Welcome!
Hello, Edith Sirius Lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Will Beback
talk 20:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Krisanaprakornkit and his team [the authors of the Cochrane review] studied only meditation practices that could be used in clinical settings. "Meditation as a part of religious or spiritual practice wasn't considered to be meditation therapy," he said. http://www.wellsphere.com/meditation-article/meditate-your-anxiety-away/369 Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 20:41, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
There were only two studies included in the review and only one of these two was about TM. See http://thediabeticnews.com/news/860.shtml . The only included study on TM seems to be http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6986134?dopt=Abstract . Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 19:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Considered for help User:JamesBWatson Edith Sirius Lee (alias IP 67.230.154) ( talk) 00:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I like the explanation of WP:RS that I have seen in comments from User_talk:Lar. Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 15:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Here is an essay that supports a sceptical view [1]
...about this. [2] The discretionary sanctions adopted at ArbCom apply to any editor of the TMM Movement articles. Do not make the mistake of thinking that, as a "new" editor, or an old editor under a new name, you are exempt from the TM ArbCom decision. Fladrif ( talk) 01:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Read WP:CHECK. Oh, and if you continue to be evasive with your answers, I will track down a CU right now and get one started, I don't technically need your permission to do so. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I will ask for formal mediation for Lead (research content): Transcedental Meditation in the next few days. Would you like to be included as an involved user. I’ll check back on your user page for an answer. Thanks.( olive ( talk) 02:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC))
I have filed a request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement concerning the recent edit warring. [3] -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
What you do with comments people leave on your talk page is your business, but you cannot delete comments that other editors have made on article or Wikipedia talk pages, as you did here. I have reverted your deletion. I agree 110% that it is "bizarre" that a number of editors have left comments on a closed RAE that has specific instructions not to modify the page. If one of the Admins running that board deletes them as untimely or improper, that is one thing. But, that is not something that mere mortals are permitted to do. See WP:TPOC Fladrif ( talk) 22:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
To answer your question here [5]. If you feel you you were not treated in an appropriate manner and that your restriction was unfair, you can appeal it as an individual editor independent of restrictions or bans placed on any other editor. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I completely forgot about the question you asked. Best wishes.( olive ( talk) 15:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC))
In case this is useful to you.
Hi Edith... If you haven't been involved in a RfA in the past you may not be aware that content issues are not really part of discussion on the process for discussing a request for adminship., There is rampant misinformation being lobbed every which way in this RfA, but discussion of content will not remedy that, probably nothing will, and in truth is probably unfair to the editor applying for adminship. I have no right to comment here, but thought to anyway for what its worth.( olive ( talk) 23:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC))
Hi Edith... I prefer not to make any comments about what RexxS may have meant. His quote though, comes from the TM ArbCom decision. [7]
Any uninvolved administrator may, in his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor editing Transcendental meditation or other articles concerning Transcendental meditation and related biographies of living people, broadly defined, if, after a warning, that editor repeatedly or seriously violates the behavioural standards or editorial processes of Wikipedia in connection with these articles. The sanctions imposed may include bans for a period of time or indefinitely from editing any page or set of pages relating to Transcendental meditation; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; blocks of up to one year in length; or any other measures that the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the proper collegial editing of these articles and the smooth functioning of the project.
Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning advising of the problems with his or her editing and containing a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. This requirement of a prior warning shall not apply if an editor who was a named party to this case engages in gross misconduct.
His comment and quote leaves out that an admin may only apply a sanction with out warning if the named party engages in gross misconduct otherwise a warning is necessary. ( olive ( talk) 17:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC))
I did not expect that you would disagree with the hidding, but I respect you a lot and do not want to oppose you in any way. Yet, I read this conversation several times, and I still feel, in the same way as Atama I guess, that there were words that express opposition in this conversation such "It's innacurate" or "No,.." that were not warranted. There was not that much opposition in the actual content (except if we read behind the words). It was very confusing to me. Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 17:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
A request for clarification [8] has been filed per [9] Although it may not affect you directly, your name has been mentioned or referenced.( olive ( talk) 20:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC))
Hi Edith. Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement are generally structured very differently from other pages on the encyclopedia. While it may be common to partake in threaded discussion at these pages, such a thing is generally frowned upon on pages like WP:AE or WP:A/R/A. Could I ask that you please refrain from doing so in the future? Thanks, NW ( Talk) 18:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Transcendental Meditation 2 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 04:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC) |
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Talk:Transcendental_Meditation#Proposal. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. diff link. Comment on article talk page directed against a single user, admin Jmh649, instead of focusing on comments addressing content. -- Cirt ( talk) 02:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
User:Edith Sirius Lee → User:Edith Sirius Lee 2 — Lost my password, no email. Edith Sirius Lee 2 ( talk) 00:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 15:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Edith Sirius Lee. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
Welcome!
