Thank you for uploading Image:Esalon osrh.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This image is not copyrighted, plz do not use images that do not comply with the Wiki copyrights policy as Wiki deletes any image that is not copyrighted automatically. If you have this image in high resolution you are welcome to use it on Wiki as long you comply with the Wiki policy, thanx Mic of orion ( talk) 22:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ZACORDA, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.zacorda.hr/en/o_nama. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 20:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Vukovar centre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 14:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, ZACORDA, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zacorda.hr/en/o_nama. As a copyright violation, ZACORDA appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. ZACORDA has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- lucasbfr talk 16:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
We are having small problem with template:"Regions which belonged to Kingdom of Hungary before the Treaty of Trianon (1920)" in articles about Croatia. Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia has declared independence from Kingdom of Hungary in October of 1918 and this was accepted by Hungary in October 1918 or I am making mistake ?-- Rjecina ( talk) 12:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Why did you add the Christianity infobox to the Anglican communion page? As far as I know these should not work as categories and should only be displayed on pages which are listed on the box, because they are series boxes. That's why the box says "part of a series on" and lists the series? If you agree perhaps you would like to revert this yourself since that's always nicer than having someone else do it for you? -- BozMo talk 13:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
If you feel that the article has a POV concern, you need to start a discussion on the talk page about it. Per the documentation, I have removed the notice. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 04:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk) 19:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Tell me what's the difference between kingdom of Hungary and lands of St Stephen-- Bizso ( talk) 21:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
guess how many titles did Austrian emperors have? that's right, 150. May I ask you why the other 145 is not there? They should be listed under a separate section called Titles. That is becuase most of them include other titles. Such king of Hungary include king of Croatia. and emperor of austria includes king of Tyrol, or emperor of lower austria, but not king of Bohemia for example. Stop acting on your emotions.-- Bizso ( talk) 21:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Now you claim that I deleted reference. Where did I delete it?-- Bizso ( talk) 22:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
In a 2007
arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the
Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the
Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.. --
Ricky81682 (
talk) 00:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Explicit warning: this is not appropriate conduct. There is no need to make suggestions as to the ethnicity of other editors as it is completely irrelevant and inappropriate. Do it again (and I'm not kidding) and you will be blocked. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 08:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
All users involved in personal union discussion are invited to RFC on Talk:Pacta conventa (Croatia)-- Rjecina ( talk) 16:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I do not understand your message. Sophia was the mother of Coloman of Hungary which is well documented. However, none of the sources I have read mention that she was Croatian. Moreover, if she had been Croatian, this fact would have probably be mentioned in order to strengthen his son's claim to the throne of Croatia. Therefore, the statement that she was Croatian should be properly cited. Otherwise, we could also state that she was Hungarian, Polish, Jew, French, American, Spanish, Ethiopian, Chinese or English. I think before labelling anybody of nationalism we should assume a good faith edit. Borsoka ( talk) 19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Do not say things like "Slovenian historians aren't reliable!" again. Wikipedia is not a soapbox and if you cannot bring yourself to work towards neutrality on these articles, you will find your editing privileges here severely limited. Attack a group of people like that again and I will bring up discussions about having you topic banned from the entire sphere of articles. That area is bad enough already and it is not amusing in the least when people act like idiots there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Um... why was I reverted? Had you glanced at the talkpage you would've noticed that the discussion was over for weeks. Nobody responded to my post and the template was on for quite a while. This is not vandalism, I've merged the article properly and explained the misunderstanding that resulted in there existing two articles on two states allegedly existing at the same time in the same place. (The debate in such issues results from the extremely unrealistic modern Croatian history, stemming from the rabid nationalism of the 1990s wartime propaganda. Much like the fictional state of "Croatia-Hungary") Regards, -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 13:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia, and Dalmatia. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. .
Anonimu (
talk) 09:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
There is a difference between a legal treaty and an ideal, non-existent, state. Anonimu ( talk) 10:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
RE:
The Hungaro-Croatian Compromise of 1868 (The Nagodba), II (Page 371) tered funds and paid over to the Autonomous Government of the said countries.
' 50. At the head of the Autonomous Provincial Government in Croatia-Slavonia and Dalmatia stands the Ban, who is responsible to the Croatian-Slavonian-Dalmatian Diet.
' 51. The Ban of Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia is appointed by His Imperial and Apostolic Royal Majesty, on the proposal and under the signature of the Royal Hungarian Joint Premier.
Source: [1]
Oh brother... :)
Step 1: READ my response (follow this link: [2])
Step 2: UNDERSTAND what its says.
Step 3: RESPOND completely and fully to what it says.
Can I put it in a simpler way? :P -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 23:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on VERN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 15:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VERN', you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ICT and University of Applied Sciences ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
This applies to infoboxes, too.
