![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() |
The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on the Weidner Center For The Performing Arts article! -- Dolotta ( talk) 00:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
Just a heads-up about the Rfc you started at Giovanni Gentile. Normally, there needs to be discussion at an article's Talk page before initiating an Rfc, and just wanted you to know that I listed it at WP:AN/RFC to get some feedback about that point. Cheers, Mathglot ( talk) 05:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jack Kirby you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jack Kirby for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Hawkeye7 --
Hawkeye7 (
talk)
06:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stay off my talk page in the future, thanks. Magnacartalibertatum ( talk) 09:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
PJI is a legal organization so it naturally contains summaries of court cases. You removed this well sourced content and replaced it with trivia from a biased source. That is not how Wikipedia works. Not in the slightest. – Lionel( talk) 09:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page
Template:Milwaukee Bucks roster appears to have added premature information about a
reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on
anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
17:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 16:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group (probationary 3 months), allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24,
I see you were turned down by Kudpung for the NPR user right, I'd suggest heading over to WP:Articles for deletion and over to WP:Requested moves and participating in some discussions to gain experience and learn policies for a while before applying again. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 22:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Insertcleverphrasehere, see below. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24/Archive 1, thanks for accepting my first article on the English Wikipedia. I'm truly humbled to see my contributions are being taken quite serious with you. Til next time, stay blessed!-- Muddyb ( talk) 06:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! I noticed you put a citation-improvement banner on the page Medusa (DC Comics) which I edit regularly... is there a reason for that? I've put references from each of her comics appearances and the page currently has 22 references. I'd love more information on what you're looking for in terms of citation. :) Thanks! Nyssie ( talk) 13:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. we are trying our best to write this in a way that is not promotional, we simply want a page. Can you please explain exactly what is wrong with the page? or what should we do to get this approved? - Pooktwo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pooktwo ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Edzedek24 — I am aware of the added responsibility associated with COI editing, and it is true that 10 out of my 15 inline references are self-published - however, the rest are reliable third-party references, and they do meet WP:RS. (I listed some of them when I responded to the last declination, but Bradv did not answer my response, and has since then deleted it.) The following supporting remarks are meant to go with the three "best known for" items in my introduction:
“ . . . the Poisson surprise method [of Legéndy and Salcman, 1985] is one of the most widely used burst detection methods since its development over thirty years ago (398 citations as of June 2018) and is still commonly used for analysing bursting activity . . .”
OAKS222 ( talk) 17:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reaching out to me. However, I still stand by my declination. I reviewed the page a second time, and agree with Bradv. This article is at the intersection of several highly scrutinized areas, including WP:COI and WP:BLP. The sources on the page itself, as before, do not credibly indicate notability due to the overwhelming level of non-independence of the sources. Hence the much higher level of scrutiny. The article needs more verifiable third-party references. Sorry, but not now. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 21:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Is this eligible for deletion? User:Strawberrian/sandbox Strawberrian ( talk) 15:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for resorting the redirect. I saw your warning on their page and a heads up that they are two reverts away from WP:3RR. Regardless hopefully they take your advice. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 00:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schofield/Rothschild shootings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schofield/Rothschild shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 05:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Etzedek24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of 100 oldest colleges and universities in the United States".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh ( talk) 14:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop. Wikipedia is
not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to
Pacific Justice Institute, will be regarded as
vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Removing high-quality, verified sources such as Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, The Washington Post is disruptive.–
Lionel(
talk)
10:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Please read WP:NC. It isn't necessary to (further) disambiguate pages like Wikirank or Inhuman (comics) for "more specific link" when no other page with the same title exists. For comics, the specific naming conventions can be found here: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics). And if you do move a page because disambiguation is needed (i.e. there are other articles with the same name), as you did when moving The American Way to The American Way (comics), then the original title that wasn't specific enough should be turned into a disambiguation page or redirected to a similar disambiguation page. If the original title still redirects to the new one, then the disambiguation was for nothing in the first place.
