![]() |
Hi EthiopianHabesha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 20:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC) |
So let me start by saying I am neither a history buff nor Oromo historian. I am not even considered Oromo like many Ethiopians specially from Addis Ababa I come from a diverse family However I find it a little unsettling a guy with a user name EthiopiaHabesha editing Oromo_People page it’s like a guys with the name SpainNonCatalonian editing Catalonian history page. My suggestion is to find an Oromo Historian who could contribute to this page, let them have a say, than you can chime in, until than the page should go back to what it was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FactCheckerAnono ( talk • contribs) 06:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
You stated: "To Otakrem, You inserted this " { {soapbox|date=June 2016} } showing in the article like this:Template:Soapbox and this kind of tag is not found under the list of wikipedia tags, if you have link showing how it can be inserted then you may let us know. — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)"
However, you could've sent this to my User Talkpage and Not the Articles Talkpage. Please delete it there and we can discuss here. The Talkpage section is meant to discuss the Menelik Article and Not how to add Templates or how to use Wikipedia etc. Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines "The purpose of an article's talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject."
"While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively" Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
As an FYI, the previous Discussions we had on the Menelik Article are in violation of these User Guidelines. So please in the future discussion Follow them as shall I. Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just took a look at your Geez people article. Has it come to your mind that Amharic are assimilated Harla? hence the name Am-Hara. The Am could be referring to Amda seyon who was attacked by harla, 14th century.I saw the language category pointing Amhara near to east Gurage and this source says Harla had their base in Metahara east shewa [1]. Kiziotherapy ( talk) 03:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Greetings! As Otakrem already explained to you [2]:
That said, kindly stop edit warring. Please instead discuss the material on the talk page. Regards-- Soupforone ( talk) 15:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, After all of our discussions and you went and deleted the source which supports the claim. I will add more of Bulatovich's quotations in the Menelik Article, every single Detail that Bulatovich had provided. I will also add more details from the other Sources. Otakrem ( talk) 19:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Menelik II. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been undone.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You recently deleted a section and added an unreliable source from a nonexistent person Fekadu Lemassa Otakrem ( talk) 05:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Otakrem (
talk)
05:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Stop your disruptive editing. On Menelik II, all I did was separate it because it needs to be separated. As you have added so much other things in that section that it is clumsy and unreadable for an English-speaker since this is a Wikipedia English version. Otakrem ( talk) 18:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to
Menelik II, appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Your recent revert to remove a new section "Atrocities committed during Menelik's reign" because you have your personal opinion/point that the sources are "politicians" is highly disruptive
Otakrem (
talk)
19:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, you have written so many walls of texts that you have forgotten the insults and accusations that you throw in your responses. You've accused me and insulted me with so many things. But I hope you change your behaviour. If you don't see anything wrong with your behaviour, then I will request the appropriate mediators to help me resolve this matter with you. Otakrem ( talk) 07:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Your edits are ridiculous and you have completely messed up some pages. Resourcer1 ( talk) 13:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, stop deleting what I entered. It is sourced and your accusation of "politicans" is unwarranted and I will report you for disruptive editing. Otakrem ( talk) 19:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Your Non-Neutral Point of View (the Pro-Amhara Biased Version) is categorically rejected. The Liberation Fronts Physically Destroyed your Amhara-Bias and nothing in Wikipedia should be used to Promote your Egotistical Abyssinian(Amhara) Fundamentalism agenda either. It will be Duly contested and even if you try to use Wikipedia guidelines to slickly Delete and Edit content that Goes against your Amhara-biased Agenda. Stop spreading your Abyssinian(Amhara) Fundamentalism AGENDA! Eritrea is an Independent Country with the Tigrinyas and Tigre people INDEPENDENT of Amhara-agenda. Follow the Wikipedia guidelines you are using to Wikilawyer me. Stop Wikilawyering me and other editors. We have EVERY RIGHT TO EDIT in WIKIPEDIA And You Are NOT AN ADIMINISTRATOR TO TELL ME HOW AND WHEN TO EDIT AN ARTICLE! You are definitely a liar here. Otakrem ( talk) 12:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
