This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canaan Union Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canaan Union Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iván Duque Márquez, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antioquia and Rafael Nieto ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Canaan Historical Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MTKASH TALK Contribs 15:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Voice Österreich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gustavus Zesch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavus Zesch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 15:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. FloridaArmy, thanks for creating John J. Fruin!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The content you have added so far is not sufficient for a biography. Please address this.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 21:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Stemmery, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please take the time to create articles with references please. You also have a typo in External Links.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 22:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
You wrote "There is a bot that fixes double redirects. Please stop deleting useful redirects as you did for Rose Wood Morrison and elsewhere. Deleting useful redirects is not G6 non controversial cleanup. Please restore this useful redirect of take it to a redirects for deletion discussion if you don't think it's useful. If you don't want to wait for a bot to fix a double redirect you can certaibly do it yourself."
Hello FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blaine Young for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Grave Creek, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Bloody Springs, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Domdeparis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
please do not create unsourced articles
To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Battle of Tuscumbia, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Domdeparis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
please add a category to the pages you create
To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
You ask "Are there female tribe members serving in the Alaska Legislature outside Alaska? Not being snarky. I might be missing something." Personally, I typically view statements such as that to be a case of grasping at straws to come up with an accolade for someone. Just some general background, Alaska Natives typically don't use the term "tribe" except in a legal sense. This doesn't carry quite the weight it does in other states because SCOTUS decided in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government that Indian Country is a void concept in Alaska due to the passage of ANCSA. Venetie and neighboring Arctic Village are a special case, as they were established as an IRA reservation sometime around the early 1940s, then chose to accept fee simple title to the reservation's lands rather than participate in the corporation scheme established under ANCSA. That's a little bit of a tangent, but yes, there are tribal organizations, just not quite in the more familiar sense down south. Anyway, there are Native women serving in other state legislatures, which is likely the intent of that particular specificity. Here is one currently serving in the Arizona Senate. My watchlist shows that editors are making a really big deal of Paulette Jordan winning the Democratic nomination for Idaho governor, and she was in the Idaho legislature until leaving to campaign for governor earlier this year. There's a few other states such as New Mexico, Oklahoma and Washington which have strong enough Native constituencies to where it's a pretty good bet that there are others.
My main concern upon seeing this article: there are certain topics in Alaska politics that I try and stay away from because of a possible COI, having been deeply involved in politics behind the scenes during the 1980s and 1990s. Virtually all of the new political biographies created about Alaska politicians the past few years have been persons with ties to a certain political consultant. I've mentioned this elsewhere, but I definitely have a COI as it concerns Chris Birch, a first-term representative who defeated multi-term incumbent Bob Lynn in the primary two years ago and is currently a candidate for Kevin Meyer's seat in the Senate. It makes us appear to be out of touch with reality when Birch's first claim to notability occurred the same year Zulkosky was born, yet no article. There are also other legislators with a more solid basis for notability than Zulkosky who lack articles, apparently for the only reason being that they're white and Republican. So much for NPOV. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 22:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Streblus elongatus, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This page might be a candidate for a redirect. It looks like the taxon may be under review. PLease do add a taxobox, refer to the family in the lead sentence and indicate why there's uncertainty over the name. Please also add IPNI and The Plant List references as sources. e.g. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2602776
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 10:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your good work on stemmery. Would you be interested in adding more about the labor history the Lebanon Woolen Mills please? Zigzig20s ( talk) 12:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Town Sports. Since you had some involvement with the Town Sports redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Peleg Chandler should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peleg Chandler .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven ( talk) 16:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Bloody Hills, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 14:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi FloridaArmy. When creating pages, would you please:
Look, you don't have to do this but it's polite to do so, and you should neither need nor expect other editors to regularly clean up after you. Clean up for good faith new editors is enough of a grind. More haste less speed please. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 07:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Betty Bartley, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 17:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newell W. Spicer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newell W. Spicer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 13:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gustavus Zesch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vicksburg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
talk
19:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adele Lacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adele Lacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades Godric 14:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
There was already an article for Harrison at William Henry Harrison (state legislator), which has a little more specific, so I merged (and added to) your article into that one.