Also, regarding this edit, please read MOS:DAB, particularly MOS:DABENTRY and MOS:DABPIPING. There should only be one blue link per entry etc. Bennv3771 ( talk) 04:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Do you think that moving these articles that I have made to drafts actually help them get better? Moving them to drafts does nothing but make less people aware of them and less accessible. Unless you intend to fix them all by yourself. ★Trekker ( talk) 00:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Nice work on this article. I have a couple print sources that might be useful to expand it some more (A Wertham-centric issue of Alter Ego and a collection of essays by Mark Evanier). I'll see what I can dig up. Argento Surfer ( talk) 19:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
The article
Midnighter (2015 comic book) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Midnighter (2015 comic book) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fearstreetsaga --
Fearstreetsaga (
talk)
02:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
However, I have concerns about some of your claims of Public Domain status, e.g. File:LafargueParishHouse.png, File:WerthamLafargueConference.png, and File:LafarguePlayroom.png with claims of "MCNY does not hold copyright on digital images. No other assertion of copyright." or "No assertion of copyright in publication." Failure to assert copyright by a museum or repository does not make an image "free": copyright is general held by the original creator and in the U.S. it is the date and copyright notice in the original publication that determines when an image falls into public domain. Subsequent republication or posting of the image does not change initial copyright unless copyright is explicitly renewed or the rights are transferred or explicitly released into the public domain or under a free license. See Copyright rules in the United States and the Hirtle Chart on Wikimedia Commons for more information. The Copyright Village Pump is a good place to ask any questions about particular images or sources. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 02:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24, thanks for withdrawing the speedy delete on the Krentz article—needed just a bit more than two minutes to add more sources & justification. ;) - Ferahgo the Assassin ( talk) 23:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your recent work patrolling new articles. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 21:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks for creating True Comics, Etzedek24!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your informative new article on True Comics.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pratibha sharma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
— JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24:
Thank you for your suggestions on how to improve the Rachel Zoll Wikipedia article. Please examine the latest version to see if it meets notability requirements in your opinion. Please consider removing the deletion template.
Heron10 ( talk) 21:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know you views of the additions to the page. Heron10 ( talk) 19:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't want to be on bad terms with you. I'm sorry if I was very rude during our last interaction. I know I have problems with overreacting. ★Trekker ( talk) 12:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I just promoted your hook and one of the images to Prep 4. I'd just like to note that the hook fact must be sourced in the article per WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria 3. Cited hook. You only provided the cite on the nomination template. I added the cite to the lead, which is the only place this hook fact appears. That surprised me; I think you should say that it was the first further down in the article, and move the cite there.
Also, you may want to check out WP:SRF to learn how to do Harvard referencing for your book sources. That way, you can print a short list of book sources in a bibliography, and the notes would each consist of a few words and automatically direct to the bibliography. If you need help on that, drop me a line. Best, Yoninah ( talk) 20:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Herron Gymnasium at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
18:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
On 12 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lafargue Clinic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1948, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, and Fredric Wertham helped establish the Lafargue Clinic in New York City, one of the first to provide low cost psychiatric services to black patients? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lafargue Clinic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Lafargue Clinic), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Wisconsin basketball comics
Thank you for quality articles such as Weidner Center for the Performing Arts, Philadelphia Sphas, Real Fact Comics and Lafargue Clinic, for work on articles for GA, such as Jack Kirby, for gnomish tasks and for copy-editing as a member of GOCE, - Zed, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24! Thanks for your copy edit of Date Masamune (Sengoku Basara) for the September copy-editing drive. It's a huge improvement to the article. I just want to give you a little feedback:
I did some minor ce for these points and a little for conciseness. But I'm being picky, for a C-class article your copy edit was plenty thorough. Please let me know if you have any questions. – Reidgreg ( talk) 20:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
On 17 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Wood (comics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bob Wood, co-creator of the comic Crime Does Not Pay, served three years in prison for manslaughter, and was murdered a year after his release? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Wood (comics). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Bob Wood (comics)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
E.C. Stoner you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fish and karate --
Fish and karate (
talk)
15:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
you are annoying. John from Idegon ( talk) 03:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
E.C. Stoner you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:E.C. Stoner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fish and karate --
Fish and karate (
talk)
08:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
On 20 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Real Fact Comics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that science fiction writer Harlan Ellison's earliest known published work was a fan letter to the comic book Real Fact Comics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Real Fact Comics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Real Fact Comics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Etzedek24 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Mini apolis 20:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC) |
