![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For editing your first template :-) Witty lama 07:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, I've looked over your draft, and am pretty close to accepting it. I was just wondering about the title. It seems you've spelled the name in all-caps, as SOLARIS. Is this an acronym or some sort, or are the all-caps used just as a stylistic device, do you know? If it's the latter, then I'm proposing to title this article as 'Solaris SBSP' – any thoughts? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 06:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello
User:DoubleGrazing, I have just submitted a new draft article - similar to the way I did with this "SOLARIS" article last year, that you reviewed -
Draft:TRUTHS. I liked the way that you put my statement of professional connection into a box on the talk page, so I have done that directly myself this time on this talk page -
Draft talk:TRUTHS. I hope that is correct.
Would you be willing to review the draft article please?
Like with SOLARIS, it might be appropriate to give this article its full title rather than the acronym. However, because of how long the full title is, it's very unlikely anyone would ever search for it that way. Therefore a redirect should be adjusted, because currently truths redirects to the article "truth".
Thank you, Ennegma ( talk) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing ( talk) 07:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)hello user:Theroadislong. I have replied to your comment on my draft article and removed the links you suggested. Can the draft be moved to become an article now? Ennegma ( talk) 15:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Paul W ( talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your work on Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies. Another editor, Clearfrienda, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work! Note to future editors: Earwig scores high because of the large block quote in the Science section. There are no actual copyvios.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
C F A 💬 18:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
On 17 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the satellite TRUTHS is planned to enable the precise calibration of Earth observation data from other satellites? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For editing your first template :-) Witty lama 07:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi, I've looked over your draft, and am pretty close to accepting it. I was just wondering about the title. It seems you've spelled the name in all-caps, as SOLARIS. Is this an acronym or some sort, or are the all-caps used just as a stylistic device, do you know? If it's the latter, then I'm proposing to title this article as 'Solaris SBSP' – any thoughts? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 06:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello
User:DoubleGrazing, I have just submitted a new draft article - similar to the way I did with this "SOLARIS" article last year, that you reviewed -
Draft:TRUTHS. I liked the way that you put my statement of professional connection into a box on the talk page, so I have done that directly myself this time on this talk page -
Draft talk:TRUTHS. I hope that is correct.
Would you be willing to review the draft article please?
Like with SOLARIS, it might be appropriate to give this article its full title rather than the acronym. However, because of how long the full title is, it's very unlikely anyone would ever search for it that way. Therefore a redirect should be adjusted, because currently truths redirects to the article "truth".
Thank you, Ennegma ( talk) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing ( talk) 07:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)hello user:Theroadislong. I have replied to your comment on my draft article and removed the links you suggested. Can the draft be moved to become an article now? Ennegma ( talk) 15:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Paul W ( talk) 14:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your work on Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies. Another editor, Clearfrienda, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work! Note to future editors: Earwig scores high because of the large block quote in the Science section. There are no actual copyvios.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
C F A 💬 18:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
On 17 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the satellite TRUTHS is planned to enable the precise calibration of Earth observation data from other satellites? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Traceable Radiometry Underpinning Terrestrial and Helio Studies), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.