STOP Vandalising the Abyssinian Article by Deleting the Properly Sourced data that I put in. You do NOT OWN the Article, you keep deleting and I will keep putting it back. Otakrem ( talk) 13:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Otakrem,as said both of us do not own wikpedia and we need to involve other editors as to weather keep the sections titled criticism and wider Habesha idenity or delete them both because they are irrelevant. So far the consensus among wikipedia editors regarding the article is based on Ethno-linguistic factors (language classification) in which political factor is not among them and it was created & maintained similarly to Iranian peoples ethno-linguistic group which includes various ethnic-groups who speak Iranian languages while most of them leaving outside Republic of Iran. Of the 235 million Iranian Ethno-linguistic Peoples only 79 million of them leave in Iran Republic and the rest leave in Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Georgia, Tajikstan, Uzbekistan, Russia and China [10] [11]. Now before requesting RfC for other editors to decide on removing or keeping both sections I have issues on what you have added under criticism section and based on WP:CHALLENGE & WP:ORIGINAL of wikipedia rules I have the right to question them. Could you let me know the citation/quotation as it is, without you modifying it, you used to write the very first sentence under criticism section, it's just I went through all the sources and I could not find a citation that supports it. From that we will continue to the other phrases which I have issues with. — EthiopianHabesha ( talk) 20:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Since you added the Expansionist section to include non-Semitic speaking people, You should not remove the mention of Oromos and cushitics Rejecting Abyssinian Identity. Are you trying reach NPOV in this article or only promote your Abyssinian Expasionist(cultural imperialist) POV ie "everyone is Abyssinian because Amhara imperialists said so"? If so, then I will keep deleting anything and everything until Abysinnian article only says "Amhara and Amharaized Tigrayans" are the only Abyssinians. Otakrem ( talk) 01:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Language is not the criteria for grouping people but citations. Its based off the wikipedia editors personal work and not references. Ge'ez is not even related to Amharic. The Tigre people for example do not want to be called Abyssinian, this can bring a potential lawsuit by members of that community against wikipedia for misrepresentation. Citations are clear. Abyssinians claim Jewish origin as the Amhara people page says. the Argobba claim descent from Arabs. Nowhere can you find a citation that claims prehistorically they were one. Please show the source of the origin of citation that exactly states what is posted on the wikipage. Duqsene ( talk) 09:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Abyssinian or Habesha are a people who are ancestral to the rulers of ancient habesha not a ethnolinguistic block. The linguistic experts have labelled the Ethio-semitic languages, the Abyssinian languages but have not said Abyssinians are all those people. If it had been based on linguistics, Amharic could not be included in the Habesha category because its not related to Ge'ez. Where is the source for all statements made? This article might help you understand Habesha/Ethiopian. Duqsene ( talk) 09:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Amharic is categorized under Ethiopian semitic because its a semitic language in Ethiopia not because its related to Ge'ez. You are dismissing the ability to provide citations for every statement written in the article. I looked at the contributions clearly and they do not say what is posted on the article. Ge'ez is not related to Amharic and all linguistics have confirmed this. It is not about ethnology-linguistics, it is an article about a people that had lived in an ancient region. Are you the editor that included these baseless statements on the article? What is an RFC? I would like to hear from other editors on this subject. Include the Oromo, Somali and all the people of ethiopia if you want to be neutral and not divisive. Duqsene ( talk) 01:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I will be awaiting your book title and page reference for the passages. Duqsene ( talk) 15:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
A graph is not a source, link an article or book. Duqsene ( talk) 09:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Duqsene, So are you saying those language graphs, showing how languages are related, is not a source? There are already many books listed in the article, see them. What you are doing is excluding researchs that considers linguists research, geneticists conclusion, archaeologists research and historical documents, and then replace them by researches that was supported by myths and legends. Why? We are not dealing with tribes but an ethno-linguistic group of people similar to Iranian peoples & Bantu peoples who included 100s of ethnic-groups (and 1,000s more tribes and many more clans under the tribes) under them with each tribes having several myths & legends about their origin. — EthiopianHabesha ( talk) 09:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Argobba Woman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 14:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Abyssinian people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
O Fortuna!
...Imperatrix mundi.
22:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
It looks like you want the Amharic language to be added into every page while dismissing the existence of Amhara people because of nationalist ties. Therefore it gives me no choice but to report you for conflict of interest. Duqsene ( talk) 23:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
Duqsene (
talk)
00:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Duqsene (
talk)
23:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, I filed a request for Arbitration regarding the Amhara people page, i also mentioned your proposal GabiloveAdol ( talk) 02:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see this. Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 17:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has declined the Amhara people arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Following consensus at the administrator's noticeboard for incidents, you are indefinitely topic-banned from making any edits relating to the Horn of Africa region, including any countries in that region or their ethnic or cultural groups. This means you are free to continue editing Wikipedia in any other area, but may not make changes to articles directly or partly related to the area covered by the topic ban. The terms of the ban re also spelled out here.