Thanks for the information. From what I read about him in various sources, he's an interesting man!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 20:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
As a previous contributor, I thought I'd give you a heads up that a discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan H. Gardner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jan_H._Gardner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bangabandhu ( talk) 22:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The reference reads "Futter was married once before, in 1927, to Patricia Elizabeth Murphy, they divorced a few years later." This was before he married Lacy, thus she was his second wife. Deb ( talk) 13:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You've been counseled many times about creating articles with flimsy sourcing. This was your article when you finished with it on May 18. The AfD was submitted on May 22, more than enough time for you to have finished your work. Instead, others have finished it for you, which is great! Your account is old enough and you have enough edits to apply for access to Newspapers.com through WP:TWL (One requirement is that you not be currently blocked, so you will need to wait at least until your block expires). I strongly recommend you apply for access with that service and any other services that might be helpful. Your enthusiasm is great, but there is nothing in WP:BEFORE that requires a user to search newspapers.com for an individual, and it is frustrating to deal with your work. Your superior attitude ( for instance) compounds this. Relationships between editors is important, and I have working relationships with many editors with whom I have a fundamental disagreement with as regards to what makes an article suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I've written articles on much less important figures than Lacy or Spicer that, in spite of my many imperfections as an editor, have shown adequate sourcing and tone that they are not contributed to AfD. As you continue to have pages proposed for discussion or deletion, I hope you take it as a sign that you have lots to improve in your editing, because it certainly isn't a sign that any editors have any problem with you personally. Smmurphy( Talk) 16:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry you got a block, its best to avoid arguments if possible and if you get annoyed take a break instead of responding.(ive had a few arguments lately and they wear me out). Thanks for your AFD contributions, have you considered reviewing at Articles for Creation as they have a big backlog, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rayart Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dmartin969 ( talk) 17:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Dmartin969 ( talk) 17:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wellyn Totman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellyn Totman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford ( talk) 07:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Dear FloridaArmy, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Rayart Pictures. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam Talk 20:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
When writing articles, please make sure to place them in the appropriate categories. Eg. for a bio, [year] births and {year} deaths. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 16:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for your addition to the lead for the Walter Futter article. Do you have a source for your addition? Any time you add new content not already in the article, a source is needed. See MOS:LEADCITE. And, any claims, like "best known" need citations.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for the new article about B-Line Trail in Bloomington, Indiana. I see that the article is tagged because there is only one source.
Do you have other sources, by chance, for the article?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 14:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
The pdf file has a lot more details on the history and pollution, but that source works for a bit on funding of cleanup. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
This is another one source article.
It's absolutely your perogative to create bare-bone articles with just one source, but it would be really nice to round out the articles rather than leaving a string of tagged articles, or articles nominated for deletion.
It will help your Wikipedia street-cred quite a bit to work on creating articles that are at least start level articles with 3+ sources with notable content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Siddharth Kumar Tewary, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Louisiana State Cotton Museum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Court of Industrial Relations (Nebraska) /
Court of Industrial Relations (Nebraska), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Chester W. Keatts /
Chester W. Keatts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. –
CaroleHenson (
talk)
05:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
I am going to revert your edit again because: 1) You have a list of only one item 2) Her work is included in the body of the article 3) She doesn't have a huge body of work and a filmography section is not needed... and even calls attention to the fact that she doesn't have a large body of work (i.e., calls to attention notability question).
This is your third attempt to add a one item list. Why is this important to you?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 17:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
I see that you started the Rennock Lodge article and state that Rennock Lodge is a neighbourhood in Kingston, Jamaica. I added a {{ Dubious}} tag to this statement because I couldn't find coordinates for a neighbourhood with that name on maps. I did a google search and I am only finding a school of that name.
I checked your first source, and there's mention of Rennock Lodge... but not specifically that it's a neighborhood. Do you know where this neighborhood is located so that I can add coordinates? Do you have a source that specifically says it's a neighborhood?
