Welcome!
Hello, Gigacephalus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
— Ruakh TALK 16:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Just for the record, Dreadstar's revert of your recent edit to the Savage/Santorum article was, IMHO, quite appropriate. The subject of Savage's intent had already been deliberated and pretty well resolved. While you are correct that the "by-product" ultimately became the definition of choice, Savage's "intent", at least at the outset of the campaign, was non-specific as to that final product. Hope that helps assuage any heartburn you might have experienced because of the revert...and thanks for your participation. JakeInJoisey ( talk) 20:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Why do you write "see talk page" in the edit summary when you haven't commented there on the issue at all? Mewulwe ( talk) 10:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I see you have been adding some links such as Indecent Publications Tribunal and Indecent Publications Act to articles. Are you interested in creating those articles? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 20:38, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions. There was not much content in this article you created - please see the consensus to merge. I have done so. Please be sure that next time you create an article, you have enough material to make it an article - not just a dictionary definition. Thank you. Maschen ( talk) 10:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Run to completion scheduling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Four-quadrant movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Powers
T 15:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four-quadrant movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four-quadrant movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Regalian Properties has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 10:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Gigacephalus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
— Ruakh TALK 16:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Just for the record, Dreadstar's revert of your recent edit to the Savage/Santorum article was, IMHO, quite appropriate. The subject of Savage's intent had already been deliberated and pretty well resolved. While you are correct that the "by-product" ultimately became the definition of choice, Savage's "intent", at least at the outset of the campaign, was non-specific as to that final product. Hope that helps assuage any heartburn you might have experienced because of the revert...and thanks for your participation. JakeInJoisey ( talk) 20:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Why do you write "see talk page" in the edit summary when you haven't commented there on the issue at all? Mewulwe ( talk) 10:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I see you have been adding some links such as Indecent Publications Tribunal and Indecent Publications Act to articles. Are you interested in creating those articles? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 20:38, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions. There was not much content in this article you created - please see the consensus to merge. I have done so. Please be sure that next time you create an article, you have enough material to make it an article - not just a dictionary definition. Thank you. Maschen ( talk) 10:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Run to completion scheduling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Four-quadrant movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Powers
T 15:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four-quadrant movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four-quadrant movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Regalian Properties has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 10:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)