This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble with editing the Yumeiro Pâtissière page. I was wondering what should I do when an editor and her friends (or possibly the editor herself using different accounts) change the article to what I think is a less Wikipedia-approved version? I have already tried discussing the issue with the main person, but she hasn't replied to me yet. I know I should wait a while, but I have a weird hunch that she has most definitely already at least seen my attempts to discuss the article with her. So, I don't know what to do if she continually ignores me and tries to win at this so-called editing war... In addition, I have discovered that most of the new changes taking place on this anime page are the exact same descriptions that were taken from the yumeiropatissierewikia page. (I'm too lazy to give citations right now but let me know if you want them).
But, in my opinion as of right now, the article should no longer be B-rated as it is currently.
So... what should I do when I can't even have a good discussion on what needs to be edited on this article?
If you are interested in helping me (please), then please look at this talk page on YP.
Please and thank you!!!!!!!! Reeniereindeer ( talk) 02:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
I would suggest to have have an RfC on the issue as it seemed no one else wanted to really comment on that one way or another. 陣 内 Jinnai 22:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know that you've done well on getting Serial Experiments Lain more in-line with the current style. :) -- Malkinann ( talk) 21:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
just to point to that FAC where that source is mentioned. In addition i saw that source in Summer Wars and in AfD. I would give it enough weight to be worth mention on a Wikipedia article. -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 20:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Any idea? Either Redline (movie) or Redline (Anime)? I leave the choice to you and can you move it to mainspace. Thanks.
Meanwhile i'm trying to figure out the remaining loses ends and a DYK hook.
I'm running out of brain fuel sorry :p
-- KrebMarkt ( talk) 20:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Added not one but two Twitch Film reviews. It happened that those two reviewers got into screening in different anime festivals.
Put it into DYK discussion here.
Crossing fingers now ;) -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 21:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
On 13 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Redline (2010 film), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 18:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Around 4.4K views for this DYK. We did well after all. Cheers ;) -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 18:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, long time no chat. I just finished rewriting List of Spice and Wolf episodes and was planning on submitting it to FLC. I do recall you giving me great advice last time I tried to run to FLC, so would you mind taking a look at it and telling me what you think? Thanks. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ♯ ♭ 17:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
|
The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award |
I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) — Farix ( t | c) 13:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For demonstrating an excellent response to a complicated discussion here. Maggie Dennis (WMF) ( talk) 16:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
I implemented the new style you showed of citing volumes in List of Naruto characters. It looks very good! Anyway, do you think it would work with the Fullmetal Alchemist lists as some volumes also contain Gaiden chapters apart from the regulars and do not use volume titles? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 02:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Fullmetal Alchemist: Volume #24. Gaiden chapter: "Daughter of the Dusk—Prologue".
Lack of volume titles isn't really a problem, since {{
gnn}} doesn't take care of the reference numbering and its |ref=
parameter is freestyle. You could do it like this:
Volume No. 24: Vol. 24 (ch. 21–24): March 7, 2001. ISBN XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X. (in Japanese). and August 1, 2004. ISBN XXX-X-XXXXX-XXX-X. (in English).
In any case, there's still massive room for improvement. Suggestions and criticism more than welcome. Good raise 04:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I received a CCI Notice from you for my latest Wiki edits. I work as the PR for a magazine and I have been editing our news onto Wikipedia, but apparently I have violated some rules by doing so. I think I was confused before as I thought if I completely cited our website as well as directly linking the exact news article I posted information from would suffice as a proper citation. I have re-edited my earlier posts, in hopes of editing the Wiki pages in an appropriate manner. From this point on, if I were to refer to our news articles as a source of information and re-write our news in a Wiki edit, would it be possible to have this CCI Notice revoked? I apologize for still being unfamiliar with all the editing rules on Wikipedia and violating these rules, but now that I am fully aware of my errors, I would greatly appreciate it if I could be forgiven for my errors and given another chance to properly contribute to the Wiki pages. Ohhellomai ( talk) 09:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
This has officially gotten out of hand with me and gwern and I can't figure out how to report. Can you tell me how or go someplace to do it? Lucia Black ( talk) 05:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
At Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year/archive1, you opposed by saying that it "Fails criterion 1" but didn't elaborate. For prose-based opposes, those of us who are directors like to see some examples provided that show a failure of the criterion. It adds weight to an oppose and helps us in our decision-making. If you get the opportunity, please consider returning to the FLC and posting a few representative weaknesses in the list. Thanks. Giants2008 ( Talk) 19:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
"I don't use a screen reader, but I suspect users of such software are likely to miss explanatory text to a table if that text is stored in the very last line of that table." this is a very good point. Would you prefer to see it as a key at the top of each section that uses such symbology? Surprising that it's not been picked up before. The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Ah, Goodraise, no need for apologies or a cookie, but thanks nevertheless. I have no issue with anything you've brought up, and I'm sorry to read that you have "dissatisfaction over the FLC process". Is there anything specific that we need to do better? I'd hate for this to turn into a counselling session, but there's no way I'd want one of most senior contributors to harbour some kind of issue without us getting an opportunity to perhaps do (or at least, start to do) something about it, improve the process and make it better for all. Times at WP:FLC are tough at the moment, we're down to our lowest ever turnover of featured lists (gone, perhaps thankfully, are the days of most cookie-cutter FLs, but nominations are few and reviewers fewer). Your comments on any FLC are always welcome, and I hope you know that. I've saved you half a cookie, just in case you pop back..... The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. I just wanted to ask you to reconsider your opposition to the functional hatnote. I picked you because your wording is so similar to how I think of the situation. Wikipedia doesn't need to get mixed up in censorship. Our readers should, in every browser, have the ability to view without images-- every browser has that.
I feel like pointing this out to our users, that their own browser can do this job for them, is the ideal solution. Once upon a time, my ideal solution was exactly the same as yours: Just educate readers about what their browser can do-- no images is a standard option.
Unfortunately, when I initially made that conclusion, I dramatically underestimated the cultural and technical barriers to IT education. Consider that I routinely am unable to help my grandparents understand very simple, user-friendly technology like a GPS or a cell phone. Now remember that my grandparents are unusually intelligent and highly educated-- they spent 12+ years of life in full time study, they learned to read as small children, they had every advantage, but they still could never figure out how to turn off images in their webbrowser. That's just the truth-- I know of no way to teach them how to do something that complicated.
Now, consider the population that is reading Wikipedia. They may not be fluent in English. They may not be highly literate. They may not be technically literate. Walking them through every possible language/browser combination with instructions on turning off images is very very difficult. I couldn't write a good walkthrough in English, how could I write one in Farsi?
The simple truth is that while telling users to turn off images using their browser is the IDEAL solution, philosophically speaking-- it doesn't work. We do not successfully communicate the instructions to our readers-- it's just a little too much.
It doesn't need to be this difficult though. Instead of making users click on talk, then on a subpage, then on instructions, then on their browser options-- we just need to have one simple box that toggles images.
I'm promise, I'm not trying to harass ya :). It's just your reasoning is right on. This should be handled in browser.
Two lines of javascript could end the whole "controversial images" debate. And with an in-page image toggle, NOTCENSORED would be even stronger. No valid complaints from readers-- we would seize the moral highground by pointing to the image toggle box any time someone brings up the notion of deletion. It would be a stable solution that educates are readons about how we don't censor, but we don't force images on people either.
Anyway, that's my pitch. :) Either way, thank you for participating in the RFC. :) -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 06:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. You have shown yourself to be a skilled image reviewer, and with that in mind I have a request for you. At Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of reptiles of Michigan/archive1, a supporter asked for an image review, and nobody has undertaken one yet. Would you please consider doing the honors? The list is otherwise ready for promotion, and I don't want to leave it at FLC for much longer if possible. Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the assessment on List of Highschool of the Dead characters. I'm adding a Reception section, and hopefully can find some sources for Creation and Conception. AngusWOOF ( talk) 21:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
I assume you're going to be sourcing, translating, adding real-world context and useful content to all these pointless articles yourself? Quite a brave project to take on yourself, good luck with that. Or you could accept that they existed for nearly 2 years without any noticeable improvement to suggest they warranted an article, and that in the following year nobody objected to their removal-- Jac16888 Talk 18:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I tried to use the Sublist feature on List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure volumes, but this did not end up working as planned and the chapter lists were never hidden in the substituted page (I've commented out the substitutions). It seems to be working fine on List of One Piece manga volumes, but I can't figure out why it's not working on the subpages here. Could you take a look seeing as you've worked on the template so much?— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 19:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
|SublistOf=
List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure volumes
. Template documentation updated.
Good
raise
03:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise, Thanks so much for coming over to Talk:Backend as a service and providing some insight about the inclusion of various company names in regards to WP:FLC. I agree with you that WP:FLC probably isn't the best to use for the issue at hand, but I like your suggestion of WP:DUE. I've posted some additional thoughts at Talk:Backend as a service. If you have time, I'd certainly appreciate your continued insight over there. Thanks! ChrisPond ( Talk · COI) 15:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated Nature reserves in Barnet for FL and The Rambling Man has suggested at [4] that I ask you to look over it. Any suggestions appreciated. Dudley Miles ( talk) 17:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Yandell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Yandell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Stoddard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Stoddard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble with editing the Yumeiro Pâtissière page. I was wondering what should I do when an editor and her friends (or possibly the editor herself using different accounts) change the article to what I think is a less Wikipedia-approved version? I have already tried discussing the issue with the main person, but she hasn't replied to me yet. I know I should wait a while, but I have a weird hunch that she has most definitely already at least seen my attempts to discuss the article with her. So, I don't know what to do if she continually ignores me and tries to win at this so-called editing war... In addition, I have discovered that most of the new changes taking place on this anime page are the exact same descriptions that were taken from the yumeiropatissierewikia page. (I'm too lazy to give citations right now but let me know if you want them).