As an FYI, I also added an {{ Importance}} tag to a statement about someone being a school dropout. Not sure why that is important.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dennis "Copper" Barth. Since you had some involvement with the Dennis "Copper" Barth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 22:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to Rennock Lodge appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters ( talk) 22:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canaan Historical Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canaan Historical Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( Help!) 17:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ruth Currie McDaniel should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Currie McDaniel .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Onel5969 TT me 11:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The article John R. Holmes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is no evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
CaroleHenson (
talk)
13:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
By you reverts and providing no feedback at the edit warring report I take it you have no response to the concerns of other editors? -- NeilN talk to me 13:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John R. Holmes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John R. Holmes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
In appreciation of your contributions on WikiProject Deletion sorting Pakistan. In my view, you have been very helpful. Thanks and Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 21:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of the West Indies (Jamaica) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of the West Indies (Jamaica) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 09:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Crystal Theatre (Gonzales, Texas) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Theatre (Gonzales, Texas) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
– CaroleHenson ( talk) 09:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Sitush ( talk) 17:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Apollon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Apollon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Saint Clair, Port of Spain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
14:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I have been adding content of interest to you to the Mona, Jamaica article about the sugar plantations, refugee camp, and the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies and still have more to add.
You have so many ideas for articles, that I am sure it is disheartening to be sanctioned. If you are interested in working together, I would be happy to work with you on this or other articles.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. The restriction in its entirely is
Not complying with the restriction will result in escalating blocks. If you have any questions or need clarification please feel free to ask me. Spartaz Humbug! 08:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Hund School and Draft:Hollywood Theater (Leavenworth, Kansas) are both NRHP listed and I added links to NRHP documentation. They both need improvement but even at this stage I believe they satisfy WP:GEOFEAT and could be moved back to main space. 24.151.50.175 ( talk) 17:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. FloridaArmy, thanks for creating Clarence L. Mohr!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please provide a citation for his post as chair of the history department to show he meets WP:NACADEMIC
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
You can still add people to Wikidata.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloody Springs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Springs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( Help!) 17:56, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
As per the decision at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#CIR_problems? I have moved the following pages to draft space to allow you to improve them so that they meet the neccessary standards to enter mainspace. As per the decision you must not move them yourself but submit them for review.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 13:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have written a number of articles about musicians and artists, where there are not always a great number of sources. Today I saw that there are some new tools available:
See the top of your Watchlist. Perhaps this is of interest to you to help find sources.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 20:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
If I am working on one of your drafts, with an {{ in use}} tag, please let me complete the work. Please note that there are times that I have worded something to avoid close-paraphrasing issues.
This is a warning that will remain in your talk history.
If you would like to work on one of your articles that was moved to draft space, there are still plenty to choose from.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 23:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Millstone Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millstone Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 14:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi FloridaArmy,
This is a last ditch effort to see if you are interested in following Wikipedia guidelines. I am in the process of putting together a posting for the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents board stating that even though you have been sanctioned, you have been ignoring the guidelines regarding:
A result of posting that could be an indefinite ban. Are you at all interested in learning and following guidelines?
If not, I think I have a strong case and will move forward of your continued editing activity against guidelines. I hope that this might give you a different viewpoint and you might choose to follow guidelines.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 16:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Normie (slang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normie (slang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris ( talk) 17:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
I just gone through the page creations here from the first Maureen Callahan created on 28/11/2017 to Pronovias created on the 14/01/2018 (87 articles) and the following 25 have been moved to draft space. Of the articles I haven't moved 13 have already been deleted, I have Prodded 1 and sent 1 to Afd. This makes a grand total of 40 articles. Which leaves 47 that IMHO are acceptable, either because others have extensively edited or they were Ok in the first place. There are still more than 230 article creations to go through. I do not believe I have been severe, I have looked at every single source in each article that I have moved where there were some as a few were totally unsourced, all my moves have edit summaries that explain why I moved them.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 18:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
I removed the pic because I thought it was on the wrong article and could be somewhat misleading. That was the image of the old high school, not the new one, which is what the article is about. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 02:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The following pages have been moved to draft space. I have moved obvious exemples with just a reference to the community decision those that are not obvious I have checked out notability, sourcing and history and where there is a serious doubt I have moved them giving my reasoning for doing it in the edit summary. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need more information as to why.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 16:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, @ Domdeparis, Deb, and EditoroftheWiki:, others, I am going to start working on the rest of the drafts. It will be actually be a lot easier to start the review with the stubs. (I got all messed up on the last article and mixed up the citations initially. Migraine doesn't help.)
I may not do tons of research, but keep some of the drafts in stub or early start versions.
