![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Flewis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
--
Danski14
(talk)
19:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Oops! I hadn't seen that you were the author of that post. While I'm replacing your edit, feel free to slap me with a trout. miquonranger03 ( talk) 02:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Enema cocktail, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone ( talk) 11:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I forgot to mention this before, but if you are uploading a public domain or (I think) GFDL image, you should upload it to Wikimedia Commons. If you upload an image with the intent to claim fair use, you should upload it to Wikipedia. -- Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for signing my guestbook. LAA Fan |
Anytime. I couldn't leave such a nice comment about my userpage unnoticed. :)-- LAA Fan sign review 04:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for those kind words :), umm for starters it's going to need better prose, so the lead will have to be a bit more detailed in explaining the Mark of the Year and all other related subjects needed in the lead (with reliable sources of course. Then you will have to format the table, and make the key into a table and instead of having the references external links make them references.-- S R X 13:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that there is a large group of editors who feel that any school is inherently notable. Accordingly, schools fall outside the scope of the A7 criterion. There are a number of other criterion that could get a school's article deleted (A1, A3, G10, G12), but the presumption is that being a school is an assertion of notability. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for signing my guestbook, and for the compliment. BTW, your page is nice too. Chamal Talk ± 02:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Chamal
Talk
± has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi. I have enabled your rollback rights. Please review the instructions at Wikipedia:Rollback feature, and practice using the tool at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Persistent misuse may lead to the tools removal. Regards. Epbr123 ( talk) 14:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I would like you to voice in on the removal of the MacDonald phrase on the Bush Doctrine article. It is blatantly anti-Semitic, fully objectionable and purports a non-NPOV view. It sabotages the reputability of the article and Wikipedia. I appeal to you for voting at Talk:Bush Doctrine#Central criticism. Also, you accusation of me vandalizing the article I have been contributing much to is incomprehensible to me - could you please explain further your rationale? I wanted the phrase removed, while User:Korny O'Near kept reintroducing the phrase. I subsequently asked for at least a compromise to include the full sentence - which you judged as vandalism. I find that utterly confusing, and do not understand how you would support something so non-NPOV as that anti-Semitic statement in an article on US foreign policy. It frankly baffles me... Please add you vote on the Talk page, since you have already been part of enforcing the phrase in place. Thanks. Scierguy ( talk) 06:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Approved :) Pedro : Chat 08:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Pedro : Chat 12:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Super Secret Barnstar |
This user has found RyRy's Secret Page! Who will be next? Can you find my Secret Page? Ver. 2.5 |
Did you revert my edit from Mr McMahon's article? HairyPerry ( talk) 17:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
HairyPerry ( talk) 12:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
HairyPerry ( talk) 13:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I agree with your suggestion on deletion. I suggest another article should be considered for deletion. Manningham_Cobras_Football_Club which was created by the same editor. Surfing bird ( talk) 00:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Could you please protect (or tell sb to do so) the page Buffet Crampon, because there is a lot of vandalism. The last one, indeed, was very funy. Cheers! Bye OboeCrack ( talk) 01:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. It seems like your recent addition to Chimera (The X-Files) is copied directly from imdb. That's just not acceptable; you have to put everything in your own words. I do believe the topic of the article is notable, and I have some sources that might help establish that, but we can't just let a copyvio sit there. Zagalejo ^^^ 01:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Your request for AWB permission has been granted. 山本一郎 ( 会話) 05:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know why you added the hoax tag to Barnafeochaig. True it isn't of first importance, but every wordo f it is 100% true. The best proof i can give you is this: [5]. This will open a PDF file. Please type the word "Barnafeochaig" there and get the answer for the veracity of this article. User:Hameshooamam —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC).
“ | It is requested that the settlement boundary of Clachan Seil be amended to include land surrounding Barnafeochaig Beag currently zoned as Countryside Around Settlement, to permit development. | ” |
Hello, I noticed your edit here. You did not leave an edit summary so I'm not sure what your intentions were with that edit. Thank you for any clarification you can provide. ~a ( user • talk • contribs) 14:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | removing ... significant parts of pages' content without any reason | ” |
Superflewis, if you are reverting vandalism so fast that you don't have time to determine whether or not it is in fact vandalism, then you need to slow down. To "simply assume that all of their edits constitute vandalism" is detrimental to Wikipedia. Gnome de plume ( talk) 15:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | Comment on content, not on the contributor | ” |
.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Van Allen radiation belt. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. .
Congratulations, -- Mifter ( talk) 00:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for monitoring this. Please report the IP to WP:AIV again if vandalism continues past your final warning. Cirt ( talk) 09:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't see why Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civionic engineering (civionics) needed non-admin closure - it looked set to be kept. But if you do a non-admin closure, complete the task and remove the AfD tag from the article. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 15:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
How does this constitute vandalism? The article is not about one artist out of hundreds that have performed cover versions. Why does that band get top billing? I do not see how they are relevant at all. Noisejunky ( talk) 16:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I notice that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H10 Hotels as "Keep", despite not being an administrator, but could you explain why, as the discussion did not seem to be unanimous in either direction and had not run for 5 days? -- DAJF ( talk) 01:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove references from articles as you did to Scott Slutzker in this edit Diff. Jeepday ( talk) 01:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Anne Dodington, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Basically, I don't see any reason to have an article about her independent of Robert Greville, 4th Baron Brooke. That might be a better one to work on. Choess ( talk) 20:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 10:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, careful when you revert multiple successive occurences of vandalism, as you end up reverting to a vandalized version. I requested semi protection of the page, and reported the vandals on AIV. Equendil Talk 13:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for twice reverting vandalism of “ Contour set”. — SlamDiego ←T 00:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. —— RyanLupin • (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Jazz Jackrabbit (character) has always been a character article before, so I think it is better for it to remain a character article forever. And for another thing, there never used to be a Jazz Jackrabbit series article before, and I do NOT want Wikipedia to have a Jazz Jackrabbit (series) article at all, so please accept my edits. 59.183.26.93 ( talk) 12:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
You are welcome...
Thanks for the welcome, I do appreciate it. I'm wondering what precipitated it? Specifically, was it my forgetting to sign others' talk pages several times in a row? If so, sorry, and I did go back and sign them once I noticed... whoops. MrNerdHair ( talk) 05:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, thanks a lot. I checked out your talk page after having you beat me to the punch on several reverts, and was introduced to Twinkle by your userbox, which I'm now using. It is awesome. I've got to go now, but I look forward to RCPing with you again. MrNerdHair ( talk) 05:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Look at my history cur) (last) 01:11, 24 September 2008 Malcolmxl5 (Talk | contribs) m (empty) (Blanking in lieu of deletion. All gone ...) (undo)
Malcolmxl5 deleted my page. Also I had it requested from contacting Wikipedia to be deleted. So please Delete it like it was. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.145.222.185 ( talk) 06:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Why does J.delanoy's opinion matter more then Malcolmxl5 and Wikipedia itself? I understand what J.delanoy said, but I would like my page to be reverted to Malcolmxl5 revision of having my paged cleared and not completely deleted.
Thanks so much! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.145.222.185 ( talk) 06:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I guess it could re-phrase it to continum of other chargings methods like Lighning GT :). I will try to re-phrase the 10 min charging. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.250.192 ( talk) 07:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm not really familiar with the account creation process so I'd rather another admin reviewed your request. I recommend you put a request in here. Hut 8.5 12:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for signing my guestbook...I really appreciate it!
Artichoke-Boy (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Artichoke-Boy ( talk) 14:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
I received a message from you asking me to stop "vandalizing" pages and that you have objections to changes that I have done. Can you please explain what you mean by vandalizing? The only change I made was updating an out of date link that already existed. It points to the same page as the previous version. So, actually, I really did not change anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.81.46 ( talk) 04:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I reviewed the IP user's edits, and found them to be helpful. The only one I wasn't sure about was here, where the user linked to a page that wasn't the target of the redirect left at androphile.org. Our anonymous friend may have made a mistake here, or maybe it's me - I don't know much at all about homosexuality in Japan. Please do be more careful, though, when rolling back edits while on RCP; please try not to bite. Thanks, WODUP 05:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Can you please explain why you reverted well intentioned edits, that were in fact reverting the original vandalism. -- Flewis (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Your doing a great job - best to stay calm and not feed the vandals [13] - we'll be there to back you up and then you can just take a moment to develop an ever so slightly glib, private smile.-- VS talk 11:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism by User:Juliovaldes. Bidgee ( talk) 13:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Flewis. I noticed that you did a spell check on Melbourne. It seems that you changed several words to American English spellings rather than Australian English spellings, e.g. recognised vs. recognized. As it is obviously an Australian article, Australian English spellings and conventions should be used. Thanks for all your work on the article so far and hopefully we can get it back to GA where it belongs! Mvjs ( talk) 03:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I added sourced material to Sparta about a modern day view about Helots. Why did you leave a message on my page saying the edit was "unconstructive"???