I appreciate this is probably unwelcome news, but it reflects a general concern about the quality and neutrality of your edits over a fair length of time. Hopefully you can find a different area of interest on Wikipedia, and if so, all the best with your editing there. If you have any questions re the topic ban, pleas elect me know on my talk page. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi EthiopianHabesha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 20:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC) |
So let me start by saying I am neither a history buff nor Oromo historian. I am not even considered Oromo like many Ethiopians specially from Addis Ababa I come from a diverse family However I find it a little unsettling a guy with a user name EthiopiaHabesha editing Oromo_People page it’s like a guys with the name SpainNonCatalonian editing Catalonian history page. My suggestion is to find an Oromo Historian who could contribute to this page, let them have a say, than you can chime in, until than the page should go back to what it was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FactCheckerAnono ( talk • contribs) 06:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:45, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
You stated: "To Otakrem, You inserted this " { {soapbox|date=June 2016} } showing in the article like this:Template:Soapbox and this kind of tag is not found under the list of wikipedia tags, if you have link showing how it can be inserted then you may let us know. — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)"
However, you could've sent this to my User Talkpage and Not the Articles Talkpage. Please delete it there and we can discuss here. The Talkpage section is meant to discuss the Menelik Article and Not how to add Templates or how to use Wikipedia etc. Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines "The purpose of an article's talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject."
"While the purpose of article talk pages is to discuss the content of articles, the purpose of user talk pages is to draw the attention or discuss the edits of a user. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, and all discussion should ultimately be directed solely toward the improvement of the encyclopedia. User talk pages must serve their primary purpose, which is to make communication and collaboration among editors easier. Editors who refuse to use their talk page for these purposes are violating the spirit of the talk page guidelines, and are not acting collaboratively" Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
As an FYI, the previous Discussions we had on the Menelik Article are in violation of these User Guidelines. So please in the future discussion Follow them as shall I. Otakrem ( talk) 16:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just took a look at your Geez people article. Has it come to your mind that Amharic are assimilated Harla? hence the name Am-Hara. The Am could be referring to Amda seyon who was attacked by harla, 14th century.I saw the language category pointing Amhara near to east Gurage and this source says Harla had their base in Metahara east shewa [1]. Kiziotherapy ( talk) 03:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Greetings! As Otakrem already explained to you [2]:
That said, kindly stop edit warring. Please instead discuss the material on the talk page. Regards-- Soupforone ( talk) 15:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, After all of our discussions and you went and deleted the source which supports the claim. I will add more of Bulatovich's quotations in the Menelik Article, every single Detail that Bulatovich had provided. I will also add more details from the other Sources. Otakrem ( talk) 19:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Menelik II. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been undone.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You recently deleted a section and added an unreliable source from a nonexistent person Fekadu Lemassa Otakrem ( talk) 05:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Otakrem (
talk)
05:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Stop your disruptive editing. On Menelik II, all I did was separate it because it needs to be separated. As you have added so much other things in that section that it is clumsy and unreadable for an English-speaker since this is a Wikipedia English version. Otakrem ( talk) 18:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to
Menelik II, appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Your recent revert to remove a new section "Atrocities committed during Menelik's reign" because you have your personal opinion/point that the sources are "politicians" is highly disruptive
Otakrem (
talk)
19:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, you have written so many walls of texts that you have forgotten the insults and accusations that you throw in your responses. You've accused me and insulted me with so many things. But I hope you change your behaviour. If you don't see anything wrong with your behaviour, then I will request the appropriate mediators to help me resolve this matter with you. Otakrem ( talk) 07:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Your edits are ridiculous and you have completely messed up some pages. Resourcer1 ( talk) 13:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
EthiopianHabesha, stop deleting what I entered. It is sourced and your accusation of "politicans" is unwarranted and I will report you for disruptive editing. Otakrem ( talk) 19:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Your Non-Neutral Point of View (the Pro-Amhara Biased Version) is categorically rejected. The Liberation Fronts Physically Destroyed your Amhara-Bias and nothing in Wikipedia should be used to Promote your Egotistical Abyssinian(Amhara) Fundamentalism agenda either. It will be Duly contested and even if you try to use Wikipedia guidelines to slickly Delete and Edit content that Goes against your Amhara-biased Agenda. Stop spreading your Abyssinian(Amhara) Fundamentalism AGENDA! Eritrea is an Independent Country with the Tigrinyas and Tigre people INDEPENDENT of Amhara-agenda. Follow the Wikipedia guidelines you are using to Wikilawyer me. Stop Wikilawyering me and other editors. We have EVERY RIGHT TO EDIT in WIKIPEDIA And You Are NOT AN ADIMINISTRATOR TO TELL ME HOW AND WHEN TO EDIT AN ARTICLE! You are definitely a liar here. Otakrem ( talk) 12:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
