![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. I have already warned FOJ not to be abusive or her talk page access would be revoked. However, she ignored this warning and posted abusive comments towards me. Can you please disable the IP's talk page access? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 16:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elockid, could you please change your block of 113.29.208.0/21 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) to a {{ schoolblock}}? The range is owned by the Catholic Education Network (CENET) so will always be accessed through a school context. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 05:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, do you have time to comment at User talk:Drmies#Identifying proxies? I'd appreciate it. - Sitush ( talk) 15:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
There are growing concerns that Amiram Goldblum is himself editing the article about him. He has two accounts: User:Rastiniak and User:רסטיניאק. Take a look at the this sockpuppet investigation. Also, read the following discussion. רסטיניאק has removed the POV tag from the article twice so far: 1 and 2. While I don't find this subject particularly interesting, I'm alarmed by the fact that Goldblum is fighting tooth and nail to get users who question the neutrality of his article to get blocked. I request you to help us determine whether the two accounts indeed belong to Goldblum. Nataev ( talk) 11:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
The Lorch article is in need of dire attention. Someone called Rich Sauce keeps posting inappropriate images.
Hi, could you re-check your proxy block on 147.91.1.44 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? It doesn't appear to be an open proxy; rather, it looks like a transparent forwarding proxy for the University of Belgrade in Serbia. Thanks! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 15:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, Elockid, I'd like to remove mentions of "transgender" from the article here. The title is misleading in that the article itself does not reference gender expression once. What are your thoughts? ... aa: talk 13:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Could this be Darkness Shines ( [2], [3], [4] 3 edits in between them) (Blocked for two weeks)? Thanks. I might be wrong but I am fairly certain, just as he finds Nangparbat edits spontaneously conspicuous, I know DS's edits. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 14:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey elcokid. meeting after a long time.
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none;">User:</span><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:30px"><b><font color="#4682B4">Elockid</font></b></span>}}
It should display Elockid. Only Elockid.
But it's displaying
Same to me. You can see my userpage.
Can you tell the reason?-- Pratyya (Hello!) 11:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Please protect El Clasico page... check the history of the edition lots of vandalism ...
Thank you
I didn't know if you wanted talk page notices about emails but after re-reading your user page appears so. A few days ago I emailed you asking your view on a Checkuser block you made which is now stale technically. It would be lovely if you could get back to me soon since Ofcourse due to it being technically stale only you can help since you blocked it. Thanks, John F. Lewis ( talk) 22:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
21:55, 12 March 2013 Elockid (talk | contribs) blocked 2605:8900::/32 (talk) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 year, 364 days, 18 hours, 10 minutes and 48 seconds ({{ webhostblock}})
There's probably a better way to get you that information, but it's after 11 and I'm sleepy. Basically, User:Wjcw came into #wikipedia-en-help today asking for an IPBE due to the fact he uses a VPS for security, which is included in that rangeblock apparently. this user was (three times if I read it right) granted IPBE for a similar reason (again, if I read it right) with about the same edit history (i.e. not much). I was wondering if there's any way your magic 8 ball/mop could determine if this is a valid case for an IPBE, and if so either reduce the range (I'm not techy, no clue if that's possible) or issue it?
Thanks, Charmlet ( talk) 04:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elockid, I need you to look at something please. Please see User_talk:Gilliam#Block for some more information. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 14:07, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Please check out the rampant vandalism at Christmas Island to see if you can apply some sort of range block to these vandals. They are redirecting the page to many inappropriate targets again.- Gilliam ( talk) 07:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This user is continously removing sourced contents in Velirs page. Please have a look. Rajkris ( talk) 20:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sure you had a good reason, but I'm unclear why you reblocked This account, which has been blocked since last September, and has not edited since then. -- Jayron 32 23:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if this is related, but I saw you blocked User:Gtownsfs, an old account which did start editing again. I'd assume someone editing the Georgetown University page and Georgia would be a sockpuppet of Satt 2, and wanted to add the name to that long list, but wasn't sure where to do that, or if it was necessary to catalog the user like that, considering the indefinite block.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 19:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
What was wrong with the content you removed from Agrippina, Countess von Zarnekau other than that it was made by a sockpuppet?-- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 02:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of risk of stepping on WP:BEANS, wouldn't it make sense (if there isn't too much collateral) to rangeblock 2600:1000:B100::/39 ?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
I wanted to recognize you for the work done fighting the Bold text vandalism by the numerous IP's I've seen on AIV. Just for fun, having checked each IP with WHOIS, nearly every one reported with that M.O had one thing in common: They were all registered to Verizon Wireless. Heh, what a waste of data. Anyway, thank you for your vigilance! Signalizing ( talk) 19:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Expeditions in Bengal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mahur and Subha ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Block Special:Contributions/82.35.218.9 with at least one year, the user always editing vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.139 ( talk • contribs)
Don't you think it was controversial to move Georgian people to Georgians without a proper Wikipedia:Requested moves, which be more appropriate and give people enough time to respond.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 22:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
He's back with a new IP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gunmetal_Angel. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 22:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Could you take a look here, please? [6] Thank you,-- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 01:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Such similar ways of editing, protesting, and articles in common. The only difference I can see is that Metallican doesn't use profanity and become a hot head like Gunmetal. My guess is they are either the same guy playing an elaborate game or they know each other. Found it pretty weirldy conincidental that their socks edited the same article in the same day, not long after one of the socks was IP rangeblocked. In any case, thanks for handling it. I will do it better if there's a next time (with diffs and so forth). -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 16:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
This really your account? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Elockid, can you please tell me if there is any way I can see all those articles that I've created?
Is there such thing on wiki which will show me those articles which was created by me since I registered in back in 2011? georgianJORJADZE 00:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Elockid this article seems to be just a bio of him written probably by him as well.
I think the article should be deleted as it has no importance as such. What do you suggest? georgianJORJADZE 13:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
You listed the entry at the bottom. It's supposed to be listed at the top (As of this post, it's number 2 at the list). You also need to put the following text on the discussion page: {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ Elockid ( Talk) 20:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Elockid,
This user is constantly removing the referenced information from the articles and calls me a nationalist on my talk page. Here and here this user completely removed the sourced information without even discussing it. Can you please see this case and warn this user for such behaviour and protect those articles he seems to be without anything to say just removes all the sources. Thanks. GJ. GEORGIANJORJADZE 11:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elockid! I'm coming to you as you seem to be mentoring Georgian Jorjadze since his return here last month, and I hope you could explain to him that he cannot behave this way. I'm referring to his recent creation, Georgian monarchs family tree of Bagrationi dynasty, where he pushes a very strong and unsourced POV regarding the origins of Georgia's main dynasty. Another user ( User:The Emperor's New Spy) and I have confronted him on the talk page of the article. Not only has he reverted us (3 times in the last hour), he also shows n the talk page strong signs of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. When confronted with the fact that modern scholarly sources contradict his version, he dismissed them in favor of medieval primary sources. When asked to not edit-war, he insisted that we discuss first, even though he's reverting to his unsourced version. I remember trying to explain to him what WP:BRD means back in 2012, but now I give up. And I'm not even going into the mess his other family trees seem to have created in the last days, as I haven't had time to get into the particulars of each, but I notice a similar discussion happened at Talk:Family tree of ancient Georgian monarchs. Could you please help? Susuman77 ( talk) 18:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elockid, as you have experience with this one in the past, can you take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx? There's another on the same article that I suspect, but I haven't had the time yet to grab the diffs etc. Also, does a hard block on the IP/ 23 range have any collateral damage? cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 15:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. My name is Niyazi Sonmez (DiGi), the husband of Ms. Triplett. I was wondering why my wife's article was deleted. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.211.73.94 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for your continued help, Elockid. Drmies ( talk) 14:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
FYI: you now also have access to the private IRC channel #wikimedia-privacy. Trijnstel talk 20:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. I have already warned FOJ not to be abusive or her talk page access would be revoked. However, she ignored this warning and posted abusive comments towards me. Can you please disable the IP's talk page access? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 16:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elockid, could you please change your block of 113.29.208.0/21 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) to a {{ schoolblock}}? The range is owned by the Catholic Education Network (CENET) so will always be accessed through a school context. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 05:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, do you have time to comment at User talk:Drmies#Identifying proxies? I'd appreciate it. - Sitush ( talk) 15:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
There are growing concerns that Amiram Goldblum is himself editing the article about him. He has two accounts: User:Rastiniak and User:רסטיניאק. Take a look at the this sockpuppet investigation. Also, read the following discussion. רסטיניאק has removed the POV tag from the article twice so far: 1 and 2. While I don't find this subject particularly interesting, I'm alarmed by the fact that Goldblum is fighting tooth and nail to get users who question the neutrality of his article to get blocked. I request you to help us determine whether the two accounts indeed belong to Goldblum. Nataev ( talk) 11:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
The Lorch article is in need of dire attention. Someone called Rich Sauce keeps posting inappropriate images.
Hi, could you re-check your proxy block on 147.91.1.44 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? It doesn't appear to be an open proxy; rather, it looks like a transparent forwarding proxy for the University of Belgrade in Serbia. Thanks! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 15:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, Elockid, I'd like to remove mentions of "transgender" from the article here. The title is misleading in that the article itself does not reference gender expression once. What are your thoughts? ... aa: talk 13:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Could this be Darkness Shines ( [2], [3], [4] 3 edits in between them) (Blocked for two weeks)? Thanks. I might be wrong but I am fairly certain, just as he finds Nangparbat edits spontaneously conspicuous, I know DS's edits. Mr T (Talk?) (New thread?) 14:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey elcokid. meeting after a long time.
{{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="display:none;">User:</span><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:30px"><b><font color="#4682B4">Elockid</font></b></span>}}
It should display Elockid. Only Elockid.
But it's displaying
Same to me. You can see my userpage.
Can you tell the reason?-- Pratyya (Hello!) 11:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Please protect El Clasico page... check the history of the edition lots of vandalism ...
Thank you
I didn't know if you wanted talk page notices about emails but after re-reading your user page appears so. A few days ago I emailed you asking your view on a Checkuser block you made which is now stale technically. It would be lovely if you could get back to me soon since Ofcourse due to it being technically stale only you can help since you blocked it. Thanks, John F. Lewis ( talk) 22:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
21:55, 12 March 2013 Elockid (talk | contribs) blocked 2605:8900::/32 (talk) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 year, 364 days, 18 hours, 10 minutes and 48 seconds ({{ webhostblock}})
There's probably a better way to get you that information, but it's after 11 and I'm sleepy. Basically, User:Wjcw came into #wikipedia-en-help today asking for an IPBE due to the fact he uses a VPS for security, which is included in that rangeblock apparently. this user was (three times if I read it right) granted IPBE for a similar reason (again, if I read it right) with about the same edit history (i.e. not much). I was wondering if there's any way your magic 8 ball/mop could determine if this is a valid case for an IPBE, and if so either reduce the range (I'm not techy, no clue if that's possible) or issue it?
Thanks, Charmlet ( talk) 04:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elockid, I need you to look at something please. Please see User_talk:Gilliam#Block for some more information. Thanks. Drmies ( talk) 14:07, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Please check out the rampant vandalism at Christmas Island to see if you can apply some sort of range block to these vandals. They are redirecting the page to many inappropriate targets again.- Gilliam ( talk) 07:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This user is continously removing sourced contents in Velirs page. Please have a look. Rajkris ( talk) 20:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sure you had a good reason, but I'm unclear why you reblocked This account, which has been blocked since last September, and has not edited since then. -- Jayron 32 23:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if this is related, but I saw you blocked User:Gtownsfs, an old account which did start editing again. I'd assume someone editing the Georgetown University page and Georgia would be a sockpuppet of Satt 2, and wanted to add the name to that long list, but wasn't sure where to do that, or if it was necessary to catalog the user like that, considering the indefinite block.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 19:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
What was wrong with the content you removed from Agrippina, Countess von Zarnekau other than that it was made by a sockpuppet?-- The Emperor's New Spy ( talk) 02:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Out of risk of stepping on WP:BEANS, wouldn't it make sense (if there isn't too much collateral) to rangeblock 2600:1000:B100::/39 ?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
I wanted to recognize you for the work done fighting the Bold text vandalism by the numerous IP's I've seen on AIV. Just for fun, having checked each IP with WHOIS, nearly every one reported with that M.O had one thing in common: They were all registered to Verizon Wireless. Heh, what a waste of data. Anyway, thank you for your vigilance! Signalizing ( talk) 19:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Expeditions in Bengal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mahur and Subha ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Block Special:Contributions/82.35.218.9 with at least one year, the user always editing vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.139 ( talk • contribs)
Don't you think it was controversial to move Georgian people to Georgians without a proper Wikipedia:Requested moves, which be more appropriate and give people enough time to respond.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 22:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
He's back with a new IP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gunmetal_Angel. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 22:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Could you take a look here, please? [6] Thank you,-- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 01:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Such similar ways of editing, protesting, and articles in common. The only difference I can see is that Metallican doesn't use profanity and become a hot head like Gunmetal. My guess is they are either the same guy playing an elaborate game or they know each other. Found it pretty weirldy conincidental that their socks edited the same article in the same day, not long after one of the socks was IP rangeblocked. In any case, thanks for handling it. I will do it better if there's a next time (with diffs and so forth). -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 16:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
This really your account? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Elockid, can you please tell me if there is any way I can see all those articles that I've created?
Is there such thing on wiki which will show me those articles which was created by me since I registered in back in 2011? georgianJORJADZE 00:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Elockid this article seems to be just a bio of him written probably by him as well.
I think the article should be deleted as it has no importance as such. What do you suggest? georgianJORJADZE 13:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
You listed the entry at the bottom. It's supposed to be listed at the top (As of this post, it's number 2 at the list). You also need to put the following text on the discussion page: {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ Elockid ( Talk) 20:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Elockid,
This user is constantly removing the referenced information from the articles and calls me a nationalist on my talk page. Here and here this user completely removed the sourced information without even discussing it. Can you please see this case and warn this user for such behaviour and protect those articles he seems to be without anything to say just removes all the sources. Thanks. GJ. GEORGIANJORJADZE 11:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elockid! I'm coming to you as you seem to be mentoring Georgian Jorjadze since his return here last month, and I hope you could explain to him that he cannot behave this way. I'm referring to his recent creation, Georgian monarchs family tree of Bagrationi dynasty, where he pushes a very strong and unsourced POV regarding the origins of Georgia's main dynasty. Another user ( User:The Emperor's New Spy) and I have confronted him on the talk page of the article. Not only has he reverted us (3 times in the last hour), he also shows n the talk page strong signs of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. When confronted with the fact that modern scholarly sources contradict his version, he dismissed them in favor of medieval primary sources. When asked to not edit-war, he insisted that we discuss first, even though he's reverting to his unsourced version. I remember trying to explain to him what WP:BRD means back in 2012, but now I give up. And I'm not even going into the mess his other family trees seem to have created in the last days, as I haven't had time to get into the particulars of each, but I notice a similar discussion happened at Talk:Family tree of ancient Georgian monarchs. Could you please help? Susuman77 ( talk) 18:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elockid, as you have experience with this one in the past, can you take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx? There's another on the same article that I suspect, but I haven't had the time yet to grab the diffs etc. Also, does a hard block on the IP/ 23 range have any collateral damage? cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 15:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. My name is Niyazi Sonmez (DiGi), the husband of Ms. Triplett. I was wondering why my wife's article was deleted. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.211.73.94 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for your continued help, Elockid. Drmies ( talk) 14:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
FYI: you now also have access to the private IRC channel #wikimedia-privacy. Trijnstel talk 20:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)