{
I lol'ed. Tempshill ( talk) 16:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thanks for answering my poker hand question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk!-- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 00:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
Thank you! If you decide to register an account, please do pop by my userpage and say hello. -- Dweller ( talk) 14:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This user has visited 41 of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. | 41 |
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thanks for answering my Antarctica's GDP question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk!-- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 01:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thank you for answering my "fanfic law sentence" question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 18:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
I note your interest in the subject of micronations.
Wikipedia always welcomes a diversity of opinion, so you might wish to consider registering as a member of the WikiProject Micronations:
I look forward to working with you over coming months to improve and significantly extend Wikipedia's micronation content. -- Gene_poole ( talk) 01:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
I've made this edit :) hydnjo ( talk) 17:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
GM, I'd like to offer a suggestion: if you don't know the answer to something -- if you don't even know the basis from which the answer arises -- then please don't post opinion to the Ref Desk as if it were fact, as you've done here. That sort of misinformation is a disservice. — Lomn 13:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Oh, dear. :-( I think I erred as I was trying to avoid saying that problematic planets' name. Certainly not "I like Uranus"! Maybe I should use this,
but I can see problems with the symbol too! Maybe Neptune could be renamed Pluto, so Pluto would once again be the outer most planet? ;-)) The
third rock out ain't too bad, imho.--
220.101.28.25 (
talk)
03:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I just realized that my initial response at the Science reference desk might have sounded brusque. Sorry about that if it did. If I were to do research into volcanoes and ice, changes in eruption magnitudes and frequencies would be something I would investigate - it is a logical first step. I'm just not sure if it's correct. Awickert ( talk) 06:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey there - I just came across your recent series of edits at Deepwater Horizon oil spill. I guess you were trying out the colors, but without edit summaries that wasn't apparent, so I had to go thru each edit one at a time to make sure they were "okay", as all sorts of stuff turns up on this article.
So for future reference: When you're not quite sure about an edit you're working on, rather than saving each of your attempts, it's much better to make liberal use of the "show preview" button, which allows you to see the results of your edit before you hit the "save page" button. That way, all of those edits that aren't quite right don't clog up the edit history (which can be a real waste of time for other editors). Plus it saves you from having to leave an Edit summary for each one. Regards, Cgingold ( talk) 20:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi again - After leaving the note above, I returned to Deepwater Horizon oil spill and discovered your most recent edit. Since you are evidently still learning the ropes when it comes to editing, please be sure to take a look at my corrective edits, which were necessary to "clean up" your edit. (I see you are active at the Ref. Desk, so consider this an answer to your "unasked question". :) And again, please be sure to leave edit summaries. Cgingold ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
My bad. I was sitting on the right on the flight in Tasmania. See my amendment at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#British_aircraft. Cheers, -- jjron ( talk) 22:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I thought that I should point this out as the page will soon archive. -- 110.49.242.117 ( talk) 20:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
The article List of speeches given by Presidents of the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hairhorn (
talk)
15:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
{
I lol'ed. Tempshill ( talk) 16:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thanks for answering my poker hand question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk!-- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 00:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC) |
Thank you! If you decide to register an account, please do pop by my userpage and say hello. -- Dweller ( talk) 14:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This user has visited 41 of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. | 41 |
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thanks for answering my Antarctica's GDP question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk!-- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 01:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Reference Desk Barnstar | |
Thank you for answering my "fanfic law sentence" question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 18:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
I note your interest in the subject of micronations.
Wikipedia always welcomes a diversity of opinion, so you might wish to consider registering as a member of the WikiProject Micronations:
I look forward to working with you over coming months to improve and significantly extend Wikipedia's micronation content. -- Gene_poole ( talk) 01:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
I've made this edit :) hydnjo ( talk) 17:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
GM, I'd like to offer a suggestion: if you don't know the answer to something -- if you don't even know the basis from which the answer arises -- then please don't post opinion to the Ref Desk as if it were fact, as you've done here. That sort of misinformation is a disservice. — Lomn 13:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Oh, dear. :-( I think I erred as I was trying to avoid saying that problematic planets' name. Certainly not "I like Uranus"! Maybe I should use this,
but I can see problems with the symbol too! Maybe Neptune could be renamed Pluto, so Pluto would once again be the outer most planet? ;-)) The
third rock out ain't too bad, imho.--
220.101.28.25 (
talk)
03:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I just realized that my initial response at the Science reference desk might have sounded brusque. Sorry about that if it did. If I were to do research into volcanoes and ice, changes in eruption magnitudes and frequencies would be something I would investigate - it is a logical first step. I'm just not sure if it's correct. Awickert ( talk) 06:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey there - I just came across your recent series of edits at Deepwater Horizon oil spill. I guess you were trying out the colors, but without edit summaries that wasn't apparent, so I had to go thru each edit one at a time to make sure they were "okay", as all sorts of stuff turns up on this article.
So for future reference: When you're not quite sure about an edit you're working on, rather than saving each of your attempts, it's much better to make liberal use of the "show preview" button, which allows you to see the results of your edit before you hit the "save page" button. That way, all of those edits that aren't quite right don't clog up the edit history (which can be a real waste of time for other editors). Plus it saves you from having to leave an Edit summary for each one. Regards, Cgingold ( talk) 20:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi again - After leaving the note above, I returned to Deepwater Horizon oil spill and discovered your most recent edit. Since you are evidently still learning the ropes when it comes to editing, please be sure to take a look at my corrective edits, which were necessary to "clean up" your edit. (I see you are active at the Ref. Desk, so consider this an answer to your "unasked question". :) And again, please be sure to leave edit summaries. Cgingold ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
My bad. I was sitting on the right on the flight in Tasmania. See my amendment at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#British_aircraft. Cheers, -- jjron ( talk) 22:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I thought that I should point this out as the page will soon archive. -- 110.49.242.117 ( talk) 20:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
The article List of speeches given by Presidents of the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Hairhorn (
talk)
15:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)