unblock
Decline reason:
Something like 95% of your edits were to other people's user talk pages. Yes, there were a few constructive edits. But ... while a broken clock is right twice a day, that doesn't mean you don't throw it away and get a new one if you think it's beyond repair. — Daniel Case ( talk) 00:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm a Wikipedia:Sock puppet of User:MRivera25, YOU WIN!!!. I tried to help you guys make a good reliable website and you all betrayed me, you all should be proad of yourselfs.-- Hacienda Guy ( talk) 16:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)MRivera25
Hi
Hello, I'm
Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
User talk:STATicVapor without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Katieh5584 (
talk)
20:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
User talk:STATicVapor, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Katieh5584 (
talk)
20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Acroterion
(talk)
20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Mike V •
Talk
20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Hacienda Guy ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What are you talking about? I'v made constructive edits here on Wikipedia, this is not fair, I'm new to this website, I deserve a second chance I can surely prove to you I'm capable of making a good encyclopedia. I request to be unblock
Decline reason:
Something like 95% of your edits were to other people's user talk pages. Yes, there were a few constructive edits. But ... while a broken clock is right twice a day, that doesn't mean you don't throw it away and get a new one if you think it's beyond repair. — Daniel Case ( talk) 00:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm a Wikipedia:Sock puppet of User:MRivera25, YOU WIN!!!. I tried to help you guys make a good reliable website and you all betrayed me, you all should be proad of yourselfs.-- Hacienda Guy ( talk) 16:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)MRivera25