Hello, Edith Sirius Lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Will Beback
talk 20:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Krisanaprakornkit and his team [the authors of the Cochrane review] studied only meditation practices that could be used in clinical settings. "Meditation as a part of religious or spiritual practice wasn't considered to be meditation therapy," he said. http://www.wellsphere.com/meditation-article/meditate-your-anxiety-away/369 Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 20:41, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
There were only two studies included in the review and only one of these two was about TM. See http://thediabeticnews.com/news/860.shtml . The only included study on TM seems to be http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6986134?dopt=Abstract . Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 19:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Considered for help User:JamesBWatson Edith Sirius Lee (alias IP 67.230.154) ( talk) 00:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I like the explanation of WP:RS that I have seen in comments from User_talk:Lar. Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 15:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Here is an essay that supports a sceptical view [1]
...about this. [2] The discretionary sanctions adopted at ArbCom apply to any editor of the TMM Movement articles. Do not make the mistake of thinking that, as a "new" editor, or an old editor under a new name, you are exempt from the TM ArbCom decision. Fladrif ( talk) 01:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Read WP:CHECK. Oh, and if you continue to be evasive with your answers, I will track down a CU right now and get one started, I don't technically need your permission to do so. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I will ask for formal mediation for Lead (research content): Transcedental Meditation in the next few days. Would you like to be included as an involved user. I’ll check back on your user page for an answer. Thanks.( olive ( talk) 02:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC))
I have filed a request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement concerning the recent edit warring. [3] -- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
What you do with comments people leave on your talk page is your business, but you cannot delete comments that other editors have made on article or Wikipedia talk pages, as you did here. I have reverted your deletion. I agree 110% that it is "bizarre" that a number of editors have left comments on a closed RAE that has specific instructions not to modify the page. If one of the Admins running that board deletes them as untimely or improper, that is one thing. But, that is not something that mere mortals are permitted to do. See WP:TPOC Fladrif ( talk) 22:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
To answer your question here [5]. If you feel you you were not treated in an appropriate manner and that your restriction was unfair, you can appeal it as an individual editor independent of restrictions or bans placed on any other editor. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, I completely forgot about the question you asked. Best wishes.( olive ( talk) 15:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC))
In case this is useful to you.
Hi Edith... If you haven't been involved in a RfA in the past you may not be aware that content issues are not really part of discussion on the process for discussing a request for adminship., There is rampant misinformation being lobbed every which way in this RfA, but discussion of content will not remedy that, probably nothing will, and in truth is probably unfair to the editor applying for adminship. I have no right to comment here, but thought to anyway for what its worth.( olive ( talk) 23:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC))
Hi Edith... I prefer not to make any comments about what RexxS may have meant. His quote though, comes from the TM ArbCom decision. [7]
Any uninvolved administrator may, in his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor editing Transcendental meditation or other articles concerning Transcendental meditation and related biographies of living people, broadly defined, if, after a warning, that editor repeatedly or seriously violates the behavioural standards or editorial processes of Wikipedia in connection with these articles. The sanctions imposed may include bans for a period of time or indefinitely from editing any page or set of pages relating to Transcendental meditation; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; blocks of up to one year in length; or any other measures that the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the proper collegial editing of these articles and the smooth functioning of the project.
Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning advising of the problems with his or her editing and containing a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. This requirement of a prior warning shall not apply if an editor who was a named party to this case engages in gross misconduct.
His comment and quote leaves out that an admin may only apply a sanction with out warning if the named party engages in gross misconduct otherwise a warning is necessary. ( olive ( talk) 17:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC))
I did not expect that you would disagree with the hidding, but I respect you a lot and do not want to oppose you in any way. Yet, I read this conversation several times, and I still feel, in the same way as Atama I guess, that there were words that express opposition in this conversation such "It's innacurate" or "No,.." that were not warranted. There was not that much opposition in the actual content (except if we read behind the words). It was very confusing to me. Edith Sirius Lee ( talk) 17:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
A request for clarification [8] has been filed per [9] Although it may not affect you directly, your name has been mentioned or referenced.( olive ( talk) 20:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC))
Hi Edith. Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement are generally structured very differently from other pages on the encyclopedia. While it may be common to partake in threaded discussion at these pages, such a thing is generally frowned upon on pages like WP:AE or WP:A/R/A. Could I ask that you please refrain from doing so in the future? Thanks, NW ( Talk) 18:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Transcendental Meditation 2 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 04:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC) |
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Talk:Transcendental_Meditation#Proposal. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. diff link. Comment on article talk page directed against a single user, admin Jmh649, instead of focusing on comments addressing content. -- Cirt ( talk) 02:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
User:Edith Sirius Lee → User:Edith Sirius Lee 2 — Lost my password, no email. Edith Sirius Lee 2 ( talk) 00:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 15:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Edith Sirius Lee. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |