![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm not sure what to do here, but if you take a lot at his contributions he was created yesterday and started to immediately remove sexual content from multiple pages; sometimes removing sourced content stating ("making more concise"). I don't think this is a new user. Anyways thank for warning him, I wasn't sure if I left a message what it should say. AerobicFox ( talk) 20:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
I had all my postings from yesterday removed as spam. One was a personal narrative of my arrest for domestic abuse. I don't see how this is considered spam. It was factual and relevant to the topic. The other was an analytical reaction to the White Privilege conference held recently. I think its point of view helps to balance other materials in the article. What rules are being violated? Why was I threatened with expulsion. The links add to one's understanding of the subject. What does the yellow sign mean? Is an appeal possible? wmcg Wmcg ( talk) 16:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
67.220.4.17 ( talk) 02:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Template:FGwiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
JJ98 (
Talk /
Contributions)
19:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if you could weigh in regarding the family tree issue. The other user keeps citing unrelated policies and refuses to discuss the issue. Since you noticed that the family tree is the only part of the article that bears actual importance to the issue, your response will be highly appreciated. Hearfourmewesique ( talk) 03:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your thoughtful comment on AfD and I was wondering if you would also add a comment about how to deal with issues under discussion over at Talk:Marcus Bachmann#BLP concerns. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 14:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
hello,
I wonder why this template doesn't include the four-star rating, for example [1]. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 12:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathanson and Young is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nathanson_and_Young until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article-- Cailil talk 01:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
A GAN on Margaret Sanger is on hold to allow time for editors to improve prose, inline citations and presentation and formatting before the review looks at accuracy, POV and coverage. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Margaret Sanger to good article status. |
SilkTork ✔Tea time 21:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Template:Review-Christgau has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Nik
the
stoned
12:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Not sure whether you're monitoring the page at all...or want to get involved...but an editor seems to be trying to drag an old skeleton out of the closet. Doniago ( talk) 00:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for the comment on my talk page the other day about my use of the "minor edit". I appreciate your feedback and your pointer to the guideline on the matter which I hadn't previously been aware off. Unfortunately, someone has since removed my addition. Se la vie, but I will remember your comment for next time.
Anyway, thanks again for taking the time to write,
Peter
Pmasters ( talk) 23:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Adams (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Adams (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Acroterion (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
I would question the need for a Wikipedia article for Adams, as there appears to be no sources available in regards to his career. Broden ( talk) 19:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14#Template:Lists of Russians 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 21:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
-- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 01:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
As you may know, this page is still transcluded on several talk page archives, such as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 20 for example. Because you requested its deletion, the places where your userpage was transcluded are confused now. Would you please permit the page to be restored long-term for the sake of these archives? I restored it in order to subst it on Talk:Indestructible (Disturbed album)/Archive 1 (where it's only used once), but some of the pages use it so many times that substing would be difficult. Please note that I redeleted it as soon as it was substed to the Indestructible archive. Nyttend ( talk) 00:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beatles - I Threw It All Away (excerpt).q0.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 17:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pink floyd the division bell front-308.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Bill Price ( nyb) 01:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.
At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).
Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.
If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pink Floyd Relics 1996-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RelicsUSA-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relics05-b-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:PinkFloyd-album-piperatthegatesofdawn 300.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm not sure what to do here, but if you take a lot at his contributions he was created yesterday and started to immediately remove sexual content from multiple pages; sometimes removing sourced content stating ("making more concise"). I don't think this is a new user. Anyways thank for warning him, I wasn't sure if I left a message what it should say. AerobicFox ( talk) 20:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
I had all my postings from yesterday removed as spam. One was a personal narrative of my arrest for domestic abuse. I don't see how this is considered spam. It was factual and relevant to the topic. The other was an analytical reaction to the White Privilege conference held recently. I think its point of view helps to balance other materials in the article. What rules are being violated? Why was I threatened with expulsion. The links add to one's understanding of the subject. What does the yellow sign mean? Is an appeal possible? wmcg Wmcg ( talk) 16:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
67.220.4.17 ( talk) 02:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Template:FGwiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
JJ98 (
Talk /
Contributions)
19:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if you could weigh in regarding the family tree issue. The other user keeps citing unrelated policies and refuses to discuss the issue. Since you noticed that the family tree is the only part of the article that bears actual importance to the issue, your response will be highly appreciated. Hearfourmewesique ( talk) 03:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your thoughtful comment on AfD and I was wondering if you would also add a comment about how to deal with issues under discussion over at Talk:Marcus Bachmann#BLP concerns. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 14:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
hello,
I wonder why this template doesn't include the four-star rating, for example [1]. -- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me I am dynamite 12:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathanson and Young is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nathanson_and_Young until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article-- Cailil talk 01:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
A GAN on Margaret Sanger is on hold to allow time for editors to improve prose, inline citations and presentation and formatting before the review looks at accuracy, POV and coverage. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:15, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Margaret Sanger to good article status. |
SilkTork ✔Tea time 21:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Template:Review-Christgau has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Nik
the
stoned
12:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Not sure whether you're monitoring the page at all...or want to get involved...but an editor seems to be trying to drag an old skeleton out of the closet. Doniago ( talk) 00:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for the comment on my talk page the other day about my use of the "minor edit". I appreciate your feedback and your pointer to the guideline on the matter which I hadn't previously been aware off. Unfortunately, someone has since removed my addition. Se la vie, but I will remember your comment for next time.
Anyway, thanks again for taking the time to write,
Peter
Pmasters ( talk) 23:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Adams (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Adams (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Acroterion (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
I would question the need for a Wikipedia article for Adams, as there appears to be no sources available in regards to his career. Broden ( talk) 19:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14#Template:Lists of Russians 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 21:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
-- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 01:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
As you may know, this page is still transcluded on several talk page archives, such as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 20 for example. Because you requested its deletion, the places where your userpage was transcluded are confused now. Would you please permit the page to be restored long-term for the sake of these archives? I restored it in order to subst it on Talk:Indestructible (Disturbed album)/Archive 1 (where it's only used once), but some of the pages use it so many times that substing would be difficult. Please note that I redeleted it as soon as it was substed to the Indestructible archive. Nyttend ( talk) 00:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beatles - I Threw It All Away (excerpt).q0.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 17:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pink floyd the division bell front-308.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Bill Price ( nyb) 01:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:
It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.
At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).
Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.
If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pink Floyd Relics 1996-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RelicsUSA-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Relics05-b-300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:PinkFloyd-album-piperatthegatesofdawn 300.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)