Question: once I have reviewed/edited (RS, content to sources, encyclopedic content, etc.) and added some more content - what is needed to move to article space (e.g., # of citations, other)?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 21:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kidd Harold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidd Harold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 03:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
By changing this article in mainspace when it had already been moved to Draft, you have lost the edit history. How do you plan to rectify this? Deb ( talk) 13:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
For the Eppse article, the easiest thing would probably be to copy the updated article over to the draft space version and then move that article to article space. Due to editing restrictions I am unable to do that. FloridaArmy ( talk) 13:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Done, having the history brought back for Old Kickapoo and Draft:Old Kickapoo. They direct to the specific section where the content was merged.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 21:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
About stuff which has gone down, I want to say that I am sorry I did not get to the wp:ANI proceeding where a ban on new articles and ban from AFD was proposed, though I did get notified and saw it. I was brooding about participating there, then it was finished before I did. I have overlapped with you on historic sites and some other places articles, and on some interesting American Civil War officers, but I have not followed and am not good on bio articles and other articles you do. It takes a lot to have a whole perspective. Maybe I could have spoken up well enough to swing the outcome on one of those bans, if I could have been very eloquent about what Wikipedia is and should be (including that articles don't have to be perfect when born) and should not be (unnecessary following/harrassment), but I guess I wasn't up to it because I didn't speak. I am sorry. I too had proceedings about me in a number of wp:ANI proceedings and eventually a horrible arbitration experience, and I did/do feel there was awful s*** that went down in my case. At my user page I state that "my overwhelming personal experience in Wikipedia has been learning firsthand about bullying and harassment, which goes on too often," and that is the truth.
But, that said, it is not too terrible to have a ban on creating new articles in mainspace. I had that imposed and it was basically perfectly fine. I continued creating articles on NRHP-listed places in draftspace and submitting them through AFC, and I had nice interactions with conscientious, nice AFC editors. Some of them were happy to see my submissions because mine were generally quite obviously notable topics and I had sources and so on. They created a special category for my contributions, even. :) I was in fact influenced in the process, to take more care in my new articles to include categories and address other aspects which I thought were unimportant myself but I gradually realized seemed to matter to other people. The AFC editors were not to blame. And it is never a problem if a new article is declined or not reviewed for a while; some delay is never a tragedy, and the drafts got more attention and development eventually and nothing was really lost by the AFC process. I hope you will keep your chin up and keep contributing largely as you have done in the past, though necessarily a bit differently now. It will work out in the long run for you too I expect. Cheers, -- Doncram ( talk) 18:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I see that this article has been directed to University of the West Indies as a result of the deletion discussion. I moved over content that you added regarding the hospital into the history section.
I didn't move over the content about the programs because much of it was announcements about something to come, which will be notable once it happens. So, that can be added later. There was also some information that didn't seem particularly notable without context - the scholarships, premiering a film, etc.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 13:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
UWI F.C. (University of the West Indies F.C.)
Conference Marley's Music, Reggae, Rastafari, and Jamaican Culture, Held at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, 5-6 February 1995
References
Hi,
It's great to see your work on drafts! Do you want Doncram, me, or someone else to review the work that you've done, with the objective of getting them ready to move to article space?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 14:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 19:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Hello, FloridaArmy!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
RoySmith
(talk)
17:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
|
(Outdent) Serial, I'm not sure what you mean that in the Victorian era people had the luxury of publishing books on anything? Publishing especially with engravings was a fairly expensive and involved task was it not? Just one version of Brittanica Depicta took years to complete as I recall. These were major works of historical importance. To a collector or museum or pageless encyclooedia it would certainly seem to me to be worthwhile to include a synopsis of what we can establish about the artists involved. FloridaArmy ( talk) 19:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, about Draft:A. Warren Gould (to go to A. Warren Gould), thanks for contacting me. Per the NRIS database 2013/2014 version, he is credited as architect of just one NRHP-listed building, Arctic Building, already mentioned in the article. But I added the NRHP document to the building article, and, bingo, there is a short bio about him including birthyear and listing various works, in the NRHP document. You may or may not know that I have developed lots of articles about architects, in Category:NRHP architects. Usually one or more of their buildings' NRHP documents have bio info like this. I use the "Query by architect" tool at http://elkman.net/nrhp/ to find their buildings, and the "Create an infobox for a given property" tool's link to NRHP document for any one given property. Here this yields not a whole lot, but enough. I'll watchlist it. Hope this helps. -- Doncram ( talk) 18:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canaan Union Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canaan Union Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iván Duque Márquez, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antioquia and Rafael Nieto ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Canaan Historical Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MTKASH TALK Contribs 15:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Voice Österreich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gustavus Zesch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavus Zesch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 15:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. FloridaArmy, thanks for creating John J. Fruin!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The content you have added so far is not sufficient for a biography. Please address this.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 21:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Stemmery, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please take the time to create articles with references please. You also have a typo in External Links.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 22:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
You wrote "There is a bot that fixes double redirects. Please stop deleting useful redirects as you did for Rose Wood Morrison and elsewhere. Deleting useful redirects is not G6 non controversial cleanup. Please restore this useful redirect of take it to a redirects for deletion discussion if you don't think it's useful. If you don't want to wait for a bot to fix a double redirect you can certaibly do it yourself."
Hello FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blaine Young for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Grave Creek, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Bloody Springs, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Domdeparis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
please do not create unsourced articles
To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Battle of Tuscumbia, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Domdeparis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
please add a category to the pages you create
To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
You ask "Are there female tribe members serving in the Alaska Legislature outside Alaska? Not being snarky. I might be missing something." Personally, I typically view statements such as that to be a case of grasping at straws to come up with an accolade for someone. Just some general background, Alaska Natives typically don't use the term "tribe" except in a legal sense. This doesn't carry quite the weight it does in other states because SCOTUS decided in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government that Indian Country is a void concept in Alaska due to the passage of ANCSA. Venetie and neighboring Arctic Village are a special case, as they were established as an IRA reservation sometime around the early 1940s, then chose to accept fee simple title to the reservation's lands rather than participate in the corporation scheme established under ANCSA. That's a little bit of a tangent, but yes, there are tribal organizations, just not quite in the more familiar sense down south. Anyway, there are Native women serving in other state legislatures, which is likely the intent of that particular specificity. Here is one currently serving in the Arizona Senate. My watchlist shows that editors are making a really big deal of Paulette Jordan winning the Democratic nomination for Idaho governor, and she was in the Idaho legislature until leaving to campaign for governor earlier this year. There's a few other states such as New Mexico, Oklahoma and Washington which have strong enough Native constituencies to where it's a pretty good bet that there are others.
My main concern upon seeing this article: there are certain topics in Alaska politics that I try and stay away from because of a possible COI, having been deeply involved in politics behind the scenes during the 1980s and 1990s. Virtually all of the new political biographies created about Alaska politicians the past few years have been persons with ties to a certain political consultant. I've mentioned this elsewhere, but I definitely have a COI as it concerns Chris Birch, a first-term representative who defeated multi-term incumbent Bob Lynn in the primary two years ago and is currently a candidate for Kevin Meyer's seat in the Senate. It makes us appear to be out of touch with reality when Birch's first claim to notability occurred the same year Zulkosky was born, yet no article. There are also other legislators with a more solid basis for notability than Zulkosky who lack articles, apparently for the only reason being that they're white and Republican. So much for NPOV. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 22:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Streblus elongatus, FloridaArmy!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This page might be a candidate for a redirect. It looks like the taxon may be under review. PLease do add a taxobox, refer to the family in the lead sentence and indicate why there's uncertainty over the name. Please also add IPNI and The Plant List references as sources. e.g. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2602776
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 10:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your good work on stemmery. Would you be interested in adding more about the labor history the Lebanon Woolen Mills please? Zigzig20s ( talk) 12:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Town Sports. Since you had some involvement with the Town Sports redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dom from Paris ( talk) 15:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Peleg Chandler should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peleg Chandler .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven ( talk) 16:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Battle of Bloody Hills, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 14:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi FloridaArmy. When creating pages, would you please:
Look, you don't have to do this but it's polite to do so, and you should neither need nor expect other editors to regularly clean up after you. Clean up for good faith new editors is enough of a grind. More haste less speed please. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 07:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Betty Bartley, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 17:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newell W. Spicer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newell W. Spicer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 13:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gustavus Zesch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vicksburg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
talk
19:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adele Lacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adele Lacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades Godric 14:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
There was already an article for Harrison at William Henry Harrison (state legislator), which has a little more specific, so I merged (and added to) your article into that one.