On 12 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herron Gymnasium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Miami University's Herron Gymnasium, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, was demolished and replaced with a parking lot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herron Gymnasium. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Herron Gymnasium), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() |
The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on the Weidner Center For The Performing Arts article! -- Dolotta ( talk) 00:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
Just a heads-up about the Rfc you started at Giovanni Gentile. Normally, there needs to be discussion at an article's Talk page before initiating an Rfc, and just wanted you to know that I listed it at WP:AN/RFC to get some feedback about that point. Cheers, Mathglot ( talk) 05:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jack Kirby you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jack Kirby for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Hawkeye7 --
Hawkeye7 (
talk)
06:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stay off my talk page in the future, thanks. Magnacartalibertatum ( talk) 09:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
PJI is a legal organization so it naturally contains summaries of court cases. You removed this well sourced content and replaced it with trivia from a biased source. That is not how Wikipedia works. Not in the slightest. – Lionel( talk) 09:21, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page
Template:Milwaukee Bucks roster appears to have added premature information about a
reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on
anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. –
Sabbatino (
talk)
17:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 16:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group (probationary 3 months), allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24,
I see you were turned down by Kudpung for the NPR user right, I'd suggest heading over to WP:Articles for deletion and over to WP:Requested moves and participating in some discussions to gain experience and learn policies for a while before applying again. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 22:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Insertcleverphrasehere, see below. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24/Archive 1, thanks for accepting my first article on the English Wikipedia. I'm truly humbled to see my contributions are being taken quite serious with you. Til next time, stay blessed!-- Muddyb ( talk) 06:04, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! I noticed you put a citation-improvement banner on the page Medusa (DC Comics) which I edit regularly... is there a reason for that? I've put references from each of her comics appearances and the page currently has 22 references. I'd love more information on what you're looking for in terms of citation. :) Thanks! Nyssie ( talk) 13:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. we are trying our best to write this in a way that is not promotional, we simply want a page. Can you please explain exactly what is wrong with the page? or what should we do to get this approved? - Pooktwo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pooktwo ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Edzedek24 — I am aware of the added responsibility associated with COI editing, and it is true that 10 out of my 15 inline references are self-published - however, the rest are reliable third-party references, and they do meet WP:RS. (I listed some of them when I responded to the last declination, but Bradv did not answer my response, and has since then deleted it.) The following supporting remarks are meant to go with the three "best known for" items in my introduction:
“ . . . the Poisson surprise method [of Legéndy and Salcman, 1985] is one of the most widely used burst detection methods since its development over thirty years ago (398 citations as of June 2018) and is still commonly used for analysing bursting activity . . .”
OAKS222 ( talk) 17:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reaching out to me. However, I still stand by my declination. I reviewed the page a second time, and agree with Bradv. This article is at the intersection of several highly scrutinized areas, including WP:COI and WP:BLP. The sources on the page itself, as before, do not credibly indicate notability due to the overwhelming level of non-independence of the sources. Hence the much higher level of scrutiny. The article needs more verifiable third-party references. Sorry, but not now. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 21:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Is this eligible for deletion? User:Strawberrian/sandbox Strawberrian ( talk) 15:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for resorting the redirect. I saw your warning on their page and a heads up that they are two reverts away from WP:3RR. Regardless hopefully they take your advice. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 00:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schofield/Rothschild shootings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schofield/Rothschild shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 05:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Etzedek24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of 100 oldest colleges and universities in the United States".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh ( talk) 14:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop. Wikipedia is
not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to
Pacific Justice Institute, will be regarded as
vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Removing high-quality, verified sources such as Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, The Washington Post is disruptive.–
Lionel(
talk)
10:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Please read WP:NC. It isn't necessary to (further) disambiguate pages like Wikirank or Inhuman (comics) for "more specific link" when no other page with the same title exists. For comics, the specific naming conventions can be found here: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics). And if you do move a page because disambiguation is needed (i.e. there are other articles with the same name), as you did when moving The American Way to The American Way (comics), then the original title that wasn't specific enough should be turned into a disambiguation page or redirected to a similar disambiguation page. If the original title still redirects to the new one, then the disambiguation was for nothing in the first place.