But, in my opinion as of right now, the article should no longer be B-rated as it is currently.
So... what should I do when I can't even have a good discussion on what needs to be edited on this article?
If you are interested in helping me (please), then please look at this talk page on YP.
Please and thank you!!!!!!!! Reeniereindeer ( talk) 02:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
I would suggest to have have an RfC on the issue as it seemed no one else wanted to really comment on that one way or another. 陣 内 Jinnai 22:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to let you know that you've done well on getting Serial Experiments Lain more in-line with the current style. :) -- Malkinann ( talk) 21:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
just to point to that FAC where that source is mentioned. In addition i saw that source in Summer Wars and in AfD. I would give it enough weight to be worth mention on a Wikipedia article. -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 20:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Any idea? Either Redline (movie) or Redline (Anime)? I leave the choice to you and can you move it to mainspace. Thanks.
Meanwhile i'm trying to figure out the remaining loses ends and a DYK hook.
I'm running out of brain fuel sorry :p
-- KrebMarkt ( talk) 20:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Added not one but two Twitch Film reviews. It happened that those two reviewers got into screening in different anime festivals.
Put it into DYK discussion here.
Crossing fingers now ;) -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 21:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
On 13 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Redline (2010 film), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 18:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Around 4.4K views for this DYK. We did well after all. Cheers ;) -- KrebMarkt ( talk) 18:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, long time no chat. I just finished rewriting List of Spice and Wolf episodes and was planning on submitting it to FLC. I do recall you giving me great advice last time I tried to run to FLC, so would you mind taking a look at it and telling me what you think? Thanks. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR ♯ ♭ 17:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
|
The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award |
I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) — Farix ( t | c) 13:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For demonstrating an excellent response to a complicated discussion here. Maggie Dennis (WMF) ( talk) 16:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
I implemented the new style you showed of citing volumes in List of Naruto characters. It looks very good! Anyway, do you think it would work with the Fullmetal Alchemist lists as some volumes also contain Gaiden chapters apart from the regulars and do not use volume titles? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 02:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Fullmetal Alchemist: Volume #24. Gaiden chapter: "Daughter of the Dusk—Prologue".
Lack of volume titles isn't really a problem, since {{
gnn}} doesn't take care of the reference numbering and its |ref=
parameter is freestyle. You could do it like this:
Volume No. 24: Vol. 24 (ch. 21–24): March 7, 2001. ISBN XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X. (in Japanese). and August 1, 2004. ISBN XXX-X-XXXXX-XXX-X. (in English).
In any case, there's still massive room for improvement. Suggestions and criticism more than welcome. Good raise 04:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I received a CCI Notice from you for my latest Wiki edits. I work as the PR for a magazine and I have been editing our news onto Wikipedia, but apparently I have violated some rules by doing so. I think I was confused before as I thought if I completely cited our website as well as directly linking the exact news article I posted information from would suffice as a proper citation. I have re-edited my earlier posts, in hopes of editing the Wiki pages in an appropriate manner. From this point on, if I were to refer to our news articles as a source of information and re-write our news in a Wiki edit, would it be possible to have this CCI Notice revoked? I apologize for still being unfamiliar with all the editing rules on Wikipedia and violating these rules, but now that I am fully aware of my errors, I would greatly appreciate it if I could be forgiven for my errors and given another chance to properly contribute to the Wiki pages. Ohhellomai ( talk) 09:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
This has officially gotten out of hand with me and gwern and I can't figure out how to report. Can you tell me how or go someplace to do it? Lucia Black ( talk) 05:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
At Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year/archive1, you opposed by saying that it "Fails criterion 1" but didn't elaborate. For prose-based opposes, those of us who are directors like to see some examples provided that show a failure of the criterion. It adds weight to an oppose and helps us in our decision-making. If you get the opportunity, please consider returning to the FLC and posting a few representative weaknesses in the list. Thanks. Giants2008 ( Talk) 19:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
"I don't use a screen reader, but I suspect users of such software are likely to miss explanatory text to a table if that text is stored in the very last line of that table." this is a very good point. Would you prefer to see it as a key at the top of each section that uses such symbology? Surprising that it's not been picked up before. The Rambling Man ( talk) 14:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Ah, Goodraise, no need for apologies or a cookie, but thanks nevertheless. I have no issue with anything you've brought up, and I'm sorry to read that you have "dissatisfaction over the FLC process". Is there anything specific that we need to do better? I'd hate for this to turn into a counselling session, but there's no way I'd want one of most senior contributors to harbour some kind of issue without us getting an opportunity to perhaps do (or at least, start to do) something about it, improve the process and make it better for all. Times at WP:FLC are tough at the moment, we're down to our lowest ever turnover of featured lists (gone, perhaps thankfully, are the days of most cookie-cutter FLs, but nominations are few and reviewers fewer). Your comments on any FLC are always welcome, and I hope you know that. I've saved you half a cookie, just in case you pop back..... The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. I just wanted to ask you to reconsider your opposition to the functional hatnote. I picked you because your wording is so similar to how I think of the situation. Wikipedia doesn't need to get mixed up in censorship. Our readers should, in every browser, have the ability to view without images-- every browser has that.
I feel like pointing this out to our users, that their own browser can do this job for them, is the ideal solution. Once upon a time, my ideal solution was exactly the same as yours: Just educate readers about what their browser can do-- no images is a standard option.
Unfortunately, when I initially made that conclusion, I dramatically underestimated the cultural and technical barriers to IT education. Consider that I routinely am unable to help my grandparents understand very simple, user-friendly technology like a GPS or a cell phone. Now remember that my grandparents are unusually intelligent and highly educated-- they spent 12+ years of life in full time study, they learned to read as small children, they had every advantage, but they still could never figure out how to turn off images in their webbrowser. That's just the truth-- I know of no way to teach them how to do something that complicated.
Now, consider the population that is reading Wikipedia. They may not be fluent in English. They may not be highly literate. They may not be technically literate. Walking them through every possible language/browser combination with instructions on turning off images is very very difficult. I couldn't write a good walkthrough in English, how could I write one in Farsi?
The simple truth is that while telling users to turn off images using their browser is the IDEAL solution, philosophically speaking-- it doesn't work. We do not successfully communicate the instructions to our readers-- it's just a little too much.
It doesn't need to be this difficult though. Instead of making users click on talk, then on a subpage, then on instructions, then on their browser options-- we just need to have one simple box that toggles images.
I'm promise, I'm not trying to harass ya :). It's just your reasoning is right on. This should be handled in browser.
Two lines of javascript could end the whole "controversial images" debate. And with an in-page image toggle, NOTCENSORED would be even stronger. No valid complaints from readers-- we would seize the moral highground by pointing to the image toggle box any time someone brings up the notion of deletion. It would be a stable solution that educates are readons about how we don't censor, but we don't force images on people either.
Anyway, that's my pitch. :) Either way, thank you for participating in the RFC. :) -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 06:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise. You have shown yourself to be a skilled image reviewer, and with that in mind I have a request for you. At Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of reptiles of Michigan/archive1, a supporter asked for an image review, and nobody has undertaken one yet. Would you please consider doing the honors? The list is otherwise ready for promotion, and I don't want to leave it at FLC for much longer if possible. Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the assessment on List of Highschool of the Dead characters. I'm adding a Reception section, and hopefully can find some sources for Creation and Conception. AngusWOOF ( talk) 21:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
I assume you're going to be sourcing, translating, adding real-world context and useful content to all these pointless articles yourself? Quite a brave project to take on yourself, good luck with that. Or you could accept that they existed for nearly 2 years without any noticeable improvement to suggest they warranted an article, and that in the following year nobody objected to their removal-- Jac16888 Talk 18:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I tried to use the Sublist feature on List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure volumes, but this did not end up working as planned and the chapter lists were never hidden in the substituted page (I've commented out the substitutions). It seems to be working fine on List of One Piece manga volumes, but I can't figure out why it's not working on the subpages here. Could you take a look seeing as you've worked on the template so much?— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 19:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
|SublistOf=
List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure volumes
. Template documentation updated.
Good
raise
03:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Goodraise, Thanks so much for coming over to Talk:Backend as a service and providing some insight about the inclusion of various company names in regards to WP:FLC. I agree with you that WP:FLC probably isn't the best to use for the issue at hand, but I like your suggestion of WP:DUE. I've posted some additional thoughts at Talk:Backend as a service. If you have time, I'd certainly appreciate your continued insight over there. Thanks! ChrisPond ( Talk · COI) 15:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated Nature reserves in Barnet for FL and The Rambling Man has suggested at [4] that I ask you to look over it. Any suggestions appreciated. Dudley Miles ( talk) 17:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Yandell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Yandell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Stoddard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Stoddard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)