LuxNevada ( talk) 15:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I accept your offer for adoption Thank you so much...-- Bobo44 ( talk) 23:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for signing my
guestbook. —
the_
ed
17—
15:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Flewis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
--
Danski14
(talk)
19:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Oops! I hadn't seen that you were the author of that post. While I'm replacing your edit, feel free to slap me with a trout. miquonranger03 ( talk) 02:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Enema cocktail, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone ( talk) 11:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I forgot to mention this before, but if you are uploading a public domain or (I think) GFDL image, you should upload it to Wikimedia Commons. If you upload an image with the intent to claim fair use, you should upload it to Wikipedia. -- Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for signing my guestbook. LAA Fan |
Anytime. I couldn't leave such a nice comment about my userpage unnoticed. :)-- LAA Fan sign review 04:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for those kind words :), umm for starters it's going to need better prose, so the lead will have to be a bit more detailed in explaining the Mark of the Year and all other related subjects needed in the lead (with reliable sources of course. Then you will have to format the table, and make the key into a table and instead of having the references external links make them references.-- S R X 13:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that there is a large group of editors who feel that any school is inherently notable. Accordingly, schools fall outside the scope of the A7 criterion. There are a number of other criterion that could get a school's article deleted (A1, A3, G10, G12), but the presumption is that being a school is an assertion of notability. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for signing my guestbook, and for the compliment. BTW, your page is nice too. Chamal Talk ± 02:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Chamal
Talk
± has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi. I have enabled your rollback rights. Please review the instructions at Wikipedia:Rollback feature, and practice using the tool at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Persistent misuse may lead to the tools removal. Regards. Epbr123 ( talk) 14:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I would like you to voice in on the removal of the MacDonald phrase on the Bush Doctrine article. It is blatantly anti-Semitic, fully objectionable and purports a non-NPOV view. It sabotages the reputability of the article and Wikipedia. I appeal to you for voting at Talk:Bush Doctrine#Central criticism. Also, you accusation of me vandalizing the article I have been contributing much to is incomprehensible to me - could you please explain further your rationale? I wanted the phrase removed, while User:Korny O'Near kept reintroducing the phrase. I subsequently asked for at least a compromise to include the full sentence - which you judged as vandalism. I find that utterly confusing, and do not understand how you would support something so non-NPOV as that anti-Semitic statement in an article on US foreign policy. It frankly baffles me... Please add you vote on the Talk page, since you have already been part of enforcing the phrase in place. Thanks. Scierguy ( talk) 06:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Approved :) Pedro : Chat 08:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Pedro : Chat 12:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
--Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Super Secret Barnstar |
This user has found RyRy's Secret Page! Who will be next? Can you find my Secret Page? Ver. 2.5 |
Did you revert my edit from Mr McMahon's article? HairyPerry ( talk) 17:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
HairyPerry ( talk) 12:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
HairyPerry ( talk) 13:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I agree with your suggestion on deletion. I suggest another article should be considered for deletion. Manningham_Cobras_Football_Club which was created by the same editor. Surfing bird ( talk) 00:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Could you please protect (or tell sb to do so) the page Buffet Crampon, because there is a lot of vandalism. The last one, indeed, was very funy. Cheers! Bye OboeCrack ( talk) 01:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. It seems like your recent addition to Chimera (The X-Files) is copied directly from imdb. That's just not acceptable; you have to put everything in your own words. I do believe the topic of the article is notable, and I have some sources that might help establish that, but we can't just let a copyvio sit there. Zagalejo ^^^ 01:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Your request for AWB permission has been granted. 山本一郎 ( 会話) 05:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know why you added the hoax tag to Barnafeochaig. True it isn't of first importance, but every wordo f it is 100% true. The best proof i can give you is this: [5]. This will open a PDF file. Please type the word "Barnafeochaig" there and get the answer for the veracity of this article. User:Hameshooamam —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC).
“ | It is requested that the settlement boundary of Clachan Seil be amended to include land surrounding Barnafeochaig Beag currently zoned as Countryside Around Settlement, to permit development. | ” |
Hello, I noticed your edit here. You did not leave an edit summary so I'm not sure what your intentions were with that edit. Thank you for any clarification you can provide. ~a ( user • talk • contribs) 14:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | removing ... significant parts of pages' content without any reason | ” |
Superflewis, if you are reverting vandalism so fast that you don't have time to determine whether or not it is in fact vandalism, then you need to slow down. To "simply assume that all of their edits constitute vandalism" is detrimental to Wikipedia. Gnome de plume ( talk) 15:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | Comment on content, not on the contributor | ” |
.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Van Allen radiation belt. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. .