Also, regarding this edit, please read MOS:DAB, particularly MOS:DABENTRY and MOS:DABPIPING. There should only be one blue link per entry etc. Bennv3771 ( talk) 04:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Do you think that moving these articles that I have made to drafts actually help them get better? Moving them to drafts does nothing but make less people aware of them and less accessible. Unless you intend to fix them all by yourself. ★Trekker ( talk) 00:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Nice work on this article. I have a couple print sources that might be useful to expand it some more (A Wertham-centric issue of Alter Ego and a collection of essays by Mark Evanier). I'll see what I can dig up. Argento Surfer ( talk) 19:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
The article
Midnighter (2015 comic book) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Midnighter (2015 comic book) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fearstreetsaga --
Fearstreetsaga (
talk)
02:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
However, I have concerns about some of your claims of Public Domain status, e.g. File:LafargueParishHouse.png, File:WerthamLafargueConference.png, and File:LafarguePlayroom.png with claims of "MCNY does not hold copyright on digital images. No other assertion of copyright." or "No assertion of copyright in publication." Failure to assert copyright by a museum or repository does not make an image "free": copyright is general held by the original creator and in the U.S. it is the date and copyright notice in the original publication that determines when an image falls into public domain. Subsequent republication or posting of the image does not change initial copyright unless copyright is explicitly renewed or the rights are transferred or explicitly released into the public domain or under a free license. See Copyright rules in the United States and the Hirtle Chart on Wikimedia Commons for more information. The Copyright Village Pump is a good place to ask any questions about particular images or sources. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 02:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24, thanks for withdrawing the speedy delete on the Krentz article—needed just a bit more than two minutes to add more sources & justification. ;) - Ferahgo the Assassin ( talk) 23:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your recent work patrolling new articles. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 21:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks for creating True Comics, Etzedek24!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your informative new article on True Comics.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pratibha sharma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
— JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24:
Thank you for your suggestions on how to improve the Rachel Zoll Wikipedia article. Please examine the latest version to see if it meets notability requirements in your opinion. Please consider removing the deletion template.
Heron10 ( talk) 21:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know you views of the additions to the page. Heron10 ( talk) 19:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't want to be on bad terms with you. I'm sorry if I was very rude during our last interaction. I know I have problems with overreacting. ★Trekker ( talk) 12:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I just promoted your hook and one of the images to Prep 4. I'd just like to note that the hook fact must be sourced in the article per WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria 3. Cited hook. You only provided the cite on the nomination template. I added the cite to the lead, which is the only place this hook fact appears. That surprised me; I think you should say that it was the first further down in the article, and move the cite there.
Also, you may want to check out WP:SRF to learn how to do Harvard referencing for your book sources. That way, you can print a short list of book sources in a bibliography, and the notes would each consist of a few words and automatically direct to the bibliography. If you need help on that, drop me a line. Best, Yoninah ( talk) 20:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Herron Gymnasium at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions)
18:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
On 12 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lafargue Clinic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1948, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, and Fredric Wertham helped establish the Lafargue Clinic in New York City, one of the first to provide low cost psychiatric services to black patients? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lafargue Clinic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Lafargue Clinic), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Wisconsin basketball comics
Thank you for quality articles such as Weidner Center for the Performing Arts, Philadelphia Sphas, Real Fact Comics and Lafargue Clinic, for work on articles for GA, such as Jack Kirby, for gnomish tasks and for copy-editing as a member of GOCE, - Zed, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Etzedek24! Thanks for your copy edit of Date Masamune (Sengoku Basara) for the September copy-editing drive. It's a huge improvement to the article. I just want to give you a little feedback:
I did some minor ce for these points and a little for conciseness. But I'm being picky, for a C-class article your copy edit was plenty thorough. Please let me know if you have any questions. – Reidgreg ( talk) 20:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
On 17 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Wood (comics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bob Wood, co-creator of the comic Crime Does Not Pay, served three years in prison for manslaughter, and was murdered a year after his release? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Wood (comics). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Bob Wood (comics)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
E.C. Stoner you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fish and karate --
Fish and karate (
talk)
15:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Etzedek24, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
you are annoying. John from Idegon ( talk) 03:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The article
E.C. Stoner you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:E.C. Stoner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Fish and karate --
Fish and karate (
talk)
08:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
On 20 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Real Fact Comics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that science fiction writer Harlan Ellison's earliest known published work was a fan letter to the comic book Real Fact Comics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Real Fact Comics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Real Fact Comics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Etzedek24 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Mini apolis 20:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC) |
On 12 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herron Gymnasium, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Miami University's Herron Gymnasium, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, was demolished and replaced with a parking lot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herron Gymnasium. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Herron Gymnasium), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.