Thanks, and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 14:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on VERN', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mblumber ( talk) 15:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article National Cake Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable unofficial holiday. Sources don't provide actual substantive coverage, just that it's a day to eat cake.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reywas92
Talk 13:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Esalon osrh.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This image is not copyrighted, plz do not use images that do not comply with the Wiki copyrights policy as Wiki deletes any image that is not copyrighted automatically. If you have this image in high resolution you are welcome to use it on Wiki as long you comply with the Wiki policy, thanx Mic of orion ( talk) 22:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ZACORDA, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.zacorda.hr/en/o_nama. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 20:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Vukovar centre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 14:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, ZACORDA, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zacorda.hr/en/o_nama. As a copyright violation, ZACORDA appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. ZACORDA has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- lucasbfr talk 16:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
We are having small problem with template:"Regions which belonged to Kingdom of Hungary before the Treaty of Trianon (1920)" in articles about Croatia. Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia has declared independence from Kingdom of Hungary in October of 1918 and this was accepted by Hungary in October 1918 or I am making mistake ?-- Rjecina ( talk) 12:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Why did you add the Christianity infobox to the Anglican communion page? As far as I know these should not work as categories and should only be displayed on pages which are listed on the box, because they are series boxes. That's why the box says "part of a series on" and lists the series? If you agree perhaps you would like to revert this yourself since that's always nicer than having someone else do it for you? -- BozMo talk 13:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
If you feel that the article has a POV concern, you need to start a discussion on the talk page about it. Per the documentation, I have removed the notice. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 04:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk) 19:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Tell me what's the difference between kingdom of Hungary and lands of St Stephen-- Bizso ( talk) 21:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
guess how many titles did Austrian emperors have? that's right, 150. May I ask you why the other 145 is not there? They should be listed under a separate section called Titles. That is becuase most of them include other titles. Such king of Hungary include king of Croatia. and emperor of austria includes king of Tyrol, or emperor of lower austria, but not king of Bohemia for example. Stop acting on your emotions.-- Bizso ( talk) 21:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Now you claim that I deleted reference. Where did I delete it?-- Bizso ( talk) 22:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
In a 2007
arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the
Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the
Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.. --
Ricky81682 (
talk) 00:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Explicit warning: this is not appropriate conduct. There is no need to make suggestions as to the ethnicity of other editors as it is completely irrelevant and inappropriate. Do it again (and I'm not kidding) and you will be blocked. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 08:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
All users involved in personal union discussion are invited to RFC on Talk:Pacta conventa (Croatia)-- Rjecina ( talk) 16:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I do not understand your message. Sophia was the mother of Coloman of Hungary which is well documented. However, none of the sources I have read mention that she was Croatian. Moreover, if she had been Croatian, this fact would have probably be mentioned in order to strengthen his son's claim to the throne of Croatia. Therefore, the statement that she was Croatian should be properly cited. Otherwise, we could also state that she was Hungarian, Polish, Jew, French, American, Spanish, Ethiopian, Chinese or English. I think before labelling anybody of nationalism we should assume a good faith edit. Borsoka ( talk) 19:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Do not say things like "Slovenian historians aren't reliable!" again. Wikipedia is not a soapbox and if you cannot bring yourself to work towards neutrality on these articles, you will find your editing privileges here severely limited. Attack a group of people like that again and I will bring up discussions about having you topic banned from the entire sphere of articles. That area is bad enough already and it is not amusing in the least when people act like idiots there. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Um... why was I reverted? Had you glanced at the talkpage you would've noticed that the discussion was over for weeks. Nobody responded to my post and the template was on for quite a while. This is not vandalism, I've merged the article properly and explained the misunderstanding that resulted in there existing two articles on two states allegedly existing at the same time in the same place. (The debate in such issues results from the extremely unrealistic modern Croatian history, stemming from the rabid nationalism of the 1990s wartime propaganda. Much like the fictional state of "Croatia-Hungary") Regards, -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 13:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia, and Dalmatia. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. .
Anonimu (
talk) 09:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
There is a difference between a legal treaty and an ideal, non-existent, state. Anonimu ( talk) 10:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
RE:
The Hungaro-Croatian Compromise of 1868 (The Nagodba), II (Page 371) tered funds and paid over to the Autonomous Government of the said countries.
' 50. At the head of the Autonomous Provincial Government in Croatia-Slavonia and Dalmatia stands the Ban, who is responsible to the Croatian-Slavonian-Dalmatian Diet.
' 51. The Ban of Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia is appointed by His Imperial and Apostolic Royal Majesty, on the proposal and under the signature of the Royal Hungarian Joint Premier.
Source: [1]
Oh brother... :)
Step 1: READ my response (follow this link: [2])
Step 2: UNDERSTAND what its says.
Step 3: RESPOND completely and fully to what it says.
Can I put it in a simpler way? :P -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 23:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on VERN, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 15:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VERN', you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ICT and University of Applied Sciences ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
This applies to infoboxes, too.
Thanks, and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 14:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on VERN', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mblumber ( talk) 15:22, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article National Cake Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable unofficial holiday. Sources don't provide actual substantive coverage, just that it's a day to eat cake.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Reywas92
Talk 13:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)