STOP Vandalising the Abyssinian Article by Deleting the Properly Sourced data that I put in. You do NOT OWN the Article, you keep deleting and I will keep putting it back. Otakrem ( talk) 13:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Otakrem,as said both of us do not own wikpedia and we need to involve other editors as to weather keep the sections titled criticism and wider Habesha idenity or delete them both because they are irrelevant. So far the consensus among wikipedia editors regarding the article is based on Ethno-linguistic factors (language classification) in which political factor is not among them and it was created & maintained similarly to Iranian peoples ethno-linguistic group which includes various ethnic-groups who speak Iranian languages while most of them leaving outside Republic of Iran. Of the 235 million Iranian Ethno-linguistic Peoples only 79 million of them leave in Iran Republic and the rest leave in Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Georgia, Tajikstan, Uzbekistan, Russia and China [10] [11]. Now before requesting RfC for other editors to decide on removing or keeping both sections I have issues on what you have added under criticism section and based on WP:CHALLENGE & WP:ORIGINAL of wikipedia rules I have the right to question them. Could you let me know the citation/quotation as it is, without you modifying it, you used to write the very first sentence under criticism section, it's just I went through all the sources and I could not find a citation that supports it. From that we will continue to the other phrases which I have issues with. — EthiopianHabesha ( talk) 20:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Since you added the Expansionist section to include non-Semitic speaking people, You should not remove the mention of Oromos and cushitics Rejecting Abyssinian Identity. Are you trying reach NPOV in this article or only promote your Abyssinian Expasionist(cultural imperialist) POV ie "everyone is Abyssinian because Amhara imperialists said so"? If so, then I will keep deleting anything and everything until Abysinnian article only says "Amhara and Amharaized Tigrayans" are the only Abyssinians. Otakrem ( talk) 01:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Language is not the criteria for grouping people but citations. Its based off the wikipedia editors personal work and not references. Ge'ez is not even related to Amharic. The Tigre people for example do not want to be called Abyssinian, this can bring a potential lawsuit by members of that community against wikipedia for misrepresentation. Citations are clear. Abyssinians claim Jewish origin as the Amhara people page says. the Argobba claim descent from Arabs. Nowhere can you find a citation that claims prehistorically they were one. Please show the source of the origin of citation that exactly states what is posted on the wikipage. Duqsene ( talk) 09:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Abyssinian or Habesha are a people who are ancestral to the rulers of ancient habesha not a ethnolinguistic block. The linguistic experts have labelled the Ethio-semitic languages, the Abyssinian languages but have not said Abyssinians are all those people. If it had been based on linguistics, Amharic could not be included in the Habesha category because its not related to Ge'ez. Where is the source for all statements made? This article might help you understand Habesha/Ethiopian. Duqsene ( talk) 09:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Amharic is categorized under Ethiopian semitic because its a semitic language in Ethiopia not because its related to Ge'ez. You are dismissing the ability to provide citations for every statement written in the article. I looked at the contributions clearly and they do not say what is posted on the article. Ge'ez is not related to Amharic and all linguistics have confirmed this. It is not about ethnology-linguistics, it is an article about a people that had lived in an ancient region. Are you the editor that included these baseless statements on the article? What is an RFC? I would like to hear from other editors on this subject. Include the Oromo, Somali and all the people of ethiopia if you want to be neutral and not divisive. Duqsene ( talk) 01:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
I will be awaiting your book title and page reference for the passages. Duqsene ( talk) 15:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
A graph is not a source, link an article or book. Duqsene ( talk) 09:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Duqsene, So are you saying those language graphs, showing how languages are related, is not a source? There are already many books listed in the article, see them. What you are doing is excluding researchs that considers linguists research, geneticists conclusion, archaeologists research and historical documents, and then replace them by researches that was supported by myths and legends. Why? We are not dealing with tribes but an ethno-linguistic group of people similar to Iranian peoples & Bantu peoples who included 100s of ethnic-groups (and 1,000s more tribes and many more clans under the tribes) under them with each tribes having several myths & legends about their origin. — EthiopianHabesha ( talk) 09:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Argobba Woman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 14:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Abyssinian people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
O Fortuna!
...Imperatrix mundi.
22:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
It looks like you want the Amharic language to be added into every page while dismissing the existence of Amhara people because of nationalist ties. Therefore it gives me no choice but to report you for conflict of interest. Duqsene ( talk) 23:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
Duqsene (
talk)
00:26, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Duqsene (
talk)
23:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, I filed a request for Arbitration regarding the Amhara people page, i also mentioned your proposal GabiloveAdol ( talk) 02:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see this. Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 17:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has declined the Amhara people arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 03:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Following consensus at the administrator's noticeboard for incidents, you are indefinitely topic-banned from making any edits relating to the Horn of Africa region, including any countries in that region or their ethnic or cultural groups. This means you are free to continue editing Wikipedia in any other area, but may not make changes to articles directly or partly related to the area covered by the topic ban. The terms of the ban re also spelled out here.
I appreciate this is probably unwelcome news, but it reflects a general concern about the quality and neutrality of your edits over a fair length of time. Hopefully you can find a different area of interest on Wikipedia, and if so, all the best with your editing there. If you have any questions re the topic ban, pleas elect me know on my talk page. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, EthiopianHabesha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)