Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Bishnujee Singh. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 07:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi FenTian! Let's discuss our dispute on the talk page for Bishnujee Singh. 107.72.162.15 ( talk) 07:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi 107.72.162.15, can you let me know your concern? As per Wikipedia policy any libelious statement about living person should be immediately removed .I believe you have not read the policy of Wikipedia regarding the matter.

Sure FenTian. Let's move the discussion to the article's talk page. I've already posted there. It seems pretty clear that the Bishnujee Singh in the court documents is the same as in the article, since they're both CEO of Cayley Aerospace. See you on the talk page! 107.72.162.15 ( talk) 07:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi 107.72.162.15,Bishnujee Singh was neither defendant nor accused in Boeing Law suit.Not sure what you are referring to.He has been Employee of BaySys Technologies in Virginia when Boeing Law suit timing is being presented.Virginia is in East Coast and Boeing Seattle in Pacific Northwest.You simply cannot attribute some one else case between two warring parties to 3rd person.I believe you have no knowledge about this Livonia law suit of Plantiff.Due to this reason your content was not in anyway related to Article Bishnujee Singh

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 08:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm AgnosticPreachersKid. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:Bishnujee Singh without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 09:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FenTian ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Editing was done because the previous person was posting defamatory content about living person which is illegal and not acceptable for Wikipedia article.Please advise whether defamatory posting about living person is allowed by Wikipedia? FenTian ( talk) 18:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You have not pointed out any specific claims that are supposed to be false. The information was supported by a reliable source, and the IP editor provided evidence that, despite your claims to the contrary, it's about the same Bishnujee Singh. Even if it weren't, there was no reason at all to blank the talk page discussion. In this context, I'm declining this request. Huon ( talk) 23:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on Bishnujee Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ukexpat ( talk) 14:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply