Sss Greenpickles987 ( talk) 14:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Greenpickles987 ( talk) 14:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:PhoenixOS, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 03:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
May 22, you may be
blocked from editing.
Toddst1 (
talk)
14:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at May 22 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 ( talk) 14:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Motion picture content rating system, you may be blocked from editing. Betty Logan ( talk) 22:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Okay Greenpickles987 ( talk) 23:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
User talk:Greenpickles987.
Lemonaka (
talk)
23:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You removed content from Wikipedia with
this edit of yours to Union City High School (New Jersey), but without providing a rationale for this in an
edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
my talk page. Thanks.
Nightscream (
talk)
22:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Motion picture content rating system.
Betty Logan (
talk)
19:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
23:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Greenpickles987 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will never add unsourced content Greenpickles987 ( talk) 23:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below. I will leave the decision on whether to make the block indefinite to the outcome of any future unblock requests. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly
harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Lemonaka (
talk)
18:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 00:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Ok Greenpickles987 ( talk) 00:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to
User talk:Betty Logan has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Betty Logan (
talk)
14:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism, as you did here. The IP is in the right with the edits, so it’s probably best if you stop edit warring - you are removing correct information from the Film and Publication Board page. - SchroCat ( talk) 19:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No he isn’t. Greenpickles987 ( talk | contribs) 23:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
I request for an expiration date. Greenpickles987 ( talk | contribs) 11:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Greenpickles987 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You blocked me forever, I will never add unsourced information ever again Greenpickles987 ( talk
Decline reason:
Merely adding an expiration date to the block does not demonstrate your understanding of the reasons for the block or tell us what you will do differently. The block will be removed when you make a successful unblock request. Please read the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft a request likely to be accepted. 331dot ( talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Sss Greenpickles987 ( talk) 14:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Greenpickles987 ( talk) 14:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:PhoenixOS, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 03:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
May 22, you may be
blocked from editing.
Toddst1 (
talk)
14:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at May 22 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 ( talk) 14:24, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Motion picture content rating system, you may be blocked from editing. Betty Logan ( talk) 22:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Okay Greenpickles987 ( talk) 23:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
User talk:Greenpickles987.
Lemonaka (
talk)
23:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You removed content from Wikipedia with
this edit of yours to Union City High School (New Jersey), but without providing a rationale for this in an
edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of
my talk page. Thanks.
Nightscream (
talk)
22:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Motion picture content rating system.
Betty Logan (
talk)
19:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
23:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Greenpickles987 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will never add unsourced content Greenpickles987 ( talk) 23:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below. I will leave the decision on whether to make the block indefinite to the outcome of any future unblock requests. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly
harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Lemonaka (
talk)
18:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 00:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Ok Greenpickles987 ( talk) 00:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to
User talk:Betty Logan has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Betty Logan (
talk)
14:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism, as you did here. The IP is in the right with the edits, so it’s probably best if you stop edit warring - you are removing correct information from the Film and Publication Board page. - SchroCat ( talk) 19:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No he isn’t. Greenpickles987 ( talk | contribs) 23:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
I request for an expiration date. Greenpickles987 ( talk | contribs) 11:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Greenpickles987 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You blocked me forever, I will never add unsourced information ever again Greenpickles987 ( talk
Decline reason:
Merely adding an expiration date to the block does not demonstrate your understanding of the reasons for the block or tell us what you will do differently. The block will be removed when you make a successful unblock request. Please read the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft a request likely to be accepted. 331dot ( talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))