Thanks for the information. From what I read about him in various sources, he's an interesting man!– CaroleHenson ( talk) 20:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
As a previous contributor, I thought I'd give you a heads up that a discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan H. Gardner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jan_H._Gardner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bangabandhu ( talk) 22:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The reference reads "Futter was married once before, in 1927, to Patricia Elizabeth Murphy, they divorced a few years later." This was before he married Lacy, thus she was his second wife. Deb ( talk) 13:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You've been counseled many times about creating articles with flimsy sourcing. This was your article when you finished with it on May 18. The AfD was submitted on May 22, more than enough time for you to have finished your work. Instead, others have finished it for you, which is great! Your account is old enough and you have enough edits to apply for access to Newspapers.com through WP:TWL (One requirement is that you not be currently blocked, so you will need to wait at least until your block expires). I strongly recommend you apply for access with that service and any other services that might be helpful. Your enthusiasm is great, but there is nothing in WP:BEFORE that requires a user to search newspapers.com for an individual, and it is frustrating to deal with your work. Your superior attitude ( for instance) compounds this. Relationships between editors is important, and I have working relationships with many editors with whom I have a fundamental disagreement with as regards to what makes an article suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I've written articles on much less important figures than Lacy or Spicer that, in spite of my many imperfections as an editor, have shown adequate sourcing and tone that they are not contributed to AfD. As you continue to have pages proposed for discussion or deletion, I hope you take it as a sign that you have lots to improve in your editing, because it certainly isn't a sign that any editors have any problem with you personally. Smmurphy( Talk) 16:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry you got a block, its best to avoid arguments if possible and if you get annoyed take a break instead of responding.(ive had a few arguments lately and they wear me out). Thanks for your AFD contributions, have you considered reviewing at Articles for Creation as they have a big backlog, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rayart Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dmartin969 ( talk) 17:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Dmartin969 ( talk) 17:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wellyn Totman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellyn Totman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford ( talk) 07:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Dear FloridaArmy, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Rayart Pictures. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam Talk 20:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC) |
When writing articles, please make sure to place them in the appropriate categories. Eg. for a bio, [year] births and {year} deaths. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 16:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for your addition to the lead for the Walter Futter article. Do you have a source for your addition? Any time you add new content not already in the article, a source is needed. See MOS:LEADCITE. And, any claims, like "best known" need citations.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for the new article about B-Line Trail in Bloomington, Indiana. I see that the article is tagged because there is only one source.
Do you have other sources, by chance, for the article?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 14:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
The pdf file has a lot more details on the history and pollution, but that source works for a bit on funding of cleanup. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
This is another one source article.
It's absolutely your perogative to create bare-bone articles with just one source, but it would be really nice to round out the articles rather than leaving a string of tagged articles, or articles nominated for deletion.
It will help your Wikipedia street-cred quite a bit to work on creating articles that are at least start level articles with 3+ sources with notable content.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Siddharth Kumar Tewary, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Louisiana State Cotton Museum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Court of Industrial Relations (Nebraska) /
Court of Industrial Relations (Nebraska), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
04:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Draft:Chester W. Keatts /
Chester W. Keatts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. –
CaroleHenson (
talk)
05:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
I am going to revert your edit again because: 1) You have a list of only one item 2) Her work is included in the body of the article 3) She doesn't have a huge body of work and a filmography section is not needed... and even calls attention to the fact that she doesn't have a large body of work (i.e., calls to attention notability question).
This is your third attempt to add a one item list. Why is this important to you?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 17:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
I see that you started the Rennock Lodge article and state that Rennock Lodge is a neighbourhood in Kingston, Jamaica. I added a {{ Dubious}} tag to this statement because I couldn't find coordinates for a neighbourhood with that name on maps. I did a google search and I am only finding a school of that name.
I checked your first source, and there's mention of Rennock Lodge... but not specifically that it's a neighborhood. Do you know where this neighborhood is located so that I can add coordinates? Do you have a source that specifically says it's a neighborhood?