Congratulations, -- Mifter ( talk) 00:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for monitoring this. Please report the IP to WP:AIV again if vandalism continues past your final warning. Cirt ( talk) 09:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't see why Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civionic engineering (civionics) needed non-admin closure - it looked set to be kept. But if you do a non-admin closure, complete the task and remove the AfD tag from the article. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 15:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
How does this constitute vandalism? The article is not about one artist out of hundreds that have performed cover versions. Why does that band get top billing? I do not see how they are relevant at all. Noisejunky ( talk) 16:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I notice that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H10 Hotels as "Keep", despite not being an administrator, but could you explain why, as the discussion did not seem to be unanimous in either direction and had not run for 5 days? -- DAJF ( talk) 01:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove references from articles as you did to Scott Slutzker in this edit Diff. Jeepday ( talk) 01:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Anne Dodington, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Basically, I don't see any reason to have an article about her independent of Robert Greville, 4th Baron Brooke. That might be a better one to work on. Choess ( talk) 20:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 10:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, careful when you revert multiple successive occurences of vandalism, as you end up reverting to a vandalized version. I requested semi protection of the page, and reported the vandals on AIV. Equendil Talk 13:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for twice reverting vandalism of “ Contour set”. — SlamDiego ←T 00:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. —— RyanLupin • (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Jazz Jackrabbit (character) has always been a character article before, so I think it is better for it to remain a character article forever. And for another thing, there never used to be a Jazz Jackrabbit series article before, and I do NOT want Wikipedia to have a Jazz Jackrabbit (series) article at all, so please accept my edits. 59.183.26.93 ( talk) 12:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
You are welcome...
Thanks for the welcome, I do appreciate it. I'm wondering what precipitated it? Specifically, was it my forgetting to sign others' talk pages several times in a row? If so, sorry, and I did go back and sign them once I noticed... whoops. MrNerdHair ( talk) 05:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, thanks a lot. I checked out your talk page after having you beat me to the punch on several reverts, and was introduced to Twinkle by your userbox, which I'm now using. It is awesome. I've got to go now, but I look forward to RCPing with you again. MrNerdHair ( talk) 05:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Look at my history cur) (last) 01:11, 24 September 2008 Malcolmxl5 (Talk | contribs) m (empty) (Blanking in lieu of deletion. All gone ...) (undo)
Malcolmxl5 deleted my page. Also I had it requested from contacting Wikipedia to be deleted. So please Delete it like it was. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.145.222.185 ( talk) 06:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Why does J.delanoy's opinion matter more then Malcolmxl5 and Wikipedia itself? I understand what J.delanoy said, but I would like my page to be reverted to Malcolmxl5 revision of having my paged cleared and not completely deleted.
Thanks so much! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.145.222.185 ( talk) 06:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I guess it could re-phrase it to continum of other chargings methods like Lighning GT :). I will try to re-phrase the 10 min charging. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.250.192 ( talk) 07:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm not really familiar with the account creation process so I'd rather another admin reviewed your request. I recommend you put a request in here. Hut 8.5 12:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for signing my guestbook...I really appreciate it!
Artichoke-Boy (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Artichoke-Boy ( talk) 14:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
I received a message from you asking me to stop "vandalizing" pages and that you have objections to changes that I have done. Can you please explain what you mean by vandalizing? The only change I made was updating an out of date link that already existed. It points to the same page as the previous version. So, actually, I really did not change anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.81.46 ( talk) 04:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I reviewed the IP user's edits, and found them to be helpful. The only one I wasn't sure about was here, where the user linked to a page that wasn't the target of the redirect left at androphile.org. Our anonymous friend may have made a mistake here, or maybe it's me - I don't know much at all about homosexuality in Japan. Please do be more careful, though, when rolling back edits while on RCP; please try not to bite. Thanks, WODUP 05:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Can you please explain why you reverted well intentioned edits, that were in fact reverting the original vandalism. -- Flewis (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Your doing a great job - best to stay calm and not feed the vandals [13] - we'll be there to back you up and then you can just take a moment to develop an ever so slightly glib, private smile.-- VS talk 11:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism by User:Juliovaldes. Bidgee ( talk) 13:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Flewis. I noticed that you did a spell check on Melbourne. It seems that you changed several words to American English spellings rather than Australian English spellings, e.g. recognised vs. recognized. As it is obviously an Australian article, Australian English spellings and conventions should be used. Thanks for all your work on the article so far and hopefully we can get it back to GA where it belongs! Mvjs ( talk) 03:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I added sourced material to Sparta about a modern day view about Helots. Why did you leave a message on my page saying the edit was "unconstructive"???
LuxNevada ( talk) 15:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I accept your offer for adoption Thank you so much...-- Bobo44 ( talk) 23:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for signing my
guestbook. —
the_
ed
17—
15:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |