Hello, FropFrop, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
Ahunt (
talk)
11:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
you were welcomed by a canadian editor who has since retired in disgust of issues he encountered trying to cope with editing in general. it would be very good if we could have a conversation here or whereever to understand the background of the sorry state of western australian aboriginal material. it is up to you, I dont mind where... JarrahTree 09:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Your self appointed merge work has no other editors involved, and as a consequence the merge is not valid - at least the input by others is reasonable to expect, as to why I might have continued or not discussion doe snot give you carte blanche to change articles - some further investigation would show that notice boards are far more suitable. I consider your merge is invalid on the grounds that substantive changes to the two articles without further consultation lacks any sense of understanding as to how wikipedia works. Before you instigated the merge, the least you could have done would be to communicate - I have a very complicated watchlist situation and would assume that if you had such a compelling desire to merge the pages some form of communication with others JarrahTree 07:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
being silly - the actual numbers of watchers at either page or talk page over the last 90 days shows a sample that is simply not a viable sample.
but even then hardly a great sample at 3 a day average
is a better chance, but then many times various editors have taken issues about subjects, and the silence is deafening at times... It requires patience Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline - expecting instant responses is not where the longer term accumulation of editing success happens.
Of course if you wish to dismiss this all as silliness.... JarrahTree 11:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Organised crime in Australia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 09:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Based on a recent post, these templates might be of interest to you:
Mitch Ames ( talk) 02:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
When making and/or addressing multiple points at Talk:Whadjuk § RfC: Inclusion of Noongar words (or any other complex discussion), please consider:
That helps avoid scenarios like this, I felt the need to include timestamps in my reference to other posts because the posts for that single conversation/thread (search for "pure speculation") do not appear on the page chronologically or correctly threaded.
See also WP:TPG#Indentation and screen readers, Help:Talk_pages#Indentation.
Thanks. Mitch Ames ( talk) 05:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oregon Equal Suffrage Amendment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kathryn Clarke. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed your request for a more recent 'reliable' reference instead of the Jolliffe. There is some other research that build on his hypothesis, for example "Continuity and colonization : the evolution of Kentish settlement – Allan Everitt" or "The Jutish forest : a study of the Weald of Kent from 450 to 1380 A.D. – Witney, K. P", there are others. But they do not resolve the hypothesis one way or another. The reference from Martin Welch, in the article, suggests that Jolliffe 'strained the available evidence', Welch goes on to say, 'that the problems thus created [by Jolliffe's hypothesis] may be resolved one day'. As far as I know it still hasn't. Wilfridselsey ( talk) 16:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
your material is very thorough, but as it is conversational non article, is it possible to get a handle on the process of what next? JarrahTree 02:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kukatja (Western Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balgo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, FropFrop, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
Ahunt (
talk)
11:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
you were welcomed by a canadian editor who has since retired in disgust of issues he encountered trying to cope with editing in general. it would be very good if we could have a conversation here or whereever to understand the background of the sorry state of western australian aboriginal material. it is up to you, I dont mind where... JarrahTree 09:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Your self appointed merge work has no other editors involved, and as a consequence the merge is not valid - at least the input by others is reasonable to expect, as to why I might have continued or not discussion doe snot give you carte blanche to change articles - some further investigation would show that notice boards are far more suitable. I consider your merge is invalid on the grounds that substantive changes to the two articles without further consultation lacks any sense of understanding as to how wikipedia works. Before you instigated the merge, the least you could have done would be to communicate - I have a very complicated watchlist situation and would assume that if you had such a compelling desire to merge the pages some form of communication with others JarrahTree 07:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
being silly - the actual numbers of watchers at either page or talk page over the last 90 days shows a sample that is simply not a viable sample.
but even then hardly a great sample at 3 a day average
is a better chance, but then many times various editors have taken issues about subjects, and the silence is deafening at times... It requires patience Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline - expecting instant responses is not where the longer term accumulation of editing success happens.
Of course if you wish to dismiss this all as silliness.... JarrahTree 11:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Organised crime in Australia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 09:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Based on a recent post, these templates might be of interest to you:
Mitch Ames ( talk) 02:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
When making and/or addressing multiple points at Talk:Whadjuk § RfC: Inclusion of Noongar words (or any other complex discussion), please consider:
That helps avoid scenarios like this, I felt the need to include timestamps in my reference to other posts because the posts for that single conversation/thread (search for "pure speculation") do not appear on the page chronologically or correctly threaded.
See also WP:TPG#Indentation and screen readers, Help:Talk_pages#Indentation.
Thanks. Mitch Ames ( talk) 05:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oregon Equal Suffrage Amendment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kathryn Clarke. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed your request for a more recent 'reliable' reference instead of the Jolliffe. There is some other research that build on his hypothesis, for example "Continuity and colonization : the evolution of Kentish settlement – Allan Everitt" or "The Jutish forest : a study of the Weald of Kent from 450 to 1380 A.D. – Witney, K. P", there are others. But they do not resolve the hypothesis one way or another. The reference from Martin Welch, in the article, suggests that Jolliffe 'strained the available evidence', Welch goes on to say, 'that the problems thus created [by Jolliffe's hypothesis] may be resolved one day'. As far as I know it still hasn't. Wilfridselsey ( talk) 16:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
your material is very thorough, but as it is conversational non article, is it possible to get a handle on the process of what next? JarrahTree 02:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kukatja (Western Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balgo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)