As an FYI, I also added an {{ Importance}} tag to a statement about someone being a school dropout. Not sure why that is important.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dennis "Copper" Barth. Since you had some involvement with the Dennis "Copper" Barth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 22:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to Rennock Lodge appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters ( talk) 22:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canaan Historical Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canaan Historical Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( Help!) 17:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ruth Currie McDaniel should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Currie McDaniel .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Onel5969 TT me 11:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The article John R. Holmes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is no evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. –
CaroleHenson (
talk)
13:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
By you reverts and providing no feedback at the edit warring report I take it you have no response to the concerns of other editors? -- NeilN talk to me 13:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John R. Holmes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John R. Holmes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 19:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
In appreciation of your contributions on WikiProject Deletion sorting Pakistan. In my view, you have been very helpful. Thanks and Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 21:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of the West Indies (Jamaica) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of the West Indies (Jamaica) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 09:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FloridaArmy,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Crystal Theatre (Gonzales, Texas) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Theatre (Gonzales, Texas) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
– CaroleHenson ( talk) 09:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Sitush ( talk) 17:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Apollon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Apollon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Saint Clair, Port of Spain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Brad
v
14:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
I have been adding content of interest to you to the Mona, Jamaica article about the sugar plantations, refugee camp, and the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies and still have more to add.
You have so many ideas for articles, that I am sure it is disheartening to be sanctioned. If you are interested in working together, I would be happy to work with you on this or other articles.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 15:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. The restriction in its entirely is
Not complying with the restriction will result in escalating blocks. If you have any questions or need clarification please feel free to ask me. Spartaz Humbug! 08:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Hund School and Draft:Hollywood Theater (Leavenworth, Kansas) are both NRHP listed and I added links to NRHP documentation. They both need improvement but even at this stage I believe they satisfy WP:GEOFEAT and could be moved back to main space. 24.151.50.175 ( talk) 17:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. FloridaArmy, thanks for creating Clarence L. Mohr!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please provide a citation for his post as chair of the history department to show he meets WP:NACADEMIC
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
You can still add people to Wikidata.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloody Springs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Springs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy ( Help!) 17:56, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
As per the decision at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#CIR_problems? I have moved the following pages to draft space to allow you to improve them so that they meet the neccessary standards to enter mainspace. As per the decision you must not move them yourself but submit them for review.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 13:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have written a number of articles about musicians and artists, where there are not always a great number of sources. Today I saw that there are some new tools available:
See the top of your Watchlist. Perhaps this is of interest to you to help find sources.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 20:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
If I am working on one of your drafts, with an {{ in use}} tag, please let me complete the work. Please note that there are times that I have worded something to avoid close-paraphrasing issues.
This is a warning that will remain in your talk history.
If you would like to work on one of your articles that was moved to draft space, there are still plenty to choose from.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 23:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Millstone Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millstone Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 ( talk) 14:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi FloridaArmy,
This is a last ditch effort to see if you are interested in following Wikipedia guidelines. I am in the process of putting together a posting for the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents board stating that even though you have been sanctioned, you have been ignoring the guidelines regarding:
A result of posting that could be an indefinite ban. Are you at all interested in learning and following guidelines?
If not, I think I have a strong case and will move forward of your continued editing activity against guidelines. I hope that this might give you a different viewpoint and you might choose to follow guidelines.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 16:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Normie (slang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normie (slang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris ( talk) 17:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
I just gone through the page creations here from the first Maureen Callahan created on 28/11/2017 to Pronovias created on the 14/01/2018 (87 articles) and the following 25 have been moved to draft space. Of the articles I haven't moved 13 have already been deleted, I have Prodded 1 and sent 1 to Afd. This makes a grand total of 40 articles. Which leaves 47 that IMHO are acceptable, either because others have extensively edited or they were Ok in the first place. There are still more than 230 article creations to go through. I do not believe I have been severe, I have looked at every single source in each article that I have moved where there were some as a few were totally unsourced, all my moves have edit summaries that explain why I moved them.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 18:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
I removed the pic because I thought it was on the wrong article and could be somewhat misleading. That was the image of the old high school, not the new one, which is what the article is about. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 02:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The following pages have been moved to draft space. I have moved obvious exemples with just a reference to the community decision those that are not obvious I have checked out notability, sourcing and history and where there is a serious doubt I have moved them giving my reasoning for doing it in the edit summary. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need more information as to why.
Dom from Paris ( talk) 16:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
FloridaArmy, @ Domdeparis, Deb, and EditoroftheWiki:, others, I am going to start working on the rest of the drafts. It will be actually be a lot easier to start the review with the stubs. (I got all messed up on the last article and mixed up the citations initially. Migraine doesn't help.)
I may not do tons of research, but keep some of the drafts in stub or early start versions.
Question: once I have reviewed/edited (RS, content to sources, encyclopedic content, etc.) and added some more content - what is needed to move to article space (e.g., # of citations, other)?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 21:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kidd Harold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidd Harold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 03:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
By changing this article in mainspace when it had already been moved to Draft, you have lost the edit history. How do you plan to rectify this? Deb ( talk) 13:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
For the Eppse article, the easiest thing would probably be to copy the updated article over to the draft space version and then move that article to article space. Due to editing restrictions I am unable to do that. FloridaArmy ( talk) 13:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Done, having the history brought back for Old Kickapoo and Draft:Old Kickapoo. They direct to the specific section where the content was merged.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 21:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
About stuff which has gone down, I want to say that I am sorry I did not get to the wp:ANI proceeding where a ban on new articles and ban from AFD was proposed, though I did get notified and saw it. I was brooding about participating there, then it was finished before I did. I have overlapped with you on historic sites and some other places articles, and on some interesting American Civil War officers, but I have not followed and am not good on bio articles and other articles you do. It takes a lot to have a whole perspective. Maybe I could have spoken up well enough to swing the outcome on one of those bans, if I could have been very eloquent about what Wikipedia is and should be (including that articles don't have to be perfect when born) and should not be (unnecessary following/harrassment), but I guess I wasn't up to it because I didn't speak. I am sorry. I too had proceedings about me in a number of wp:ANI proceedings and eventually a horrible arbitration experience, and I did/do feel there was awful s*** that went down in my case. At my user page I state that "my overwhelming personal experience in Wikipedia has been learning firsthand about bullying and harassment, which goes on too often," and that is the truth.
But, that said, it is not too terrible to have a ban on creating new articles in mainspace. I had that imposed and it was basically perfectly fine. I continued creating articles on NRHP-listed places in draftspace and submitting them through AFC, and I had nice interactions with conscientious, nice AFC editors. Some of them were happy to see my submissions because mine were generally quite obviously notable topics and I had sources and so on. They created a special category for my contributions, even. :) I was in fact influenced in the process, to take more care in my new articles to include categories and address other aspects which I thought were unimportant myself but I gradually realized seemed to matter to other people. The AFC editors were not to blame. And it is never a problem if a new article is declined or not reviewed for a while; some delay is never a tragedy, and the drafts got more attention and development eventually and nothing was really lost by the AFC process. I hope you will keep your chin up and keep contributing largely as you have done in the past, though necessarily a bit differently now. It will work out in the long run for you too I expect. Cheers, -- Doncram ( talk) 18:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I see that this article has been directed to University of the West Indies as a result of the deletion discussion. I moved over content that you added regarding the hospital into the history section.
I didn't move over the content about the programs because much of it was announcements about something to come, which will be notable once it happens. So, that can be added later. There was also some information that didn't seem particularly notable without context - the scholarships, premiering a film, etc.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 13:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
UWI F.C. (University of the West Indies F.C.)
Conference Marley's Music, Reggae, Rastafari, and Jamaican Culture, Held at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, 5-6 February 1995
References
Hi,
It's great to see your work on drafts! Do you want Doncram, me, or someone else to review the work that you've done, with the objective of getting them ready to move to article space?– CaroleHenson ( talk) 14:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 19:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Hello, FloridaArmy!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
RoySmith
(talk)
17:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
|
(Outdent) Serial, I'm not sure what you mean that in the Victorian era people had the luxury of publishing books on anything? Publishing especially with engravings was a fairly expensive and involved task was it not? Just one version of Brittanica Depicta took years to complete as I recall. These were major works of historical importance. To a collector or museum or pageless encyclooedia it would certainly seem to me to be worthwhile to include a synopsis of what we can establish about the artists involved. FloridaArmy ( talk) 19:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, about Draft:A. Warren Gould (to go to A. Warren Gould), thanks for contacting me. Per the NRIS database 2013/2014 version, he is credited as architect of just one NRHP-listed building, Arctic Building, already mentioned in the article. But I added the NRHP document to the building article, and, bingo, there is a short bio about him including birthyear and listing various works, in the NRHP document. You may or may not know that I have developed lots of articles about architects, in Category:NRHP architects. Usually one or more of their buildings' NRHP documents have bio info like this. I use the "Query by architect" tool at http://elkman.net/nrhp/ to find their buildings, and the "Create an infobox for a given property" tool's link to NRHP document for any one given property. Here this yields not a whole lot, but enough. I'll watchlist it. Hope this helps. -- Doncram ( talk) 18:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)