Hello, Gounder vamsam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director ( talk) 02:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kongu Vellalar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 11:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Urali Gounder. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay ( talk) 14:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Urali Gounder. - Arjayay ( talk) 12:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Urali Gounder, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay ( talk) 11:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Alex Bakharev ( talk) 12:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gounder vamsam ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

The last edit was a sourced compilation

Decline reason:

Your last two edits were this. If you believe you have properly cited that change, you either profoundly misunderstand WP:CITE or WP:CIR is at play here. Either way, the block is appropriate (or too short). Yamla ( talk) 12:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Urali Gounder. - Arjayay ( talk) 17:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Urali Gounder. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Alexf ^(talk) 11:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on User:Gounder vamsam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sheldybett ( talk) 11:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure what you were doing with Kongu. You seem to have been adding content to the wrong page. It's hard to imagine that "Urali Gounder" is commonly called "Kongu", or that "Urali munnetra kazhagam" is commonly called Kongu. -- Yamla ( talk) 16:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinitely for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.